Social media is the main source of news for majority Americans, according to new research
Social media platforms have overtaken traditional television as the primary source of news for Americans, according to new research from the Reuters Institute.
The study reveals that 54% of people in the United States now get their news from social media and video networks, including platforms like Facebook, X, and YouTube. This marks a significant shift, as traditional TV channels account for 50%, and news websites and apps are at 48%.
The report, which surveyed nearly 100,000 people in 48 countries, suggests that the rise of social media and personality-driven news is happening more rapidly and with greater impact in the US than in other countries.
"Changes in the media landscape are occurring faster in the United States, where social video and personality-based news are playing an increasingly dominant role," the report stated.
For the first time, social media overtakes TV as Americans' top news source pic.twitter.com/zuLKpnA6oC — Bob Pickard (@BobPickard) June 16, 2025
Among the most influential figures in this shift is podcaster Joe Rogan. Nearly a quarter (22%) of Americans reported encountering news or commentary from Rogan within the past week, making him one of the most widely-seen personalities in the country.
Nic Newman, the report's author, explained that the rise of online influencers and personal brands presents a significant challenge for traditional news outlets.
He added that many politicians are now opting to appear on platforms hosted by sympathetic online personalities instead of mainstream media, bypassing critical questioning in favour of more favourable coverage.
Our Digital News Report 2025 is out today with data from 48 markets. Publishers face new competition from online influencers + AI chatbots. Online video is booming. News subscriptions remain flat . #DNR25
📱Explore full report https://t.co/2bjWxZCv88 + 🧵 thread pic.twitter.com/VY0Bu8RhX1 — nicnewman (@nicnewman) June 17, 2025
The report also highlighted concerns regarding the spread of misinformation.
Nearly half (47%) of respondents worldwide cited influencers and personalities as major sources of false or misleading information, placing them on par with politicians in terms of accountability for spreading unverified content.
The growing prominence of social media platforms like X is also evident in the United States.
Since Elon Musk's acquisition of X in 2022, the network has seen a notable shift, with an influx of right-leaning users, particularly among young men. This has contributed to a tripling of self-identified right-wing users on the platform in the US.
In contrast, platforms like Threads, Bluesky, and Mastodon have had little impact on global news consumption, with reach remaining under 2% in most markets.
Key findings from the report also show that TikTok is the fastest-growing platform for news, with 17% of people globally now using it for news—an increase of four percentage points from last year. Additionally, the use of AI chatbots for news consumption is on the rise, particularly among younger users.
However, many respondents expressed concerns about the transparency and reliability of news delivered via AI.
Despite these shifts, trust in established news brands remains strong. The report found that all generations still value trusted sources with a track record of accuracy, even though their usage may have declined.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
a day ago
- Business Recorder
Trump's sweeping tax-cut, spending bill clears first US Senate hurdle
WASHINGTON: The Republican-controlled US Senate narrowly advanced President Donald Trump's, sweeping tax-cut and spending bill on Saturday, during a marathon weekend session marked by political drama, division and lengthy delays as Democrats sought to slow the legislation's path to passage. Lawmakers voted 51-49 to open debate on the 940-page megabill, with two of Trump's fellow Republicans joining Democrats to oppose the legislation that would fund the president's top immigration, border, tax-cut and military priorities. Trump on social media hailed the 'great victory' for his 'great, big, beautiful bill.' After hours of delay, during which Republican leaders and Vice President JD Vance worked behind closed doors to persuade last-minute holdouts to support the measure, Democrats demanded that the megabill first be read aloud in the chamber - a task that could delay the start of the debate until Sunday afternoon. Democrats say the bill's tax cuts would disproportionately benefit the wealthy at the expense of social programs for lower-income Americans. 'Senate Republicans are scrambling to pass a radical bill, released to the public in the dead of night, praying the American people don't realize what's in it,' Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer said on the Senate floor. 'Democrats are going to force this chamber to read it from start to finish,' he said. Once the bill has been read, lawmakers will begin up to 20 hours of debate on the legislation. That will be followed by a marathon amendment session, known as a 'vote-a-rama,' before the Senate votes on passage. Lawmakers said they hoped to complete work on the bill on Monday. Republican Senators Thom Tillis and Rand Paul voted against opening debate, a move that seemed for a time to be in danger of failing. Trump attacked Tillis, who opposed the bill's cuts to the Medicaid healthcare program for lower-income Americans, which he said would be devastating for his native North Carolina. Tillis is up for reelection next year. 'Numerous people have come forward wanting to run in the Primary against 'Senator Thom' Tillis. I will be meeting with them over the coming weeks,' the president posted. Paul opposed the legislation because it would raise the federal borrowing limit on the $36.2 trillion US debt by an additional $5 trillion. 'Did Rand Paul Vote 'NO' again tonight? What's wrong with this guy???' Trump said on social media. In limbo Saturday's vote was in limbo for hours as Vance, Senate Majority Leader John Thune and other top Republicans sought to persuade last-minute holdouts to support the legislation. It was not clear what deals if any were struck to win over their support. Hardline Republican Senators Rick Scott, Mike Lee and Cynthia Lummis, who want deeper cuts in federal spending, voted to support the bill in the end. Another hardliner, Senator Ron Johnson, initially voted no but flipped his vote and backed the legislation. Trump was monitoring the vote from the Oval Office late into the night, a senior White House official said. The megabill would extend the 2017 tax cuts that were Trump's main legislative achievement during his first term as president, cut other taxes and boost spending on the military and border security. The nonpartisan Joint Tax Committee released an analysis projecting that the Senate bill's tax provisions would reduce government revenue by $4.5 trillion over the next decade, increasing the $36.2-trillion US government debt. The White House said this month the legislation would reduce the annual deficit by $1.4 trillion. Iran-Israel situation: US Senate Democrats seek briefing for all senators The world's richest person, Elon Musk, also took a swipe at the bill, which would end tax breaks for the electric vehicles that his automaker Tesla manufactures. Calling the bill 'utterly insane and destructive,' he risked reigniting a feud with Trump that raged earlier this month, before Musk backed down from his rhetoric. 'The latest Senate draft bill will destroy millions of jobs in America and cause immense strategic harm to our country!' Musk wrote in a post on his social media platform X. Medicaid changes Republicans from states with large rural populations have opposed a reduction in state tax revenue for Medicaid providers, including rural hospitals. The newly released legislation would delay that reduction and would include $25 billion to support rural Medicaid providers from 2028 to 2032. The legislation would raise the cap on federal deductions for state and local taxes to $40,000 with an annual 1% inflation adjustment through 2029, after which it would fall back to the current $10,000. The bill would also phase the cap down for those earning more than $500,000 a year. That is a major concern of House Republicans from coastal states, including New York, New Jersey and California, who play an important role in keeping the party's narrow House majority. Republicans are using a legislative maneuver to bypass the Senate's 60-vote threshold to advance most legislation in the 100-member chamber. Democrats will focus their firepower with amendments aimed at reversing Republican spending cuts to programs that provide government-backed healthcare to the elderly, poor and disabled, as well as food aid to low-income families. The bill also would raise the Treasury Department's debt ceiling by trillions of dollars to stave off a potentially disastrous default on the nation's debt in the coming months. If the Senate passes the bill, it will then return to the House of Representatives for final passage before Trump can sign it into law. The House passed its version of the bill last month.
Express Tribune
3 days ago
- Express Tribune
Global matcha craze sparks shortages
At a minimalist Los Angeles matcha bar, powdered Japanese tea is prepared with precision, despite a global shortage driven by the bright green drink's social media stardom, reports AFP. Of the 25 types of matcha on the menu at Kettl Tea, which opened on Hollywood Boulevard this year, all but four were out of stock, the shop's founder Zach Mangan told AFP. "One of the things we struggle with is telling customers that, unfortunately, we don't have" what they want, he said. With its deep grassy aroma, intense colour and pick-me-up effects, the popularity of matcha "has grown just exponentially over the last decade, but much more so in the last two to three years," the 40-year-old explained. It is now "a cultural touchpoint in the Western world" – found everywhere from ice-cream flavour boards to Starbucks. This has caused matcha's market to nearly double over a year, Mangan said. "No matter what we try, there's just not more to buy." Thousands of miles (kilometres) away in Sayama, northwest of Tokyo, Masahiro Okutomi – the 15th generation to run his family's tea business – is overwhelmed by demand. "I had to put on our website that we are not accepting any more matcha orders," he said. Producing the powder is an intensive process: the leaves, called "tencha," are shaded for several weeks before harvest, to concentrate the taste and nutrients. They are then carefully deveined by hand, dried and finely ground in a machine. 'Long-term endeavour' "It takes years of training" to make matcha properly, Okutomi said. "It's a long-term endeavor requiring equipment, labour and investment." "I'm glad the world is taking an interest in our matcha... but in the short term, it's almost a threat – we just can't keep up," he said. The matcha boom has been fuelled by online influencers like Andie Ella, who has more than 600,000 subscribers on YouTube and started her own brand of matcha products. At the pastel-pink pop-up shop she opened in Tokyo's hip Harajuku district, dozens of fans were excitedly waiting to take a photo with the 23-year-old Frenchwoman or buy her cans of strawberry or white chocolate flavoured matcha. "Matcha is visually very appealing," Ella told AFP. To date, her matcha brand, produced in Japan's rural Mie region, has sold 133,000 cans. Launched in November 2023, it now has eight employees. "Demand has not stopped growing," she said. In 2024, matcha accounted for over half of the 8,798 tonnes of green tea exported from Japan, according to agriculture ministry data – twice as much as a decade ago. Tokyo tea shop Jugetsudo, in the touristy former fish market area of Tsukiji, is trying to control its stock levels given the escalating demand. "We don't strictly impose purchase limits, but we sometimes refuse to sell large quantities to customers suspected of reselling," said store manager Shigehito Nishikida. "In the past two or three years, the craze has intensified: customers now want to make matcha themselves, like they see on social media," he added. Tariff threat Anita Jordan, a 49-year-old Australian tourist in Japan, said her "kids are obsessed with matcha." "They sent me on a mission to find the best one," she laughed. The global matcha market is estimated to be worth billions of dollars, but it could be hit by US President Donald Trump's tariffs on Japanese products - currently 10 per cent, with a hike to 24 per cent in the cards. Shortages and tariffs mean "we do have to raise prices. We don't take it lightly," said Mangan at Kettl Tea, though it hasn't dampened demand so far. "Customers are saying: 'I want matcha before it runs out'." At Kettl Tea, matcha can be mixed with milk in a latte or enjoyed straight, hand-whisked with hot water in a ceramic bowl to better appreciate its subtle taste. It's not a cheap treat: the latter option costs at least $10 per glass, while 20 grams (0.7 ounces) of powder to make the drink at home is priced between $25 and $150. Japan's government is encouraging tea producers to farm on a larger scale to reduce costs. But that risks sacrificing quality, and "in small rural areas, it's almost impossible," grower Okutomi said. The number of tea plantations in Japan has fallen to a quarter of what it was 20 years ago, as farmers age and find it difficult to secure successors, he added. "Training a new generation takes time... It can't be improvised," Okutomi said.
Business Recorder
4 days ago
- Business Recorder
Public aggression, private restraint
EDITORIAL: Good thing this isn't turning out to be another one of president Trump's tricks. For once, the president's abrupt pivot from war to diplomacy appears to have held — and the Iran-Israel ceasefire, fragile though it may be, has held with it. That's saying something, given how recently he admitted to using negotiations as a ruse to lull Iranian leadership while Israel launched the opening salvos. Then, while dangling a two-week window for talks, he struck again. And just a day before announcing the ceasefire, he was still entertaining talk of regime change in Tehran. It didn't help that both Israel and Iran absorbed far more damage in this brief but blistering episode than they had anticipated. Israel, in particular, was caught off guard by the scale and precision of Iranian strikes. Entire neighbourhoods in Tel Aviv and Haifa were gutted, shattering the long-held illusion that Iran would never retaliate directly or decisively. Iran's ability to sustain such an attack — even under the weight of sanctions and international isolation — shocked not just Israeli planners, but its American backers. And yet the first reliable indicator that something had changed did not come from official channels — it came from the markets. As Iranian missiles were still in the air, oil prices dropped and equities rallied. That told the real story. The strikes were not interpreted as escalation. They were decoded as de-escalation — symbolic retaliation with political cover and strategic signalling, not a trigger for all-out war. Markets, unlike political speechwriters, have no time for theatrics. They responded to what was, not what was said. There's also mounting evidence that the Americans and Iranians coordinated just enough to allow each other a way out. Personnel and key assets were quietly moved out of harm's way before attacks. Trump even publicly thanked Iran for what he called their 'professionalism' in avoiding casualties. It's also being reported that the US gave Tehran advance notice before targeting their airbases — giving both sides political ammunition for domestic audiences, while reducing the actual cost of confrontation. This manufactured choreography — public aggression, private restraint — is telling. It allowed Iran to claim it struck back without inviting a second wave. It gave Israel the opportunity to insist it had delivered deterrence. And it gave Trump the spotlight to play the peacemaker. But if the intent was to defuse tensions, it would have helped if the ceasefire hadn't come less than 24 hours after open talk of regime change. That inconsistency is now the biggest source of instability. No one knows if Trump is negotiating in good faith or simply buying time. If this pattern holds — provoke, pause, provoke again — then the region will remain locked in a cycle of symbolic restraint followed by unpredictable violence. And that will do little to prevent the next miscalculation. In the meantime, diplomacy has been reduced to theatre, and restraint outsourced to financial markets. The real risk is that, next time, the choreography may fail. Trump's current narrative only works if all parties stick to the script. But war, unlike politics, doesn't always respect timing or intention. Already he's fuming and swearing at both parties — more Israel than Iran — for violating the truce. For now, the ceasefire holds. But so does the memory of how it began. And unless Trump proves capable of consistency — something he has shown no talent for — the next strike may not come with the courtesy of advance notice or a convenient off-ramp. That's what should worry everyone. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
