Michelle Obama on why she's 'not letting up' about nutrition for kids
"We've got to make it easy for parents to afford - and cook with - fresh ingredients," Obama continued. "We've got to make it easy for kids to get some exercise during the school day. We've got to make it easy for everybody to hydrate themselves without loading up on sugar."
Michelle Obama: 'Everyone would know' if she divorced Barack Obama: 'I'm not a martyr'
Obama -who said that "children's health is about so much more than our kids" - told Parents that "what's available in our stores, what's on the menu in schools, whether or not our kids can play safely at the playground, it all ladders up to the wellbeing of our families and communities."
"It's a challenge I've tackled from a variety of ways for more than a decade and a half. And I'm not letting up any time soon," she added.
Obama got candid for the interview as Parents honors her with its Next Gen Awards, which applauds the work of 40 "changemakers" that have "made life better for kids and families this year."
When did Michelle Obama start advocating for school lunch changes?
Obama has advocated for healthier nutrition for children since the first term of her husband and former President Barack Obama, who took office in 2009.
He signed the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act into law in 2010 and Michelle Obama supported the idea to improve the nutrition of school lunches and farm-to-school programs. During her husband's second term in 2014, she sparred with some congressional Republicans, who believed the school lunch nutrition issue was local versus federal.
Michelle Obama discusses parenting daughters Malia and Sasha in the White House
In the Parents interview, Michelle Obama, mom to Malia Ann, 27, and 24-year-old Sasha Obama, also got candid about parenting, telling the outlet that she and former President Obama, 63, "did everything we could to give our girls as normal of a life as possible" while they were growing up.
"When we were at the White House, we made sure they were doing things like making their beds every morning and as they got older, getting summer jobs," she added.
Michelle Obama reveals daughter Malia Obama's name change
The "IMO" podcast cohost said that her daughters' lives "slowly began to inch a little closer toward normalcy," but their "extraordinary" circumstances have "forced them to learn critical skills like discipline, flexibility, and determination to go after what they really wanted."
Now, Malia Ann is pursuing a film career in Hollywood and recently helmed a 2023 short film "The Heart" which she wrote and directed. The Obamas celebrated the birthday of their youngest daughter Sasha, a University of Southern California grad, last month.
Contributing: David Jackson, Christine Rushton
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
4 hours ago
- The Independent
Hawley says he and Trump had ‘nice visit' after president ripped him as ‘second-tier' over stock bill: ‘Full speed ahead'
Sen. Josh Hawley laughed off President Donald Trump's attack on him, telling The Independent that he and the president met after Trump called him a 'second-tier' senator. Earlier in the day, Trump had posted on Truth Social and attacked the Missouri Republican for his legislation that would ban stock trading among lawmakers as well as the president and vice president, and for not supporting a measure by Sen. Rick Scott (R-FL) that would review former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's stock trading. Hawley had named his bill the PELOSI Act, as a play on her and her husband's trading. 'He is playing right into the dirty hands of the Democrats,' Trump said. 'It's a great Bill for her, and her 'husband,' but so bad for our Country! I don't think real Republicans want to see their President, who has had unprecedented success, TARGETED, because of the 'whims' of a second-tier Senator named Josh Hawley!" But Hawley told The Independent that he and Trump later spoke. 'He and I had a nice visit this afternoon and he reiterated that he is in favor of a stock ban for members of Congress that he wants to see it passed,' he said. 'He thinks we need to move full speed ahead.' Despite the fact that in 2021, Hawley led efforts to object to the 2020 presidential election results even after the Senate reconvened when the riot at the US Capitol ended, he has occasionally been on the opposing side of Trump's policies. For much of the debate around the 'One Big, Beautiful Bill,' Hawley raised objections about cuts to Medicaid, though he ultimately voted for the bill. Banning members of Congress from trading stocks has long held bipartisan support. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY), Sen. Jon Ossoff (D-GA) and even former congressman Matt Gaetz supported legislation to ban members from trading stock. Despite this, the legislation has long stalled. Many Democrats and Republicans have pointed to Pelosi and her husband Paul's success on the stock market as a potential reason the bill never received a vote on the floor, though she expressed openness to legislation toward the end of her tenure. Hawley clashed earlier with Senate Republicans on the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs about his legislation, which he entitled the PELOSI Act. Republicans argued that the legislation would unfairly target Trump. But committee chairman Rand Paul (R-KY) argued that since the bill would only apply to lawmakers after their next term began, it provided cover to Trump and Vice President JD Vance. 'But the fact that they don't want to apply it to Donald Trump means that it's a really crummy bill and it would do terrible things to Donald Trump's finances,' Paul said. The committee passed his legislation to ban members of Congress and their spouses from trading stocks. But Hawley was the sole Republican to vote on his own legislation and it passed with the help of Republicans. In the end, Hawley was the only Republican on the committee to vote for the legislation. But Hawley does not have much reason to worry about losing his seat for a while. He won re-election in 2024 and would not be up again for another six years, after Trump has left office. Pelosi, for her part, endorsed the bill, which was renamed as the HONEST Act. 'While I appreciate the creativity of my Republican colleagues in drafting legislative acronyms, I welcome any serious effort to raise ethical standards in public service,' she said. 'The HONEST Act, as amended, rightly applies its stock trading ban not only to Members of Congress, but now to the President and Vice President as well.' OnTuesday, Hawley floated legislation that would send $600 tariff rebate checks to Americans, but not to 'Biden voters,' only to 'Trump blue-collar voters.' 'Well, you wouldn't give it to everybody, you'd give it to the working people,' the Missouri Republican told far-right podcaster and former Trump adviser Steve Bannon on Tuesday. 'You'd give it to our people.' 'I mean, you know, the rich people don't need it … what I mean by that is all those Democrat donors of Wall Street, all these hedge fund guys, who all hate the tariffs, by the way.'
Reuters
5 hours ago
- Reuters
Partisan rancor in Congress raises risk of US government shutdown this fall
WASHINGTON, July 31 (Reuters) - Growing Democratic rancor in the U.S. Congress over President Donald Trump's tactics on the federal budget is threatening the long legislative tradition of funding the government through bipartisan deals, while raising the risk of a partial shutdown this fall. Republicans stirred the Democrats' distrust by clawing back $9 billion of congressionally approved money at the White House's behest and discussing making further such rescissions. Some hardline Republicans have floated the unprecedented idea of bypassing Senate rules requiring 60 of the 100 members to agree on most legislation to pass a funding bill for the fiscal year beginning October 1 without any Democratic votes. "Republicans in Congress are bowing down to Donald Trump and ratifying some of his worst efforts," Democratic Senator Elizabeth Warren said in a floor speech outlining her unwillingness to cooperate on government funding without a Republican agreement not to rescind the money later. "The Trump administration is saying, loud and clear, Donald Trump makes all the decisions." The budgeting process has long been strained. For almost three decades lawmakers have failed to pass the 12 bills that are meant to detail the government's discretionary spending and the government has partially shut down 14 times since 1981 as lawmakers have missed deadlines. The annual battle over discretionary spending involves less than a third of the roughly $6.75 trillion federal budget, with funding for programs like building roads and supporting schools. The rest is mandatory spending including Social Security, Medicare and roughly $1 trillion of financing costs for the nation's $36 trillion in debt. As the Senate prepares to leave Washington for a month-long summer recess, Republicans have also hardened their rhetoric about government funding by trying to blame any future shutdown on Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer and House Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries. "If we end up with a Schumer shutdown at the end of the year, the Democrats are going to own that," Senate Majority Leader John Thune told a news conference. The last government shutdown, which stretched over 35 days from late 2018 into early 2019, occurred during Trump's first term in office. Polling at the time showed that voters blamed Republicans for the disruption. The task of keeping the government funded has historically fallen to bipartisan negotiators to find deals that can pass the House of Representatives and garner the 60 votes needed to approve most legislation in the Senate. "Budgeting is hard. Budgeting is governing. And the way things have been so politicized and partisanized, it makes it almost impossible for Congress to legislate effectively," said William Hoagland, a former Senate Republican aide and fiscal legislation veteran who is now at the Bipartisan Policy Center think tank. This time around, the challenge has been complicated by the aggressive tactics of Trump budget director Russell Vought, who has withheld funding appropriated by Congress, succeeded in getting Republicans to defund Democratic priorities including the Corporation for Public Broadcasting and threatened to use so-called pocket rescissions to withhold other allocated funds. Trump has also proposed a fiscal 2026 budget that calls for $163 billion in spending cuts. "We all want to pursue a bipartisan, bicameral appropriations process," Schumer told reporters. "The Republicans are making it extremely difficult to do that." Hardline conservative House Republicans have been discussing the possibility of setting a new precedent for partisanship by using the parliamentary process known as budget reconciliation to pass full-year 2026 funding legislation to reopen government agencies at lower spending levels in the event of a shutdown. The tactic was most recently used to pass Trump's sweeping tax-cut and spending bill earlier this month. Democrats also used it under President Joe Biden to pass his domestic agenda. "It's not a serious discussion yet. But it might be as we get closer to September 30," said Representative Andy Harris, chair of the ultraconservative House Freedom Caucus. Thune and House Speaker Mike Johnson, who has floated the possibility of further reconciliation packages, said they have not considered the idea. Some traditional-minded Republicans have rejected it out of hand. "That's a bad idea," House Appropriations Committee Chairman Tom Cole said. "It means everything has to be partisan all the time. Appropriations, historically, is bipartisan." But hardliners who have seen their demands for deep spending cuts frustrated over the years say Republicans could need an alternative to the usual bipartisan path. "We'd all prefer that you do the appropriations process. So, we should keep trying to get that done. But if we can't, and we have to look at something else, we'll look at something else," said Representative Jim Jordan, a leading hardliner. "Whether we'll do that or not, I don't know. But it's already happened," the Ohio Republican said when asked about reconciliation as a way to reopen shuttered federal agencies. Experts say using reconciliation as a vehicle to reopen shuttered federal agencies may not be feasible, given that Congress would first need to pass a budget resolution that could take weeks or even months to craft. But hardliners say they are aware of that issue. "It's hard to do reconciliation at the last minute. That's the problem," said Representative Warren Davidson. Asked if the potentially long lead time ruled out its use, the Ohio Republican replied: "I hope not. We're trying to make sure it doesn't die."
Economist
5 hours ago
- Economist
The US in brief: The Fed holds its nerve, and its rate
The Federal Reserve held its benchmark interest rate at 4.25-4.5%. Two rate-setters, Christopher Waller and Michelle Bowman, voted against the decision—the first ' double dissent ' by members of the Fed's board in more than 30 years. The central bank's decision will anger Donald Trump, who has been calling for lower borrowing costs and publicly toying with the idea of ousting Jerome Powell, the Fed's chairman. The administration made a dizzying array of trade announcements in advance of its invented deadline, set for tomorrow, for countries to sign trade deals with America or face high(er) tariffs. It trumpeted deals with South Korea, Cambodia and Thailand. Mr Trump increased levies on many Brazilian goods from 10% to 50%, citing the ' extraordinary threat ' its government poses to America. He also threatened India with tariffs of 25% on its goods and an unspecified 'penalty' because it imports Russian oil and weapons. And certain copper products, including pipes and cables, will face tariffs of 50% from tomorrow. Democrats on the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee used an arcane law to demand that the Justice Department release documents related to the late Jeffrey Epstein, a convicted child molester. The 'rule of five' allows a group of five committee members to request information relevant to its remit from federal agencies. The provision, introduced in 1928, has seldom been used, so its effectiveness is unclear. The Senate voted 52-44 to confirm Joe Kent as head of the National Counterterrorism Centre. Mr Kent, a former Green Beret and CIA agent, has served as an aide to Tulsi Gabbard, the director of national intelligence. Democrats objected to his nomination because of his association with far-right figures and track record of promoting the 'Fedsurrection' conspiracy theory, which holds that the FBI initiated the storming of the Capitol on January 6th 2021. Republicans in Texas's legislature unveiled a proposal to redraw the boundaries of the state's electoral districts to help them win five extra seats in America's House of Representatives at the midterms in 2026. Republicans have a majority in both chambers of the Texas legislature, but Democrats have in the past fled the state, making the legislature inquorate, to block similar efforts. Texas's gambit has sparked talk about other states, both Republican- and Democrat-controlled, doing the same. Kamala Harris said she would not run to be California's governor in 2026. Despite her defeat in the presidential election in 2024, it had been widely presumed that the former vice-president would both bid to lead her home state and be the strong favourite. Her decision blows the Democratic primary wide open. Gavin Newsom, the current Democratic governor, cannot serve a third term. Fix up, look sharp Initially Mr Trump was keen to eliminate the Federal Emergency Management Agency, which oversees disaster relief. After a flood in Texas in early July killed more than 135 people, he softened. Now his administration talks of making FEMA more 'efficient'. Read our story on how America is remaking its disaster-relief system and trying to get rid of perverse incentives. A view from elsewhere 'Trump is extractive, not transactional as the lazy cliché goes,' wrote Prashant Jha in the Hindustan Times, an Indian newspaper. 'It is not about a give and take; it is predominantly about take, with a little bit of give.' He gets away with it because America 'is very powerful and the costs of a retributive Trump are very high'. And 'no one believes in the only other option, which is collective resistance.' Figure of the day Up to $500m, the amount that Harvard University is reportedly prepared to pay to get the Trump administration off its back. Columbia University and the University of Pennsylvania have both already paid up, and yesterday the administration succeeded in shaking down Brown University. Read our story about what the president is teaching America's richest university. Today's poll Every week YouGov polls Americans on behalf of The Economist. Yesterday the administration said it would revoke the 'endangerment finding', a declaration by the EPA in 2009 that greenhouse gases are a risk to health. Yet a plurality (37%) of Americans want government restrictions on greenhouse-gas emissions expanded, and 21% want them kept the same. Only 24% wanted restrictions reduced or eliminated. Daily Quiz From Monday to Thursday we'll quiz you on all things American. To mark Mr Trump's visit to his Scottish golf courses, this week's questions are on previous presidents who have shared his passion for the links. Thursday: Which president was the first to install a putting green on the White House lawn? Wednesday: An ancestor of George H.W. Bush and George W. Bush gives his name to one of golf's oldest international tournaments, held on the Old Course at St Andrews since 1922. What is it called? See how to take part in the quiz at the bottom of this page. If you enjoyed this week's questions, play Dateline, The Economist' s history game. Seen on Truth Social 'Wow! Canada has just announced that it is backing statehood for Palestine. That will make it very hard for us to make a Trade Deal with them. Oh' Canada!!!' —Donald Trump invents another reason to impose tariffs on America's trading partners.
