logo
Why youth mobility and fishing are key issues ahead of UK/EU summit

Why youth mobility and fishing are key issues ahead of UK/EU summit

Yahoo17-05-2025
The right of young people to move freely between the UK and EU has emerged as a key negotiating point - along with fishing rights - ahead of a summit in London which the prime minister hopes will "reset" relations between the two sides.
Before Brexit, people were allowed to come and go under "freedom of movement" rules. The EU would like a new "youth mobility scheme" but there are concerns about what impact this might have on UK immigration numbers.
Fishing rights are another potential sticking point with the EU calling for an extension of the current post-Brexit deal, but UK fishing groups calling for changes to it.
BBC Verify has been examining both issues and why they are important.
Since Brexit, UK and EU citizens no longer have an automatic right to live, work, or study in each other's countries.
To come to the UK for an extended period, EU nationals usually need specific visas - many of which require a sponsor.
Following these new rules, there has been a significant drop in the number of EU students coming to the UK.
The UK does have an existing Youth Mobility Scheme (YMS) which allows young adults to live, work and study in the UK for up to two years.
People from specific countries can apply but not from EU ones.
They have to pay an application fee, the health surcharge, and have at least £2,530 in savings. Unlike most other visa schemes, the YMS does not require sponsorship.
Last year, just over 24,000 YMS visas were issued - Australians were the largest single group, followed by New Zealanders and Canadians.
Just over a year ago, the EU proposed a "youth mobility scheme" for EU and UK citizens (aged 18 to 30), allowing stays of up to four years. The idea was rejected by the-then Conservative government.
It it is politically sensitive, given Sir Keir Starmer's pledge to "significantly" reduce immigration levels in the coming years.
Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch has warned against "backsliding on freedom of movement".
Documents circulated between EU states suggested any deal could be rebranded as a "youth experience" scheme, in an apparent bid to downplay any link to migration.
Madeleine Sumption from Oxford University's Migration Observatory told BBC Verify that a UK/EU youth mobility scheme would likely increase net migration in the short term, as new participants arrive.
However, she adds that if everyone left the UK when their visa expired, the long-term impact on migration levels would be minimal.
"If the UK is worried about the impact, it could phase in the scheme, where it gradually increases the quota. So as people leave, the quota could be raised rather than a big bang, all come at once," she said.
Home Secretary Yvette Cooper is reportedly arguing for visas to be limited to one year so that EU citizens taking part do not show up in official immigration figures, with applications also subject to an overall cap.
Another consideration, Ms Sumption points out, is how many people would go home when their temporary visa comes to an end.
"Even on temporary visas, people do stay. They get a job offer and end up getting a skilled visa through their employer", she says.
The Oxford Migration Observatory says about 10% of people who arrived on temporary worker visas in 2014 from Australia, Canada and New Zealand remained in the UK at the end of 2023.
Fishing is another sensitive subject.
The post-Brexit deal on fishing rights - who gets to fish where - expires at the end of June 2026.
Several EU countries, including France, are asking the UK for concessions, in return for the things the UK wants from the summit.
They are pushing for a long-term extension of the current arrangements, agreed in 2020.
Fishing only accounts for an estimated 0.4% of UK GDP but it was a big issue in the Brexit campaign and promises were made that the UK would become an "independent coastal state".
Under the Brexit deal in 2020 however, EU boats were given continued access to UK waters.
In 2023, UK vessels landed 719,000 tonnes of fish - an increase of 14% compared to 2019.
However, this growth has been driven by Scottish catches, while English fishing boats have seen a fall in their landings.
This is linked to the way in which fish quotas were divided up after Brexit, benefitting some areas.
At the same time, it has become harder for the UK to export fish to the EU due to post-Brexit paperwork and checks.
In 2023, the UK exported 235,606 tonnes of fish to the EU. That's down 29% compared to the 2019 figure of 333,403 tonnes.
Chris Ranford, Chief Executive of the Cornish Fish Producers' Organisation (CFPO), represents 175 member vessels and says nothing much has changed, since BBC Verify last spoke to him in 2022.
He says French vessels are still fishing off the Cornish coast: "Very modern, very high-powered French fishing vessels that have much greater catching capacity than the UK or Cornish boats come up to the six-mile line. We don't have space to fish."
For him, the number one priority for any future fishing deal is to stop EU vessels entering the stretch of coastal water that lies between six and 12 nautical miles offshore.
France has reportedly called for continued access to UK waters for its fishing boats, in exchange for a defence deal the UK is pushing for.
We asked the Maritime Fisheries Committee for Northern France for comment.
Another area of improvement Mr Ranford is calling for is easier access to EU markets.
"Our small to medium-sized businesses can't afford to do the extra paperwork to get the fish to the EU market," he said.
Elspeth Macdonald, who represents 450 fishing boats as Chief Executive of the Scottish Fishermen's Federation, says: "The market access to the EU has become more bureaucratic."
She says she is disappointed with the five-year fishing deal the UK signed up to.
"Our position approaching the EU reset… is that the access to each other's waters would be on the basis of annual discussions".
"By having that lever around access, the UK could secure a much fairer share of the resources in our own waters."
There are strong opinions on both sides on fishing and youth mobility.
If the UK is to get what it wants from the summit, including easing the trade in agricultural goods between the UK and the EU, there will have to be some give and take in the coming days.
What do you want BBC Verify to investigate?
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Switzerland seeks trade deal with Trump without getting into EU bind
Switzerland seeks trade deal with Trump without getting into EU bind

Yahoo

time30 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Switzerland seeks trade deal with Trump without getting into EU bind

By Dave Graham ZURICH (Reuters) -Switzerland is exploring what concessions it can make to secure a deal with Washington on trade, but it must tread carefully to protect its interests with key trading partner, the European Union, politicians and people familiar with the matter said. The Swiss cabinet last month approved its biggest trade policy overhaul in years with the EU, two months after the U.S. stunned Switzerland by announcing 31% tariffs - well above the 20% rate Washington set out for the 27-nation bloc. That shock prompted a scramble by business leaders and officials to underline how much Switzerland invests in the United States and the tariff threat was suspended for a 90-day period ending July 9. Talks are continuing. Nicolas Walder, a Greens member of the lower house of parliament's foreign policy committee, said Switzerland must insist on its commitment to multilateralism with the U.S. "A deal should not interfere with any agreement that Switzerland has signed or wants to sign, and should specifically mention the bilateral agreement with the EU," said Walder, whose committee is regularly briefed on the trade talks. The Swiss mandate for negotiating with the U.S. stipulates that relations with its other trade partners be upheld. Any U.S. deal must be compatible with Switzerland's future relations with the EU, a Swiss source familiar with the matter said. Swiss officials and lawmakers believe that a 31% tariff can be averted, but say U.S. President Donald Trump's existing 10% baseline tariff looks likely to stay. "Switzerland is negotiating in good faith with the U.S. government, aiming for a positive outcome," the Swiss Economy Ministry said in a statement in response to questions on the points made by Reuters in this article. The EU trade agreement faces a lengthy approval process and is almost certain to be put to a national referendum under Switzerland's system of direct democracy. CONCESSIONS Trump's unpredictable approach to trade policy has been a challenge for Switzerland, which abolished its own industrial tariffs last year and sets great store by adherence to rules. Eager to offer Trump something, Switzerland is exploring granting concessions to the U.S., such as greater market access for produce like seafood and citrus fruits, the source said. Home to pharmaceutical giants Roche and Novartis - both big U.S. investors - Switzerland also knows Washington has been investigating trade practices in the sector and does not want any deal to be muddied later by pharma tariffs, the source said. "This is absolutely crucial," said Simon Michel, a federal lawmaker and CEO of medical technology company Ypsomed. Jean-Philippe Kohl, deputy director of industry association Swissmem, said even if only a 10% tariff applies, the dollar's decline against the Swiss franc amid the trade uncertainty was already making exporters' goods dearer in the U.S. And if the EU secured better tariff terms with Washington, that could put Swiss firms at a disadvantage. "It's therefore important that the dialogue with the U.S. quickly lead to a positive outcome," he said. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data

Julian Harris: Charts to Cheer up the Chancellor
Julian Harris: Charts to Cheer up the Chancellor

Bloomberg

time35 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

Julian Harris: Charts to Cheer up the Chancellor

A picture is worth a thousand words, as they say. Here at Bloomberg we prefer to think that a chart is worth a thousand words, so allow me to present today's long read: For the uninitiated, it shows the yield on 30-year UK government bonds (known as gilts) and arguably tells the whole story of the chaotic last 48 hours that the Labour government inflicted on itself. Yesterday's jump, as you presumably know by now, was triggered by Keir Starmer's failure to sufficiently endorse a clearly emotional Rachel Reeves while she sat behind him, struggling to hold back tears.

Europe's Billionaires Are Bending to Trump--Here's Why Investors Should Pay Attention
Europe's Billionaires Are Bending to Trump--Here's Why Investors Should Pay Attention

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Europe's Billionaires Are Bending to Trump--Here's Why Investors Should Pay Attention

With Donald Trump's July 9 tariff deadline approaching, pressure is mountingnot just in Brussels, but in boardrooms across Europe. Automakers like Mercedes-Benz (MBGAF), BMW (BMWKY), and Volkswagen (VWAGY) have been quietly flying executives to Washington, lobbying U.S. officials directly and proposing their own peace terms to head off a potential 50% tariff on European exports. Luxury powerhouses like LVMH (LVMUY) and pharmaceutical giants like Sanofi have joined in, signaling a clear shift: many of Europe's biggest companies are no longer aligned with the EU's hardline approach. Behind the scenes, they're urging Brussels to cut a quick deal and scale back retaliatory measures, including removing high-profile U.S. products like bourbon from any counter-tariff list. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 4 Warning Sign with MBGAF. What's driving this sudden corporate detente? Profitsand survival. European companies generate wide margins in the U.S. and rely heavily on American technology, suppliers, and research partnerships. A retaliatory tariff packageinitially floated at 95 billionhas already been softened by member state requests that could slash it by nearly 70 billion. Lobby groups representing sectors from medical devices to spirits warn that hitting back at the U.S. would hurt European firms just as much, if not more. If the EU retaliates, the sector is hit twice, said MedTech Europe CEO Oliver Bisazza. That fear has flipped the script, with industries now pressing Brussels to de-escalate, even if it means swallowing a flat 10% tariff and lobbying for carve-outs in key sectors like pharma, semiconductors, and aerospace. But this fractured front comes at a delicate time for the EU. With domestic demand weakening, China gaining ground, and energy costs still elevated post-Ukraine, the U.S. market is more important than ever. Brussels wants to preserve unity, but member states are growing impatient. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz has openly criticized the Commission's slow, complex process and called for speed over perfection. LVMH Chairman Bernard Arnault has gone furtheractivating long-standing ties with Trump and making personal trips to Washington to promote a calmer path. His message? In this geopolitical chess match, compromise could be the smartest move Europe has left. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store