
We're still on a roll - thanks to Britain's builders, says Screwfix boss
The bold Screwfix fascia is a newcomer to the city centres and suburbs of Britain. A supplier to the smaller tradesman, it is at the cutting edge of shopping innovation. Under Garnier's leadership, Screwfix has transformed turnaround times for local builders, enabling them to spend more time on the job.
The concept of smaller Screwfix outlets occurred 'by accident' during the pandemic, Garnier explains. He said Kingfisher had experimented with a 'very tiny' store at London's Victoria station and was 'amazed by the result'.
The French boss, who lives in Marylebone, central London ('I don't like to commute,' he says), dresses for the shop floor, not the boardroom. Slim and lithe, he wears a blue polo shirt and a blouson.
We don't tend to think of Kingfisher as a clothing retailer. But among its best sellers in the blazing summer heat are hard-wearing shorts for construction workers and durable fans on stands.
I wonder if the arrival of a Screwfix on my high street risks putting the local hardware shop out of business? The store manager argues that they do different things. When someone comes in looking for a couple of brass screws, he sends them to the DIY shop. Builders want bulk - a box of a hundred or more.
The building trade, Garnier tells me, now say 'I'll Screwfix it' when going online, like when people say 'I'll Google it'. Store assistant Steve, who shows me around a 'City' format shop with 12,000 items, demonstrates a screen that can identify a broken part, such as an electric socket or an obscure tool, and source it immediately.
The IT system then locates an exact replacement that can be clicked and collected within a minute or couriered locally within 20 minutes.
There are now 952 Screwfix stores in the UK, with 30 in city centres, and another 30 planned for this year. Aside from Screwfix, Kingfisher is best known for B&Q.
Bringing more technology and speed to Kingfisher is among the ideas learned in China that Garnier, 59, has brought to the group since taking the helm in September 2019. A Sino-enthusiast, he tries to keep up with his Chinese language skills, having spent a great deal of time in the country. As a result, he says the antipathy to Beijing in the US and the West is 'very sad'.
The company's expansion plans include rolling out more Screwfix stores and extending Tradepoint, the membership scheme for tradesmen at larger B&Q stores, by adding builders' entrances.
It is also experimenting with smaller high street and suburban B&Qs, with the collapse of rival Homebase having created a chance to snap up useful locations. Garnier buys into Britain as a nation of gardeners, with B&Q now claiming to be the biggest horticultural retailer in the UK.
Kingfisher is also focused on expanding its online operation, and is devoting a third of its spending to technology.
However, there are clouds on the horizon. Kingfisher, which also owns brands such as Castorama in France, expects to take a multi-million-pound hit from Labour's decision to raise employers' national insurance contributions. But Garnier strikes a philosophical, almost conciliatory, tone to the tax raid. 'It is an obviously difficult situation [for the Government],' he says.
Yet it will take a toll on the firm, which expects a £145 million hit to profits as a result of tax rises in the UK as well as a similar payroll and packaging tax in France.
Garnier also vents his frustration at Whitehall's failure to recognise what he says is the imbalance between online and brick-and-mortar retailers. 'If you describe yourself as an online company, you don't pay tax at all in the UK,' Garnier says. 'Even in the EU, they don't pay tax anywhere. That's unfair, because retailers must compete with them.'
That causes companies to 'invest less' and 'over time you lose competitive edge'. He adds: 'We need a level playing field with online companies, such as Amazon and Google.'
I suggest that all of this works against Chancellor Rachel Reeves's growth agenda. 'Yeah, exactly,' he retorts.
The Frenchman's biggest corporate challenge is Kingfisher's French arm, sparking speculation that it might be separated from the rest of the business or sold. But he is adamant that it is a core business and that shareholders have bought into a recovery plan. 'Discounter Brico Dépôt [in France and Spain] is doing very well. We gained market share in 2024,' Garnier says, although he admits that France is still 'tough and more difficult than the UK'.
' Inflation is lower in France than in the UK, but unemployment is higher. In France, it is all about consumer sentiment. The British consumer is very resilient, there is an energy in the UK,' he says.
By contrast, the French are more cautious. In uncertain times, they save rather than spend.
Turning Castorama around has required some changes, including talks with France's trade unions to push through job cuts. And some of its shops are being moved to franchise models.
'That's delivered so far,' he says.
In Britain, Kingfisher isn't worried about the unions. But does he fear the changes in Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner's Employment Rights Bill?
Garnier is sanguine, believing the company is in a 'good place' to weather the changes. But he concedes that the firm might have to adjust some part-time contracts.
As a keen sailor, Garnier is used to moving with the prevailing winds, which may explain his somewhat relaxed attitude to the storms buffeting the UK economy.
That doesn't mean he is happy with the country's direction, and is unimpressed by Labour's failure to build relationships 'through engagement, trust and stability'.
'That's what we need,' he says.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Times
33 minutes ago
- Times
Mayors to be given powers to fast track planning permission
Mayors will get sweeping powers to grant upfront planning permission in Labour's drive to speed up development. Angela Rayner, the deputy prime minister, has promised more 'large-scale projects' as she grants mayors greater control over what is built locally. An English devolution bill published last week set out Rayner's plan for all areas of the country to have a mayor with greater powers over areas such as transport, skills and housing. The bill will give mayors far wider power over local planning applications as Rayner and Sir Keir Starmer aim to kickstart homebuilding and other development that will spur the economy. Labour is promising to build 1.5 million homes over the parliament, but numbers have slumped to record lows under rules introduced by the previous government.


Times
34 minutes ago
- Times
Swinney has blown our chances of a payoff for all those turbines
Lesley Riddoch is fed up. Granted, this is not an unusual condition for the independence-supporting columnist and promoter of all things Nordic. But it is not hard to understand why she's upset that there was scarcely a murmur of discontent from the Scottish government last week after Ed Miliband scrapped zonal energy pricing. 'Where's the outcry from the SNP or Greens?' she asked, plaintively. What was so wrong about Scots getting cheaper bills? How could John Swinney have missed this opportunity to demand that Scots get direct benefit from Scotland's wind? Surely this was a slam dunk for a nationalist party which always claims that Scots were robbed of the last energy bonanza in the North Sea. Zonal pricing is the idea, promoted by Greg Jackson of Octopus Energy and backed by Jonathan Brearley of the regulator Ofgem, that electricity prices in Scotland should reflect its contribution to addressing climate change. All those wind farms in the North Sea and the towering turbines now gracing Scotland's hills are supposed to deliver cheap-as-chips energy. But Scottish bills have continued to rise, plunging around a million Scots into fuel poverty. • Rejection of postcode electricity pricing pleases energy bosses Yet Scotland could enjoy 'the cheapest energy costs in Europe', according to Jackson, if the UK government introduced zonal pricing. The cost of electricity, he says, should reflect the cost of producing and transporting it. In the past, location didn't matter much because power for the electricity grid was generated by coal, gas and nuclear plants which were dispersed across the country. But with renewable energy generated in the North Sea, location very much does matter. It is expensive to transport the electricity produced by Scottish wind farms to the south of England, where most of it is used. Huge infrastructure projects are necessary to drag the reluctant electrons five hundred miles through cables and interconnections. A lot of energy is lost on the way through heat and leakage. Allowing energy costs to fall in areas where it is generated should be more energy-efficient. More importantly, it might encourage energy-intensive industries to come to Scotland. Those footloose data centres and artificial intelligence companies, with their insatiable demand for energy, could locate in Scotland to take advantage of lower energy costs. Given the chronic overconcentration of economic activity in the south of England, this is not such a daft idea. At any rate, you'd think that this is something that would appeal to Swinney, the first minister, who keeps saying he wants economic growth brought back to Scotland. Scotland was one of the centres of the Industrial Revolution largely because of an abundance of coal and other raw materials. That's why the Clyde could build a fifth of world shipping before the First World War and mills such as Ravenscraig could later turn out miles of sheet metal for the motor industry. The days of coal are over, of course, and Westminster has passed a death sentence on the Scottish oil and gas industry. So surely Scotland would have a case for demanding that the new industries of the digital age should be located where energy is abundant. Of course, zonal pricing might have had awkward trade-offs. If Scots paid less for their energy, English consumers would presumably have to pay more. Yet it would not be a massive imposition for the 65 million consumers who don't live in Scotland to finance a couple of hundred quid off the bills of the five million who do. The main reason Swinney has been reluctant to campaign for zonal pricing is that the big energy companies, most notably SSE and Scottish Power, are firmly against it. These largely foreign-owned behemoths have a material interest in the status quo. They are compensated generously by a panoply of schemes such as contracts for difference, which effectively guarantee that the profits from renewable energy are never less than the profits they make from gas. At least a quarter of domestic energy bills go toward subsidies for renewables. They claim that they would not be able to finance new wind farms if differential pricing undermined profitability. However, the energy companies also benefit directly from the mismatch between where energy is generated and where it is used. Last year they earned nearly £2.7 billion in constraint payments, largely for turning their windmills off when they generated too much energy for the grid to accommodate. A quarter of Scotland's potential was switched off last year. Well, there seems an obvious solution to that. Even more obvious is surely the propaganda benefit to a nationalist government of a situation where Scottish wind energy was actually being wasted. Moreover, communities are already being compensated for proximity to wind farms, albeit in a very limited way. RES, a renewables development company, has been setting up local energy discount schemes (LEDs) across the country since 2012. Properties near Glenchamber Wind Farm in Dumfries and Galloway can apply for a £200 discount on electricity bills. So zonal pricing is actually happening — just not at scale. And even as Miliband killed the idea of zonal pricing, he promised zonal compensation for communities facing wind farm development. There will have to be, he said, 'direct community benefits'. Perhaps it is not feasible to disaggregate the National Grid to create zonal pricing. There is a democratic argument that energy costs should be the same across the UK. But given that so much of the cost of renewables is covered by subsidies, surely this could be re-engineered to allow Scottish homes and businesses to benefit from all that wind. UK energy policy is anyway riddled with anomalies, waste and unfairness. Miliband is using punitive taxation to accelerate the collapse of Scotland's oil and gas industry. The promise of a bonanza of green jobs has been as false as Labour's promise to cut energy bills by £300. If zonal pricing isn't feasible, then what would be a sensible way of compensating Scots for the disruption to their environment and their selfless contribution to saving the planet? And why isn't the Scottish government arguing for it? For once, there is good reason here to play the Scottish card. Instead of meekly acquiescing in the diktat of the renewable energy cartel, the Scottish government should be holding Miliband's feet to the fire and making sure the dash for renewables doesn't leave Scotland on the sidelines. As Riddoch says: 'Why the heck not?'


Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Farage beats Starmer in every respect except one, poll finds
Voters believe Nigel Farage is better than Sir Keir Starmer in almost every respect, but is less honest than him, according to a new poll. The Reform UK leader is seen as being more in touch with ordinary people, paying greater attention to detail and being a stronger leader than the Prime Minister. A new survey by Ipsos asked respondents to say whether they felt certain positive characteristics applied to Sir Keir, Mr Farage or Kemi Badenoch, the Tory leader. The Reform leader came out on top in every question, apart from when voters had to say which of the leaders they believed was an 'honest person'. It comes as Reform continues to surge in the polls, with Ipsos finding that the party is ahead of Labour and the Conservatives. The party exceeded expectations at the local elections in May, when they gained over 600 councillors and seized the parliamentary seat of Runcorn and Helsby from Labour. More than 50 per cent of voters said that Mr Farage had 'a lot of personality', compared to just 21 per cent saying the same of the Prime Minister. Thirty seven per cent said that they felt Mr Farage was a capable leader, and 41 per cent said they would describe him as a strong leader, compared to just 31 per cent and 26 per cent for Sir Keir. But a third of respondents said that the Prime Minister was honest, compared to 29 per cent for Mr Farage. Sir Keir suffered the biggest fall in approval rating after winning an election of any prime minister in the modern era, despite his landslide 174-seat majority. Despite the vast number of Labour MPs, ministers have struggled to pass key legislation because of the discontent on their backbenches. The largest rebellion of the Prime Minister's career meant that he was forced to back down on several elements of his welfare reforms, eradicating billions in planned savings. Other policies that have attracted particularly widespread criticism include the scrapping of the universal winter fuel payment for pensioners, which the Chancellor had to partly reverse. The new polling also found that just a quarter of people believe that Rachel Reeves will still be the Chancellor by the next general election. The number of voters who think that Sir Keir understands the problems facing Britain has fallen by 18 per cent since the general election last year. The latest poll also found that voters narrowly judged Mr Farage to be 'good in a crisis' at 27 per cent, compared to 26 per cent for Sir Keir. Mrs Badenoch received just 18 per cent.