
Scholars explain how humans can hold the line against AI hype, and why it's necessary
Strategic refusal is one of the ways to counter AI hype. (Bigstock Illustration / Digitalista)
Don't call ChatGPT a chatbot. Call it a conversation simulator. Don't think of DALL-E as a creator of artistic imagery. Instead, think of it as a synthetic media extruding machine. In fact, avoid thinking that what generative AI does is actually artificial intelligence.
That's part of the prescription for countering the hype over artificial intelligence, from the authors of a new book titled 'The AI Con.'
''Artificial intelligence' is an inherently anthropomorphizing term,' Emily M. Bender, a linguistics professor at the University of Washington, explains in the latest episode of the Fiction Science podcast. 'It sells the tech as more than it is — because instead of this being a system for, for example, automatically transcribing or automatically adjusting the sound levels in a recording, it's 'artificial intelligence,' and so it might be able to do so much more.'
In their book and in the podcast, Bender and her co-author, Alex Hanna, point out the bugaboos of AI marketing. They argue that the benefits produced by AI are being played up, while the costs are being played down. And they say the biggest benefits go to the ventures that sell the software — or use AI as a justification for downgrading the status of human workers.
'AI is not going to take your job, but it will likely make your job shittier,' says Hanna, a sociologist who's the director of research for the Distributed AI Research Institute. 'That's because there's not many instances in which these tools are whole-cloth replacing work, but what they are ending up doing is … being imagined to replace a whole host of tasks that human workers are doing.'
Such claims are often used to justify laying off workers, and then to 'rehire them back as gig workers or to find someone else in the supply chain who is doing that work instead,' Hanna says.
Tech executives typically insist that AI tools will lead to quantum leaps in productivity, but Hanna points to less optimistic projections from economists including MIT's Daron Acemoglu, who won a share of last year's Nobel Prize in economics. Acemoglu estimates the annual productivity gain due to AI at roughly 0.05% for the next 10 years.
What's more, Acemoglu says AI may bring 'negative social effects,' including a widening gap between capital and labor income. In 'The AI Con,' Bender and Hanna lay out a litany of AI's negative social and environmental effects — ranging from a drain on energy and water resources to the exploitation of workers who train AI models in countries like Kenya and the Philippines.
The authors of 'The AI Con': Emily Bender (left) is a linguistic professor at the University of Washington. Alex Hanna (right) is director of research at the Distributed AI Research Institute. (Bender Photo by Susan Doupé; Hanna Photo by Will Toft)
Another concern has to do with how literary and artistic works are pirated to train AI models. (Full disclosure: My own book, 'The Case for Pluto,' is among the works that were used to train Meta's Llama 3 AI model.) Also, there's a well-known problem with large language models outputting information that may sound plausible but happens to be totally false. (Bender and Hanna avoid calling that 'hallucination,' because that term implies the presence of perception.)
Then there are the issues surrounding algorithmic biases based on race or gender. Such issues raise red flags when AI models are used to decide who gets hired, who gets a jail sentence, or which areas should get more policing. This all gets covered in 'The AI Con.'
It's hard to find anything complimentary about AI in the book.
'You're never going to hear me say there are things that are good about AI, and that's not that I disagree with all of this automation,' Bender says. 'It's just that I don't think AI is a thing. Certainly there are use cases for automation, including automating pattern recognition or pattern matching. … That is case by case, right?'
Among the questions to ask are: What's being automated? How was the automation tool built? Whose labor went into building that tool, and were the laborers fairly compensated? How was the tool evaluated, and does that evaluation truly model the task that's being automated?
Bender says generative AI applications fail her test.
'One of the close ones that I got to is, well, dialogue with non-player characters in video games,' Bender says. 'You could have more vibrant dialogue if it could run the synthetic text extruding machine. And it's fiction, so we're not looking for facts. But we are looking for a certain kind of truth in fictional experiences. And that's where the biases can really become a problem — because if you've got the NPCs being just total bigots, subtly or overtly, that's a bad thing.'
'The AI Con: How to Fight Big Tech's Hype and Create the Future We Want,' by Emily M. Bender and Alex Hanna. (Jacket design by Kris Potter for Harper)
Besides watching your words and asking questions about the systems that are being promoted, what should be done to hold the line on AI hype? Bender and Hanna say there's room for new regulations aimed at ensuring transparency, disclosure, accountability — and the ability to set things straight, without delay, in the face of automated decisions. They say a strong regulatory framework for protecting personal data, such as the European Union's General Data Protection Regulation, could help curb the excesses of data collection practices.
Hanna says collective bargaining provides another avenue to keep AI at bay in the workplace. 'We've seen a number of organizations do this to great success, like the Writers Guild of America after their strike in 2023,' she says. 'We've also seen this from National Nurses United. A lot of different organizations are having provisions in their contracts, which say that they have to be informed and can refuse to work with any synthetic media, and can decide where and when it is deployed in the writers' room, if at all, and where it exists in their workplace.'
The authors advise internet users to rely on trusted sources rather than text extruding machines. And they say users should be willing to resort to 'strategic refusal' — that is, to say 'absolutely not' when tech companies ask them to provide data for, or make use of data from, AI blenderizers.
Bender says it also helps to make fun of the over-the-top claims made about AI — a strategy she and Hanna call 'ridicule as praxis.'
'It helps you sort of get in the habit of being like, 'No, I don't have to accept your ridiculous claims,'' Bender says. 'And it feels, I think, empowering to laugh at them.'
Links to further reading
During the podcast, and in my intro to the podcast, we referred to lots of news developments and supporting documents. Here's a selection of web links relating to subjects that were mentioned.
Bender and Hanna will be talking about 'The AI Con' at 7 p.m. PT today at Elliott Bay Book Company in Seattle, and at 7 p.m. PT May 20 at Third Place Books in Lake Forest Park. During the Seattle event, they'll share the stage with Anna Lauren Hoffmann, an associate professor at the University of Washington who studies the ethics of information technologies. At Third Place Books, Bender and Hanna will be joined by Margaret Mitchell, a computer scientist at Hugging Face who focuses on machine learning and ethics-informed AI development.
My co-host for the Fiction Science podcast is Dominica Phetteplace, an award-winning writer who is a graduate of the Clarion West Writers Workshop and lives in San Francisco. To learn more about Phetteplace, visit her website, DominicaPhetteplace.com.
Fiction Science is included in FeedSpot's 100 Best Sci-Fi Podcasts. Check out the original version of this report on Cosmic Log to get sci-fi reading recommendations from Bender and Hanna, and stay tuned for future episodes of the Fiction Science podcast via Apple, Spotify, Player.fm, Pocket Casts and Podchaser. If you like Fiction Science, please rate the podcast and subscribe to get alerts for future episodes.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
MrBeast CEO and 'Beast Games' winner rally brand partners and rare disease support on Wall Street
NEW YORK (AP) — MrBeast's new CEO hit Wall Street Wednesday as YouTuber Jimmy Donaldson's media empire looks to develop long-term brand partnerships and, in turn, unlock more funding for its charitable content. Venture capitalist Jeff Housenbold took over MrBeast leadership last summer with a mandate to professionalize an ever-growing entertainment company. YouTube's most popular creator had reached record audience levels far outpacing its startup days, while vowing to reassess its internal culture amid multiple controversies. But, despite joining Nasdaq's closing bell ceremony on Wednesday, Housenbold said their strategic plan does not currently include a public offering — or any active funding rounds. 'Do I want to make banger content? Yeah. That's cool," Housenbold told The Associated Press. "But what can we do with that banger content? Generate profits, make a sustainable business that gives us greater ability to impact people's lives around the world.' 'We're marching quickly to profitability, so we don't have to raise additional capital,' he added. Instead, MrBeast is focused on securing multi-year exclusive advertising deals as opposed to single-video brand partnerships. With 416 million subscribers and legions of impressionable young fans, Housenbold argued that MrBeast is uniquely positioned to deliver more bang for companies' marketing bucks by pointing that 'firehouse of attention' at them. Along the way, Housenbold said he is encouraging Donaldson to tout the channel's charitable works — which often feature quantifiable stunts such as building wells, removing ocean plastic or covering cataract surgery costs. The company, in his view, 'can do good while doing well.' 'The more people who like us 'cause we do good, the more people watch our videos," he said. 'The more people watch our videos, the more we're able to drive in fees from our advertising partners... the more we can invest in more content to do more good in the world.' New projects such as the Amazon Prime reality show and a James Patterson novel from HarperCollins aim to diversify the genders and ages of his audience. Housenbold said that base has historically consisted mostly of 8-to-25-year-olds and men. But Housenbold acknowledged missteps in last year's production of 'Beast Games," which prompted allegations of 'unsafe' conditions from some contestants who said an unorganized set led to injuries, irregular food provision and lacking access to medication. While describing most of those reports as 'inaccurate,' Housenbold said they were 'better prepared' for the second season's recently wrapped shoot. 'Building sets for a 10-episode show is different than a 22-minute YouTube video," he said. "The scale, the size, the sophistication, the safety, the security, the cost effectiveness of doing that. We didn't staff up enough for Beast Games.' Ringing Nasdaq's closing bell Wednesday with Housenbold was the winner of the $10 million grand prize awarded in that inaugural 'Beast Games' season. Jeffrey Allen, the father of a child with creatine transporter deficiency, has promised to put some of his winnings toward existing treatments and research for a cure to the rare genetic disorder. He said the Association for Creatine Deficiencies, where he is a board member, added 1,000 new donors in the weeks following the final 'Beast Games' episodes' release. He hopes Wednesday's visit will draw more attention and money to all rare diseases. 'This is where companies that are bringing true change to the marketplace come to listen to other companies," Allen said. "So, there's no better place for a budding rare disease nonprofit to come and show, 'Hey we're trying to change the world, too.'' ___ Associated Press coverage of philanthropy and nonprofits receives support through the AP's collaboration with The Conversation US, with funding from Lilly Endowment Inc. The AP is solely responsible for this content. For all of AP's philanthropy coverage, visit Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Tesla profits pulled down by falling EV sales and regulatory credits
Falling EV sales combined with a lower average selling price, less revenue from regulatory credits, and a decline in solar and energy storage revenue took a toll on Tesla's bottom line during the second quarter of 2025. And a 17% growth in revenue in its services business, which includes cash generated from its Supercharging network, wasn't enough to close the gap. The company reported Wednesday revenue of $22.5 billion, a 12% decline from the same period last year. The company's second quarter revenue results did show an improvement over the first quarter when it generated $19.3 billion in revenue and it was just barely above analysts expectations. Analysts polled by Yahoo Finance expected revenue in the second quarter to reach $22.13 billion. Net income, and more specifically operating income, is where the year-over-year gap grows larger. Tesla reported net income of $1.17 billion in the second quarter, a 16% drop from the $1.4 billion in net income in the same period last year. Tesla reported $409 million in net income during the first quarter of the year. Tesla's operating income fell 42% year-over-year to $923 million. Tesla's earnings are largely a reflection of falling sales — although fewer regulatory credits also played a role. The company brought in $439 million in regulatory credits in the second quarter, a 50% drop since the same period last year. Earlier this month, Tesla said it delivered 384,122 vehicles in the second quarter of this year, a 13.5% drop from the same period in 2024. Second-quarter sales were an improvement over the first quarter, however, when the company delivered 337,000 vehicles. Meanwhile, Tesla is facing regulatory and legal pressures that could further undermine its effort to reboot sales. The California Department of Motor Vehicles is arguing in a hearing that kicked off Monday that Tesla should lose its license to sell vehicles in the state over false advertising claims on its branded Autopilot and Full Self-Driving advanced driver assistance systems. Meanwhile, a civil lawsuit is playing out in a Florida courtroom over a fatal 2019 crash in which a Tesla driver using Autopilot plowed through an intersection and struck two people. The case, which will allow a jury to consider punitive damages, centers on how Autopilot is advertised to its customers. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Google's AI push pays off with solid second quarter, but doubts about company's future persist
SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — Google's accelerating shift into artificial intelligence helped propel its corporate parent to another quarter of solid growth while a crackdown on its internet empire looms in the background. The results released Wednesday for the April-June period provided the latest sign that Google is deftly navigating the technological landscape's tilt toward AI while still capitalizing on well-worn techniques that have made it the internet's main gateway for the past quarter century. That balancing act helped Google parent Alphabet Inc. earn $28.2 billion, or $2.31 per share, during the second quarter, a 19% increase from the same time last year. Revenue climbed 14% from a year ago to $96.4 billion. Both figures easily eclipsed analysts' projections. 'We had a standout quarter, with robust growth across the company," Alphabet CEO Sundar Pichai said. 'We are leading at the frontier of AI and shipping at an incredible pace. AI is positively impacting every part of the business, driving strong momentum.' The numbers were initially overshadowed by a disclosure that Alphabet is increasing this year's budget for capital expenditures by $10 billion to $85 billion as part of its effort to fend off intensifying competition from AI startups such as OpenAI's ChatGPT and Perplexity. Besides those threats, a federal judge who declared Google's search engine to be an illegal monopoly is now weighing a range of countermeasures that include requiring the sale of its popular Chrome browser. Alphabet's shares dipped 1% in extended trading after the quarterly report came out. After initially dipping following the disclosure about the rising costs of AI, Alphabet's stock price rebounded and rose by more than 1% in extended trading. The performance covered a stretch that saw Google bring even more AI technology into its search engine in an effort to maintain its dominance, including the May release of its own version of a conversational answer engine called AI Mode. That addition supplemented its more than year-old use of extensive summaries called AI Overviews that Google now frequently highlights at the top of its results page while decreasing the number of its traditional links to other websites. The shake-up has resulted in even more interaction with Google's search engine and steady earnings growth to support Alphabet's $2.3 trillion market value, said Jim Yu, chief executive of BrightEdge, a firm that analyzes search trends. Google's search-driven ad revenue totaled $54.2 billion in the past quarter, a 12% increase from the same time last year. 'All this AI stuff is not slowing Google down, they are doing a very good job of evolving with the times,' Yu said. The AI boom has also been fueling demand in Google's Cloud division that sells computing power and other services. Google Cloud continued to thrive in the past quarter with revenue rising 32% from a year ago to $13.6 billion. The division is under pressure to deliver robust growth from investors to help justify Google's huge investments in AI technology.