Trump's drastic cuts to federal agencies temporarily halted by U.S. judge
U.S. President Donald Trump's administration must temporarily halt its sweeping government overhaul because Congress did not authorize it to carry out large-scale staffing cuts and the restructuring of agencies, a federal judge has ruled.
U.S. District Judge Susan Illston in San Francisco sided Friday with a group of unions, non-profits and local governments, and blocked large-scale mass layoffs known as "reductions in force" for 14 days.
"As history demonstrates, the president may broadly restructure federal agencies only when authorized by Congress," said Illston.
The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The ruling is the broadest of its kind against the government overhaul that has been led by Elon Musk, the world's richest person who is also CEO of electric-vehicle maker Tesla.
Dozens of lawsuits have challenged the work of the Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE, on various grounds including violating privacy laws and exceeding its authority, with mixed results.
Agencies thrown 'into chaos,' plaintiffs say
Trump directed government agencies in February to work with DOGE to identify targets for mass layoffs as part of the administration's restructuring plans.
Trump urged agencies to eliminate duplicative roles, unnecessary management layers and non-critical jobs, while automating routine tasks, closing regional field offices and reducing the use of outside contractors.
"The Trump administration's unlawful attempt to reorganize the federal government has thrown agencies into chaos, disrupting critical services provided across our nation," said a statement from the coalition of plaintiffs.
"Each of us represents communities deeply invested in the efficiency of the federal government — laying off federal employees and reorganizing government functions haphazardly does not achieve that."
WATCH | Musk orders federal workers to justify their jobs:
Elon Musk orders U.S. federal workers to justify their jobs
3 months ago
Duration 2:03
U.S. federal workers were ordered to justify their jobs this weekend by submitting five bullet points on their accomplishments from the past week or face termination. The initiative, spearheaded by Elon Musk and his Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) team, has Republican backing, Democratic opposition and warnings of legal challenges ahead.
Illston scheduled a hearing for May 22 to consider a longer-lasting preliminary injunction.
She said the plaintiffs are likely to succeed on merits of some of their claims in their lawsuit, which was filed on April 28 and alleged Trump exceeded his authority. It also alleged the Office of Management and Budget, DOGE and Office of Personnel Management exceeded their authority and violated administrative law.
Illston said plaintiffs are likely to suffer irreparable harm without the temporary restraining order, which she said preserves the status quo.
Illston said the plaintiffs submitted more than 1,000 pages of evidence and 62 sworn declarations, and she highlighted some of the material.
For example, she said the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health and its Pittsburgh office, which researches health hazards facing mineworkers, had 221 of the department's 222 workers terminated, citing the union. She gave similar examples at local offices of Head Start, which supports early learning, the Farm Service Agency and the Social Security Administration.
"The court here is not considering the potential loss of income of one individual employee, but the widespread termination of salaries and benefits for individuals, families, and communities," Illston wrote in her ruling.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Toronto Star
11 minutes ago
- Toronto Star
A Canadian recession seemed certain. Not anymore
We're close to the point of maximum distress over U.S. President Donald Trump's assault on the Canadian economy. We know that Trump is likely to get Prime Minister Mark Carney's signature on a trade deal we won't like, maybe worse than we've braced for. Opinion articles are based on the author's interpretations and judgments of facts, data and events. More details
National Post
11 minutes ago
- National Post
Adam Zivo: Canada needs a new LGB movement — without T
Article content The gay movement ultimately proved more successful — largely because homosexuals were better resourced and were, on average, more strategic with their battles and words. In other words: respectability politics worked. As such, the transgender community was eventually absorbed into the gay rights movement as a junior coalition partner in the 1990s, forming the modern LGBT umbrella. Article content Transgender people greatly benefited from this alliance, with gay labour setting the foundation for eventual trans acceptance. There were few downsides for homosexuals at first, because 'LGBTQ' organizations remained cognizant of their needs. But then the United States legalized same-sex marriage and many homosexuals, feeling victorious, drifted away from community activism. Article content In their absence, LGBTQ organizations were entirely co-opted by transgender activism, and the social issues faced by gays and lesbians (e.g. sexualized drug use for men, and intimate partner violence for women) were abandoned in the gutter. Many homosexuals found themselves voiceless, and, worse yet, scorned by the very institutions that were supposed to represent them. Article content Article content Cannibalized from the inside by gender radicalism, the mainstream LGBTQ movement came to insist that biological sex is irrelevant to orientation. Lesbians were advised to enjoy 'girl dick' while gay men were pressured to unlearn their ' genital preferences.' Homosexuals who asserted their sexual boundaries were excommunicated from queer spaces and dating apps while being smeared as bigots. Article content In tandem, vulnerable same-sex attracted youth were pressured into receiving irreversible sex changes under the auspices of 'gender-affirming care,' simply because they exhibited perfectly normal episodes of gender confusion that, in most cases, would have resolved naturally. This homophobic practice of 'transing away the gay' received little scrutiny from mainstream LGBTQ institutions, because the safety of young gays and lesbians apparently matters less than maintaining the myth that all gender dysphoria is indicative of transgenderism. Article content Article content Some gender radicals even began to crusade against gay men in particular. Not only did they normalize using 'cis gay' as a slur, they propagated a revisionist history wherein the participation and impact of gay activists was minimized, if not completely erased. Gay men were told, remarkably, that they owed their rights to 'trans women of colour,' even though this claim has never been remotely true. Article content And throughout all of this, the trans-led 'LGBTQ' movement still found time to alienate the rest of society, too. According to the 2025 Ipsos LGBT+ Pride Report, which uses polling data gathered across 26 countries, support for transgender rights has declined markedly since 2021, with same-sex rights seeing a similar, albeit weaker, softening. Handing over the reins to gender radicals has been demonstrably disastrous — decades of progress risk being undone by the current backlash. Article content In this context, it is imperative that the LGB community seize control of its own destiny. There is no reason for homosexuals to subordinate their interests to transgender activists who so often despise them. Gays and lesbians should not passively sit around while gender radicals sabotage public support for same-sex relationships. Let each community chart its own autonomous paths, as was done decades ago, and if there are opportunities for inter-community co-operation, then that should be explored — but on an equal and limited basis. Article content
Globe and Mail
11 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
This Spectacular Vanguard ETF Is on Course to Crush the S&P 500 Yet Again in 2025
Key Points Eleven sectors are represented in the S&P 500, but information technology is the largest by a country mile. Investors who haven't owned tech stocks like Nvidia, Microsoft, and Apple over the past decade have likely underperformed the broader market. The Vanguard Information Technology ETF offers investors exposure to those stocks, and over 300 others from this high-flying sector. 10 stocks we like better than Vanguard Information Technology ETF › Information technology is the largest of 11 sectors in the S&P 500, with a weighting of 33.9%. That's partly because the sector is home to the world's three most valuable companies: Nvidia, Microsoft, and Apple, which have a combined market capitalization of $11 trillion. They have each obliterated the return of the S&P 500 over the past decade: NVDA data by YCharts Investors who haven't owned those three tech titans have probably underperformed the broader market. However, they aren't the only high-flying stocks in the information technology sector, and there's a simple way to buy them all. The Vanguard Information Technology ETF (NYSEMKT: VGT) is an exchange-traded fund (ETF) that invests exclusively in information technology stocks. It outperformed the S&P 500 every year, on average, since it was established in 2004, and it's on track to do so again in 2025. The world's most dominant tech stocks packed into one low-cost ETF The Vanguard ETF isn't limited to the information technology stocks within the S&P 500 alone -- it invests across the entire sector. It holds 319 stocks from 12 \information technology subsegments including semiconductors, systems software, and application software. The semiconductor segment is the largest by far with a weighting of 30.4%, which shouldn't be a surprise considering data center hardware is at the heart of the artificial intelligence (AI) boom. Nvidia's market capitalization recently topped $4.2 trillion because of the enormous demand for its data center chips, and even Broadcom has become a trillion-dollar giant thanks to its AI hardware sales. But the AI theme is prevalent throughout the entire information technology sector. In fact, each of the top 10 holdings in the Vanguard ETF -- which represent 58.8% of the value of its portfolio -- is participating in the AI race. Stock Vanguard ETF Portfolio Weighting 1. Nvidia 16.74% 2. Microsoft 14.89% 3. Apple 13.03% 4. Broadcom 4.57% 5. Oracle 2.05% 6. Palantir Technologies 1.64% 7. Cisco Systems 1.58% 8. International Business Machines 1.56% 9. Salesforce 1.47% 10. Advanced Micro Devices 1.31% Data source: Vanguard. Portfolio weightings are accurate as of June 30, 2025, and are subject to change. Microsoft and Oracle are two of Nvidia's biggest customers. They operate a growing number of data centers fitted with thousands of AI chips, and they rent the computing capacity to businesses and developers for profit. Microsoft, however, has also become a leader in AI software thanks to its Copilot virtual assistant, which is integrated into each of its most popular products including Windows and 365 (Word, Excel, and PowerPoint). Palantir is another AI software powerhouse. It operates three core platforms: Gotham and Foundry help businesses and governments extract actionable insights from their data, and AIP (Artificial Intelligence Platform) helps them integrate AI into their everyday workflows. Prominent tech analyst Dan Ives from Wedbush Securities believes Palantir's valuation could soar by 177% to reach $1 trillion within the next three years, as enterprises race to turn their data into dollars. Outside of its top 10 holdings, the Vanguard ETF holds a number of other prominent AI software stocks. They include AI cybersecurity giants Palo Alto Networks and CrowdStrike, plus Adobe, and Snowflake, to name just a few. The best part about the Vanguard ETF might be its ultra-low cost. It has an expense ratio of just 0.09%, so a $10,000 investment would incur an annual fee of just $9. Vanguard says competing funds across the industry charge an average of 0.93%, so they are a whopping 10 times more expensive to own. On course to beat the S&P 500 again in 2025 The Vanguard Information Technology ETF generated a compound annual return of 13.7% since its inception in 2004, handily beating the S&P 500 which has returned an average of 10.1% per year over the same period. That trend looks set to continue in 2025, because the ETF was sitting on a year-to-date gain of 10.3% as of market close July 18, whereas the S&P was sitting on a lesser gain of 7.3%. Tech stocks are having yet another stellar year thanks to AI, with shares of Microsoft, Nvidia, and Palantir up 21%, 24%, and 104%, respectively. But investors should never put all of their eggs in one basket. If the AI boom falters, those high-flying stocks could suffer steep corrections which might lead the information technology sector to temporarily underperform the rest of the market. As a result, this Vanguard ETF should only be added to a diversified portfolio to mitigate risk. That strategy can still drive incredible returns if things go well. An investor who placed $20,000 in the S&P 500 in 2004 would be sitting on $167,000 today. But had they split the $20,000 equally and placed $10,000 in the S&P 500 and $10,000 in the Vanguard ETF, they would have $264,800 today. That's a life-changing difference for most people. Should you invest $1,000 in Vanguard Information Technology ETF right now? Before you buy stock in Vanguard Information Technology ETF, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Vanguard Information Technology ETF wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $665,092!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,050,477!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,055% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 180% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 21, 2025
