logo
Denmark has long been Euroskeptic. Donald Trump helped change that

Denmark has long been Euroskeptic. Donald Trump helped change that

CNN —
As Denmark takes over the presidency of the European Union, Danes are more strongly pro-European than at any time in the past two decades – a shift in sentiment that can at least partly be attributed to US President Donald Trump.
An eye-opening survey published in March by Berlingske, a Danish daily newspaper, said 41 percent of Danes now see the United States as a threat. It also said 92 percent of respondents either 'agree' or 'mostly agree' that the Nordic nation needs to rely more on the European Union than the US for its security.
Given the recent tensions between Washington and Copenhagen, those statistics may not be surprising.
Since his return to the White House, Trump has spoken frequently and aggressively about Greenland, an autonomous crown dependency of Denmark, saying he would like the US to own it.
Vice President JD Vance and members of the Trump family have made what many see as provocative trips to and statements about the world's largest island.
After Vance's visit to the US military's Pituffik Space Base in Greenland in March, Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen pushed back on his claim that Denmark isn't doing enough for defense in the Arctic, calling her country 'a good and strong ally.'
Back in Trump's first administration, too, Greenland was a hot topic. In 2019, he reportedly accused Frederiksen of making a 'nasty' and 'absurd' statement in discussions about the island.
US Vice President JD Vance (second right) and second lady Usha Vance (second left) tour the US military's Pituffik Space Base, on March 28, 2025 in Pituffik, Greenland.Sinking trust in Trump
Lykke Friis, a prominent Danish international affairs analyst and a former minister, told CNN that the country has experienced 'a triple shock' that includes the war in Ukraine and the departure of the United Kingdom from the EU, known as Brexit. The biggest shock, however, has come in the form of Trump.
'Now we have a different Denmark,' she said.
Speaking to CNN from Copenhagen, Marie Bjerre, the Danish minister for European affairs, conveyed a similar message – that the second Trump administration has changed Danish perspectives toward both the US and the European Union.
'Things have dramatically changed in Denmark and our attitude toward Europe,' she said, without mentioning the president's name directly.
US President Donald Trump, left, walks by Denmark's Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen prior to a group photo of NATO heads of state and government in The Hague, Netherlands, on June 25, 2025.
Geert Vanden Wijngaert/AP
She was also very clear that Denmark feels a sense of disappointment in its longtime ally.
Denmark would still like to have a strong relationship with the US, Bjerre said, 'but in a situation where the US is closing itself more around itself… is threatening us with tariffs and also criticizing Europe, our freedom of expression and all sorts of other things. Of course, in that situation, we have to be stronger on our own.'
She added, 'The world order, as we have known it since the Second World War, is changing and we have to deliver to that geopolitical new situation that we are standing in.'
The minister also referenced the historic ties and shared past experiences of both nations, expressing a degree of frustration, if not anger, about how that relationship has changed.
'You could not put a paper in between the US and Denmark, we have always supported the US. We went into war with our soldiers in Iraq and Afghanistan… Seeing us, as a country, being criticized for not being a good ally, of course, that does affect our opinion,' Bjerre said.
Per capita, Denmark lost the second-highest number of soldiers of all the US-led coalition partners fighting in Afghanistan. In total, 43 Danish soldiers died, equating to 7.82 deaths per million citizens. The US, by comparison, lost 7.96 soldiers per million.
'We used to be a very, very transatlantic country… that has plummeted,' said Friis. 'There is now the feeling… we simply cannot trust him,' she said – the 'him' being Trump.
'Huge' change in tone
The shift in Danes' opinions coincides with Denmark taking up the rotating, six-month EU presidency.
Historically, the southernmost Scandinavian nation has tended to be Euroskeptic, Friis told CNN, never feeling European at heart. She described it as sustaining a transactional relationship with Brussels, based on 'pragmatic co-operation.'
Denmark has long worried about the EU wading into Danes' lives, fearing in particular for its relatively unregulated labor market. It has various opt-outs on EU policy, including not joining the EU's single currency, the euro.
'We do things differently to other European nations,' said Bjerre.
Politicians and citizens used to fear that the EU 'would become too dominating and too powerful,' Friis said, but now 'the fear is the complete opposite.' Danes feel the bloc is 'too weak' to deal with Putin to the East and Trump to the West, she said.
Friis also described the prime minister's shift in tone as 'huge,' saying Frederiksen used to be 'very skeptical towards the EU.'
In June, Frederiksen announced that Denmark was quitting the so-called 'Frugal Four,' an informal group of EU nations that had pushed to limit common spending, saying that 'the most important thing is to rearm Europe.'
Laying out Denmark's priorities for the EU presidency later that month, she reiterated that view, saying: 'Now more than ever Europe needs to step up and stand together. We have to build an even stronger Europe, a more secure Europe where we are able to protect our democracies.'
EU-commissioned, biannual polls show a clear trend of increased trust in the EU over the past two decades, rising from 46 percent in spring 2005 to 74 percent this past spring. Steeper increases can be seen during Trump's first term, after Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine, and as Trump's second term began.
The war in Ukraine has had a significant influence on Danish views on the EU, Friis said.
'The very fact that you had a war in our backyard has sort of created a completely new sort of atmosphere around security in Denmark, people are worried. People are prepping now because they're scared about what could happen also to our own security,' she said.
Bjerre said Copenhagen's EU presidency would prioritize a 'stronger Europe and a changing world,' with Europe having a real focus on security.
Denmark takes the European helm, then, at a time of increasingly pro-European sentiment among its own population and a wider recognition in Europe that it must do more to stand on its own. The problem is that some of Europe's most pressing issues – Ukraine, trade tariffs and security – mean talking to the US and Trump. And at the moment, there may not be much love lost between the two.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Israel Between the Jaws of a Mill
Israel Between the Jaws of a Mill

Voice of Belady

time2 hours ago

  • Voice of Belady

Israel Between the Jaws of a Mill

Written by Howayda Awad Ahmed Israel's deception of European countries and the lies it employs in the media it broadcasts to those countries, claiming that the land inhabited by the Jews is the Promised Land, and that the Palestinians are merely Arab inhabitants seeking to strip them of their Jewish identity. Because most of those countries have a mental makeup problem, namely the persecution of Jews since ancient all the crimes committed by the Zionist army against defenseless civilians and children are in defense of existence. Since Operation Flood of Al-Aqsa, European support has reached its peak at all levels. They support the Israeli existence and the defense of its land, as they claim. This support has not ceased to this day due to the Zionist media fabrications, lies, and various stories broadcast to delude the European continent into believing that they are in a state of defense of existence. Quite simply, Gaza was lost and reduced to rubble, with more than 25,000 martyrs and thousands more injured, hungry, and disabled. All this was applauded by Europe, which embraces all the ideas promoted by the Hebrew media in Europe day and night to gain positions and endless support. This was in the complete absence of international and humanitarian law, international conventions, and treaties. But a surprise recently occurred: the European conscience began to awaken slightly from its deep slumber and accepted the proposal of Spain and Ireland in 2024 and to consider the European partnership with Israel. This stems from the refutation of the position of the Israeli government and its far-right Prime Minister Netanyahu regarding US President Donald Trump's recent moves in the Middle East, the negotiations with Iran to halt its nuclear program, Trump's choice to play it alone, far from Israel, his agreement with the Houthis in Yemen, the cessation of airstrikes on Yemen, and the exclusion of Israeli ships from the agreement. Netanyahu felt anger and disappointment, and that Trump only cares about America's interests, even at Israel's expense. Matters worsened when Trump visited the Gulf last month, ignoring a visit to Israel. The situation then escalated with the establishment of mechanisms and a negotiating line directly with Hamas to secure the release of an American prisoner without any reference to Israel. Europe is following Trump's ideology directly, but this time it has adopted an independent approach, not subservient to the US position all along. It has a different stance on events in the Middle East and Ukraine, and is committed to European economic security. Europe's pent-up anger is searching for an outlet to explode from Israeli practices. We have seen France, Britain, and Canada in particular summon Israeli ambassadors, suspend talks on a free trade zone with Britain, and demand and condemn the cessation of displacement, genocide, and starvation in Gaza, and open the door to humanitarian aid. Israel's response, unfortunately, was the Gideon Armored Vehicles, an operation designed to end its plan to completely occupy Gaza, divide it, and tighten security control over it. It has thrown all European opinion, unable to ignore humanitarian and civil society organizations working in international relief, universities, and school students denouncing Israeli massacres, and bringing this matter to the International Court of Justice or the International Criminal Court. All of this has put pressure on Europe. Because the world is now governed by the logic of the jungle and double standards, Europe's position will become difficult if it does so, harming its position on the Russian-Ukrainian war. It has found it necessary to unify its position and change its direction. This has placed the entity under isolation and boycotts in various popular spheres, halting conferences and research activities, and closing some Israeli-affiliated companies. This clear and explicit threat from the European Union will have a profound impact due to Israel's violations of human rights. Israel may even lose trade relations with the European Union, which accounts for more than 30 percent of Israel's international trade. The situation is exacerbated in the practical field, including satellites and the requirements of scientific advancements in the field of computers and globalization. The issue of a European review and the suspension of the partnership between the 27 member states represented by the European Union and the practical suspension of their partnership with Israel seems a remote possibility, as it requires the unanimity of all member states. However, the good thing about what is happening is that there are more than 15 member states capable of halting trade with Israel, even if the decision is opposed by Germany and Hungary, with their significant influence. But in the end, it appears that all this opposition and skirmishes are nothing more than a purely political exercise to appease European public opinion, which has recently awakened and begun to grieve. Despite all this, the Jewish lobby abroad will not allow any resolution to emerge that opposes and undermines Israel's path of killing, destruction, and displacement. Therefore, Israel pretended to accept the pressure and allowed the entry of some food, relief supplies, and trucks, which do not meet the needs of Gaza, which is crying out for refuge. Unfortunately, this aid was used as a political bargaining chip and a weapon for Israel in a war that will only end by a miracle. Then the Zionist entity resumes broadcasting to the European media that they do not understand the gravity of the security situation and that the people of Israel are threatened by the Arabs, thus allowing its actions to go unpunished, dissolving partnerships, terminating trade agreements, and stripping it of its international immunity. Let us see what the outcome of the two-state solution conference this month at the United Nations, under French and Saudi sponsorship, will be, and what recommendations it may ultimately unravel. Then Israel resumes broadcasting to the European media to stop European decisions, using the old priesthood of anti-Semitism and its influence on European commercial, political, economic, social, and even humanitarian decision-makers. Israel will not abandon its old dream of extending the Nile to the Euphrates and its project of regional expansion in Lebanon, Syria, and all the countries of the Arab region. It will maintain a state of no war, no peace, and insecurity, which will make all the countries of the region aware that future expansionism will not stop as long as the United States and the European Union take a position of objection at times and rejection at other times, to silence the peoples of the world.

BRICS summit in Brazil to champion multilateralism amid trade tensions
BRICS summit in Brazil to champion multilateralism amid trade tensions

Daily News Egypt

time3 hours ago

  • Daily News Egypt

BRICS summit in Brazil to champion multilateralism amid trade tensions

Leaders of the growing BRICS group of nations are gathering in Brazil for a summit overshadowed by United States President Donald Trump's new tariff policies, with the bloc aiming to present itself as a defender of multilateralism. The leaders, mainly from the developing world, will use the two-day summit beginning in Rio de Janeiro on Sunday to discuss ways to increase cooperation amid what they say are serious concerns over Western dominance. The event will be marked by the high-profile absences of two of the bloc's most influential leaders. For the first time since taking power in 2012, Chinese President Xi Jinping will not be attending in person, instead sending Premier Li Qiang. Russian President Vladimir Putin will also miss the in-person summit. He is wanted by the International Criminal Court (ICC) for his role in the 2022 invasion of Ukraine, and Brazil, as a signatory to the Rome Statute that established the court, would be required to enforce the arrest warrant. Hosted by Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, the talks will be attended by Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Chinese Premier Li Qiang, among others. Egypt's Prime Minister Mostafa Madbouly will attend on behalf of President Abdel Fattah Al-Sisi. Now chaired by Brazil, leaders at the summit are expected to criticise the Trump administration's 'indiscriminate' trade tariffs, saying they are illegal and risk hurting the global economy. Global health policies, artificial intelligence and climate change will also be on the agenda. A Counterweight to the West The 17th BRICS Summit comes at a time of growing global volatility. Amid mounting geopolitical tensions and economic fragmentation, the bloc is positioning itself as a source of stability. The group sees itself as a forum for cooperation between countries of the Global South and a counterweight to the Group of Seven (G7), which is comprised of leading Western economic powers. Its creation has been described as a significant challenge to the US-led global political, economic and financial systems that have dominated since the Second World War. In a preview report for the summit, the Brazilian Centre for International Relations (CEBRI) last week labelled BRICS 'the first-ever transregional association of non-Western States'. The bloc's members have advocated for a multipolar world order and a greater voice for fast-developing countries of the Global South in world affairs. The theme of this year's summit is 'Strengthening Global South Cooperation for More Inclusive and Sustainable Governance'. Expansion and Economic Influence Originally an acronym for Brazil, Russia, India and China, the bloc held its first summit in 2009. South Africa was invited to join a year later, adding the 'S' to BRICS. The group has since undergone significant expansion. It now comprises 10 countries after Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, the United Arab Emirates and Indonesia joined earlier this year. Saudi Arabia was slated to join last year and is listed as a member on the BRICS website, but it has not yet made a final decision. This expansion marks a qualitative leap in its representativeness and influence. The BRICS countries now account for almost half of the world's population, 36 percent of global land area, and more than 50 percent of global economic growth. With the addition of its new members, the bloc represents nearly 30 percent of global GDP. To challenge established financial institutions, BRICS created the New Development Bank (NDB) as an alternative to the World Bank. The NDB has approved over $39 billion for 120 projects, focusing on infrastructure, clean energy and sustainable development. The bloc has also established a mechanism to provide financial support during economic crises, partially rivalling the role of the International Monetary Fund (IMF). De-dollarisation and its Challenges BRICS nations continue to push for reform of global institutions like the United Nations Security Council, IMF and World Bank. They are also working to diversify from US dollar-denominated trade, a process known as de-dollarisation. Intra-BRICS trade is increasingly conducted in local currencies and through alternative payment systems to the Western-backed Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication (SWIFT). Policymakers have also mooted the possibility of launching their own currency to challenge the US dollar, but progress has been slow. Plans have met resistance from some members, particularly India, over concerns about China's economic dominance. The plans were further stymied when Trump warned BRICS that the bloc would face 100% tariffs on imports to the US if a common currency were announced. Growing Interest in Membership According to the bloc's website, 44 nations have either formally applied for membership or made exploratory moves toward joining. This year, Belarus, Bolivia, Cuba, Kazakhstan, Malaysia, Thailand, Vietnam, Uganda and Uzbekistan became partner countries under the moniker BRICS+, seen as a prelude to formal membership. Other nations expressing interest include Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Burkina Faso, Cambodia, Chad, Colombia, the Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Honduras, Laos, Kuwait, Morocco, Myanmar, Nicaragua, Pakistan, the Palestinian territories, Senegal, South Sudan, Sri Lanka, Syria, Venezuela and Zimbabwe. However, expansion is not without its own political hurdles. Argentina had applied to join, but its application was withdrawn under President Javier Milei in December 2023, who cited a preference to maintain close ties with the West. Turkey's plan to join was vetoed by India, which cited Ankara's close ties with its foe Pakistan.

US tariffs to kick in Aug 1 barring trade deals: Treasury Secretary - Economy
US tariffs to kick in Aug 1 barring trade deals: Treasury Secretary - Economy

Al-Ahram Weekly

time4 hours ago

  • Al-Ahram Weekly

US tariffs to kick in Aug 1 barring trade deals: Treasury Secretary - Economy

US tariffs will kick in on August 1 if trading partners from Taiwan to the European Union do not strike deals with Washington, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said Sunday. The rates will "boomerang back" to the sometimes very high levels which President Donald Trump had announced on April 2, before he suspended the levies to allow for trade talks and set a July 9 deadline for agreement, Bessent told CNN. Bessent confirmed comments by Trump to reporters aboard Air Force One on Friday in which he also cited a new deadline: "Well, I'll probably start them on August 1. Well, that's pretty early. Right?" The president said he had signed 12 letters to be sent out, likely on Monday. The tariffs were part of a broader announcement in April where Trump imposed a 10 percent duty on goods from almost all trading partners, with a plan to step up these rates for a select group within days. But he swiftly paused the hikes until July 9, allowing for trade talks to take place. Countries have been pushing to strike deals that would help them avoid these elevated duties. So far, the Trump administration has unveiled deals with the United Kingdom and Vietnam, while Washington and Beijing agreed to temporarily lower staggeringly high levies on each other's products. Bessent said the administration was "close to several deals." "I would expect to see several big announcements over the next couple of days," he said. But he would not say which countries he was referring to, adding: "I don't want to let them off the hook." As his July 9 deadline approaches, Trump has repeatedly said he plans to inform countries of US tariff rates by sending them letters. Aboard Air Force One on Friday, Trump said sending notices would be much easier than "sitting down and working 15 different things... this is what you have to pay, if you want to do business (with) the United States." Bessent pushed back at CNN host Dana Bash's assertion the administration was using threats rather than negotiations, and denied that Trump was setting a new deadline with the August 1 date. "It's not a new deadline. We are saying, this is when it's happening. If you want to speed things up, have at it. If you want to go back to the old rate, that's your choice," he said. He said the playbook was to apply "maximum pressure" and cited the European Union as an example, saying they are "making very good progress" after a slow start. EU and US negotiators are holding talks over the weekend, and France's finance minister said Saturday he hoped they could strike a deal this weekend. Other countries were still expressing unease, however. Japan's Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba said Sunday he "won't easily compromise" in trade talks with Washington. And BRICS leaders meeting in Rio de Janeiro are expected to decry the tariffs Sunday, saying they are illegal and risk hurting the global economy. Follow us on: Facebook Instagram Whatsapp Short link:

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store