logo
Does RAT Hold Key To Air India Probe? Turbine Had Deployed Before Crash

Does RAT Hold Key To Air India Probe? Turbine Had Deployed Before Crash

NDTV17-06-2025
New Delhi:
India saw one of its worst aviation disasters, in which at least 270 people were killed, last week and new evidence indicates that both engines of the Air India Boeing Dreamliner 787-8 may have failed or it may have suffered a total electrical or hydraulic malfunction.
Clearer audio and video from the June 12 crash show that the Ram Air Turbine or RAT - a small propeller-like device which deploys automatically when there is a dual-engine failure or total electronic or hydraulic failure - was deployed on the Dreamliner, which crashed just 32 seconds after taking off from the Ahmedabad airport.
The distinct high-pitched whine of the RAT can be clearly heard in the audio in the absence of the roar of the aircraft's jet engines and its deployment can also be made out in the video, which shows the plane struggling to maintain altitude and then beginning to descend rapidly.
The RAT uses wind speed to generate emergency power and experts say its deployment, which happens automatically, points to three possible scenarios - both engines of the aircraft failed, it suffered an electronic failure, or its hydraulics failed.
Veteran Indian Air Force Pilot and aviation expert Captain Ehsan Khalid said he had suspected dual engine failure on the day of the crash itself, after the video emerged, as the aircraft was not 'yawing' (turning abruptly) and it is nearly impossible for birds to hit both engines at the same time.
"Dual engine failure was almost everybody's guess. The lone survivor of the crash had also said he heard a sound, which could be the deployment of the RAT; the racing of an engine, which could have been the propeller turning and picking up speed; and he saw red and blue lights, which could have been the emergency power connecting and the emergency lights turning on," he said.
"The aircraft was actively flying and it was not able to maintain its height. It was a dual loss of power, which would obviously lead to lower speed and a loss of lift (the upward force that opposes gravity and allows an aircraft to fly) and the plane will continue to go down the way it did. The Ram Air Turbine deploys when there is a dual engine failure or electrical failure or hydraulic failure," he explained.
The former Air Force pilot said an electrical failure, in certain conditions, could have led to the engines shutting down.
"The engines shut down at precisely the same time. If there had been even a two-second difference, there would have been a predominant yaw to the left or the right. The engines have shut down digitally, precisely, and at the same time, which could have only happened due to a malfunction in the software, which was executed by a wrong signal from the sensors, which could have come from an electrical failure," he said.
Professor of airspace Dr Aditya Paranjape also said the evidence points to both engines failing to provide thrust.
"Airplanes are configured to climb out with just one engine operational, it is a standard manoeuvre known as a one engine out climb. That manoeuvre additionally requires that the rudder be deflected in the direction of the working engine to balance out the differential yawing movement, which we don't see here... The loss of power is identical on both sides of the airplane," he emphasised.
32 Seconds Of Terror
The Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner, which was operating as Air India flight AI-171 to London, had taken off from Ahmedabad on the afternoon of June 12 and crashed into the complex of the BJ Medical College - an aerial distance of less than 2 km. The crash took place at 1.38 pm, just 32 seconds after the aircraft took off.
Of the 242 people, including 10 crew members and two pilots, on board the flight, only one - 40-year-old Vishwash Kumar Ramesh, a British-Indian who was returning to the UK after a visit - survived. At least 30 people on the ground, including trainee doctors, were also killed.
A bird hit was suspected to be the initial cause of the crash but it has been ruled out now as no bird carcasses were found on the runway and the two available videos don't show any fire, sparks, smoke or debris around the engines.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Indian Aviation Mayday On June 12: A Monumental Air Disaster
Indian Aviation Mayday On June 12: A Monumental Air Disaster

News18

time38 minutes ago

  • News18

Indian Aviation Mayday On June 12: A Monumental Air Disaster

June 12 was a surreal day of monumental tragedy for Bharat, the third biggest aviation market in the world. It began with the 'Mayday Call' around 1339 hours from the cockpit of AI India flight 171 enroute from Ahmedabad Airport to the London Gatwick Airport, that within seconds turned into the first ever 'Hull Event' pertaining to a Boeing 787 Dreamliner. Within seconds, India witnessed unfolding of a surreal monumental tragedy – the worst accident involving an Indian Aircraft in India as well as the worst disaster on the ground unleashed by the lunchtime horror.

AI crash probe should also focus on possible fault in stabilizer: Expert
AI crash probe should also focus on possible fault in stabilizer: Expert

Business Standard

timean hour ago

  • Business Standard

AI crash probe should also focus on possible fault in stabilizer: Expert

A veteran pilot and aviation consultant has suggested that investigators should also focus on a possible fault in flight AI171's stabilizer, which he believes could have created conditions for the plane's crash, albeit due to an unintended mistake by the pilot. Air India flight 171, which crashed moments after taking off from Ahmedabad, killing 241 on board and 19 on the ground, had arrived from Delhi before its onward journey to London Gatwick on June 12. The crew reported a fault with the stabilizer to engineers in Ahmedabad who fixed it, according to a preliminary report into the investigation released on July 12. Aviation expert Captain Ehsan Khalid told PTI that investigators should also check the flight data recorder for stabilizer inputs data, in case it was not fixed properly and created conditions for the crash during the takeoff roll of the Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner. The stabilizer is part of the aircraft's tail and helps in pitching up and down its nose on command from the pilot. Khalid has flown Airbus and Boeing planes, including Boeing 737. He said if a fault crops up in the stabilizer during takeoff roll, the pilot flying has to perform the following memorised routine: take one hand off the control column, reach down and turn off the stabilizer control switches located under the thrust lever assembly. As it happens, the orange switches are right next to the fuel control switches, which have become the focus of the investigation and much speculation into the crash. Khalid suggested that there is a possibility the first officer, who was flying the plane, turned off the fuel to both engines by mistake while intending to cut off the stabilizer, even though both switches feel different to touch. During takeoff, the pilot does not look anywhere except straight ahead to ensure the plane is climbing safely, he said. "I have a problem with the Boeing philosophy. It's the pilot flying who is required to turn off the stabilizer in case of a fault and not the other pilot," he said. In its preliminary report on the Boeing 787-8 crash, the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) said the fuel supply to both engines of the plane was cut off within a gap of one second, causing confusion in the cockpit soon after takeoff. "In the cockpit voice recording, one of the pilots is heard asking the other why did he cut off. The other pilot responded that he did not do so," the report said. According to Khalid, the entire cockpit voice recording could have been made public by the AAIB and if that was released, "these speculations or insinuations or smear campaign would not have been there because a pilot, as a community, feels that they are the goalkeeper of flight safety". He also said the AAIB report has given rise to more speculations, which were not there before. Khalid also noted that an electrical malfunction could also have resulted in the aircraft's fuel switches being cut off soon after takeoff. "While it is also true that the switch may be in one position and that position may be 1 and the second position is 0 in electrical terms... (then) 0 to 1 or 1 to 0 (position) could have transitioned because of an electrical malfunction or a signal malfunction while the switch could be at the same point. "That is why I think AAIB, in their own judgment, were very careful in not using the word that fuel switches were moved. They could have used it. It is not that they do not know about it," he said. Amid speculations that pilot error could have caused the crash, the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) on Thursday said it is too early to reach any definite conclusions on the Air India plane crash as the probe is still on and urged everyone to refrain from spreading premature narratives that risk undermining the integrity of the investigative process amid speculations. Various pilot associations have raised concerns about the AAIB report and have urged all parties to refrain from speculations. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

AI 171 crash: AAIB slams 'irresponsible conclusions' after US media claims says Captain 'turned off fuel switches'
AI 171 crash: AAIB slams 'irresponsible conclusions' after US media claims says Captain 'turned off fuel switches'

Time of India

time2 hours ago

  • Time of India

AI 171 crash: AAIB slams 'irresponsible conclusions' after US media claims says Captain 'turned off fuel switches'

NEW DELHI: Following constant media reports in the west on Air India AI 171 crash that squarely point the blame on the captain of the doomed aircraft based on information from US authorities, India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) on Thursday called out this 'irresponsible' drawing of 'conclusions through selective and unverified reporting. ' The bureau issued this statement after The WSJ in its latest report on the issue said, '…captain turned off switches that controlled fuel flowing to the plane's two engines' accidentally or deliberately, citing people familiar with US officials' early assessment of evidence uncovered in the crash investigation. 'The first officer who was flying the Boeing 787 Dreamliner asked the more-experienced captain why he moved the switches to the 'cutoff' position after it climbed off the runway, these people said. The first officer expressed surprise and then panicked, these people said, while the captain seemed to remain calm,' the WSJ report adds. TOI has not independently verified these claims. While promising regular updates into the probe, AAIB said Thursday: 'Certain sections of the international media are repeatedly attempting to draw conclusions through selective and unverified reporting. Such actions are irresponsible, especially while the investigation remains ongoing… essential to respect the sensitivity of the loss faced by family members of deceased passengers, crew of the aircraft and other deceased persons on ground. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 5 Books Warren Buffett Wants You To Read in 2025 Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo ' 'The purpose of AAIB's investigation and preliminary report is to provide information about 'WHAT' happened. The preliminary report has to be seen in this light. At this stage, it is too early to reach to any definite conclusions. The investigation by AAIB is still not complete. The final investigation report will come out with root causes and recommendations ,' AAIB said. The AAIB's prelim report has been panned by experts and pilots for selective indirect quoting of the cockpit voice recorder and on several other grounds. Many seasoned aviators in India say the prelim report seems to predictably shield the original equipment manufacturer (Boeing, in this case) while putting the blame squarely on a pilot who is no longer around to defend himself. AAIB has now defended itself after drawing massive flak since last Saturday: 'AAIB has a flawless record in investigating 92 accidents and 111 serious incidents since its inception in 2012… The VT-ANB (AI 171) accident has been the most devastating accident in recent aviation history and the investigation is being undertaken in a rigorous and most professional manner in accordance with the AAIB Rules and international protocols… not the time to create public anxiety or angst towards safety of Indian aviation industry, particularly on basis of unfounded facts. ' There has been a massive outcry against the prelim report which has spawned the suicide theory. Perhaps in a damage control move, Union aviation minister Ram Mohan Naidu hours after its release last Saturday urged people not to 'jump to conclusions' and 'wait for the final (probe) report.' Air India MD & CEO has said the report has 'opened additional questions' and also requested 'everyone to avoid drawing premature conclusions as the investigation is far from over. ' After the first Boeing 737MAX of Indonesia's Lion Air crash in October 2019 also, fingers were pointed at pilot — one of who was an Indian — error. It took a second B737 MAX crash, of Ethiopian barely five months later in March 2019, that led to discovery of a major flaw in a software of the plane and led to its global grounding. To be fair, the B787 Dreamliner has had its share of technical issues but had never seen a crash since it started flying in Dec 2009, till June 12, 2025. While there is no information apart from the prelim report in India — where the crash happened on an Indian carrier — US authorities have been speaking to the media and giving out alleged information that seems to be giving a clean chit to compatriot Boeing while blaming the dead Indian pilot. The preliminary report had identified that first officer Clive Kunder was the pilot flying the doomed AI 171 while Captain Sumeet Sabharwal was the pilot monitoring. Without mentioning who said what, the report had said: ''One of the pilots is heard asking the other why did he cutoff. The other pilot responded that he did not do so.' It was generally inferred that the pilot flying had his hands full and so the one monitoring could have toggled the switch. Now the WSJ report quotes 'people familiar with the matter' that the Captain had turned off the switches. 'The report didn't say whether turning off the switches might have been accidental or deliberate,' the latest news report says. 'The preliminary details have fuelled the belief among some US officials that criminal authorities should review the matter, as would likely be the case if the crash had occurred on American soil, people familiar with the matter said. In the US, accident investigators historically have involved agencies such as the FBI if they believe a potential crime occurred, rather than a safety mishap,' the WSJ says. 'Contents of the flight's cockpit voice recorders have been tightly held by Indian authorities and seen as key to helping fill out the sequence of events in the flight's final moments. Jennifer Homendy, chairwoman of the US National Transportation Safety Board, has sought to listen to the recording herself, according to people familiar with the matter,' it adds. Homendy's goal, according to WSJ, in working with Indian authorities was 'to quickly determine whether the crash presented any immediate safety concerns to the traveling public.' Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store