Trump health info blackout shocks providers
Why it matters: The removed sites, primarily maintained by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, covered issues like contraception, transgender health and climate change that President Trump and Republicans have repeatedly targeted.
The blackout shook health researchers and providers and raised the specter of the Trump administration limiting what public health information Americans can see.
The information affected included CDC guidelines for treating sexually transmitted infections, used to know what tests to run and lay out treatment plans, said David Harvey, executive director of the National Coalition of STD Directors.
Without access, "people will get sick. And, especially in cases like congenital syphilis where you cannot lose a day to treat, babies will die," he said in a statement. The information has since reappeared.
Another affected website is used by clinicians to select birth control after a recent pregnancy. It helps rule out risky options if a patient has a heart condition or even is breastfeeding, physician and public health researcher Jeremy Faust wrote on Substack.
State of play: A New York Times analysis found that more than 8,000 webpages across federal websites, including 3,000 from CDC, had been removed since Friday afternoon.
Data sets also disappeared: More than 2,200 data sets came offline between President Trump's inauguration and Friday afternoon, according to tallies compiled from data.gov, a repository of publicly available federal data, and the Internet Archive.
Some had been restored as of Sunday.
The CDC's website for the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, which hosts vaccine recommendations for kids and adults, went down on Friday evening but was back online by Saturday.
But references to COVID-19 vaccine and pneumococcal vaccine recommendations approved during ACIP's October meeting that appeared on a version of the recommendations page captured before Trump's inauguration appear to have been removed.
CDC webpages now have a banner noting that the website is being modified to comply with new executive orders.
The CDC said in a statement that all changes to the Health and Human Services websites are in accordance with President Trump's executive orders that called for an end to federal diversity, equity and inclusion programs and that declared the government will only recognize two sexes, male and female.
"The Office of Personnel Management has provided initial guidance on both Executive Orders and HHS and divisions are acting accordingly to execute," CDC said.
Scientists, journalists and others who rely on HHS data sets rushed to save data last week, anticipating some of it would disappear. The pace accelerated when word began circulating that the administration would take down government websites not in compliance at the close of business on Friday.
The Arizona Public Health Association urged its members to download key information from federal websites.
"If you use these resources, don't assume they'll still be there next week or that some archive website will have captured and preserved them — download and save them now before it's too late," the association wrote in a memo released Wednesday.
Members of a top advisory board to the CDC also sent a letter to the agency's acting director asking for an explanation of the removal of public health data, Stat reported.
Nine out of 12 public health researchers and scientists on the board signed the letter, and they expect to be fired for doing so, they told Stat.
The data blackout came after Trump ordered the U.S. withdrawal from the World Health Organization, signed executive orders targeting transgender health care, and halted many external communications from HHS.
A freeze on grants and other federal funding also paralyzed state Medicaid agencies and some health providers until a federal judge halted it.
💭 Our thought bubble: The full extent of changes to federal health information and data may not be know for some time. If the Trump administration removes gender, race or other demographic categories from data sets, it could fundamentally change the data.
April Rubin contributed
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
21 minutes ago
- USA Today
Do you know the signs of a tick bite? What to look for
This year's tick season has been extremely active, leading to a surge in ER visits because of tick bites, particularly in the Northeast. This year's figures are the highest since 2019, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Of the nearly 900 species of ticks in the world, the United States is home to nearly 50 species, according to the National Institutes of Health. Although only a few kinds of ticks can transmit disease to people, those species are growing in numbers and reach. Tiny yet dangerous ticks can spread a number of diseases to humans and animals. But don't panic if you discover a tick on you or a family member. Just because a tick lands on you or bites you doesn't guarantee that you will contract Lyme disease or any of the other diseases they spread. Here are some tips to help you identify and remove a tick: How to recognize a tick Ticks use your body heat, breath, movement and smell to find you. They also employ a variety of methods to locate their victims. Some prefer to wait in leaf litter or dead logs, and others like to scale tall grass or other vegetation, according to the Mayo Clinic. More: Tick bites sending more people to ER than years past, CDC data shows Unable to view our graphics? Click here to see them. Where to look for ticks If you are returning indoors after being outside, it's a good idea to check your clothes and body for ticks. Ticks can be as small as a poppy seed. For a disease to be transmitted, a tick must stay connected to its host for 24 to 36 hours. By removing the tick promptly, you can reduce the chance of becoming infected. Here are some tips on how to deal with a tick: What do tick bites look like? Found a tick? Don't panic Here's the proper way to remove a tick: What happens if you don't remove a tick? According to the CDC, specific tick species can spread diseases like Lyme disease, southern-tick associated rash sickness (STARI) and Rocky Mountain spotted fever (RMSF) in certain regions of the nation. Not all ticks carry infections, but waiting too long to remove one from your skin can raise the risk of transmission. CONTRIBUTING Mary Walrath-Holdridge/USA TODAY
Washington Post
23 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Live updates: Trump to unveil initiative to ease access to medical records
President Donald Trump is expected to announce an initiative at the White House on Wednesday to ease Americans' access to medical records, tapping the help of technology and health care companies. The White House has advertised an afternoon speech in the East Room on 'Making Health Technology Great Again.' Trump, who returned from a four-day trip to Scotland on Tuesday, also plans to sign legislation Wednesday. He is continuing to face fallout from his administration's decision to limit the release of files from the Jeffrey Epstein case, but White House officials believe the uproar from Trump's political base has calmed. Three weeks ago, White House officials were battling a frenzy from President Donald Trump's supporters over the Jeffrey Epstein case. But the flurry of criticisms from within the 'Make America Great Again' movement have quieted, and Trump officials say they are plotting steps to try to shape the public narrative to their advantage. The Senate voted Tuesday night to confirm Emil Bove as a federal appeals court judge, ending a contentious confirmation in which the top Justice Department official and former attorney for Donald Trump was the target of three whistleblower complaints alleging he put the president's agenda above legal principles. The 50-49 vote giving Bove a seat on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit was mostly along party lines. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's team on Tuesday denounced the Pentagon's internal review of his actions in the 'Signalgate' affair, calling the independent inquiry 'clearly a political witch hunt' and asserting without evidence that details of the nonpartisan review were leaked to the news media by 'Biden administration holdovers.' The Trump administration on Tuesday temporarily halted all funding for science research issued by the National Institutes of Health before releasing the funds later in the day, according to emails obtained by The Washington Post and more than a half-dozen federal officials familiar with the matter. The halt stemmed from a footnote in an Office of Management and Budget document, according to an email sent to NIH staff Tuesday afternoon by the NIH's associate director for budget, Neil Shapiro.
Los Angeles Times
an hour ago
- Los Angeles Times
Pandemic aged our brains faster, whether or not we got COVID, study says
By almost any measure, living through a once-in-a-century pandemic emergency that killed 7 million people — including 1.1 million in the U.S. alone — was a harrowing experience. Now, there's new evidence suggesting our brains bear the scars of that ordeal. Living through the pandemic aged our brains faster — even among people who never became sick with COVID-19, according to a recent study. 'Our study suggests that the experience of living through the COVID-19 pandemic was associated with slightly faster brain aging, even in people who were never infected with the virus,' the study's lead author, Ali-Reza Mohammadi-Nejad of the University of Nottingham in England, wrote in an email to The Times. 'This effect was subtle but measurable,' he added. The study, published this month in the journal Nature Communications, wasn't designed to pinpoint the exact cause of the accelerated brain aging. 'But we believe the cumulative stressors of the pandemic — such as prolonged isolation, disrupted routines, reduced physical and cognitive activity, and economic uncertainty — likely contributed to the observed brain changes,' Mohammadi-Nejad said. Those factors are all known to influence brain health over time. As the study notes, 'it remains unclear whether these brain aging effects may be at least partially reversible.' Dr. Peter Chin-Hong, a UC San Francisco infectious-disease expert who wasn't affiliated with the study, said its findings demonstrate 'that even if you don't get infected, all the repercussions of the pandemic — like social isolation and stress — can have an impact on brain health.' 'We know that other things that we do have an impact on brain health, like exercise and diet and sleep,' Chin-Hong said. 'So it makes sense that something as global and as profound as a pandemic would have an impact on brain health.' Those effects don't necessarily include immediate decreased cognitive function, however. Although researchers documented accelerated aging in generally all the brain scans they studied, only those who contracted COVID-19 showed 'small but measurable declines in cognitive performance — mainly in processing speed and mental flexibility,' according to Mohammadi-Nejad. 'This suggests that infection may introduce additional biological effects, such as inflammation or vascular issues, that are more directly linked to cognitive symptoms,' he said. Past studies have noted cognitive effects after COVID-19 illness, especially in severe cases, he said. But what's new is that evidence of cognitive decline was found even in this study's population 'of generally healthy volunteers, most of whom had mild cases.' 'It shows that even mild infection can leave subtle traces in the brain, although the effect size is relatively small,' Mohammadi-Nejad said. The effect was especially pronounced among older people, the study found, 'suggesting a complex model of cognitive decline due to more pronounced accelerated brain aging from infection-related factors in older people.' The study was based on an analysis of brain scans from the UK Biobank, a large biomedical database in the United Kingdom that contains health information from volunteers taken both before and after the onset of the pandemic. The study focused on a group of 996 participants and compared brain scans taken before and after the pandemic began. The group comprised primarily middle-aged and older people, ranging in age from 47 to 79. Only those who were generally healthy were included in the study, meaning they didn't have chronic illness such as heart disease, diabetes, dementia, kidney disease or major depression. In this group, scientists found the accelerated brain aging was seen more strongly overall in older people and men. People who were socioeconomically disadvantaged — ranking lower on indicators such as income, education, employment and health access — also had more pronounced brain aging, Mohammadi-Nejad said, 'likely due to increased exposure to pandemic-related stress and fewer resources to buffer its effects.' This isn't the first study to suggest brain health was altered by the experience of living through the pandemic. A study published last year in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, by scientists at the University of Washington, suggested that COVID-19 lockdown measures 'resulted in unusually accelerated brain maturation in adolescents' and was greater in magnitude in females than males. The authors of that study noted that 'females are at a higher risk for developing anxiety and mood disorders than males during typical adolescent development.' But among adults, past research has suggested 'men may be more susceptible to certain forms of brain aging,' Mohammadi-Nejad said. Other research, the study noted, has found 'greater male susceptibility to cortical atrophy and neuroinflammation under stress, which aligns with our findings of heightened pandemic-related brain aging in males.' There are a number of limitations to the study. The people participating in the study who had COVID-19 had mostly mild cases — and they were generally healthier than the population overall, since those with chronic illnesses were excluded. Among study participants who contracted COVID-19, fewer than 4% required hospitalization. The vast majority had mild illness; and all participants tested negative for COVID-19 within two to three weeks. Other factors also could contribute to the documented brain aging, including 'reduced physical activity, poorer diets and increased alcohol consumption' during the pandemic, the study said. Many unanswered questions remain. If further studies do prove the pandemic-related factors caused accelerated brain aging, rather than simply being associated with it, how long will those effects last? And, 'once you have it, can you do anything to make it better?' Chin-Hong asked. The study doesn't answer the question of whether the accelerated brain aging is reversible. But it is well known that there are things that are good for general brain health, Mohammadi-Nejad said: physical activity, mental stimulation, social interaction, healthy sleep and good nutrition among them. 'Public policies that reduce social isolation and ensure continued access to physical, cognitive, and emotional well-being during major disruptions could help mitigate future effects on brain health,' he said. For some, the study may raise the question of whether the pandemic-era response measures employed in Britain were worth the cost. But answering that question today — years after COVID ceased to be a novel public health threat — is complicated. 'Our study wasn't designed to evaluate public health policies or determine what should or shouldn't have been done. What we show is that the pandemic experience, independent of infection, was associated with changes in brain health,' Mohammadi-Nejad said. COVID-19 today is very different than the dark early period of the pandemic, when the disease devastated many families, prematurely killing grandparents and leaving children to grow up without their dad or mom. The death rate was much higher in the initial phase of the emergency, with hospitals in some areas overwhelmed with staggering numbers of critically ill people. The risk of getting long COVID, and suffering debilitating symptoms such as brain fog or persistent fatigue, was also once much higher than it is today. Early in the pandemic, 'it was a more serious time for COVID,' Chin-Hong said. 'It was a time when you didn't want to get infected at all.... Like, who would want to get Alpha or Delta, you know?' he added, referring to the variants that preceded Omicron. Today's version of COVID is 'less invasive — even independent of the fact that we have more immunity,' Chin-Hong said. The latest subvariants of the coronavirus don't 'get inside the body as much as the earlier variants.' Chin-Hong said he's glad there was a time early in the pandemic where 'we tried to avoid COVID as much as possible,' noting that infection itself has a chance of affecting the brain. That said, it's also clear that health issues such loneliness have a clear effect on brain health. Dr. Vivek Murthy, the former U.S. surgeon general, issued an advisory on what he called a national epidemic of loneliness and isolation in 2023, and warned that loneliness is associated with a greater risk of dementia, depression, anxiety and premature death. About half of U.S. adults experienced loneliness even before the pandemic, according to Murthy's report, which urged the public to fight loneliness and isolation by taking steps to strengthen their relationships. The British government in 2018 found loneliness to be such a public health concern that it created a new position: minister of loneliness. The latest study underscores the idea that things such as exercise, sleep, diet, social connection and stress reduction are important for our brain health, according to Chin-Hong. Resolving stress and a lack of social connection 'is probably as important as ... focusing on things like blood pressure and the things we traditionally think about,' he said.
