Homebuyers face less housing market competition from investors right now
During the pandemic housing boom, real estate investors rushed in. With home prices and rents soaring—and mortgage rates hovering at historic lows—investor purchases surged. But since mortgage rates spiked in 2022, the investor landscape has shifted dramatically. The easy-money days are gone, and investors are now navigating a much tougher market defined by tighter margins, slower rent growth, and fewer cash-flow opportunities.
To better understand how investors are adapting to the housing market, ResiClub recently teamed up with Stessa, an asset management and accounting software for real estate investors, owned by Roofstock.
Investors who own at least one single-family investment property were eligible to respond to the Stessa-ResiClub Real Estate Investor Survey, fielded between May 20 and June 6, 2025. In total, 239 single-family investors/landlords completed the survey.
Here are some of the findings:
45% of U.S. real estate investors say they plan to grow their portfolios in the near term.
Nearly two-thirds of real estate investors (65%) say the most frustrating part of the buying process is finding deals that generate positive cash flow; that share is even higher among landlords based in the West (78%).
Half of surveyed real estate investors (50%) said they'd accept a mortgage rate up to 7% on their next purchase.
58% of real estate investors say they self-manage their properties.
20% say they first look at off-market deal sources.
When it comes to the search, real estate investors say Zillow is the most helpful platform, with more than 70% considering it 'very helpful' or 'somewhat helpful.'
Big picture: Taking into account home prices, decelerated rent growth, and interest rates, many single-family real estate investors are hard-pressed to find new rental properties that generate enough cash flow in today's market. It takes more work now to find the needed returns.
The final deadline for Fast Company's Next Big Things in Tech Awards is Friday, June 20, at 11:59 p.m. PT. Apply today.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fast Company
15 hours ago
- Fast Company
Housing market watch: Would taking Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae public drive up mortgage rates in 2026?
Want more housing market stories from Lance Lambert's ResiClub in your inbox? Subscribe to the ResiClub newsletter. Earlier this month, President Donald Trump signed his party's reconciliation/tax overhaul bill. With reconciliation/taxes now in the rearview mirror, Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae conservatorship could move up the docket. After all, back in May, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said that privatizing Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac would be on the agenda after taxes and trade deals. 'It [privatization of Fannie and Freddie] is a goal for this administration,' Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said in May. 'Again, we're doing peace deals, tax deals, and trade deals. As we land some of those deals then we will focus on that [privatization of Fannie and Freddie]. But what I can tell you is that we are doing a great deal of studying at Treasury because the one requirement for this privatization is that they are privatized in such a way that mortgage spreads do not widen.' One reason housing stakeholders should pay attention to the fate of Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae is the long standing concern that ending conservatorship could put upward pressure on mortgage rates. See, once released, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac could need to hold more capital to absorb losses. To build and maintain that capital, they may need to increase guarantee fees charged to lenders. In addition, upon release, unless there's an 'explicit guarantee' or backstop from Congress, investors may demand higher returns to account for increased risk. Those concerns are real enough that this spring, both Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) director Bill Pulte said that Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae conservatorship changes wouldn't be made if doing so put upward pressure on mortgage rates/mortgage spreads. 'The priority for a Fannie and Freddie release, the most important metric that I'm looking at is any study or hint that mortgage rates would go up. Anything that is done around a safe and sound release [of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac] is going to hinge on the effect of long-term mortgage rates,' Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said in February. While Bessent has suggested they're looking into 'privatization,' Pulte has indicated it's not really Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac 'privatization,' but rather taking them 'public.' To be honest, I'm not entirely sure what he's getting at. Maybe keeping them in conservatorship but selling off more shares? I'm not sure. 'At Fannie Mae we have $4.3 trillion on our balance sheet. At Freddie Mac, we have over $3 trillion,' Pulte said in May. 'I would point you to his [Trump's May] tweet. He explicitly says he wants to take them [Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac] public—he did not say he wants to privatize them or many of the other things that are out there. I think these businesses have a ton of value. These businesses one day could be worth trillions of dollars. We'll see what the president ultimately decides.' While the U.S. Treasury owns the majority of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac profits through senior preferred stock agreements, the common and preferred shares that existed before conservatorship were never fully wiped out. Once Wall Street realized Trump had won the 2024 election, the stocks of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac spiked as the market priced in higher odds that the second Trump administration would attempt to end the current status quo. Looking at their share prices today, it's clear that either Wall Street or retail investors (or both) think something new is still on the horizon for Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae. As noted above, Pulte made comments in May that seemed to suggest that what they're considering could just be selling off/releasing some of the Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae stocks currently held by the government, and maybe not a full release. To better understand what the Trump administration is planning to do with Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae—and how they're considering concerns that a release could put upward pressure on mortgage rates—we reached out to Pulte to see if he'd speak at ResiDay 2025 on Friday, November 7. He said yes. By the time ResiDay 2025 rolls around, we may already have a much clearer picture of what the administration is planning to do—or not do—with Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae. Even then, there will be several other timely topics we'd like to ask Pulte about. That could include how they plan to implement any Freddie Mac/Fannie Mae changes; Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac accepting VantageScore 4.0 for mortgage underwriting; and his public attacks on Jerome Powell. Here's a quick Q&A if you're looking for a refresher on Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae. Why are Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in conservatorship? Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were placed into conservatorship by the FHFA in September 2008 after suffering massive losses during the housing crash, threatening the stability of the U.S. financial system. The U.S. Treasury provided a bailout to keep them afloat, and they have remained under government control ever since—despite returning to profitability. What do Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac do, and how do they impact the housing market? Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae are government-backed enterprises that help keep the U.S. mortgage market running smoothly. They don't issue home loans themselves—instead, they buy mortgages from lenders, bundle them into mortgage-backed securities, guarantee those securities against default. This process creates a steady flow of capital, helping lenders offer more mortgages and keeping mortgage rates lower. Because Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae set strict standards for the loans they buy, Freddie and Fannie shape how lenders underwrite mortgages. Their policies also influence who gets access to credit, especially first-time and lower-income buyers. During downturns, Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, in theory, help stabilize the housing market by continuing to support lending. While Fannie and Freddie are not officially backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government, they are in federal conservatorship and widely perceived as having 'implicit' government support. What's the worst case scenario for mortgage rates if conservatorship ends without government backing? IF Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae were fully released without an 'implicit' or 'explicit' government guarantee, Moody's chief economist Mark Zandi tells ResiClub he thinks it could push up mortgage rate by 60 bps to 90 bps. So for instance, a 60 bps increase, would push the average 30-year fixed mortgage rate today from 6.82% to 7.42%. 'Release of the GSEs as SIFIs with no government guarantee, explicit or implicit—This would add an estimated 60-90 basis points to 30-year fixed mortgage rates compared to the current status quo for the typical borrower through the business cycle. Without a government guarantee, the Federal Reserve would not be able to buy the GSEs' MBS, and there is the risk that the rating agencies would downgrade the GSEs' debt and securities. The GSEs' share of the mortgage market would significantly decline, and it would increase for private lenders and the FHA, resulting in greater taxpayer exposure, as taxpayers bear all the risk in FHA loans,' Mark Zandi told ResiClub earlier this year.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
These 75 housing markets hit a critical threshold in favor of homebuyers
Want more housing market stories from Lance Lambert's ResiClub in your inbox? Subscribe to the ResiClub newsletter. What is fractional leadership, and why is it booming now? Why setting boundaries makes you more valuable at work 5 companies that could hit a $4 trillion market cap after Nvidia During the Pandemic Housing Boom, from summer 2020 to spring 2022, the number of active homes for sale in most housing markets plummeted as homebuyer demand quickly absorbed almost everything that came up for sale and sellers had ultimate power. Fast-forward to the current housing market, and the places where active inventory has rebounded to 2019 levels (due to strained affordability suppressing buyer demand) are now the very places where homebuyers have gained the most power. At the end of June 2025, national active housing inventory for sale was still -11% below June 2019 levels. However, more and more regional markets are surpassing that threshold. This list is growing: January 2025: 41 of the 200 largest metro area housing markets were back above pre-pandemic 2019 inventory levels. February 2025: 44 of the 200 largest metro area housing markets were back above pre-pandemic 2019 inventory levels. March 2025: 58 of the 200 largest metro area housing markets were back above pre-pandemic 2019 inventory levels. April 2025: 69 of the 200 largest metro area housing markets were back above pre-pandemic 2019 inventory levels. May 2025: 75 of these 200 major markets were back above pre-pandemic 2019 inventory levels. Now, at the latest reading for the end of June 2025, 78 of the 200 markets are above pre-pandemic 2019 inventory levels and ResiClub expects that count will continue to rise this year. This next table helps you see what the inventory picture in these same 78 markets looks like now and what it looked like last year. Among these 78 markets, you'll find lots in Sun Belt markets like Florida, Texas, Arizona, and Colorado. Many of the softest housing markets, where homebuyers have gained leverage, are located in Gulf Coast and Mountain West regions. Some of these areas were among the nation's top pandemic boomtowns, having experienced significant home price growth during the pandemic housing boom, which stretched housing fundamentals far beyond local income levels. When pandemic-fueled domestic migration slowed and mortgage rates spiked, markets like Cape Coral, Florida, and San Antonio, Texas, faced challenges as they had to rely on local incomes to sustain frothy home prices. The housing market softening in these areas was further accelerated by the abundance of new home supply in the pipeline across the Sun Belt. Builders in these regions are often willing to reduce net effective prices or make other affordability adjustments to maintain sales. These adjustments in the new construction market also create a cooling effect on the resale market, as some buyers who might have opted for an existing home shift their focus to new homes where deals are still available. In contrast, many Northeast and Midwest markets were less reliant on pandemic migration and have less new home construction in progress. With lower exposure to that demand shock, active inventory in these Midwest and Northeast regions has remained relatively tight, keeping the advantage in the hands of home sellers. This embedded content is not available in your region. Generally speaking, housing markets where inventory (i.e., active listings) has returned to pre-pandemic levels have experienced softer/weaker home price growth (or outright declines) over the past 36 months. Conversely, housing markets where inventory remains far below pre-pandemic levels have, generally speaking, experienced more resilient home price growth over the past 36 months. ResiClub PRO members can find our latest inventory analysis for +800 metros and +3,000 counties here, and our latest analysis showing why the 2019 inventory comparison remains insightful here. This post originally appeared at to get the Fast Company newsletter: Sign in to access your portfolio
Fast Company
2 days ago
- Fast Company
Housing market shift has yet to loosen these 30 still-tight markets
Want more housing market stories from Lance Lambert's ResiClub in your inbox? Subscribe to the ResiClub newsletter . National active housing inventory for sale at the end of June this year was up 29% compared with June 2024. That's just 12% below pre-pandemic levels in June 2019. However, while the national housing market has softened and inventory has surpassed 2019 pre-pandemic levels in some pockets of the Sun Belt, many housing markets remain far tighter than the national average. Generally speaking, housing markets where inventory (i.e., active listings) has returned to pre-pandemic levels have experienced softer/weaker home price growth (or outright declines) over the past 36 months. Conversely, housing markets where inventory remains far below pre-pandemic levels have, generally speaking, experienced more resilient home price growth over the past 36 months. Pulling from ResiClub's monthly inventory tracker, we identified the tightest major housing markets heading into the spring 2025 season, where active inventory is still the furthest below pre-pandemic 2019 levels. These markets are where home sellers have maintained more power compared with most sellers nationwide.
