Italy's Supreme Court Verdict Serves A Blow To Oil Company ENI, A Victory For People And Planet
'The Supreme Court establishes unequivocally that no one is above the law and that the interests of Big Oil cannot outweigh the rights of people to have their health and safety protected by courts. The protection of the fundamental human rights of citizens threatened by the climate emergency is above any other prerogative. Climate justice is now a key concern for Italy's courts,' Greenpeace Italy and ReCommon said.
The landmark ruling by the Supreme Court of Cassation will significantly influence all current and future climate lawsuits in Italy, as well as the protection of climate-related human rights already recognised by the European Court of Human Rights.
The lawsuit against ENI, CDP and MEF, seeking redress for current and future damages resulting from climate change, will now continue before the Court of Rome.
Notes:
[1] In May 2023, the 12 Italian citizens and the two organisations filed a civil lawsuit against ENI, the MEF and CDP, - the latter two entities as shareholders exercising a dominant influence over ENI. The plaintiffs sought redress for current and future damages resulting from climate change, to which the Italian oil and gas giant has knowingly and significantly contributed over the decades. ENI, CDP and MEF contested the very authority of Italian courts to hear the case, arguing that climate lawsuits are not justiciable in Italy. Consequently, the 12 citizens, Greenpeace Italy and ReCommon appealed to the country's highest court, the Supreme Court of Cassation, for a final decision on whether judges in Italy can decide on climate cases.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsroom
7 hours ago
- Newsroom
Legal fight over when a dog is a trademark – it's just barking
Nightwear company Peter Alexander has blocked an Italian clothing label from trademarking a sausage dog featured in its prospective New Zealand branding, claiming it is too similar to its own dachshund mascot 'Penny'. Daniele Ondeggia, the head of Italian casual clothing label Harmont & Blaine, applied to New Zealand's intellectual property office to trademark its logo featuring a dachshund named 'Blaine' in 2022. Harmont & Blaine is based in Naples and has stores throughout Europe and in North America.
NZ Herald
5 days ago
- NZ Herald
Free rent, free bike – but would you move to East Germany?
Listening to articles is free for open-access content—explore other articles or learn more about text-to-speech. Eastern block charm: Residential complexes in Eisenhuettenstadt. Photo / Getty Images Opinion Like many Europeans, you too have probably daydreamed about picturesque Italian villages where you can buy a house for just a couple of New Zealand dollars. Italian village authorities have been offering up properties for as little as one euro in order to keep their towns alive as youngsters move to big cities and the elderly have nobody to leave their rustic homes to. Facing the same sorts of issues, small towns in France and Croatia have launched similar schemes. And now the Germans are trying to get on the act, too. Well, sort of. In typical German style, it's not quite as wildly romantic as a one-euro shanty on a French mountainside. Instead, municipalities in rapidly depopulating former East Germany are promoting what they call Probewohnen, or 'trial residency'. Hundreds have applied for an apartment, at no or minimal cost, for several weeks. The idea is that they get a taste of life in the East and then potentially decide to stay. Goerlitz, a town on the border with Poland, has had a scheme like this in various forms since 2015. Other towns have caught on more recently. Last year Guben, population 16,000, started its own version – besides an apartment, the city will even give you a bicycle to get around on. Later this summer, Eisenhuettenstadt, population 24,000, will welcome its first trial residents. Other East German cities, including Frankfurt an der Oder, Wittenberge, Dessau-Rosslau and Eberswalde, have also flirted with temporary tenants. Tangible results are hard to come by. Surveys by the Leibniz Institute of Ecological Urban and Regional Development suggest 47% of the temporary residents in Goerlitz 'could imagine moving there'. Nobody seems to know if they ever actually did. In Guben, around 13 families out of 48 have stayed. In Frankfurt an der Oder, six tenants out of 20 signed permanent rental contracts. Some folk do love the idea. As one wannabe Goerlitz-er, interviewed by the Liebniz Institute, explained, 'I like Goerlitz a lot because it's still a city – but without those big city problems.' On the other hand, those crumbling Italian and French villages do conjure up bucolic, olive oil-drenched visions: baguettes for breakfast, quaint locals, romantic misunderstandings and sun-sweetened tomatoes, with lashings of red wine, for lunch. Eisenhüttenstadt, built in the 1950s as a model socialist city and once called Stalinstadt, offers a greying collection of Soviet-era prefab apartment blocks in a park-like setting. Good times for fans of Brutalist architecture. But would you really want to live there? There's something even worse lurking in former East Germany. It's here that the country's far-right party, Alternative for Germany or AfD, is particularly popular. The AfD, with its xenophobic policies, got at least a third of all votes in these areas in the last federal elections. In Goerlitz, the AfD – chapters of which are under observation by domestic spy agencies for their extremist tendencies – got almost 49%. Germany is already having problems attracting people to fill labour shortages caused by its ageing population. Around 400,000 people annually are needed here to remedy those. But at the same time, the most recent research by the Institute for Employment Research at Germany's Federal Employment Agency shows that one in four immigrants is considering leaving town. Two-thirds of around 50,000 immigrants polled said they had experienced discrimination, especially in interactions with authorities, police and at the workplace. Another third said they'd never felt welcome in Germany. And then, they add, there's the stifling bureaucracy, the high taxes and huge health insurance bills. Can a free bike and two rent-free weeks combat all that? Seems unlikely. Cathrin Schaer is a freelance journalist living in Berlin.
Scoop
6 days ago
- Scoop
Italy's Supreme Court Verdict Serves A Blow To Oil Company ENI, A Victory For People And Planet
In a landmark decision, Italy's highest court ruled that Italian judges can hear climate change lawsuits to protect people's human rights. This decision supports the appeal case filed in June 2024 by 12 Italian citizens, Greenpeace Italy, and ReCommon against energy giant ENI and its main shareholders, the Ministry of Economy and Finance (MEF) and Cassa Depositi e Prestiti S.p.A. (CDP), Italy's development bank.[1] 'The Supreme Court establishes unequivocally that no one is above the law and that the interests of Big Oil cannot outweigh the rights of people to have their health and safety protected by courts. The protection of the fundamental human rights of citizens threatened by the climate emergency is above any other prerogative. Climate justice is now a key concern for Italy's courts,' Greenpeace Italy and ReCommon said. The landmark ruling by the Supreme Court of Cassation will significantly influence all current and future climate lawsuits in Italy, as well as the protection of climate-related human rights already recognised by the European Court of Human Rights. The lawsuit against ENI, CDP and MEF, seeking redress for current and future damages resulting from climate change, will now continue before the Court of Rome. Notes: [1] In May 2023, the 12 Italian citizens and the two organisations filed a civil lawsuit against ENI, the MEF and CDP, - the latter two entities as shareholders exercising a dominant influence over ENI. The plaintiffs sought redress for current and future damages resulting from climate change, to which the Italian oil and gas giant has knowingly and significantly contributed over the decades. ENI, CDP and MEF contested the very authority of Italian courts to hear the case, arguing that climate lawsuits are not justiciable in Italy. Consequently, the 12 citizens, Greenpeace Italy and ReCommon appealed to the country's highest court, the Supreme Court of Cassation, for a final decision on whether judges in Italy can decide on climate cases.
