Trump demands pharma companies slash drug prices in next 60 days
The letters represent an escalation of the administration's push for lower drug prices by launching a 'most favored nation' model, which ties the prices of prescription medicines in the U.S. to the lowest found among comparably wealthy nations.
Trump demanded the companies immediately cut the prices they charge Medicaid patients for existing drugs, and stipulate that they will not charge Americans more than prices offered overseas for new drugs.
The White House said the administration would use trade policy to support manufacturers in raising prices internationally to match the U.S. prices, so long as increased revenues abroad are reinvested directly into lowering prices for American patients and taxpayers.
Trump told manufacturers that if they 'refuse to step up,' the federal government 'will deploy every tool in our arsenal to protect American families from continued abusive drug pricing practices.'
He gave the companies 60 days to comply.
Letters were sent to AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, EMD Serono, Genentech, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Johnson & Johnson, Merck, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Regeneron and Sanofi.
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt announced the new moves during a briefing, and Trump then posted the letters to his Truth Social account.
In the letters, Trump said none of the proposals he has heard from drug companies about bringing down high prices have been acceptable.
'Most proposals … promised more of the same: shifting blame and requesting policy changes that would result in billions of dollars in handouts to the industry,' the letters stated.
Moving forward, Trump said the only solutions he will accept are those that provide 'American families immediate relief from the vastly inflated drug prices and an end to the free ride of American innovation by European and other developed nations.'
The letters said companies must also establish a direct-to-consumer sales method so manufacturers can 'cut out middlemen' and sell drugs at prices that match what private insurers pay.
A growing number of drug companies— including Eli Lilly and Novo Nordisk— have already started selling their anti-obesity drugs directly to consumers at lower prices to patients who pay without insurance.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Associated Press
a few seconds ago
- Associated Press
What's known and not yet known about the Justice Department's scrutiny of Trump-Russia probe origins
WASHINGTON (AP) — News that Attorney General Pam Bondi is moving to criminally investigate the Obama-era origins of the Trump-Russia investigation means that one of the most studied, and politically polarizing, chapters of modern American history will be under the microscope yet again. Here's a look at what's known and not yet known about the latest Justice Department revelation: A saga with a long backstory Perhaps no issue continues to aggravate President Donald Trump more than the assessment by intelligence officials that Russia interfered in the 2016 election on his behalf and the investigation by law enforcement into whether his campaign colluded with Moscow to tip the outcome of the contest. Robert Mueller, the former FBI director tapped as special counsel by Trump's first Justice Department to investigate, found that Russia had waged a multi-prong operation in Trump's favor and that the Republican president's campaign welcomed the aid. But Mueller did not find sufficient evidence of a criminal conspiracy between Russia and the Trump campaign. As president for a second time, Trump has made no secret of his desire to use the Justice Department as a weapon of retribution against perceived political adversaries he sees as having smeared him, including by calling for Obama-era officials to be jailed. And his administration, now more broadly and across multiple agencies, has been engaged in a effort to reopen the long-accepted conclusion — including among prominent Republicans — of Russian interference and to scrutinize the officials involved in reaching that assessment. A Bondi grand jury directive Bondi, a Trump loyalist, has directed Justice Department prosecutors to present evidence related to the Russia inquiry to a grand jury. Grand juries are tools used by prosecutors to issue subpoenas for records and prosecutors and to produce indictments based on the evidence they receive. The bar is low for an indictment given that the presentation of evidence by prosecutors is one-sided, though grand juries do have the option to decline to indict and have done so in the past. A person familiar with the matter confirmed Bondi's directive to The Associated Press but key questions remain. It was not disclosed, for instance, which prosecutors are pursuing the investigation, where the grand jury that might hear evidence is located and whether and when law enforcement officials might seek to bring criminal charges. The Justice Department, in an unusual statement last month, appeared to confirm the existence of an investigation into former FBI Director James Comey and former CIA Director James Brennan but provided no details or specifics. Potential targets of probe remain unclear It's not clear who might be targeted in the investigation, but the Trump administration has been aggressively challenging intelligence community conclusions about Russia's actions and intentions that had long ago seemed settled. It's been a welcome diversion for the administration as it confronts a wave of criticism from Trump's base and conservative influencers over the handling of records from the Jeffrey Epstein sex trafficking investigation. In the last month, Trump administration officials and allies have released a series of documents aimed at casting doubt on the extent of interference and at portraying the original Russia investigation as an Obama administration frame-job. The documents have been hailed as incontrovertible proof of a conspiracy, but a close inspection of the records shows they fall well short of that. Among the documents released by Tulsi Gabbard, the administration's director of national intelligence, are emails from 2016 showing that Obama administration officials recognized in 2016 that Russians had not hacked state election systems to manipulate votes in favor of Trump. But the absence of evidence that votes were switched — something the Obama administration never alleged — has no bearing on the ample evidence of other forms of Russia interference, including a hack-and-leak operation involving Democratic emails and a covert social media campaign aimed at sowing discord and spreading disinformation. Last week, Sen. Chuck Grassley, the Republican chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, released a previously classified annex of a 2023 report by John Durham, the special counsel appointed by the first Trump administration to hunt for government misconduct in the Russia probe. The annex included a series of emails, including one from July 2016 that was purportedly sent by a senior staffer at a philanthropic organization founded by billionaire investor George Soros, that referred to a plan approved by then-Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton to falsely link Trump to Russia. But Durham's own report took pain to note that investigators had not corroborated the communications as authentic and said the best assessment was that the message was 'a composites of several emails' the Russians had obtained from hacking — raising the likelihood that it was a product of Russian disinformation. Fresh scrutiny has also centered around the intelligence community assessment on Russian election interference, which was published in January 2017. An annex in a classified version of the assessment contained a summary of the so-called Steele dossier — a compilation of opposition research that included uncorroborated rumors and salacious gossip about Trump and Russia. The latest in a series of investigations Just as Russian interference has been heavily scrutinized, so too has the U.S. government's response to it. Multiple government reports, including not only from Mueller but also a Republican-led Senate intelligence committee that included current Secretary of State Marco Rubio, have documented Russia's activities in sweeping details. To be sure, reports from the Justice Department inspector general and Durham also identified significant flaws in the FBI's Russia investigation, including errors and omissions in applications the Justice Department submitted to a secretive surveillance court to eavesdrop on a national security adviser to the 2016 Trump campaign. But Durham found no criminal wrongdoing among government officials, bringing three criminal cases — two against private citizens that resulted in acquittals at trial and a third against a little-known FBI lawyer who pleaded guilty to doctoring an email. It is unclear if there is any criminal wrongdoing that exists that Durham, who launched his investigation in 2019 and concluded it four years later, somehow missed during his sprawling inquiry.
Fox News
a few seconds ago
- Fox News
Caldwell: Democrats Would Rather Go Viral Than Help The People They've Lost
Fox News Political Analyst Gianno Caldwell joins Fox Across America With Jimmy Failla to shed light on what's driving the Democratic Party's cratering popularity with voters over the past year. 'If you look at the Wall Street Journal polling from just last month, and when I say last month we're talking, I think it was like July 25th, it showed that every day Americans have a 65% unfavorable approval rating for the Democratic Party. But they look at Republicans favorable in terms of people who can handle getting issues, key issues done. And we're talking about those that they voted for, table kitchen issues, like the economy, immigration, and many of those things. They look at Republicans favorably on that front. Democrats have a very big issue. I mentioned this on Harris Falkner's show today. It's viral versus policy. They rather go viral than to help the people that they've lost. And I'm talking about the working-class people like union workers in Michigan and many other places, working- class, middle-class Americans who believe that they do not have their best interests at heart. And remember, Democrats used to be the party of heart. It wasn't necessarily common sense, it wasn't necessary reason, but you felt good about voting for them, regardless of any of the issues lined up from an economic perspective or immigration perspective for you as a person. And I'm talking mainly young folks really felt this way. But now they're not even a party of heart, they're the party of hate. And that's honestly where they've come.' Gianno Caldwell Talks About How He Turned Pain Into Purpose Jimmy and Gianno also share their thoughts on the left-wing outrage mob's nonsensical attacks against actress Sydney Sweeney and her new ad campaign with American Eagle. Listen to the podcast to hear what else they discussed!
CBS News
a few seconds ago
- CBS News
Baltimore County executive claims sanctuary jurisdiction designation is a mistake
Baltimore County is listed as Maryland's only sanctuary jurisdiction in the Department of Justice's (DoJ) list of locations that it claims have policies that "impede enforcement of federal immigration statutes and regulations." It comes amid the Trump administration's continued crackdown on illegal immigration in the U.S. Baltimore County Executive Kathy Klausmeier believes the county was erroneously included in the list, and said the Office of Law is contacting the DoJ to "correct this mistake." "Public safety remains a top priority, where we practice community policing – an approach proven to enhance safety by encouraging cooperation with law enforcement at varying levels," Klausmeier said in a statement. "We will continue to support our valued law enforcement personnel while following federal, state, and local laws." The Justice Department shared the list on Tuesday, saying the designations were chosen after a review of laws, ordinances and executive directives in the listed locations. According to the DoJ, a location is designated as a sanctuary jurisdiction if it publicly declares itself as such, if they have laws or regulations that "obstruct or limit local law enforcement cooperation with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)," or if it limits whether local agencies share information about the immigration status of detainees with federal authorities. The DoJ also describes sanctuary jurisdictions as those that prohibit the use of funds for federal immigration enforcement, those that train government employees and law enforcement to enforce sanctuary policies and those that do not honor ICE detainer requests. Further, the department listed locations as sanctuary jurisdictions if they restrict ICE officials from interviewing detainees without consent, if they create offices to help migrants "evade federal law enforcement officers," or if they avoid federal laws that prevent migrants from receiving certain benefits. The list will be re-evaluated on a regular basis to include or remove jurisdictions that change their policies or laws, the department said. Each listed location will have a chance to respond to its designation, according to the DoJ. The list follows President Trump's April executive order, called Protecting American Communities from Criminal Aliens. The measure directs the DoJ and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to publish a list of locations that "continue to use their authority to violate, obstruct, and defy the enforcement of federal immigration laws," according to the Justice Department. Under the executive order, the Office of Management and Budget was ordered to identify federal funds, grants and contracts that can be terminated or suspended in designated sanctuary jurisdictions. The measure also directs the DHS to pursue legal action and enforcement measures for locations that remain sanctuary jurisdictions after local officials are notified of the designation. In April of 2024, before President Trump's second term, Baltimore County launched the Welcoming and Belonging Strategic Plan, which served as a guide for welcoming "new residents from around the world who are eager to share their values, build new connections, and use their talents to make our county safer, stronger, and more prosperous." The plan came after community meetings between migrants and county leaders. In March 2025, the Baltimore County Board of Education passed a measure to protect students who are migrants after a high school teacher allegedly posted to social media saying he would expose his students who attended an immigration rally. The measure ensures that migrant students have the right to access programs in the district without intimidation. The measure also affirmed the board's commitment to protecting student privacy. In April, Maryland lawmakers passed a similar measure, the Maryland Values Act, which identified sensitive locations – like schools and churches – and determined how they can respond if immigration officials show up. The law also created privacy protections for migrants' data. The Department of Homeland Security shared a similar list in June, though it listed eight Maryland counties and 10 Maryland cities as sanctuary jurisdictions. The list has since been removed from the DHS website, but it included the following: Cities Counties Several state and local leaders responded to the DHS's list, including Baltimore Mayor Brandon Scott, who said, "By definition, Baltimore is not a sanctuary city, because we do not have jurisdiction over our jails. We follow our limited obligations as defined under federal immigration law." Leaders from both Anne Arundel and Howard counties said they are in compliance with federal immigration laws.
