logo
Donald Trump's assault on American greatness

Donald Trump's assault on American greatness

Irish Times3 days ago
Sometimes one must look at the big picture. On July 4 2026, the
US
will celebrate its 250th year of independence. The declaration of independence itself stated that: 'We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.'
These ideas were imperfectly realised. A civil war and the civil rights movement were still to come. Yet the birth of the United States of America was to be a hugely significant moment.
The US had the potential to become the first truly mighty republic since the Roman one, which perished at the battle of Actium in 31BC. Without US power, a German or a Russian dictatorship would have surely conquered Europe.
Without the US example, democratic capitalism would not have spread across the world. This would be a far poorer world, beset by all the ills of despotism.
READ MORE
As I argued in a 2016 column, Donald Trump's arrival on the political scene puts all this at stake. The peril is far closer today. He survived his attempt to overthrow the result of the 2020 presidential election, to return triumphantly in 2024. Trump is unchained. The energy of this administration is transforming the world.
[
Donald Trump's false promises to his supporters
Opens in new window
]
Let us start with the domestic front.
We are watching an assault on the rule of law. Abbe Lowell, erstwhile defender of Jared Kushner and Hunter Biden, warns that Donald Trump is pushing US democracy to breaking point.
Actions include executive orders against law firms and the appointment of unqualified loyalists to key positions.
Most ominous of all, as Edward Luce notes, is the expansion in the power and resources of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, which operates very much like a secret police.
The Juggle: the issues facing women with young children when balancing childcare and their careers
Listen |
44:30
Closely related has been the assault on the government. Elon Musk's so-called Department of Government Efficiency was a fraud. The goal was not efficiency but subservience.
It was to destroy the independence of public servants. In the process many valuable activities were also destroyed, notably USAID's health programmes. The costs will be huge.
Yet another aspect is Trump's extensive use of emergency powers and executive orders. He has made 168 of the latter in just the first few months of this term, bringing his total far above those of his recent predecessors. Trump rules by decree. That is one of the signs of a dictatorship.
[
President Trump: Irish writers have their say
Opens in new window
]
A further concern is legitimisation of corruption. Arguably, this is revealed in his own behaviour and that of his family. It is also shown in the pause in enforcement of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, once an example of good behaviour.
Yet more fundamental is the war on science, a potent source of US exceptionalism. Stanford's Larry Diamond, a leading expert on democracy, writes: 'The scope and depth of the devastation Trump is wreaking on American leadership in science and technology is so massive and sweeping that it is hard to understand without resorting to a preposterous theory, such as that Trump is an agent not of imperial Russia but of Communist China'.
Last but not least is the fiscal policy just enacted in the 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act'. This guarantees huge fiscal deficits into the indefinite future. That, in turn, also ensures huge current account deficits forever, since these are how the US economy balances supply and demand.
[
Trump's big, beautiful Bill could be the Republicans' undoing in mid-term elections
Opens in new window
]
Now turn to the impact on US international relations and global public goods.
Above all, the trade war is not over
.
The 90-day pause on 'liberation day' tariffs is due to come to an end. Deals have not been reached with more than a handful of partners.
This economically destructive war on US creditors and, above all, the uncertainty it creates, will continue. The trade war represents an assault on the institutions created by the US after the second world war. It is also damaging US alliances. More broadly, all US commitments are in doubt: Volodymyr Zelenskiy's grotesque humiliation in the White House showed that.
The trade regime was a global public good. Another has been the dollar-based monetary regime. Again, Trump's policies cast doubt on the stability of the currency and the credibility of its issuer.
[
Cliff Taylor: Trump's latest threat of 200% pharma tariffs raises big questions for Ireland
Opens in new window
]
Last but not least, though fully in line with the movement's assault on science, is the virulent climate 'denialism': if it is inconvenient, it cannot be true, is the motto. The obvious historical parallel is with Lysenkoism, the ruinous Stalinist campaign against evolutionary biology.
Almost everything being done by Trump will weaken the US in its rivalry with China. This rivalry can and must be managed in the interests of all. But I, for one, desperately want the core values of freedom of opinion, democratic politics, the rule of law and openness to the world as a whole to survive.
Trump is not just assailing these values at home, he is weakening them abroad, notably by destroying US credibility as an ally.
How can one reasonably expect a fickle and fiscally profligate US, which is destroying core institutions and values, to match a giant with more than four times its population? This is surely a fantasy.
In just under six months, only an eighth of his term, Trump has made huge strides in his war on everything that made the US successful. Only the Maga base, Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping should feel happy. The most coherent part of the programme is the attempt to turn the US into an autocracy. Much of the rest is incoherent.
But, given the evident success, in his own terms, of just his first six months, it would be a rash person who assumed that this counter-revolution against all the US represents, at home and abroad, will fail. One can hope. But Trump is doing terrifyingly well. – Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2025
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How Donald Trump ended up with a cabinet of incompetents
How Donald Trump ended up with a cabinet of incompetents

Irish Times

time3 hours ago

  • Irish Times

How Donald Trump ended up with a cabinet of incompetents

It was a Jack Nicholson-Tom Cruise moment. US president Donald Trump couldn't handle the truth. He didn't even know the truth. And he has no respect for truth, so even if he knew, why would he tell the truth about the truth? At a White House lunch with African leaders on Wednesday, Trump engaged in a bizarre exchange with the New York Times White House reporter Shawn McCreesh. The day before, when CNN's Kaitlan Collins asked the president who authorised the pause on weapons shipments to Ukraine – at a time when Russia is engaged in a barbarous onslaught, indiscriminately killing civilians – Trump replied, defensively: 'I don't know. Why don't you tell me?' The Pentagon's puer aeternus, Pete Hegseth , was sitting right beside Trump. And reporters soon ferreted out the information that perennial screw-up Hegseth had ordered the pause without telling Trump, Marco Rubio and other top officials. READ MORE Trump reversed the Pentagon chief, reflecting a belated awareness of the fact that Vladimir Putin is playing him for a fool. Like a spurned lover, he keened that his Russian boyfriend's promises are 'meaningless'. In a follow-up the next day, McCreesh asked Trump if he had figured out who had ordered the munitions to Ukraine halted. When Trump said no, McCreesh pressed him: 'What does it say that such a big decision could be made inside your government without your knowing?' Trump bristled. A jester like Hegseth had kept the king in the dark on a consequential move. 'If a decision was made, I will know,' Trump blustered. 'I'll be the first to know. In fact, most likely I'd give the order, but I haven't done that yet.' It is not reassuring, at a time of man-made and natural disasters, that the president is spouting gobbledegook and his maladroit cabinet members are spinning out. It's a paradox: if you choose your cabinet based on looks, you are likely to end up with a cabinet that makes you look bad. Running government is harder than bloviating on Fox News and assorted podcasts. And if you demand uber-fealty from your advisers, you will end up surrounded by toadies who don't level with you. In the dishy new book 2024: How Trump Retook the White House and the Democrats Lost United States, Josh Dawsey, Tyler Pager and Isaac Arnsdorf describe how Sergio Gor, a Trump aide who rose by publishing Trump's coffee table books, created draconian loyalty tests during the transition. 'Trump believed the biggest mistake of his first term was picking disloyal officials, and Gor was determined to disqualify candidates who had ever criticized Trump or anyone associated with him,' the authors write. Kristi Noem is loyal to Trump. But perhaps it was too much to ask that someone who executed her own puppy was going to understand the humanitarian necessity of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (Fema). Noem has been parroting Trump and talking about abolishing Fema since she got the job heading the department of homeland security. She recently enacted a debilitating rule designed to cut the Fema budget, dictating that every grant and contract over $100,000 (€85,500) needs explicit permission from her. As CNN pointed out, that's 'pennies' in an agency where disaster costs soar into the billions. At the same time, the Times reports, the agency didn't answer nearly two-thirds of calls to its disaster line because it had fired hundreds of call centre contractors. (Now, confronted with the Texas disaster, the administration is backing off the eradication plan.) As Trump was preparing to travel to Kerr County, Texas, to inspect flood damage on Friday, the White House posted a meme of him as Superman, playing off the new movie about the Man of Steel. But the initial federal response was less than super. Noem didn't authorise Fema's deployment of rescue teams until Monday, more than 72 hours after the flooding began, CNN reported, and there have been questions about crucial staffing shortages at the National Weather Service as floodwaters rose. Pam Bondi enraged the Trump faithful when, after she inflamed conspiracy theorists about Jeffrey Epstein documents, her justice department said on Monday there was nothing more to see. No client list. Move along, please. 'Are people still talking about this guy, this creep?' an irritated Trump asked reporters about his erstwhile paedophile playmate. Laura Loomer demanded that Bondi resign, writing on X: 'I cannot sugar coat how much good will Pam Bondi has cost the Trump admin with the base this week. She is a massive liability to President Trump.' On Wednesday, Bondi angrily accused Dan Bongino, conspiracist podcaster turned FBI deputy director, of leaking stories that whipped up expectations for Epstein secrets. He denied it, and told people he was considering quitting. Now furious right-wing conspiracists think there's a cover-up of the cover-up. Vapidly, agriculture secretary Brooke Rollins suggested people on Medicaid could replace deported immigrants. They can pick our crops! It's unreal, but Sean Duffy, once a Real World cast member, is in charge of transportation and Nasa. And don't forget the scary spike in measles cases fuelled by the anti-vaccine crowd; thank you, RFK jnr! It turns out, even good-looking dodos are still dodos. This article originally appeared in The New York Times .

Macron expresses ‘very strong disapproval' of Trump's tariff threat as EU leaders react
Macron expresses ‘very strong disapproval' of Trump's tariff threat as EU leaders react

Irish Times

time5 hours ago

  • Irish Times

Macron expresses ‘very strong disapproval' of Trump's tariff threat as EU leaders react

US president Donald Trump 's threat on Saturday to place a 30 per cent tariff on goods from the European Union caused outrage among European leaders, with some urging retaliatory tariffs while others said they hoped a deal could still be worked out before the new levies went into effect. The European Union has been in deep negotiations with Washington in the hope of reaching trade deals that would avert such punishing levies and a wider trade war. But Trump's threat to impose a 30 per cent levy on European and Mexican goods on August 1st upended months of deliberations in one fell swoop, and European leaders are threatening to strike back. Ursula von der Leyen , president of the European Commission, the EU's executive branch, said her administration was ready to keep working toward an agreement before the August 1st deadline. 'At the same time, we will take all necessary steps to safeguard EU interests, including the adoption of proportionate countermeasures if required,' she said. The European Council president, António Costa, said on social media that the EU 'remains firm, united and ready to protect our interests.' READ MORE The European Union had been frantically pushing for an agreement right up until Mr Trump announced the new tariffs Saturday morning. Many in Europe had been expecting at least a 10 per cent baseline tariff, with some possible exemptions. President Emmanuel Macron of France suggested the 30 per cent rate came as a surprise after weeks of negotiations that he said were 'made in good faith'. He voiced 'very strong disapproval' of the tariffs in a social media post. France has been one of the loudest voices in Europe calling for retaliatory tariffs against the United States if a deal isn't reached. Macron reiterated a plea for the European Commission, which is negotiating on behalf of the EU countries, to mobilise 'all the instruments at its disposal'. Others calling for retaliation include Brando Benifei, chair of the European Parliament's delegation for relations with the United States, and Bernd Lange, chair of the European Parliament's Committee on International Trade. Benifei said the EU's executive branch should 'immediately put on the table a series of new credible countermeasures on goods, services, and intellectual property rights that would take effect August 1st without an agreement, and let's no longer postpone those that are due to come into force next week.' Lange called the tariffs an 'outrage'. 'We should no longer wait and see, but use our economic strength to make it clear that these unfair trade practices are unacceptable,' he said. Prime minister Giorgia Meloni of Italy, one of the few European leaders Trump likes, struck a more cautious tone. Her office said in a statement that it would make 'no sense to spark a trade war between the two sides of the Atlantic', and urged negotiators to avoid 'polarisations that would make reaching an agreement more complex'. Mr Trump threatened to meet any EU tariff retaliation with an equal increase in US tariffs. Experts said that would increase the chances of a wider trade war between the United States and Europe. Dan O'Brien, chief economist at the Institute of International and European Affairs, said on social media that a 30 per cent tariff on European goods exported to America would have 'a significant trade destruction effect'. The new tariffs also prolong the economic uncertainty weighing on various exporters, including German carmakers, Italian wine exporters and Irish pharmaceutical companies. Hildegard Müller, who heads VDA, the main lobby group for German carmakers, called the latest tariffs 'regrettable' and urged negotiators from the European Union and the United States to find a solution 'as quickly as possible'. Müller said that the 27.5 per cent tariffs already in place for cars imported to the United States were hurting German automakers. It remains unclear whether the threatened 30 per cent tariffs would apply to imported cars, since Trump's letters said the latest tariffs would be 'separate from all sectoral tariffs'. If they did apply, European carmakers such as Volkswagen would be among the hardest hit. Almost all major carmakers also manufacture vehicles in Mexico. Mexico is projecting confidence that it will fend off a new set of tariffs threatened by Mr Trump, with talks already under way to avert the worst. Mexican president Claudia Sheinbaum noted in speeches that every country has been getting a letter from Mr Trump as he implements global protectionist policies. Her team had already begun discussions with the US on Friday and she was confident Mexico would get a deal. 'We've had some experience with these things for several months now,' Sheinbaum said at a clinic opening in Ensenada, Baja California. 'And I think we're going to reach an agreement with the United States government.' – This article originally appeared in The New York Times , additional reporting by Bloomberg

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store