Trump tests the final limits of his Capitol control
The GOP is spinning its wheels over the current draft of Trump's 'big beautiful bill,' which doesn't do enough for high-tax-state Republicans, doesn't cut enough for deficit hawks, and goes too far on Medicaid for plenty of others. For Trump, the delay is a buzzkill that could reveal the limits of his power — and a hindrance to scoring the wins he promised on the campaign trail.
Trump usually comes out on top in this type of conflict; he easily overcame opposition to re-electing House Speaker Mike Johnson and passing a stopgap government funding bill. Then the GOP Congress deferred still more of its power to Trump on his Cabinet, his tariffs and his unilateral reshaping of the federal government.
But the party-line megabill that's now wobbling in the House is an outlier. The 'big beautiful bill' is the first real opportunity for Republican wonks, committee chairs and battleground-seat majority-makers to write a law.
Which is why Trump's visit to the House on Tuesday did not have an immediately decisive effect, as he and Johnson seek to muscle through the legislation before the weekend.
'Trying to browbeat us in front of the conference, it wasn't a smart idea,' Rep. Andrew Garbarino, R-N.Y., who is holding out for more state and local tax relief, told Semafor. 'It just made, I think, the [likelihood] of getting this bill passed harder this week.'
For Trump, it's perhaps the ultimate test of his second-term power after he scrapped back to the presidency despite two impeachments, a lost election and a phalanx of fellow Republicans who thought the party might move past him. Now he wants the congressional GOP to cast aside their doubts about the legislation in front of them.
The SALT deduction? It shouldn't hold up the bill. Changes to Medicaid? As long as they're focused on 'waste, fraud and abuse,' they're good enough for Trump. The growing debt? Something for another day ('zippo' was said about the deficit in Tuesday's meeting, said one House Republican).
And he'd definitely like Congress to lift the debt ceiling for a couple of years, no matter how anathema such a vote is to many conservatives.
'You don't want to get to the point where you just become frozen and therefore don't act,' Sen. John Kennedy, R-La., told Semafor. 'Something will pass, I don't know what it will look like. I can't tell you that I'll vote for it. But I'm looking for a reason to.'
Trump's message to House Republicans was that the Senate is going to change the bill anyway – so they might as well pass it now.
Trump said 'the time for debating, for negotiating is over,' House Majority Leader Steve Scalise, R-La., said at an Americans for Prosperity event on Tuesday.
Even so, Scalise added, 'we've got members in the room that are still trying to negotiate. … We'd be voting next February if some people got their way.'
Still, some House Republicans said they were unmoved on Tuesday. Unfortunately for Trump, they might be easier to convince than stubborn senators. The Senate, famously, killed Trump's Obamacare repeal attempt in 2017 after the House passed it.
'He's the most persuasive. There is no substitute,' Sen. Shelley Moore Capito, R-W.Va, who used to serve in the House, said of Trump.
But 'individual senators maybe tend to be a little more obstinate, and successfully so,' she added. 'Because there's only 100 of us, and we don't have the pressure of running every two years.'
Trump's most effective argument on Tuesday was that his party should play team ball. He wants the debt ceiling increased in the party-line legislation to keep away a 'leverage point for the Democrats,' said Rep. Dusty Johnson, R-S.D.
It's an argument that works with plenty of Republicans — but enough of them to pass both chambers of Congress? That remains unclear.
Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., viewed as the firmest 'no' vote in the Senate GOP, told Semafor that if Republicans 'take the debt limit out, I'll support it.'
During Tuesday's meeting, the president pivoted between lighthearted jabs at holdouts and urging those same members to abandon long-held positions in favor of projecting unity.
Even as he singled out Reps. Mike Lawler of New York and Thomas Massie of Kentucky, the jokey nature of Trump's House speech charmed members — and he successfully moved some like Rep. Tim Burchett, R-Tenn., closer to 'yes.'
But the scarcity of detail around issues like Medicaid may have also drawn out some hard decisions.
The legislation includes requirements for some beneficiaries to make co-pays and restrict the provider tax that some states use to increase the federal share of certain Medicaid payments.
A White House official declined to directly address the provider tax and co-pay proposals, but said that Trump only wants the bill to include work requirements, to bar undocumented immigrants from the program, and end waste, fraud and abuse.
There's just one problem with that: The last phrase means different things to everyone. Asked if the bill's current language goes beyond 'waste, fraud and abuse' cited by the president, Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, said 'yes.'
But Burchett told reporters after Trump's remarks that he 'understood' that reductions to the federal share of spending on Medicaid were still on the table. And Freedom Caucus Chair Andy Harris, R-Md., said Trump 'will not mind' additional changes.
The comments were in sharp contrast to those from GOP leaders, who insisted that Trump's primary message was to take the deal on the table – including SALT and Medicaid.
'He feels like, 'We found a really good sweet spot everybody. Let's move forward,'' Rep. Blake Moore, R-Utah, told Semafor.
Is this the moment congressional Republicans reject Trump? We're understandably skeptical.
Scalise said he could fill a file with all of the 'obituaries' written about the GOP's party-line bill so far.
On the other hand, Trump may underestimate GOP lawmakers' hopes to leave a real mark on this bill — particularly during a Congress that has otherwise been strikingly deferential to the White House.
And Republicans know the speaker invented the Memorial Day deadline for passage in the House, so they feel more comfortable using their leverage today than they will in December.
Some Republicans saw progress on Tuesday. Dusty Johnson said that though he was 'not suggesting that everything is hunky-dory,' he saw Trump's speech getting the party 'closer to the finish.'
And there are plenty of middle-of-the-road members who were already happy with the bill as-is. Changes that win over fiscal hawks would also risk isolating the GOP conference's more silent majority.
'If we cut enough money out of the federal budget right now, which is what some of my friends advocate, you'd create riots in the streets,' Rep. Frank Lucas, R-Okla., told Semafor.
As for confidence in the speaker, his fans said he's got a hot hand. After convening his conference with Trump, Mike Johnson visited with Senate Republicans on Tuesday. Many of them left the room impressed.
'He has delivered what was seemingly impossible, three times, with two budget resolutions and a [stopgap spending bill] to the end of the fiscal year,' said Sen. Steve Daines, R-Mont.
Mike Johnson doesn't want the Senate to change his bill too much, per Axios.
Massie thinks his colleagues will cave, CNN reports.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Switzerland could revise offer on Trump tariffs, business minister says
By John Revill ZURICH (Reuters) -The Swiss government is open to revising its offer to the United States in response to planned heavy tariffs, Business Minister Guy Parmelin said, as experts warned the 39% import duties announced by President Donald Trump could trigger a recession in Switzerland. Switzerland was left stunned on Friday after Trump hit the country with one of the highest tariffs in his global trade reset, with industry associations warning of tens of thousands of jobs being put at risk. The country's cabinet will hold a special meeting on Monday to discuss its next steps, with Parmelin telling broadcaster RTS that the government would move quickly before the U.S. tariffs are imposed on August 7. "We need to fully understand what happened, why the U.S. president made this decision. Once we have that on the table, we can decide how to proceed," Parmelin said. "The timeline is tight, it may be hard to achieve something by the 7th, but we'll do everything we can to show goodwill and revise our offer," he added. Parmelin said Trump was focused on the U.S. trade deficit with Switzerland, which stood at 38.5 billion Swiss francs ($48 billion) last year, with Switzerland buying U.S liquefied natural gas (LNG) among the options under consideration. Another option could be further investments by Swiss companies in the United States, Switzerland's biggest export market for its pharmaceuticals, watches and machinery. "Look at the European Union, they promised to buy LNG. Switzerland imports LNG too — maybe that's one path," Parmelin said. "Maybe more investments. But to be sure it's a strong enough basis for continuing talks, we have to fully understand what the U.S. expects." Both Parmelin and Swiss President Karin Keller-Sutter were also ready to travel to Washington to pursue talks if necessary, he added. Swiss officials rejected reports that the higher than expected tariffs were imposed after a bad-tempered telephone call between Keller-Sutter and Trump late on Thursday. "The call was not a success, there was not a good outcome for Switzerland," a government source told Reuters. "But there was not a quarrel. Trump made it clear from the very beginning that he had a completely different point of view, that 10% tariffs were not enough. "We are working hard to find a solution and are in contact with the American side," the source added. "We hope we can find a solution before August 7." Tariffs would have a huge impact on Switzerland's export-orientated economy and raised the risk of a recession, said Hans Gersbach, an economist at ETH, a university in Zurich. Swiss economic output would be reduced by 0.3% to 0.6% if the 39% tariff was imposed, a figure which could rise to above 0.7% if pharmaceuticals - which are currently not covered by the U.S. import duties - were included. Prolonged disruptions could shrink Swiss GDP by more 1%, Gersbach said. "There would be a risk of a recession," Gersbach said. Swiss shares are expected to be hit by the tariffs news when the stock market reopens on Monday after being closed during the Swiss National Day holiday on Friday. The tariffs could also see the Swiss National Bank cut interest rates in September, said Nomura. "We expect one more 25bp policy rate cut from the SNB in September, which would take the rate to -0.25%," the bank said. "A hit to growth from U.S. tariffs on exports would likely weaken economic growth and cause further deflation pressures, adding to the likelihood of easing to a negative policy rate." Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's former jobs data chief decries firing of successor
(Bloomberg) — President Donald Trump's firing of the chief labor statistician was criticized by her predecessor, who called it an unfounded move that will undermine confidence in a key data set on the US economy. We Should All Be Biking Along the Beach Seeking Relief From Heat and Smog, Cities Follow the Wind Chicago Curbs Hiring, Travel to Tackle $1 Billion Budget Hole NYC Mayor Adams Gives Bally's Bronx Casino Plan a Second Chance 'This is damaging,' William Beach, whom Trump picked in his first term to head the Bureau of Labor Statistics, said on CNN's State of the Union on Sunday. Trump on Friday fired Erika McEntarfer hours after labor market data showed weak jobs growth based in part on steep downward revisions for May and June. The move by Trump, who claimed the latest monthly report was 'phony,' prompted an outcry from economists and lawmakers. 'I don't know that there's any grounds at all for this firing,' said Beach, whom McEntarfer replaced in January 2024. 'And it really hurts the statistical system. It undermines credibility in BLS.' Studies indicate that the agency's data is more accurate than 20 or 30 years ago, including any revisions of the initial data, Beach said. Even so, he said he'll trust future BLS data because people working for the agency are 'some of the most loyal Americans you can imagine,' making the bureau 'the finest statistical agency in the entire world.' Bank of America CEO Brian Moynihan, speaking Sunday on CBS's Face the Nation, urged the US government to improve its data collection to avoid revisions that engender distrust. 'We watch what consumers really do. We watch what businesses really do,' Moynihan said, while not addressing the politics of the firing. 'They can get this data, I think, other ways, and I think that's where the focus would be.' He noted the revision for May and June data, while not unusual, was one of the largest in seven years. 'That creates doubt around it,' he said. 'Let's spend some money. Let's bring the information together. Let's find where else in the government money is reported.' McEntarfer was confirmed by the Senate in a bipartisan 86-8 vote. Vice President JD Vance, then a senator, voted to approve her nomination. Kevin Hassett, Trump's chief economic adviser at the White House, alleged that the large jobs data revisions were poorly explained and were evidence enough for a 'fresh set of eyes' at BLS. He sought to contradict Beach's portrayal of the agency as politically neutral. 'The bottom line is that there were people involved in creating these numbers,' Hassett said on NBC's Meet the Press. Pressed on whether Trump would fire anyone offering data he disagreed with, Hassett, who heads the National Economic Council, disagreed. 'No, absolutely not,' he said. 'The president wants his own people there so that when we see the numbers, they're more transparent and more reliable.' How Podcast-Obsessed Tech Investors Made a New Media Industry Everyone Loves to Hate Wind Power. Scotland Found a Way to Make It Pay Off Russia Builds a New Web Around Kremlin's Handpicked Super App Cage-Free Eggs Are Booming in the US, Despite Cost and Trump's Efforts What's Really Behind Those Rosy GDP Numbers? ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Sign in to access your portfolio


Politico
27 minutes ago
- Politico
Former Trump statistics chief slams Friday firing of Erika McEntarfer
Trump fired McEntarfer after BLS' monthly jobs report for July showed that the economy had added just 73,000 jobs, coming in under expectations. He also took issue with the agency's major revisions to job numbers from May and June. Employment only increased by 33,000 jobs in those two months, the government said Friday, down by 258,000 from previous estimates. Revisions to preceding job reports are routinely issued when a new one comes out. The president also suggested McEntarfer had led an effort to inflate job statistics to aid former Vice President Kamala Harris ahead of the 2024 election. McEntarfer, Trump wrote Friday on Truth Social, would 'be replaced with someone much more competent and qualified.' But Beach told Hunt on Sunday that the bureau's estimates are far better now than in previous decades. And the president's firing of McEntarfer 'undermines credibility' in the statistical system, he said. 'Suppose that they get a new commissioner and this person, male or female are just the best people possible. And they do a bad number. Well, everybody's going to think, well, it's not as bad as it probably really is because they're going to suspect political influence.' Larry Summers, who led the Treasury Department under former President Bill Clinton, told ABC's George Stephanopoulos on Sunday that the firing 'is the stuff of democracies giving way to authoritarianism.' 'I mean, this is way beyond anything that Richard Nixon ever did, Summers said on 'This Week.' 'I'm surprised that other officials have not responded by resigning themselves as took place when Richard Nixon fired people lawlessly.'