logo
‘Kaalidhar Laapata' review: An effective tale of losing and finding a family

‘Kaalidhar Laapata' review: An effective tale of losing and finding a family

Scroll.ina day ago
There was a neat symmetry in Madhumita's Tamil film K.D. (2019), about the bond between an 80-year-old man and an eight-year-old boy. For her Hindi adaptation Kaalidhar Laapata, Madhumita shrinks the generation gap while retaining the themes of rejection, abandonment and second chances.
The ZEE5 release is led by 49-year-old Abhishek Bachchan as 40-year-old Kaalidhar, who appears to have early onset dementia. Tired of caring for Kaalidhar, his greedy brothers Manohar (Vishwanath Chatterjee) and Sundar (Priyank Tiwari) and Manohar's wife Neetu (Madhulika Jatoliya) dump him at the Kumbh Mela.
Only Kaalidhar's sister Gudiya (Priya Yadav) mourns the disappearance of a man who has sacrificed his life and his love Meera (Nimrat Kaur) for his family. All seems lost for Kaalidhar until he runs into the precocious orphan Ballu (Daivik Baghela).
Ballu adopts the disoriented Kaalidhar and encourages him to have the experiences he has denied himself. Meanwhile, government official Subodh (Mohammed Zeeshan Ayyub) sets out to find Kaalidhar, his motives as murky as Kaalidhar's kin.
By directing the Hindi version and co-writing the screenplay with Amitosh Nagpal, Madhumita stays in charge of the film's emotional beats. The core relationship between two cast-aside souls who find that they have a lot in common was the chief draw of the original film and is the reason the Hindi retooling works too.
The choice of a younger protagonist means that the adaptation needs to justify itself more vigorously. The exact nature of Kaalidhar's ailment isn't clear, not are his symptoms consistent with his behaviour.
Subodh feels shoehorned into the story, rather than an important neutral witness to Kaalidhar's journey. While Kaalidhar Laapata is sluggishly paced and doesn't capture the sheer ordinariness of its anguished hero or his milieu, the remake does portray the ways in which love and empathy transcend familial ties.
Abhishek Bachchan and Daivik Baghela bring out the warmth and mutual respect that develops between Kaalidhar and Ballu – the older man vulnerable and confused, the boy confident and cheerfully cynical.
Bachchan has played this type of sad sack character in recent films, including I Want to Talk (2024) and Be Happy (2025). Under Madhumita's careful direction, Bachchan delivers one of his more affecting performances.
Play
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Exoticised, alienised, villainised': A book looks at how Muslims have been portrayed in Hindi films
‘Exoticised, alienised, villainised': A book looks at how Muslims have been portrayed in Hindi films

Scroll.in

timean hour ago

  • Scroll.in

‘Exoticised, alienised, villainised': A book looks at how Muslims have been portrayed in Hindi films

In the introduction to Postcolonial Bollywood and Muslim Identity: Production, Representation, and Reception, academic Nadira Khatun writes, 'Bollywood has represented Muslims through a selective ideological lens and often overlooked situating them in landmark Indian socio-political historical events.' Khatun adds that Hindi cinema has portrayed Muslims in 'essentialized' and 'homogenized' ways. 'Muslims are always associated with a few religio-cultural components, such as the Urdu language, biryani and meat as a food habit, sartorial practices such as wearing the skull cap, burqa and Pathani dress,' Khatun writes. '…But the truth is that Muslims around the nation observe different diets, language, and sartorial choices.' Postcolonial Bollywood and Muslim Identity (Oxford University Press) analyses the diverse ways in which Muslims have been represented in Hindi cinema down the decades. Between the 1940s and the 1970s, films portrayed Muslims as rulers or aristocrats, a representation that appears positive but was misleading, Khatun says. 'The audiences of those films formed an imagined image of Muslims, and that image was in absolute contrast to the real image of Indian Muslims at that time,' she writes. In subsequent decades, Muslim characters were often gangsters, terrorists or collaborators with Pakistani spies. The book, an expansion of Khatun's doctoral thesis, also examines noteworthy contemporary films with Muslim characters, such as My Name is Khan (2010), Dear Zindagi (2016) and Gully Boy (2019). The renewed interest in the historical genre is in stark contrast to older films such as Mughal-e-Azam (1960) and Jodhaa Akbar (2008), Khatun finds. Newer films such as Samrat Prithviraj (2022) and the blockbuster Chhavva (2025) identify Muslim rulers as foreigners and despots who delight in torturing their Hindu rivals. 'It can be argued that Bollywood as a mass art form has responded to selective historical moments of the past and present,' Khatun writes. 'Through these selective ultra-nationalist and ultra-violent representations of the notion of the Hindu nation and Muslim Other, Bollywood has contributed to the hegemonic Hindutva discourse.' Khatun spoke to Scroll about what prompted her interest in the subject and how she views the evolution of Muslim representation. Here are edited excerpts from the interview. What prompted you to write Postcolonial Bollywood and Muslim Identity? I have been told multiple times, you don't look like a Muslim. I felt that Bollywood plays a huge role in the perception of how Muslims look or behave in a particular way. I grew up in the 1990s when the Khans were the biggest superstars, but they were playing Hindu characters like Prem and Raj. Meanwhile my family members were marginalised in some contexts. So my own identity issues led me to choose the subject of the book. What has been the general pattern of the representation of Muslims in cinema? Earlier, Muslims were either exoticised, alienised or villainised. They were rarely shown as ordinary citizens with regular lives and regular jobs. Between the 1940s and 1960s, there were many films about Muslim kings and nobles. In later decades, you had Muslim social films where Islamicate culture was primarily portrayed. After the 1990s, particularly following the demolition of the Babri Masjid [on December 6, 1992], the idea of the enemy changed. Previously, villains were Mogambo and Gabbar Singh. From the 1990s onwards, the enemies were characterised as terrorists, gangsters, brutal invaders and rioters. A film inspired by an actual incident such as a terrorist attack is held to be more believable. Films with a lead protagonist who is a Muslim invariably place the characters in the middle of issues or show Muslim women facing oppression, such as Secret Superstar. Or take a film like Lipstick Under My Burkha. The Muslim character played by Konkona Sensharma is struggling with the number of children she has. Women, particularly, are shown as going through subjugation or repression. Darlings reinforces the stereotype of Muslim men as violent. Domestic violence is everywhere, it isn't restricted to any one community. That said, Alia Bhatt's character Safeena in Gully Boy is assertive, she has a voice. Usually, Muslim girls are shown as very weak or oppressed. There are rare film texts where you have the characters like Safeena who owns her religion and wears a hijab because she wants to and not because she is subjugated. Muslim characters also feature prominently in films with patriotic or nationalistic themes. Muslim characters are supposed to prove their nationalism or allegiance to the nation. This is even the case with a non-mainstream film like Iqbal. You are putting out the message that you have to prove your nationalism to be considered a good Muslim. A new trend I noticed was supernatural elements with Islamic demonic powers, such as Pari and Roohi. The women in these films are shown to be subjugated, they get possessed and they need supernatural forces to gain power. Films like Gully Boy and Mulk have saviours coming in from the outside. Audiences believe that Muslims are the way they are shown in films. Muslims are usually side characters. Did your research throw up positive examples of representation? The Hindi film industry has always had a reputation for being secular and giving space to marginal cultures. This isn't the case in other film industries. Take Bengali cinema – even its most celebrated directors have largely ignored the community. There are examples of Muslims being represented in a fair way, where they are not shown as obviously religious. In these films, Muslims are mostly character actors and not the lead protagonists. Films like Zindagi Na Milegi Dobara or Dear Zindagi have regular, ordinary Muslim characters. It's fascinating to see Jehangir Khan [played by Shah Rukh Khan] in Dear Zindagi. As an audience member, I didn't look at him for his religious identity. His predominant identity is that of a therapist. He is like any other human being. Also in recent years, we lack the cinematic representation seen in the films of Saeed Mirza and MS Sathyu in the 1980s and 1990s, which were critical of the socio-political events of their times. We are avoiding or entirely ignoring issues – the lynchings, the bulldozing, the attacks on meat sellers, the loss of livelihood. We are living in a time of sustained attacks on Muslim identity and an attempt to erase India's Muslim heritage. How is this playing out in films? If you look at the filmmaking part, there are fewer Muslim filmmakers, writers and lyricists. Muslims are being represented by non-Muslims, except in a few cases like Zoya Akhtar, Kabir Khan and Imtiaz Ali. Kabir Khan's New York is at least trying to generate a dialogue about the roots of terrorism. His film Bajrangi Bhaijaan doesn't demonise Pakistanis as well as Muslims because many times, 'Muslims' and 'Pakistanis' are used interchangeably. So, an insider point of view also matters. More recently, we have Muslims in historical films. In movies like Padmaavat or Chhaava, Muslims are shown as outsiders and villains who want to harm the nation or torture Hindus, who are shown as the original inhabitants of the country. The older Muslims historicals, such as Mughal-e-Azam and Shah Jahan, glorify and exoticise rulers. This is problematic too. How can an ordinary viewer relate to these films? Jodhaa Akbar in 2008 was the last film where a Mughal ruler was shown in a positive light. If you must take up social issues, why not subjects that have wider implications in the contemporary societal context, topics that can help us make sense of the larger politics? Some of these forms of representation have a direct impact on society, such as what happened in the case of Chhaava. There is a definite polarisation. One of my participants said that audiences are learning about history from cinema. That said, cinema isn't the only culprit – there are larger politics at play.

Bollywood six-month report card: The best performances of the year so far, from Adarsh Gourav to Kanwaljit Singh
Bollywood six-month report card: The best performances of the year so far, from Adarsh Gourav to Kanwaljit Singh

Indian Express

timean hour ago

  • Indian Express

Bollywood six-month report card: The best performances of the year so far, from Adarsh Gourav to Kanwaljit Singh

It's no secret that Bollywood has struggled this year, but this is becoming something of a trend. Even when Hindi films do well financially, they're rarely the kind that deserve to be praised. There's an art to a great mainstream performance, and actors like Ayushmann Khurrana and Rajkummar Rao had seemingly cracked the code, before falling into a trap that has consumed bigger stars than them in the past. The best performances this year so far have come on the small screen, with Sanya Malhotra delivering yet another remarkable turn as a downtrodden housewife in Mrs. It's slim pickings out there, with Akshaye Khanna's murmured performance as the villainous Aurangzeb in Chhaava almost making the cut by process of elimination. Meanwhile, Sunny Deol proved that he can have a laugh at his own expense in Jaat, a movie with a genuinely enjoyable first half but a truly terrible second. As much as people enjoyed watching Vicky Kaushal in Chhaava, it's disappointing to see one of our most talented male actors reduce himself to starring in a movie that basically requires him to scream at the top of his lungs. Here's a list of the top Hindi performances of the year so far. Mia Maelzer (Stolen) As a young tribal mother named Jhumpa in Stolen, Mia Maelzer exudes a quiet ferocity that saves her character from being a stereotype. The biggest compliment that one can pay her is that she is able to get the audience to root for someone who allows their toddler to be kidnapped from under their nose. Jhmpa could've very easily been perceived as a negligent mother. But over the course of the thriller, she transforms into a fuller person. While much of this is down to the writing and the direction, a lot of it is a direct result of the lived-in performance that Maelzer delivers. She's quietly the protagonist of the film, and one to watch out for. Also read – Stolen: The rare Hindi movie that isn't afraid to insult its own audience, and you know what, we deserve it Adarsh Gourav (Superboys of Malegaon) While the industry turns to Rajkummar Rao and Ayushmann Khurrana for roles that demand small-town angst, Adarsh Gourav has proven, several times, that he's probably the brightest star out there. In Reema Kagti's Superboys of Malegaon, he's predictably excellent as a wannabe filmmaker whose story serves as a metaphor for so many others like him in our country. A tip of the hat to Shashank Arora, who has the almost Bill Nighy-esque ability to steal every scene he's in, and Vineet Kumar Singh, who's better here than he was in Chhaava and Jaat combined. Also read – Superboys of Malegaon: Piracy can't be condoned, but Reema Kagti's film believes it's essential to the survival of theatres Kanwaljit Singh (Mrs) They wouldn't have made a movie like Mrs before, and even if they had, they would've conveniently shown the 'villain' to be an overbearing dictator who probably yelled a lot, and perhaps even raised their hand against the protagonist of the story. She's played by Sanya Malhotra, who's as good as ever. But a key reason behind the effectiveness of her performance is Kanwaljit Singh. He plays the domineering father-in-law character with such a quiet menace that you can't help but lean in and take notice. By avoiding a high-pitched tone, he is able to convey his character's firm belief in what he's doing is right. Also read – Mrs: Sanya Malhotra is Bollywood's posterchild for smash-the-patriarchy cinema, and her Neglected Housewife trilogy is one for the ages Gagan Dev Riar (Costao) Appearing only briefly in the otherwise ordinary film Costao, Gagan Dev Riar leaves a mark. Nawazuddin Siddiqui's performance as the titular customs officer, who is caught in a murder scandal, is rather uninspired. However, as the CBI officer tasked with investigating the protagonist, Riar has a sincerity that saves the character from being an outright villain. Like Costao himself, Riar's character is simply doing his job. Sometimes, little is more. Zahan Kapoor (Black Warrant) It's never easy playing the audience surrogate character in a film or show; they're usually the least interesting part of the story. Often, the folks they meet on their journey are far more colourful than they are. But Zahan Kapoor manages to make his wet-behind-the-ears cop more layered than you'd expect. He's vulnerable but strong-willed; he's ambitious but not arrogant. It's a fine line to balance, and Kapoor does it really well. Shoutout to his co-stars in the show as well: Paramvir Singh Cheema, Rahul Bhat, Anurag Thakur, and the very memorable Siddhant Gupta as Charles Sobhraj.

Abhishek Bachchan reveals he doesn't get ‘affected' by social media chatter: ‘I have grown up in the film industry…'
Abhishek Bachchan reveals he doesn't get ‘affected' by social media chatter: ‘I have grown up in the film industry…'

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

Abhishek Bachchan reveals he doesn't get ‘affected' by social media chatter: ‘I have grown up in the film industry…'

Bollywood's beloved star Abhishek Bachchan recently completed 25 years in the industry. Reflecting on the same, the star gave multiple interviews where he spoke about varied subjects. In one of his interviews, he spilled the beans on things that matter to him and the things that don't bother him. He highlighted that in the day and age of social media, the online chatter really doesn't affect him much. Here's what Abhishek Bachchan actually said Abhishek, while speaking to Instant Bollywood, weighed in on what it is like to live in a family packed with versatile and talented actors. Is it always serious business talk in the house, or does the scene look different? To this, Abhishek responded that they do talk about work many times, but that is not always the main focus. 'There are other discussions on the table that happen as well,' he said before adding, 'I have grown up in this film industry, so I also know what to take seriously and what not to take seriously. I don't get affected by what's happening in social media.' He further stated that his nephew, Agastya Nanda, who has just begun his career, might get affected. 'But with time, one also develops a thick skin. One has to know that it is not the be-all or end-all of life,' he quoted. For the unversed, Agastya made his acting debut with 'The Archies.' Directed by Zoya Akhtar, it was released in 2023 on OTT. Meanwhile, if we talk about Abhishek's work, he was last spotted in the comedy movie Housefull 5, which became a hit at the box office. His latest release is Kaalidhar Laapata, which premiered on ZEE5 on July 4.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store