logo
Map Shows Where Hegseth Wants US Military on China's Doorstep

Map Shows Where Hegseth Wants US Military on China's Doorstep

Miami Herald13-06-2025
U.S. defense chief Pete Hegseth on Wednesday stressed the role of regional partners in the Pentagon's bid to counter an increasingly assertive China.
"The Indo-Pacific is our priority theater, and China is our pacing threat,' he said while making the case for the defense budget requested by the Trump administration for the next fiscal year.
Those words echoed his May 31 remarks at the Shangri-La Dialogue defense summit in Singapore, where he hailed examples of U.S. and allied military cooperation—including those illustrated on the Newsweek map below.
China's rapid military buildup and competing territorial claims have strained ties with several neighbors, including U.S.-allied Philippines and Japan, both of which share defense treaties with Washington that could potentially draw American forces into a conflict.
Chinese threats and increasing military activities around Taiwan, the island democracy Beijing claims as its territory, have further raised concerns. The tensions have driven some of China's neighbors to deepen military cooperation with the United States and one another.
Newsweek contacted the Chinese Embassy in Washington, D.C., for comment by email, but did not receive a response before publication time.
In Singapore, Hegseth praised President Donald Trump's "America First" foreign policy while blaming former President Joe Biden for the U.S.-Mexico border crisis to Russia's invasion of Ukraine.
Yet, he added, "America First certainly does not mean America alone."
Taking aim at what he called China's "destabilizing actions," Hegseth said the U.S. should be prepared for war, although deterring Chinese military aggression by raising its costs was preferable.
"We're doing this here in the Indo-Pacific in three distinct ways: first, by improving our forward force posture. Second, by helping allies and partners strengthen their defense capabilities. And third, by rebuilding defense industrial bases," he told attendees.
These efforts include deploying to the first island chain assets such as the U.S. Marine Corps' NMESIS high-precision anti-ship missile system to the Luzon Strait—a maritime choke point frequented by Chinese warships.
The platform was delivered to the Philippines' far-northern Batanes province about 120 miles south of Taiwan. The deployment "enhanced our interoperability and improved our readiness on cutting-edge platforms, where we need them and when we need them," Hegseth said.
The NMESIS missile system adds to the growing U.S. firepower in the Southeast Asian country. Last year, the U.S. deployed a U.S. Army Mid-Range Capability, also known as the Typhon missile launcher, to the Philippines ahead of joint military drills last spring.
Philippine officials initially suggested the system would be removed after the drills, but later indicated it could remain indefinitely, irking officials in Beijing over the system's ability to reach China's eastern seaboard with weapons like as the Standard Missile-6 and the Tomahawk cruise missile.
A second Typhon system will be deployed to AUKUS partner Australia this summer, where the U.S. Army plans to conduct its first-ever live-fire test of the system on foreign soil, Hegseth said.
This year, Washington and Canberra also reached an agreement for Australia to produce 155-millimeter artillery rounds and assemble guided multiple-launch rocket systems, boosting Australia's potential as a force multiplier in the event of a conflict.
Washington's efforts to deepen cooperation with Japan, a key Pacific security treaty ally, are also advancing, with upgrades to the joint headquarters of the U.S. Forces Japan. The move will increase deterrence and mark "progress the alliance has made toward improving interoperability and strengthening Japan's capabilities," Hegseth said.
The changes, which began in April, will integrate U.S. land, air, sea, space and cyber forces under a single headquarters. There are currently over 50,000 active-duty American military personnel in Japan—the most stationed in any foreign country.
The U.S. is also ramping up cooperation with India, one of the four Quad nations and a country that continues to experience friction with China along its disputed border regions in the Himalayas.
The Pentagon is working with the South Asian country—an increasingly capable arms manufacturer—to "co-produce equipment needed to deter aggression, and this includes negotiating an agreement to bring our industrial bases ever closer," Hegseth said.
Following February talks in Washington between Trump and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, the two leaders announced an "Autonomous Systems Industry Alliance" that will see the two countries co-develop and co-produce sea drones and counter-drone systems.
Da Wei, director of the Center for International Security and Strategy at Beijing's Tsinghua University, told Newsweek:"What I want to stress is we are on the path to better relations with regional countries—so we don't need the U.S. to teach us."
"I think Secretary Hegseth is kind of trying to [come] between China and regional countries. I don't think this will be successful."
The House Appropriations Committee advanced the Pentagon's request for a base defense budget of $892.6 billion, lower than the $1 trillion figure previously pledged by Trump.
That, along with a $150 billion reconciliation package providing additional funds for priority programs such as shipbuilding and munitions, is expected to pass in the overall congressional vote.
Related Articles
China Feuds With US Ally Over Fighter Jet InterceptUS Ally Keeps American Missiles at Choke Point Near ChinaUS Aircraft Carrier Holds 'Warfighting' Drills on China's DoorstepChina Closer To Solving Hyperloop Train's Biggest Flaw
2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Attorney General Campbell joins other states in lawsuit challenging Department of Education mental health funding cuts
Attorney General Campbell joins other states in lawsuit challenging Department of Education mental health funding cuts

Boston Globe

time17 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

Attorney General Campbell joins other states in lawsuit challenging Department of Education mental health funding cuts

The Education in Massachusetts has seen Advertisement 'As our young people face a nationwide mental health epidemic, it is critical to ensure they have access to the resources they need, including mental health professionals in schools,' Campbell said in the statement. 'The Trump Administration does not have the power to arbitrarily revoke grant funding that provides critical mental health services to our students.' 'I will continue to fight against unlawful federal actions that harm our children,' she said. Advertisement Campbell signed the lawsuit with attorney generals from three other New England states: Connecticut, Maine, and Rhode Island. The remaining states are California, Colorado, Delaware, Illinois, Maryland, Michigan, New Mexico, New York, Nevada, Oregon, Washington, and Wisconsin. The lawsuit names the Department of Education and Education Secretary Funds for 'Because of the termination of this program, thousands of low-income American students across several school districts in Greater Boston will lose the support of these psychologists and counselors in training,' the statement said. In April, Ava Berger can be reached at

Defeat of a 10-year ban on state AI laws is a blow to tech industry
Defeat of a 10-year ban on state AI laws is a blow to tech industry

Boston Globe

time17 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

Defeat of a 10-year ban on state AI laws is a blow to tech industry

'The Senate came together tonight to say that we can't just run over good state consumer protection laws,' Sen. Maria Cantwell, D-Wash., said in a statement. 'States can fight robocalls, deepfakes and provide safe autonomous vehicle laws.' Advertisement There are no federal laws regulating AI but states have enacted dozens of laws that strengthen consumer privacy, ban AI-generated child sexual abuse material and outlaw deepfake videos of political candidates. All but a handful of states have some laws regulating artificial intelligence in place. It is an area of deep interest: All 50 have introduced bills in the past year tied to the issue. The Senate's provision, introduced in the Senate by Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, sparked intense criticism by state attorneys general, child safety groups and consumer advocates who warned the amendment would give AI companies a clear runway to develop unproven and potentially dangerous technologies. The proposed ban on state AI laws stemmed from a proposal championed by Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La. On May 22, the House's approved version of the bill included the 'Artificial Intelligence and Information Technology Modernization Initiative,' a 10-year moratorium on state AI laws. Advertisement Silicon Valley venture capital powerhouse Andreessen Horowitz and AI startups OpenAI and Anduril, a defense tech company, lobbied fiercely in favor of the amendment. They said it was too difficult for startups to comply with dozens of different state AI laws. The Trump administration also threw its support behind the proposal. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick called the moratorium a critical policy to advance American leadership in AI. 'If we're serious about winning the AI race, we must prioritize investment and innovation,' Lutnick posted on social media Monday. On Sunday, it appeared more likely the AI amendment might go through after Sen. Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn., reached a compromise with Cruz on a shorter moratorium of five years. But the compromise included language that many legal experts said could neuter existing state laws. Blackburn withdrew her amendment written with Cruz late Monday and introduced a motion to strike his original amendment. 'The Senate did the right thing today for kids, for families and for our future by voting to strip out the dangerous 10-year ban on state AI laws, which had no business being in a budget bill in the first place,' Jim Steyer, CEO of the child safety group, Common Sense Media, said in a statement. This article originally appeared in .

Roughly 30 percent of 2024 voters used mail ballot: Research
Roughly 30 percent of 2024 voters used mail ballot: Research

The Hill

time20 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Roughly 30 percent of 2024 voters used mail ballot: Research

Nearly a third of the ballots cast in the presidential election last fall were submitted by mail, despite long-standing efforts from President Trump and other Republicans to discourage the controversial voting method, new research found. The U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC) released a report this week that found that, while mail-in ballots didn't hit the record levels seen during the height of the pandemic four years earlier (43 percent), the percentage of voters who cast ballots by mail last fall (30.3 percent) remained well above pre-pandemic levels. Most voters in the 2024 general election cast their ballots in person, with 37.4 percent on Election Day and 35.2 percent through in-person early voting opportunities, the report found. However, more than 48 million mail-in votes were cast and counted in the 2024 presidential election, in addition to ballots sent in by members of the military and other overseas voters. 'State policies on the availability of mail voting have evolved rapidly over the past few election cycles,' the EAC's analysts wrote of the findings. Eight states and Washington, D.C., have adopted 'all' or 'mostly' mail elections, where ballots are sent to registered voters and can be returned via secure drop boxes or the U.S. Postal Service, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures. Additional states allow mail-in elections in some jurisdictions. The growing popularity of voting by mail also comes as Trump has targeted the ballot-casting method as a potential avenue for voter fraud. The president signed an executive order in March that would require all states and territories to count mail-in ballots on or before Election Day, as part of a broader election system overhaul that Trump backed after years of making unfounded claims about widespread voter fraud. 'Free, fair, and honest elections unmarred by fraud, errors, or suspicion are fundamental to maintaining our constitutional Republic,' Trump wrote in the order, which a federal judge blocked last month. 'The right of American citizens to have their votes properly counted and tabulated, without illegal dilution, is vital to determining the rightful winner of an election.' Trump's executive order, rather than ending early voting, sought to rein in delays in finalizing vote tallies in some states, including California, which is the country's most populous state and has an all-mail voting system. California allows mail-in ballots postmarked by Election Day to be counted up to seven days after polls close. Trump cited other countries that have more restrictions on when ballots can be counted, including those submitted by mail. 'While countries like Denmark and Sweden sensibly limit mail-in voting to those unable to vote in person and do not count late-arriving votes regardless of the date of postmark, many American elections now feature mass voting by mail, with many officials accepting ballots without postmarks or those received well after Election Day,' he wrote. The EAC findings are based on surveys of elections officials in all 50 U.S. states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, American Samoa, Guam and the Northern Mariana Islands.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store