&w=3840&q=100)
Streamlined processes help companies speed up voluntary closures
Until 2021-22, voluntary liquidation, under the Companies Act, would take an average of 499 days. The main obstacles included the time taken by the registrar of companies (RoC) to publish notices of closure in newspapers. Further, there were no fixed timelines for each step and there would be multiple demands for document resubmissions. The government resolved the key issue by publishing weekly or fortnightly notices which itself brought the timeline to 195 days.
In the IBC process, the paper highlighted, the delays were due to the time taken to obtain no-objection certificates (NoCs) from various departments, including the Income-Tax (I-T) department and a lack of standard operating procedure.
In November 2021, the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) brought out a clarification stating there is no NoC requirement from the I-T department. In April 2022, the timelines were reduced and IBBI also brought in a compliance certificate for voluntary liquidations with a checklist for faster processing of cases.
The working paper by PM-EAC highlighted that the nuts-and-bolts reforms are not systematically researched, documented, or taught, but are an important part of a policymaker's toolkit. Before the IBBI amendments, the average time for submission of final reports took 499 days for cases with creditors and 461 days for cases without creditors, the paper said.
'One thing that can be improved further is faster processing at the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT)-level, so that the time taken for final closing of companies can be reduced after submission of the final report,' the working paper said.
IBBI data showed that till December 2021, final reports for voluntary liquidations were submitted for 49 per cent cases and final orders for dissolution passes for only 25 per cent. But as of December 2024, of the 2,133 cases initiated for voluntary liquidation, final reports have been submitted for 75 per cent cases and 54 per cent cases have been closed by dissolution. The remaining 21 per cent are at the NCLT-level.
The working paper highlighted that the setting up of the faceless Centralised Processing for Accelerated Corporate Exit (C-PACE) on May 1, 2023 fixed timelines for each step, identified nodal departments from each department and limited the number of resubmission requests by RoCs.
The average time taken to strike off cases filed under this system reduced to only 90 days in 2023-24 and further to 60 days in 2024-25 until January. 'This is even better than what was envisaged when C-PACE was announced, which was getting the processing time to under six months,' the working paper said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hindu
2 hours ago
- The Hindu
AIC T-Hub spacetech accelerator cohort with 17 startups takes off
Seventeen startups are part of the second cohort of AIC T-Hub spacetech accelerator programme Orbit, launched to provide them resources, mentorship and strategic connections. Addressing key challenges across critical space domains, including satellite technology, reusable rockets, propulsion systems, intelligent manufacturing, space biology, space-based communication and data analytics are focus of the programme. The startups have been selected based on a structured selection process, T-Hub said on Tuesday. Experts, including former DRDO chairman and Scientific Adviser to Defence Minister Reddy, director at G.P. Birla Archaeological, Astronomical & Scientific Research Institute Reddy, former scientist and associate director of SDSC ISRO Seshagiri Rao, former scientist at NASA AMES & NASA Goddard Mila Mitra, and Deputy General Manager at CNES-France Space,Gautier Champion are supporting the second cohort. ResearchSat, Space Unlock, Cosmo Crawler, Kosmos Connect, ADTCore, Spacebelief, Space App India, Resolute Lab India, Vedasya, Polygon Geospatial, ioTHyAi, Stardour, Erudite, Cosmoserve Space, Raksyon, Nalwa Aero and Levitar Systems are the 17 selected startups. 'At T-Hub, we are focused on backing founders who take on tough, meaningful challenges. Spacetech is one of those areas where India has both the talent and the opportunity to lead. As recent funded ventures show, Hyderabad and Telangana are among the regions leading this charge,' said T-Hub CEO Kavikrut. AIC T-Hub CEO Rajesh Kumar Adla said the goal is to raise more than ₹3 crore in funding and support the development of 10-plus new IP assets.


Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Adani buys out Ambani's power plant at Butibori
Nagpur: Adani Power has finally taken over Anil Ambani-led Reliance Group's power plant at Butibori for Rs4,000 crore. The acquisition was formally completed on Tuesday. Originally built for captive supply of cheap power to industries in Butibori and nearby areas, the power plant ended up catering to Mumbai before it ran into trouble. Reliance company, Vidarbha Industries Power Limited (VIPL), had set up a 600MW (2 units of 300 MW) capacity generation plant at Butibori over a decade ago. The plans for a group captive power plant (GCPP) for local industries did not take off, and later the status was changed to an independent power plant (IPP) and it began supplying to Mumbai. The buyout surpasses Adani's power generation capacity in the region to that of Koradi and Khaparkheda power stations of state-owned Mahagenco. Adani Group already operates a 3,300 MW power plant at Tiroda in Gondia. With the VIPL takeover, its capacity stands at 3,900 MW in Vidarbha. VIPL was undergoing a corporate insolvency resolution process (CIRP) under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). On June 18 this year, the Bombay bench of National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) approved Adani Power's resolution plan. Subsequently, the plan was successfully implemented on July 7, said a note shared by Adani Group. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Glicemia acima de 100? Ele usou isso Saúde Nacional Undo When the plant was operational, Reliance Group had secured power distribution rights for part of Mumbai and electricity generated at Nagpur's VIPL plant went to the state capital. Eventually, Adani Group took over distribution rights and did not continue the power purchase agreement (PPA) with VIPL after its tenure ended. Industrialists in the Butibori Manufacturers Association (BMA) recall the day the foundation was laid. "There were frequent interactions with the company's officials for local units joining the GCPP. However, plans did not take off despite big hopes," says Puneet Mahajan from BMA. Sources said overall troubles in the group also impacted VIPL operations as coal supplies through an assured linkage were also a bottleneck. Meanwhile, sources in Adani Group said further plans on supply of power generated from the VIPL plant are yet to be drawn. Nitin Lonkar, former BMA secretary, said local industrialists hope that the takeover by Adani Group may revive the plans.


India Gazette
2 hours ago
- India Gazette
National Herald case: No transparency in shares, says ASG Raju on argument of respondents
New Delhi [India], July 8 (ANI): The Rouse Avenue court on Tuesday heard the rebuttal arguments by Additional Solicitor General (ASG) SV Raju on the cognisance of a prosecution complaint filed by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) against Congress leaders Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi and others. ASG Raju submitted that there was no transparency and that other shareholders were dummies for Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi. 'Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi may not be getting a dividend today, they may get their due share the moment they quit,' he contended. The Special Judge, after hearing part of the arguments, listed the matter for July 12 for hearing the remaining arguments by the ASG. At the outset, ASG submitted that as per the Companies Act, a 'not-for-profit company' can undertake commercial activities. 'They got the shares at a cheaper price...,' ASG said. It was also submitted by the ASG that shares held by Congress leaders Motilal Vohra and Oscar Fernandes, who have passed away, were transferred. He said that their shares were not sold in open market as it would have disclosed the actual price of share. It was also argued that there was a criminal breach of trust, adding that any property acquired by a criminal breach of trust is stolen property. The possession of stolen property attracts section 411 of IPC, which is a scheduled offence under PMLA. ASG submitted that there was a criminal breach of trust by AICC and AJL in relation to Rs 90 crore. Young Indian had also obtained a loan from a Non-Banking Financial Company (NBFC), identified as Dotex. During the pre-lunch session, Senior Advocate Pramod Kumar Dubey, appeared for Dotex Merchandise Pvt Ltd. He submitted that Dotex was registered as a Non-Banking Financial Company by the Reserve Bank of India in February 2010. 'There is no cancellation of my registration. When RBI has given a recognition. The ED can't overreach by calling Dotex a sham accommodation entry operator,' Dubey said. For the day-to-day functioning of the Young Indian company, a loan was required. A loan was obtained from Dotex, the Senior Advocate stated. 'Is this written anywhere that the loan was given to acquire the property of AJL. My knowledge was that the loan was taken for the day-to-day function of the company,' Dubey added. There is no criminal intent on the part of Dotex, no role in alleged offence, he said. The Senior Advocate rejected allegations of conspiracy. 'Jiske khilaf koi case nahi, uske khilaf Conspiracy hai.' (the ones who have no case against them, they have a conspiracy) As per the judgment of the Supreme Court, the theory of conspiracy is not applicable in the cases of PMLA, the Senior Advocate argued. The ED's claim of the cheque of Rs 1 crore being dated as October 24, 2010 was also disputed with the claim that the cheque was of December 24, 2010. It was also submitted that loan was given on the basis valid documents though it was not on stamp paper. 'Dotex got interest at the rate of 14 percent. The repayment of loan was also done. Every information was given to ED, it was not considered,' said Dubey. 'Dotex has not committed any offence, then where is the question of Sunil Bhandari doing offence being a director. He has done nothing, they (ED) cannot connect me with the other accused,' the Senior Advocate said. 'My act is not a part of criminal activity, my giving loan is not a criminal activity,' he added. Advocate Soujanya Sankaran appeared for Sunil Bhandari, whose name is in the ED chargesheet, and submitted that this court has no jurisdiction to take cognizance. 'The foundational fact has to be produced by the ED,' she added. She also submitted that this case is based on a complaint filed by Subramaniam Swamy. There is no foundational basis to proceed against accused Sunil Bhandari, who is director of Dotex, she submitted. (ANI)