Final verdict nears in SIS's legal battle to annul ‘deviant' fatwa
Published on: Wed, Jun 18, 2025
By: Alysha Edward, FMT Text Size: The Federal Court is set to rule on the constitutionality of a fatwa issued by the Selangor religious authorities declaring the organisation 'deviant' for subscribing to 'liberalism' and 'religious pluralism'. PETALING JAYA: The Federal Court is set to rule on Thursday in a high-profile case involving a fatwa by the Selangor religious authorities that labelled women's rights group Sisters in Islam Forum (Malaysia) (SIS) a 'deviant' organisation. SIS is appealing a 2023 Court of Appeal ruling that dismissed its challenge against a fatwa issued by the Selangor Islamic religious council (Mais) 11 years ago.
Advertisement In 2014, Mais had decreed that SIS had deviated from the teachings of Islam by purportedly subscribing to 'liberalism' and 'religious pluralism'. Case history and contentions In October 2014, SIS, a company limited by guarantee established under the Companies Act 1965, filed for judicial review. It contended that the fatwa was unconstitutional and could not be imposed on a corporate entity governed by civil law. The case has since evolved into a constitutional battle over whether religious edicts can be enforced against non-religious organisations, and whether the civil courts have jurisdiction to review them. In its court filings, SIS also argued that certain terms used in the fatwa, such as 'liberalism' and 'pluralism', were vague and undefined, making enforcement arbitrary and open to abuse. The group questioned whether state religious authorities could direct federal bodies like the Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission (MCMC) to enforce such orders, raising concerns over the overlap of power between state religious authorities and federal jurisdiction. In 2016, the High Court dismissed SIS's leave application on jurisdictional grounds, but the Court of Appeal later reversed that decision, allowing the inter partes hearing to take place. In 2019, the High Court heard the case on its merits and dismissed it, holding that the fatwa was not a final decision and, therefore, was not amenable to a judicial review. In 2022, the Federal Court, on an application by SIS, declared Section 66A of the Administration of the Religion of Islam (State of Selangor) Enactment 2003 to be unconstitutional. The provision had attempted to grant shariah courts the power to hear and decide judicial reviews against decisions made by the state's religious councils or committees. In March 2023, the Court of Appeal in a 2-1 decision, upheld the High Court's 2019 ruling. However, the dissenting judge on the panel ruled that a fatwa cannot be enforced on a company, as the shariah jurisdiction is only meant to attach to individuals who profess the Islamic faith. Arguments in the Federal Court In the Federal Court, SIS argued that the fatwa violated its constitutional rights to freedom of expression, association and religion. It also said the fatwa was issued without due process, as the organisation was not given the opportunity to defend itself. Mais and the state fatwa committee, for their part, argue that they had the necessary jurisdiction to issue the fatwa. They claim the fatwa is consistent with Islamic teachings, and that SIS was merely seeking to undermine their religious authority. * Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel and Telegram for breaking news alerts and key updates! * Do you have access to the Daily Express e-paper and online exclusive news? Check out subscription plans available.
Stay up-to-date by following Daily Express's Telegram channel. Daily Express Malaysia
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
an hour ago
- New Straits Times
Review maritime laws with Sabah, Sarawak a harmonisation exercise, says Loke
KUALA LUMPUR: The government will review maritime laws with Sabah and Sarawak, ensuring that the process respects the Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63) and preserves the states' maritime powers. Transport Minister Anthony Loke said the Malaysia Maritime Law Revision and Reform Committee (MLRRC) had been given one year to complete their review, which was aimed to harmonise the outdated laws. "All six Acts will be reviewed in an integrated manner, and we hope to take a more comprehensive approach. "The principle here is that we are not looking to consolidate authorities, especially with regard to merchant shipping. We are not trying to merge or take over any authority from Sabah and Sarawak. "Maritime powers under the Sabah and Sarawak governments will remain intact. We respect the MA63. "What we are doing now is a harmonisation exercise. By harmonisation, we mean that if there are inconsistencies or conflicting provisions across laws, we aim to align them so that the legal provisions between the peninsula, Sabah, and Sarawak are consistent. "That is what we are working on, with cooperation and consent from the Sabah and Sarawak governments," he told reporters after officiating Malaysia Maritime Week today. Last week, Loke announced the establishment of MLRRC, which would be chaired by Federal Court judge Tan Sri Nallini Pathmanathan. The first phase of the MLRRC Committee's assignment will focus on six main legislative instruments, namely the Merchant Shipping Ordinance 1952, Merchant Shipping Ordinance 1960 (Sabah) and the Merchant Shipping Ordinance 1960 (Sarawak). Other instruments include the Penang Port Commission Act 1955, the Port Authorities Act 1963 and the Port (Privatisation) Act 1990. The MLRRC membership consists of 23 permanent representatives from ministries or departments, and the Sabah and Sarawak governments. Loke said the revision was necessary as many of the existing maritime laws were outdated and had not been amended. "Many of these laws are no longer relevant or in line with current developments. We need to revisit them to ensure our maritime industry remains competitive," he said. He added that although the committee tasked with the review was given a one-year timeframe, they had been instructed to expedite the process. "Once the review is completed, we will appoint consultants to examine the legislation and draft the necessary amendments. When the drafts are ready, they can be presented to the ministry at any time. "We hope that starting this year, we will be able to table proposed amendments during every parliamentary sitting," he said.
The Sun
2 hours ago
- The Sun
DAP to issue stand on Nick Adams' envoy appointment: Loke
PETALING JAYA: DAP will issue an official statement soon on the controversial potential appointment of Australian political commentator Nick Adams as a special envoy to Malaysia, said party secretary-general Anthony Loke. 'DAP will make a stand. We will issue a statement on that. 'I have just instructed our International Secretary to issue a statement,' he told reporters after officiating the launch of Malaysian Maritime Week 2025. Adams' reported nomination has sparked backlash across the political spectrum, with critics citing his history of far-right rhetoric and open support for US President Donald Trump and the Israeli Zionist regime. On Sunday (July 13), Amanah Youth called the appointment an insult to Malaysia's dignity and foreign policy, labelling Adams a far-right propagandist. PKR Youth also raised concerns, saying Adams' extremist views contradict Malaysian values. Selangor PAS Youth similarly urged Wisma Putra to reject the nomination, citing his anti-Islam rhetoric and staunch support for Israel. Adams, a US-based pro-Trump commentator with no diplomatic experience, is widely known for his provocative public statements.
The Sun
2 hours ago
- The Sun
Anwar to finalise top judiciary appointments pending Rulers' consent, says Loke
PETALING JAYA: The appointments to fill several key vacancies in the judiciary including the top post of Chief Justice will be presented to the Conference of Rulers, which is scheduled to convene tomorrow, said DAP secretary-general Anthony Loke. He said Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim had already provided a detailed briefing on the matter to Pakatan Harapan ministers and Members of Parliament yesterday, ensuring that coalition backbenchers were fully informed. 'I think we now have the full picture from the Prime Minister. Of course, he has updated the Cabinet from time to time but yesterday's session was to give an overall view to our backbenchers,' Loke said at a press conference after officiating the Malaysian Maritime Week 2025. He added that the Prime Minister had made it clear that a decision would be made soon, pending the consent of the Conference of Rulers. 'We hope that once the Conference of Rulers gives its consent, the decision will be announced,' he said. Government spokesman and Communications Minister Fahmi Fadzil also confirmed yesterday that Pakatan Harapan MPs were briefed on the judiciary appointments, among other national matters, during a nearly two-hour meeting with the Prime Minister in Putrajaya. The country's judiciary leadership is undergoing a transition, following the retirement of Chief Justice Tun Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat who made history in 2019 as the first woman to hold the post. Her departure has left a vacancy at the top of the Federal Court bench along with pending appointments to other senior judicial roles. In the absence of a new appointment, Chief Judge of Malaya Tan Sri Hasnah Mohammed Hashim has stepped in to temporarily carry out the responsibilities of Chief Justice. Under Article 122B of the Federal Constitution, the Chief Justice and other top judicial appointments such as the President of the Court of Appeal, Chief Judges of Malaya and Sabah and Sarawak as well as Federal Court judges are made by the Yang di-Pertuan Agong, acting on the advice of the Prime Minister and after consulting the Conference of Rulers. These appointments are typically based on recommendations by the Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC), a statutory body established in 2009 to ensure transparency and meritocracy in judicial selections. The delay in announcing a successor has attracted public attention, particularly from members of the legal fraternity and civil society, who have stressed the importance of maintaining public confidence in the independence and continuity of the judiciary.
