SANDF troops to land in Bloemfontein as South Africa ramps up withdrawal from war-torn DRC
Image: Jonisayi Maromo/IOL
The South African National Defence Force (SANDF) has announced the upcoming arrival of the third group of soldiers returning from the SADC Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (SAMIDRC).
SANDF national spokesperson, Rear Admiral Prince Tshabalala said the airplane will be arriving in South Africa with approximately 220 passengers on board.
'This group is scheduled to land at Bram Fischer International Airport on Monday, 16 June 2025, between 3pm and 5pm,' said Tshabalala.
A fourth group is expected to arrive in South Africa on Tuesday.
'This phased return is part of the SANDF's planned withdrawal from the mission area. Upon their return, the troops will undergo the standard demobilisation programme, which includes health screenings, psychological support, and reunification services,' he said.
SANDF spokesperson, Rear Admiral Prince Tshabalala.
Image: Jonisayi Maromo/IOL
The jubilant members of the SANDF were welcomed by the SANDF top brass led by Chief of the SANDF, General Rudzani Maphwanya.
The SANDF members arrived in a chartered Air Tanzania Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner on Sunday evening, where they individually met and shook hands with the military leadership.
In high spirits, the SANDF members were singing and dancing as they queued to meet Maphwanya. Afterwards, they were assembled in a building where Maphwanya addressed them, before the troops left for demobilisation in Bloemfontein.
Get your news on the go, click here to join the IOL News WhatsApp channel.
'Some of you, when we met in Goma (city in DRC) you were saying this old man is going to leave us here. I heard it. Now you are back home, welcome back home. I am smiling because I am happy. I came to salute you, and I will continue to salute you for the good work that you have done.
'Your stories are better told by those who were on the other side of the barrel, because they know, they felt it. They are the ones that attested, so be proud of what you were doing. If we are required to do so, we will do it again,' Maphwanya addressed the uniformed troops, with the majority of the soldiers responding: 'Yes sir'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
8 hours ago
- IOL News
The Real Genocide: South Africa's Betrayal of Its African Majority
Gillian Schutte explores how the Genocide Convention's principles apply to the systemic oppression of South Africa's African majority, revealing a slow genocide that challenges our understanding of justice and equality. Image: IOL In 1948, in the aftermath of the Second World War and the Holocaust, the Genocide Convention was adopted to prohibit not only the mass killing of populations, but also their systematic destruction through prolonged deprivation. Article II(c) of the Convention defines genocide to include the 'deliberate infliction on the group of conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part.' This clause was intended to capture structural mechanisms of annihilation that may not involve overt violence, but which nonetheless result in the steady elimination of a people. In 2025, the conditions under which the African majority indigenous to South Africa are forced to live closely resemble those anticipated by the drafters of that clause. Against this legal and historical framework, the claim by some Afrikaner groups that they are victims of genocide is not only absurd, but deeply cynical. The real slow genocide is unfolding daily, and not against the privileged white farmers but against the African majority, whose conditions of life have been deliberately structured to remain unliveable. More than three decades after the end of apartheid, South Africa remains one of the most unequal societies in the world. According to the World Bank (2022), the top 10% of the population controls more than 85% of household wealth. Oxford University's 2024 Global Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI) reports that over 25 million South Africans continue to live in severe multidimensional poverty. The overwhelming majority of this population is the African. The MPI captures deprivations across education, health, housing, water, sanitation, and nutrition. These are measurable exclusions from the basic elements of life. Racial inequality remains deeply entrenched. A 2023 report by Statistics South Africa found that 64.2% of African majority households lived below the upper-bound poverty line, compared to 1.2% of white households. The African majority is overrepresented across all categories of deprivation. Seventy-five percent of unemployed individuals are from this majority. Eighty-seven percent of people living in informal settlements are from the African majority. More than 70% of households relying on woefully inadequate social grants for survival fall within this group. The slow genociding of the Black and poor in South Africa is no longer explained by the legacy of apartheid alone. It is the result of a post-apartheid order that institutionalised inequality through policy, economic restructuring, and elite consensus. What was promised as transformation became management. Redistribution was replaced with fiscal discipline. Land reform was stalled through bureaucratic impasse. Economic ownership remained virtually unchanged. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading The country's political transition was paralleled by an economic settlement aligned to global neoliberal frameworks. From the early 1990s, the new government came under pressure from international financial institutions and Western governments, particularly the United States, to commit to market-friendly reforms. This included the liberalisation of trade and capital flows, a focus on inflation targeting, and the privatisation of public services. These policies were formalised in the Growth, Employment and Redistribution (GEAR) strategy in 1996. The result was the absorption of the new state into a global system that privileged investor confidence over social redress. In this context, poverty among the African majority became institutionalised through structural austerity. Basic services remain underfunded. According to the Auditor-General's 2023 report, only 41 of 257 municipalities received clean audits. Many are unable to provide clean water, maintain sewage systems, or ensure waste collection. Public health facilities are under-resourced. Hospitals in rural areas operate without functioning equipment, while clinics in informal settlements routinely face medicine shortages. Schools in poor communities often lack electricity, running water, and qualified teachers. In 2022, over 4,500 schools were still using pit latrines. Far from being abstract deficits, these are measurable forms of neglect that directly affect life expectancy and health outcomes. In 2023, the average life expectancy for the Black and poor was 64 years, compared to 77 for white South Africans. The mortality rate for children under five in the poorest quintile is three times higher than in the wealthiest. Malnutrition among children under five has increased over the last five years, particularly in provinces with high unemployment and food insecurity. The psychological impact is equally devastating. A study published in The Lancet (2023) found that suicide rates among youth from the Indigenous African majority in South Africa have risen steadily since 2018, with poverty, hopelessness, and unemployment identified as key drivers. Gender-based violence, substance abuse, and intra-community violence are all symptoms of sustained structural abandonment. These conditions reflect a strategy of economic apartheid underpinned by political inertia. The mechanisms of this containment are enforced through monopoly capital and state complicity. A handful of corporations continue to dominate key sectors of the economy. These firms remain largely white- or foreign-owned, and their profits are often transferred offshore. The state acts less as regulator and more as facilitator, offering tax incentives and infrastructure support while communities living near mining zones or agricultural estates remain without clean water or basic services and are exposed to unregulated blasting and life threatening pollution. Economic policy is crafted in consultation with business interests. Social policy, by contrast, is treated as a liability. These dynamics are legitimised through the language of governance and reform, but they function as instruments of slow elimination. The majority is governed at a distance, spoken for in summits, referenced in policy statements, yet never materially prioritised. When they protest, they are met with violence. When they vote, they are promised inclusion. When they die, they are listed in aggregate. The Government of National Unity (GNU) formed in 2024 represents a continuation of this deprivation strategy. It maintains the neoliberal model. It is an alliance of economic custodianship. Austerity remains intact. Redistribution is avoided. The poor are once again promised delivery through institutional harmony, while the economy continues to serve the elite. This is political convergence around the status quo. The slow genociding of the Indigenous African majority in South Africa conforms to the logic identified by the Genocide Convention. The state and its economic partners have constructed conditions of life that are not survivable over time. The infrastructure of social reproduction -health, education, housing, employment - has been systematically undermined. The result is premature death on a mass scale, disintegration of communities, and intergenerational trauma. The Convention's clause on conditions of life does not require mass graves. It requires evidence of structural processes that lead to physical destruction. That evidence is abundant. What distinguishes South Africa's case is the normalisation of this destruction through the language of democracy. The state performs concern. It hosts dialogues. It commissions reports. But the material conditions do not shift. The poor are slowly erased through inaction, underdevelopment, and neglect that is both chronic and targeted.
Eyewitness News
9 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
Holomisa says SANDF not in a fit state to defend the country if it is attacked
JOHANNESBURG - Deputy Defence Minister Bantu Holomisa said that the military was not in a fit state to defend the country if attacked due to outdated equipment and underfunding. However, Holomisa said the country was currently not under any threat of being attacked. South Africa's military conducts regular threat analysis to determine whether the country is at risk of attack from foreign or domestic enemies. Speaking on the Clement Manyathela Show on 702, Holomisa said the July 2021 unrest and the recent floods in the Eastern Cape "embarrassed" the South African National Defence Force (SANDF). READ: Motshekga assures Parliament that SANDF capable of defending SA "Soldiers being carried by military buses going to a violent situation, it showed the defence equipment is obsolete. I cannot give another explanation, and if we were to be attacked, yes, we would respond, but I am not that confident about the state of readiness of the SANDF. Let us not mislead the people. I am not here to spin, but I must tell you the truth." Holomisa said that part of the problem was that the military was not being properly funded. "Every (defence) minister I can think of, they have been complaining since time immemorial that the defence is declining. How many defence reviews have been produced and the National Treasury has just ignored? They even ignored the president in 2023, who said, the budget of defence must move from 0.57% of the GDP to 1.5% of the GDP."
IOL News
13 hours ago
- IOL News
Without US handouts, Trump says Musk would head back to South Africa
Donald Trump hit back at Elon Musk on Tuesday, slamming the government subsidies Musk gets after the billionaire criticised Trump's key spending bill. Image: Graphic/Se-Anne Rall In a striking rebuke, former President Donald Trump took to social media on Tuesday to target tech mogul Elon Musk, asserting that the billionaire owes much of his empire to substantial government subsidies. Trump's statement, delivered through his preferred platform, accused Musk of building his wealth on taxpayer dollars, claiming that without these financial boosts, Musk would be forced to 'shut it all down and head back home to South Africa.' US President Donald Trump once again targeted former aide Elon Musk on Tuesday, attacking the amount of government subsidies the entrepreneur is receiving, after the tech billionaire renewed criticism of the president's flagship spending bill. Image: Donald Trump/Truth Social The scathing remarks come amid growing scrutiny over Musk's ventures, which span electric vehicles, space exploration, and satellite technology. Trump's assertions raise an important discourse regarding the public's investment in private innovation, particularly as America strives to maintain its competitive edge in technology and green energy. 'Rocket launches, satellites, and electric car production would grind to a halt—and the U.S. would save a fortune,' Trump added, suggesting a complete overhaul of how taxpayer funds are allocated to private enterprises. Moreover, the former president did not shy away from mocking Musk's backing of electric vehicle (EV) mandates, branding it 'ridiculous.' Trump's criticism highlights a broader divide in the political landscape regarding climate policies and the role of government in fostering—or hindering—economic growth in emerging sectors. In an unexpected twist, Trump hinted that even the popular cryptocurrency Dogecoin (DOGE) should reassess its association with Musk's taxpayer-funded ventures, suggesting a potential instability in the billionaire's business practices that could affect his influence in the digital currency sphere. IOL
