
Bunk beds purchased to deal with prison overcrowding
Bunk beds are being purchased for
prisons
as part of an attempt to deal with record
overcrowding
, which led to more than 350 inmates sleeping on mattresses on cell floors.
Minister for Justice
Jim O'Callaghan
told the Dáil it was 'extremely important' that
prison overcrowding
is addressed and that bunk beds were among the measures being used to improve the situation for inmates.
More than 5,300 prisoners were in custody earlier this month, with 358 people sleeping on floors because of the lack of beds, according to the Irish Prison Service.
The Minister said capacity 'across the prison estate' has increased by more than 300 spaces since 2022. He said 134 of these were delivered in the past 12 months 'and more than 100 additional spaces will be added this year'.
READ MORE
He said the issue is 'a priority for me' and that he plans to visit every prison in the State.
Speaking during justice questions, he said he would change the law around community service orders and increase the maximum number of hours that can be imposed from 240 to 480. He also said he would introduce electronic monitoring 'particularly in respect of remand prisoners'.
Mr O'Callaghan was replying to Social Democrats justice spokesman
Gary Gannon
, who pointed out that 'hundreds of people are sleeping on floors' in prisons. He noted that the number of prisoners who died in custody increased from 20 in 2023 to 31 last year.
Mr Gannon said that in many cases prison conditions 'are nothing short of Dickensian' due to overcrowding and that is a 'serious failing of our criminal justice infrastructure'.
[
Head of Irish Prison Service defends surge in number of prisoners being released early
Opens in new window
]
The Dublin Central TD acknowledged that certain cases should result in prison sentences but 'right now, prisons are filled with people serving short sentences for petty, non-violent crimes'.
Mr O'Callghan told him that as part of measures to lead to 'decarceration' he proposes to amend the 1983 Criminal Justice (Community Service) Act.
He said judges currently have to consider a community service order if a sentence of up to one year could be imposed.
'I am going to extend that so that when a court is considering a sentence which carries a penalty of up to two years, the court must also consider a community service order,' he said.
The Minister he would not be 'going down the route taken in England and Wales' to release serious offenders at a very early stage to deal with overcrowding.
Mr Gannon called for an audit 'of who exactly the people are in our prisons'.
'What we have at the moment is a conveyor belt of people who, for various reasons, usually addiction, go into our prisons, sleep on floors and continue that addiction.'
Mr O'Callaghan agreed that
'many of the people who are given prison sentences have addiction issues and chaotic lives'. He said judges sometimes give prison sentences because they think 'individuals can get some mandatory services provided to them there'.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Times
39 minutes ago
- Irish Times
If long-term renting is such a good solution, why don't more politicians do it?
The Government has opted to reject suggestions from various quarters, including some of its own , that it should establish a fund to allow Irish savers to finance the development of affordable housing for sale. Instead, it's going to entice international investors to do so. It will just be housing for rent, not sale, and it won't be affordable for most. Oblivious to the contradictory position of luring landlords while simultaneously persisting with the fantasy of being parties that support home ownership, Government policy is engineering a decline in people owning their own homes, and a commensurate rise in numbers renting. Hundreds of thousands of households will become poorer, and a small cohort of landlords will become a lot wealthier . Is this private rental sector into which more and more households are going to be corralled even fit for purpose? One issue is the fact that there is no deposit protection scheme in Ireland, despite the issue of deposits consistently being the second most common reason for disputes between landlords and tenants. These are schemes run in other countries by private companies or state agencies into which tenants pay their deposits, instead of handing them over to their landlord. The scheme then returns the deposit at the end of the tenancy, if all is well in the interim. Complaints of landlords not returning deposits to tenants drop significantly under such schemes. READ MORE There were 474 applications to the Residential Tenancies Board to resolve disputes about deposit retention in the first three months of 2025 alone. There has been a provision in Irish legislation for the establishment of such a scheme for a decade, but the section of the Residential Tenancies (Amendment) Act 2015 has never been commenced. Last February, People Before Profit TD Paul Murphy introduced a Bill to force the Government to establish the scheme. Nothing has happened since. There is also no definition of rent in Irish legislation to say what is included or not included under it. This lack of clarity facilitates large landlords in levying – according to recent media reports – up to an extra €200 per month for the use and upkeep of common areas. Common areas are places that tenants do not occupy exclusively and have no control over. In the US, large landlord Greystar (which is also present here) is facing a a class-action lawsuit after the Federal Trade Commission accused the company of imposing hidden 'junk' fees , which it denies. The FTC's lawsuit states that the fees 'make it impossible to actually rent from Greystar for the advertised prices'. It accuses the commission of over-reach. Such additional charges allows for circumvention of rent caps. Regardless of recent Government bluster about increasing security for tenants during the reform of Rent Pressure Zones, the fact remains that tenants of a 'small landlord' can face eviction for essentially spurious reasons such as the probably unprovable 'personal hardship ' of the landlord, or because a member of the landlord's family might need the property. The Government's strategy is that in order for rents for already financially stressed tenants to fall, rents for financially stressed tenants must first be allowed to rise Most renters in Ireland live a very legally precarious existence, regardless of how good their landlord is. Ireland is an outlier in this regard, compared to many countries with an established rental sector. Rent inflation in Ireland is 39 per cent higher than the European average , and housing costs in general are more than double this average when utility bills are factored in. Those hardest hit by affordability issues also include better-off renters. According to the Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), in 2023 'middle-to-higher-income renters in Ireland are more likely to face high housing costs than their European counterparts'. Fourteen per cent of the richest Irish renters pay more than 30 per cent of their income on rent, versus 3 per cent on average elsewhere. Sixteen per cent of the next-wealthiest renters pay more than 30 per cent of their income on rent compared to 9 per cent on average elsewhere. The Government's strategy is that in order for rents for already financially stressed tenants to fall, rents for financially stressed tenants must first be allowed to rise. High rents will then attract international investment, which will then build apartments for rent, which will then reduce rents across the board. Ignoring for a moment the significant pain that will be inflicted on all tenants while enacting this strategy of building housing that the majority of renters do not want , recent research from Harvard's Joint Center for Housing Studies found that the benefits of the construction of new apartments for rent does not find its way down to help those who need affordable rents. Given previous rent inflation, it is highly unlikely rents will fall here in any meaningful way, if at all. On the regulatory front, local authorities are charged with inspecting private rented sector accommodation to ensure it is safe and compliant with regulations. They each have a target to inspect 25 per cent of the private rented dwellings in their area. In 2023, just nine out of 31 local authorities hit that target (Meath achieved 45 per cent), and nine failed to meet it. Galway City Council managed to inspect less than 3 per cent of the private rented stock in its area. In 2023, 23 local authorities reported that more than 90 per cent of inspected dwellings were found to be non-compliant with the required standards. There are other concerns: tenancies being misrepresented as less secure licence agreements; landlords wilfully ignoring legal requirements including having to provide their names to tenants; and investigations that take years by an under-resourced RTB. The fact is that whether renting from the Government's white knights – international investors – or the traditional small landlord, there are serious issues with the private rented sector that need to be addressed before the State can legitimately expect people to willingly rent a home instead of owning one. The minuscule proportion of Government politicians who rent (in a country where one in five people in the population generally are in the private rental sector) tells its own story. If more politicians don't choose to rent long-term, why do they believe so many of us should? Dr Lorcan Sirr is senior lecturer in housing at the Technological University Dublin

Irish Times
40 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Foreign affairs committee begins discussions on contentious Occupied Territories Bill
An Oireachtas committee will start discussing the Occupied Territories Bill on Tuesday, when senior officials from the Department of Foreign Affairs are questioned by TDs and Senators on a summary of the Bill published by the Government last week. The Bill begins pre-legislative scrutiny and will continue on Wednesday when Senator Frances Black , who originally proposed the legislation back in 2018, appears before the foreign affairs committee . Supporters of the Bill want it to be rushed through the Houses of the Oireachtas and passed into law before the summer break, but most sources acknowledge that is not feasible. Last week, the Government published the heads of the Bill – a section-by-section summary – of the Israeli Settlements in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (Prohibition of Importation of Goods) Bill 2025, its version of the Occupied Territories Bill proposed by Senator Black. READ MORE It would ban the import of goods produced in the Israeli settlements, which are, according to International Court of Justice, illegally occupied Palestinian territories. 'Daddy' Trump meets Nato, while defence, trade and Gaza dominate EU summit Listen | 44:28 However, the Government's version does not include a ban on services, which it says is not possible under European law, though that is disputed by pro-Palestine campaigners. The foreign affairs officials are expected to be questioned on this point. It is expected that many committee members will seek to agree on a recommendation for the inclusion of services in the proposed legislation when the pre-legislative process is completed and a report compiled for the Government. The process will continue over the coming weeks as the committee hears from several groups and interested parties, though it is not clear if the Israeli government will be invited to make a submission to the committee. Israel withdrew its ambassador, Dana Erlich, from Dublin last year in protest at what it said was the anti-Israel stance of the Irish Government, something strongly disputed by Taoiseach Micheál Martin and Tánaiste Simon Harris. Allowing the Bill to begin its passage through the legislative process was specifically cited by the Israelis as part of the reason for closing their embassy here. 'We have been putting in place arrangements for extra sittings,' said Fianna Fáil TD John Lahart, who chairs the committee. 'We'll produce a report which will tee up the Dáil debate on the Bill.' There is some nervousness in Government about the possible consequences of passing the Bill, with the US government and business organisations underscoring their opposition to the measure. While the amount of trade between the State and the Occupied Territories is minuscule, the proposed legislation is seen – by supporters and opponents – as an important test case. Other European countries, frustrated with the lack of EU action against Israel on Gaza, have been asking the Irish Government about the legislation.


Irish Times
40 minutes ago
- Irish Times
Iranian firm sought Irish diplomats' help for business deals with Vodafone, Eir and Three
A telecoms company with suspected ties to a key arm of the Iranian regime asked Irish diplomats for help setting up business deals in the Republic with Eir , Vodafone and Three , internal correspondence shows. The Iranian company linked to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) requested the help of the State's Embassy in Tehran at the start of this year to line up mobile roaming agreements with several Irish networks. In a January 6th letter, seen by The Irish Times, the Mobile Company of Iran (MCI) said it wanted to expand its roaming coverage to Ireland, 'considering the friendly relations' between the two countries. The Mobile Company of Iran is one of the largest telecoms firms in the country and is owned by a company believed to be under the control of the IRGC. READ MORE The revolutionary guard is a military force, but also controls sections of many important economic industries in Iran. It oversees covert operations and plays a central role in aiding Middle East proxy militias, such as Hamas and Hizbullah. 'We would like to express our gratitude for the consistent efforts of the Embassy of Ireland in strengthening bilateral relations between the Islamic Republic of Iran and Ireland,' the letter from MCI to the Irish Embassy said. The Iranian company claimed it had international roaming deals in place with nearly 200 operators across 110 countries, where local providers extend mobile phone coverage to customers travelling from foreign countries. 'We kindly request the esteemed Embassy of Ireland to facilitate and support the establishment of international roaming agreements with active operators in Ireland (Three, Vodafone, and Eir),' the letter said. The Republic's ambassador to Iran, Laoise Moore, did not respond to the letter, a copy of which was released to The Irish Times following a Freedom of Information Act request. Vodafone previously had a roaming deal with MCI, but cut ties in the last year. The UK telecoms giant feared the agreement might breach rules prohibiting companies from doing business with the Iranian regime. Three Ireland did not respond to queries about whether it was involved in any discussions to sign a roaming deal with the Iranian company. An Eir spokeswoman said its roaming agreements were 'established in full compliance with existing international legal frameworks'. The company 'reviews publicly available sanctions lists prior to finalising any agreements', she said. Eir did not respond to specific questions about MCI. An internal assessment by the European Commission, the EU's executive arm, previously said there was reason to believe MCI was 'indirectly owned or controlled' by an entity that had been sanctioned by the bloc. The main shareholder of MCI is connected to an entity put on an EU sanctions blacklist in 2010, due to links to the IRGC. A Department of Foreign Affairs spokesman said the IRGC was subject to economic sanctions, but the Mobile Company of Iran itself was not. Irish staff working in the Tehran Embassy were evacuated when fighting between Israel and Iran intensified, in the 12-day war that ended at the start of last week. The Embassy in Iran had only reopened last year, after having been closed in 2012 as part of a cost-cutting effort following the financial crash. The letter from MCI to Ms Moore was addressed to 'His excellency, ambassador of Ireland in the Islamic Republic of Iran'.