logo
'If you can send people to Mars...': LA residents protest against Elon Musk's Tesla diner; constant honking, massive traffic

'If you can send people to Mars...': LA residents protest against Elon Musk's Tesla diner; constant honking, massive traffic

Time of India2 days ago
Hollywood residents say their life has become hell since Elon Musk's Tesla diner opened on July 21.
Elon Musk's Tesla Diner in Hollywood has already rattled the LA residents as they say their life has become absolutely hell since the retro-futuristic diner opened next door on July 21.
There is a massive traffic gridlock, and as the diner is open 24X7, there is constant honking but the residents have been experiencing all of it since the construction began. 'Even with the blinds closed, it feels like we're at the world's worst rave,' Kristin Rose, a local, wrote in an email to Tesla and the building manager before moving out of her apartment.
The construction began in 2023, and the work went on six days a week, starting as early as 4am.
Now that it opened, the suffering doubled with emissions, noise coming out of the diner. Some residents claimed that their views got blocked by the diner's one of the two 45-foot movie screens.
"If you can send people to Mars, you should be able to figure out how to make this doable for residents," Laura Kody, another local, said to ABC7.
"We were really excited for the supercharger station; we thought it would bring good business to the area, but it has caused insane gridlock from 1 pm to 1 am," a Hollywood resident said.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Ranked: The Most Stunning Underrated Coastal Getaways in Europe
12facts.com
Learn More
Undo
"The gridlock is insane. I can imagine that if there's an emergency or something, an ambulance would literally not be able to get to us and that's extremely concerning for me because my parents are elderly," she added.
Anti-Tesla protesters added to the noise this weekend as they were there in front of the diner with signs reading 'Fuck Nazi Billionaires' and 'Boycott Tesla'.
11-hour wait for Tesla burgers and fries
Musk's idea of a 'old school drive-in, roller skates & rock restaurant' goes back to 2018 when he proposed this. Since opening on Monday, the retro-futuristic diner with electric vehicle-charging stations has had long lines of customers who are served burgers in Cybertruck-designed boxes. One customer posted to YouTube that he waited 11 hours for the restaurant to open.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Elon Musk's Tesla fined over  ₹1,996 crore in Florida autopilot crash case; jury flags ‘responsibility' amid tech failure
Elon Musk's Tesla fined over  ₹1,996 crore in Florida autopilot crash case; jury flags ‘responsibility' amid tech failure

Mint

time29 minutes ago

  • Mint

Elon Musk's Tesla fined over ₹1,996 crore in Florida autopilot crash case; jury flags ‘responsibility' amid tech failure

Elon Musk's Tesla has been ordered to pay more than $240 million in damages to victims of a deadly car crash in Florida that involved its Autopilot driver assist technology after a Miami jury found the EV maker responsible for the incident. Tesla had significant responsibility as its technology failed, the federal jury observed. Not all the blame can be put on the driver of the car, even the one who confessed that he was distracted by his mobile phone when he hit a young strargazing couple. The jury's decision comes at a time when Elon Musk is trying to convince Americans that Tesla's cars are safe to be self-driven, as he seeks to roll out a driverless taxi firm in several cities shortly. The jury's decision ends a four-year-long case, which stands out not just for its outcome but the very fact that it even made it to trial. Several such cases against Tesla have earlier been dismissed or settled by the company to avoid controversial trials. 'This will open the floodgates,' said Miguel Custodio, a car crash lawyer not involved in the Tesla case. 'It will embolden a lot of people to come to court.' The case also included startling charges by lawyers for the family of the deceased, 22-year-old, Naibel Benavides Leon, and for her injured boyfriend, Dillon Angulo. They claimed Tesla either hid or lost key evidence, including data and video recorded seconds before the accident. Tesla said it made a mistake after being shown the evidence and honestly hadn't thought it was there. 'We finally learned what happened that night, that the car was actually defective,' said Benavides' sister, Neima Benavides. 'Justice was achieved.' Tesla has previously faced criticism that it is slow to cough up crucial data by relatives of other victims in Tesla crashes, accusations that the car company has denied. In this case, the plaintiffs showed Tesla had the evidence all along, despite its repeated denials, by hiring a forensic data expert who dug it up. 'Today's verdict is wrong," Tesla said in a statement, 'and only works to set back automotive safety and jeopardize Tesla's and the entire industry's efforts to develop and implement lifesaving technology,' They said the plaintiffs concocted a story 'blaming the car when the driver – from day one – admitted and accepted responsibility.' In addition to a punitive award of $200 million, the jury said Tesla must also pay $43 million of a total $129 million in compensatory damages for the crash, bringing the total borne by the company to $243 million. 'It's a big number that will send shock waves to others in the industry,' said financial analyst Dan Ives of Wedbush Securities. 'It's not a good day for Tesla.' Tesla said it will appeal. Even if that fails, the company says it will end up paying far less than what the jury decided because of a pre-trial agreement that limits punitive damages to three times Tesla's compensatory damages. Translation: $172 million, not $243 million. But the plaintiff says their deal was based on a multiple of all compensatory damages, not just Tesla's, and the figure the jury awarded is the one the company will have to pay. It's not clear how much of a hit to Tesla's reputation for safety the verdict in the Miami case will make. Tesla has vastly improved its technology since the crash on a dark, rural road in Key Largo, Florida, in 2019. But the issue of trust generally in the company came up several times in the case, including in closing arguments Thursday. The plaintiffs' lead lawyer, Brett Schreiber, said Tesla's decision to even use the term Autopilot showed it was willing to mislead people and take big risks with their lives because the system only helps drivers with lane changes, slowing a car and other tasks, falling far short of driving the car itself. Schreiber said other automakers use terms like 'driver assist' and 'copilot' to make sure drivers don't rely too much on the technology. 'Words matter,' Schreiber said. 'And if someone is playing fast and lose with words, they're playing fast and lose with information and facts.' Schreiber acknowledged that the driver, George McGee, was negligent when he blew through flashing lights, a stop sign and a T-intersection at 62 miles an hour before slamming into a Chevrolet Tahoe that the couple had parked to get a look at the stars. The Tahoe spun around so hard it was able to launch Benavides 75 feet through the air into nearby woods where her body was later found. It also left Angulo, who walked into the courtroom Friday with a limp and cushion to sit on, with broken bones and a traumatic brain injury. But Schreiber said Tesla was at fault nonetheless. He said Tesla allowed drivers to act recklessly by not disengaging the Autopilot as soon as they begin to show signs of distraction and by allowing them to use the system on smaller roads that it was not designed for, like the one McGee was driving on. 'I trusted the technology too much,' said McGee at one point in his testimony. 'I believed that if the car saw something in front of it, it would provide a warning and apply the brakes.' The lead defense lawyer in the Miami case, Joel Smith, countered that Tesla warns drivers that they must keep their eyes on the road and hands on the wheel yet McGee chose not to do that while he looked for a dropped cellphone, adding to the danger by speeding. Noting that McGee had gone through the same intersection 30 or 40 times previously and hadn't crashed during any of those trips, Smith said that isolated the cause to one thing alone: 'The cause is that he dropped his cellphone.' The auto industry has been watching the case closely because a finding of Tesla liability despite a driver's admission of reckless behavior would pose significant legal risks for every company as they develop cars that increasingly drive themselves.

Elon Musk's Tesla Ordered By Florida Jury To Pay Millions Of Dollars In 2019 Fatal Autopilot Crash
Elon Musk's Tesla Ordered By Florida Jury To Pay Millions Of Dollars In 2019 Fatal Autopilot Crash

India.com

time29 minutes ago

  • India.com

Elon Musk's Tesla Ordered By Florida Jury To Pay Millions Of Dollars In 2019 Fatal Autopilot Crash

Tesla Car Crash: In a rare legal blow to Elon Musk's Tesla, a federal jury in Miami has ordered the company to pay $329 million in damages for a fatal crash involving its Autopilot driver-assistance system. According to court records, the jury awarded $200 million in punitive damages, along with $59 million to the family of Naibel Benavides Leon and $70 million to her boyfriend, Dillon Angulo. The case involved a tragic late night accident in 2019 on a dark road in Key Largo, Florida. The jury found that Tesla's Autopilot system was partly responsible for the crash that killed 22-year-old Naibel Benavides Leon and left her boyfriend, Dillon Angulo, seriously injured after a Tesla Model 3 slammed into them while they were stargazing on the roadside. Meanwhile, Tesla plans to appeal the verdict, according to its defense attorneys. More To Follow...

Kate Middleton never wears these 5 things in public
Kate Middleton never wears these 5 things in public

Time of India

time39 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Kate Middleton never wears these 5 things in public

(Image Credits: Pinterest) Kate Middleton is undeniably one of the most stylish women in the British royal family. Considering her numerous duties as the future queen of England, she has keenly followed the rules and regulations as the Princess of Wales. She always abides by the royal directives, which include maintaining a strict dress code. Despite having an expansive wardrobe, there are a few rare fashion items that she rarely sports. This consists of a particular colour as well. The shade of orange The royals steer clear of the orange shade. However, this has a theory that doesn't photograph well. Although the late queen was spotted in this bright hue many a time, because of its bright palette, Kate Middleton refrains from wearing this hue. However, she's seen in peach and coral shades, which have always been on the table for her. (Image Credits: Pinterest) High wedges are a big no Although there's no royal rule against wearing sandals, Kate has never been seen wearing heeled wedges. It is said that the late queen didn't like its vibe, so Kate Middleton adhered to her tone and, on most of the accounts, is seen in high-heeled sandals, mules, and bellies. Kate Middleton's 10 stylish moments Sneakers and a purse don't go hand in hand Kate allegedly never wears a purse when she's donning sneakers. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Book Extragrande 4 BHKs at 7 Mahalaxmi from 10.81 Cr* 7 Mahalaxmi, Runwal Group Enquire Now Undo Nobody knows the styling logic behind this, but speaking of sneakers, Kate prefers to stick to functional brands like Superga, New Balance, Nike, and Adidas, and has never seen sneaker brands like Converse and Puma. On top of that, she's never carried any of Princess Diana's handbags, even though she's inherited many pieces from Diana's personal collection. Cartier is a go-to choice Kate never wears a timepiece except for her Cartier Ballon Bleu watch, which looks formal and subtle. In nearly every public appearance, whether with a lavish gown or a simple co-ord set, she always carries this simple piece. Many of the other royals have been spotted in stunning timepieces, but Kate likes to keep things simple and subtle. (Image Credits: Pinterest) No Versace ensemble in the wardrobe While the Princess of Wales has been spotted wearing multiple luxurious labels from across the globe, there's one brand she's never seen in. It's Versace. Versace outfits are known for their bold, opulent, and sensual designs and include rich fabrics and intricate detailing, with iconic motifs that can be a daring pick for the royal princess. Although the brand is an epitome of female empowerment and luxury, she has never donned any of their pieces. The Princess of Wales couldn't be more of a beauty icon if she tried. Almost all of the things mentioned above seem like her personal choice, which makes her more refined and directive. She consistently maintains her impeccable style, making her unique and iconic. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Friendship Day wishes , messages and quotes !

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store