
Hong Kong delivery workers' rights group ceases operations
Without providing a reason, the Riders' Rights Concern Group announced on Monday evening that it would cease operations effective immediately. The posts appeared on Facebook and Instagram before their social media pages became inaccessible.
The labour group is part of the Hong Kong Christian Industrial Committee, a non-government pressure group.
The announcement came just days after an opinion piece in the Hong Kong Economic Journal suggesting that lawmakers had been warned not to discuss four issues, including delivery workers' rights.
It is unclear whether the warnings came from the local authorities. HKFP has reached out to the government for comment.
The concern group has campaigned for delivery workers' rights and lobbied for strengthened legal protections since 2021.
The concern group supported foodpanda strikes over wage cuts in 2022 and assisted workers for the delivery company Zeek after it shut down in 2023. It also warned of further exploitation in the industry after UK food delivery company Deliveroo announced its exit from the Hong Kong market in March.
Some lawmakers in the city's opposition-free legislature, including Lam Chun-sing, chair of the Federation of Hong Kong and Kowloon Labour Unions, have called for the creation of a third legal category recognising the hybrid status of delivery workers.
Following strikes by delivery workers earlier this year, labour and welfare chief Chris Sun last month told lawmakers that the Hong Kong government will introduce a proposal this year to enhance the rights and benefits of digital platform workers.
Couriers for Keeta have been staging a series of protests across Hong Kong since late April demanding better treatment from the delivery platform.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


HKFP
6 days ago
- HKFP
Hong Kong universities told to handle student misconduct ‘seriously' after AI-generated images scandal
Chief Executive John Lee has urged Hong Kong universities to handle student misconduct 'seriously,' after a male student allegedly created AI-generated indecent images of more than 20 women. Universities shoulder the responsibility of developing students' moral character, and any misconduct that infringes on individual rights and privacy should be dealt with seriously, Lee said at a weekly press conference on Tuesday. 'While some misconduct may be dealt with under internal university rules, any act that may contravene the law should be reported to law enforcement agencies for action,' the chief executive said. Lee's remarks come after a male law student at the University of Hong Kong (HKU) was accused of creating pornographic images of around 20 to 30 women, including his classmates and teachers, without their consent. The student allegedly used photos he found on the women's social media accounts to generate pornographic images using free online artificial intelligence (AI) tools. HKU said in a statement on Saturday that the university had issued a warning letter to the male student and demanded that he make a formal apology to the women affected. But it was revealed that some women had requested that HKU involve the university's Disciplinary Committee to handle the matter, according to three anonymous victims who posted a summary of the accusations on Instagram. The victims said their request did not go through as HKU cited legal opinions in telling them that the male student likely did not commit an offence that could be addressed by the Disciplinary Committee. Lee on Tuesday said most of Hong Kong's laws apply to online behaviours, drawing attention to offences under the Crimes Ordinance and the Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance. For example, both 'publication or threatened publication of intimate images without consent' and 'access to a computer with dishonest intent' are offences under the Crimes Ordinance, each carrying a maximum punishment of five years in jail. Lee also said that in April, the government's Digital Policy Office published a guideline for generative AI use, promoting the 'safe and responsible development' of the technology and its related activities. The chief executive did not mention any proposal for legislation regarding AI. 'AI is an emergent technology that evolves very rapidly, with new capabilities and developments changing in a very short period of time,' he said. He added that the government would monitor the development of AI and study overseas regulations of the technology.


HKFP
14-07-2025
- HKFP
Hong Kong court urged to ‘reverse' democrat's acquittal in landmark subversion case
Hong Kong prosecutors have urged the Court of Appeal to 'reverse' the acquittal of barrister and former district councillor Lawrence Lau in a landmark national security case involving 47 pro-democracy figures. Government prosecutors on Monday challenged the High Court's decision in May last year to clear Lau of conspiracy to commit subversion in connection with an unofficial primary election held in July 2020. Lau was one of two defendants acquitted of the charge after standing trial for 118 days. Fourteen democrats were convicted after trial, while 31 others pleaded guilty earlier. The 45 democrats were eventually jailed, with sentences ranging from four years and two months to 10 years. Deputy Director of Public Prosecutions Anthony Chau told judges Jeremy Poon, Anthea Pang, and Derek Pang that the trial court 'erred' by failing to find that Lau agreed to a scheme, which aimed to veto the government's budget once elected as lawmakers, ultimately forcing the resignation of the chief executive and a government shutdown. The trial judges also made a mistake when they ruled that Lau did not have an intention to subvert the state power, the prosecutor said. Chau argued that there was 'overwhelming evidence' showing that Lau knew the objectives of Project 35+, a plan put forward by former legal scholar Benny Tai to help the pro-democracy camp achieve majority control in what was then a 70-seat legislature. Citing Lau's attendance in the first coordination meeting among democrats running in the Kowloon West constituency, his signing of a nomination form to join the primaries, and his Facebook post on July 14, 2020, admitting his defeat in the polls, Chau said the 'overall conduct' of Lau was 'consistent to the scheme.' 'We invite the court to reverse the verdict,' Chau said, adding Lau's case should be referred back to the lower court for a retrial. In response, Lau, who acted as his own legal representative, told the court that he had never advocated for the 'five demands' stemming from the 2019 protests nor for the resignation of the chief executive. He also never advocated vetoing the government budget indiscriminately, the barrister said. 'The verdict of the trial court should not be casually interfered [with],' Lau said. The challenge to Lau's acquittal is part of a 10-day appeal proceeding, which also involves appeals against the convictions and sentences of democrats jailed in the subversion case that began in 2021. On Monday, lawyers for some of the appellants began to make a joint submission, arguing that the act of vetoing government bills, including the budget, was not an abuse of a lawmaker's power. The trial court had sided with the prosecution and ruled that voting against the government budget indiscriminately was in breach of the powers and functions of the Legislative Council. Representing former legislators Helena Wong and Lam Cheuk-ting, barrister Erik Shum said lawmakers who take into account political agendas when they vote for a bill 'could not possibly' be seen as abusing their power. He said legislators had 'no duty' to explain their votes, adding that in any democratic society, the function of lawmakers includes the power to disapprove – a mechanism the lawyer described as 'cannot be argued against.' Shum's arguments were echoed by Trevor Beel, barrister for journalist-turned-activist Gwyneth Ho. Beel told the court that the word 'indiscriminate' was never used by the defendants, but rather was a term adopted by the prosecutors in the case. Those who took part in the primaries only stated openly that they would 'proceed with a mandate,' which Beel said was 'clearly given to the people.' 'If their mandate was not considered by the government, then they would proceed to vote against the budget. That's not an abuse of their power. That's an exercise of their power,' he said. Monday's hearing saw a last-minute withdrawal from former district councillor Michael Pang, whose lawyer confirmed with the judges that he had signed an agreement to abandon the appeal. Pang was escorted away from the dock by a corrections officer shortly afterwards. The remaining 13 jailed democrats were in the dock on Monday. They waved, nodded, and made hand gestures to the public gallery, where their family, friends and supporters were seated. Among the court attendees was Lee Yue-shun, the other democrat cleared of the subversion charge last year. His co-defendant, ex-district councillor Henry Wong, who was released from jail in May, was also present. The appeal proceeding will continue on Tuesday morning.


RTHK
13-07-2025
- RTHK
Labour import scheme needs to continue: Chris Sun
Labour import scheme needs to continue: Chris Sun Chris Sun rejected a fresh call from trade unionist Bill Tang to suspend the importation of catering workers. File photo: RTHK Labour Minister Chris Sun on Sunday rejected fresh calls to suspend the importation of workers, saying there was an acute labour shortage in many sectors. This came after trade unionist lawmaker Bill Tang said imported labour for the catering sector should be suspended as many locals were concerned about their jobs. Speaking on a TVB programme, Sun said the Enhanced Supplementary Labour Scheme already ensured that locals got priority, as employers can only import workers if they are unable to hire a local after a four-week recruitment exercise. The minister told reporters the government had received more than a hundred complaints of employers sacking locals after hiring imported labour but that, so far, initial evidence suggested there had been just two such cases. "Because we're talking about initial evidence, we cannot implement executive sanctions right away. We need to give the employers time to explain their case to us," Sun said. "But given the evidence, we have put them on our watch list, which means their ongoing import applications have been suspended." Sun said if the violations are substantiated, the authorities will impose sanctions "without hesitation". That means all import applications for the employer concerned will be withdrawn and the employer won't be able to apply to import workers for two years. Meanwhile, the minister said in another related case, an initial probe had found that an employer had refused to hire a local during the four-week recruitment period. Sun said the authorities are now waiting for the employer's reply.