
Telangana is still fighting for its water 10 years after breaking away from Andhra Pradesh
At the heart of the water-sharing issue lies the Krishna river, which flows through Andhra Pradesh, Telangana, Maharashtra, and Karnataka. Telangana and Andhra Pradesh share two dams built on the river—the Srisailam dam and the Nagarjunasagar dam.
More than 10 years after its separation from Andhra Pradesh, Telangana is still fighting for its rightful share of water.
A dispute over Nagarjunasagar dam water-sharing led to a face-off between the two states' police in November 2023. As Telangana officials were busy with elections, police and irrigation department officials in Andhra Pradesh released more than 2,000 cusecs of water—beyond the state's share.
The 2023 incident exemplified how Andhra Pradesh has repeatedly used more than its allocated share of water. The people of Telangana have suffered due to these inequalities, which should have ended after bifurcation when the state gained control over its resources.
To ensure that Andhra Pradesh and Telangana adhere to the water-sharing ratio of 66:34, the central government set up the Krishna River Management Board (KRMB), which comprises officials from the two states as well as central officials. It should have been smooth sailing with the KRMB taking over the duties of water-sharing, but the issue remains unresolved.
Also read: Two Telugu states, one river — why Andhra & Telangana are fighting it out over the Krishna
Political rivalry complicates water disputes
The water-sharing battle is as much political as it is technical. When K Chandrashekar Rao (KCR) became Telangana's first chief minister, his contemporary was Telugu Desam Party (TDP) chief N Chandrababu Naidu in Andhra Pradesh. The two leaders were at odds—Naidu not only had to share the capital Hyderabad but was also running Andhra Pradesh from Telangana, as Hyderabad remained the joint capital for 10 years post-bifurcation.
What added to the tension was the fact that KCR was once a TDP member who quit the party in 2001 to form the Telangana Rashtra Samithi (now Bharat Rashtra Samithi). His former boss had become his political rival.
When YSR Congress Party (YSRCP) chief Jagan Mohan Reddy won in Andhra Pradesh in 2019, there seemed hope for better relations. KCR, being anti-Naidu, began warming up to Jagan. Both leaders held meetings, and it appeared Telangana and Andhra Pradesh would finally get along.
But the honeymoon was short-lived—and the reason was water. Andhra Pradesh decided to use 3 TMC of water from the Srisailam dam without informing the KRMB or Telangana, thus ending any prospect of collaboration between the two states.
Telangana seeks larger share
After bifurcation in 2014, the BRS government under former chief minister KCR sought a higher share of water from the Krishna river—demanding a 50:50 ratio instead of the current 66:34 split favouring Andhra Pradesh. The matter was taken to the Brijesh Kumar disputes tribunal and remains pending.
'The issue has always been with AP officials releasing more water from our side without informing us. Telangana is a new state and we need more water, especially since we have major projects like Kaleshwaram,' an official from the Telangana irrigation department said.
Meanwhile, Andhra Pradesh has undertaken several major projects, including the Polavaram national irrigation project on the Godavari river. Located near Ramayampet village in West Godavari district, the project aims to irrigate 75.38 lakh acres and supply 7.32 TMC of drinking water to Visakhapatnam city.
With Congress now in power in Telangana—a party historically at odds with the TDP—an amicable solution between the two states seems unlikely. The only way forward is for the KRMB to do its job and ensure both states receive their rightful share of water.
Yunus Lasania is a Hyderabad-based journalist whose work primarily focuses on politics, history and culture. He tweets @YunusLasania. Views are personal.
(Edited by Prashant)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India.com
an hour ago
- India.com
Which policy of China has brought Bangladesh and Pakistan closer to Beijing and why India should be worried?
New Delhi: The growing closeness between China, Pakistan and Bangladesh has become a matter of concern for India. On June 19, representatives of the three countries met in Kunming, China on the alternative to SAARC (South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation). Pakistan is already in debt to China and China's influence is also increasing in Bangladesh. CDS General Anil Chauhan had recently expressed concern about this. What are Pakistan, Turkey and China working on? Turkey is also involved in this matter, which is providing military assistance to Pakistan and strengthening its defense ties with Bangladesh. In such a situation, India can get caught in a difficult diplomatic situation. Pakistan takes loans from China and buys weapons. Its economy is based on loans from IMF and China. More than 80% of Pakistan's military equipment comes from China. The World Bank estimates that it may take more than 40 years for Pakistan to repay its debt to China. China wants to take advantage of this situation to increase its dominance in South Asia. According to reports, China also supported Pakistan during Operation Sindoor in May 2025. Where does Bangladesh stand? Indian Army Deputy Chief Lieutenant General Rahul R Singh had alleged that China had given active military assistance to Pakistan during Operation Sindoor. However, China has denied this allegation. Some people even saw this war as a test of Chinese weapons. China is also trying to defame companies supplying weapons to India. On the other hand, Bangladesh is also getting trapped in China's debt. The situation has worsened after the fall of the Hasina government in August 2024 following student protests. Muhammad Yunus' interim government is showing signs of aligning with China. Why should India be worried? China's growing influence on Pakistan and Bangladesh is worrying for India. China is interfering in Pakistan through infrastructure projects. Bangladesh is also taking loans from China and getting closer to Pakistan. The situation has worsened after the fall of Sheikh Hasina's government. A survey by Chatham House in June 2025 revealed that 75% of Bangladeshis prefer China, while only 11% prefer Indian. In the last few years, it has been propagated that India was supporting the Hasina government, which was infamous for its dictatorship. Anti-Hasina sentiments have also affected India. Muhammad Yunus' interim government is building good relations with Pakistan and military ties between the two countries are also growing.


Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Bihar polls: Owaisi eyes alliance or third front
With Bihar headed for assembly elections in a few months, AIMIM chief Asaduddin Owaisi has stepped up efforts to re-engage the state's minority vote bank , especially after the passage of the Waqf Bill. Concerned about losing ground, especially after RJD and Congress joined anti-Waqf protests, AIMIM is trying to reposition itself. In 2020, AIMIM won five seats in alliance with Upendra Kushwaha and BSP-all in the Seemanchal region-but four MLAs later defected to the RJD. The party is now left with just Akhtarul Iman, its state chief. Iman recently wrote an open letter to INDIA bloc parties urging them to include AIMIM in their alliance. "We're waiting for a response. The assembly session starts next week. If they ignore us, the people will judge both sides," he told ET. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Play War Thunder now for free War Thunder Play Now Undo On the SIR exercise in Bihar, Owaisi met EC officials separately in Delhi. Iman, who is among the petitioners in the Supreme Court case, said, "I am the only petitioner who is also a voter in Bihar." Sources said Owaisi and Iman are also exploring a third front, similar to their 2020 strategy. Live Events


The Print
2 hours ago
- The Print
Eyewitness in 1984 Pul Bangash Gurudwara case denies ‘falsely' implicating Tytler
The 70-year-old woman eyewitness had also claimed before Special Judge Jitendra Singh that she kept mum, fearing for her only son's life and revealed Tytler's name for the first time in 2016 to the CBI after her son passed away. Earlier on Friday, Harpal Kaur Bedi, an eyewitness to the killing of three men by a mob that torched the north Delhi gurdwara during the riots, had deposed that she had seen Tytler instigating the mob and asking them to 'loot and kill the Sikhs'. New Delhi, Jul 12 (PTI) A key witness in the Pul Bangash Gurdwara case related to the 1984 anti-Sikh riots on Saturday told a Delhi court that she was not pressured by the CBI or Sikh leaders to 'falsely' implicate Congress leader Jagdish Tytler. During her cross-examination by Tytler's counsel on Saturday, Bedi said, 'It is wrong to suggest that I was pressurised by the CBI or leaders of the Sikh community to name Jagdish Tytler in the case to falsely implicate him. 'It is further wrong to suggest that my entire testimony is a deliberate attempt to frame accused Jagdish Tytler in the case. It is wrong to suggest that my testimony is false and fabricated.' The court has posted the matter for recording the statement of another witness on July 21. The CBI had on May 20, 2023, filed a chargesheet against Tytler in the case. Tytler 'incited, instigated and provoked the mob assembled at Pul Bangash Gurudwara Azad Market' on November 1, 1984, that resulted in the burning down of the Gurdwara and the killing of three Sikhs — Thakur Singh, Badal Singh and Gurcharan Singh — the CBI alleged in its chargesheet. The CBI had also said in its chargesheet that Tytler came out of a white Ambassador car in front of the gurdwara on November 1, 1984, and instigated a mob by shouting 'kill the Sikhs, they have killed our mother'. Anti-Sikh riots had erupted in several parts of the country in the aftermath of the assassination of Prime Minister Indira Gandhi by her Sikh bodyguards on October 31, 1984. PTI MNR RHL This report is auto-generated from PTI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.