218 Republicans Vote for Budget Ripping Away Health Care From Millions
The House of Representatives passed the bill 218-214, with every 'yes' vote coming from a Republican. Only two Republicans, Representatives Thomas Massie and Brian Fitzpatrick, were brave enough to join Democrats and vote against the legislation.
The bill includes historic rollbacks of social programs. The Congressional Budget Office estimates it will strip 17 million people of their health insurance by 2034 due to its cuts to Medicaid and the Affordable Care Act, and deal the most severe blow to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or food stamps, in the program's history. By some estimates, the bill's Medicaid cuts alone are projected to cause 51,000 avoidable deaths per year.
And it will staggeringly transfer wealth from less wealthy to ultra-wealthy Americans. According to the Washington Center for Equitable Growth, it is 'the most regressive tax and budget law in at least the past 40 years.' Trump and other Republicans are sure to try to distract from this by pointing to the bill's sops to those expecting populist reforms—such as its no-tax-on-tips provision—which themselves are 'designed in ways that limit their benefits for less affluent taxpayers.'
And, of course, it will supercharge the Trump administration's barbaric war on immigrants, pouring $100 billion dollars into Immigration and Customs Enforcement, all while the American public increasingly considers the agencies' actions of late to be going too far. This part of the bill, Vice President JD Vance implausibly argued, makes all of its odious effects 'immaterial' by comparison.
All this while adding an estimated $3.3 trillion to the nation's debt.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
23 minutes ago
- Fox News
NY Times addresses backlash over report on NYC mayoral candidate Mamdani's college application
The New York Times seems to be in damage control after the paper's story about New York City mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani identifying as Asian and African American on his college application upset some of its readers, leading to an editor from the outlet attempting to clear up the controversy on social media on Friday. The article claimed that Mamdani, when asked his race on his 2009 college application to Columbia University, checked the boxes for "Asian" but also "Black or African American," in their article published on Thursday. The Times' assistant managing editor for Standards and Trust, Patrick Healy, put out a lengthy statement on X the following day after receiving "reader feedback" on the article. "Our reporters obtained information about Mr. Mamdani's Columbia college application and went to the Mamdani campaign with it. When we hear anything of news value, we try to confirm it through direct sources. Mr. Mamdani confirmed this information in an interview with The Times," he wrote. Healy explained that the New York City mayoral candidate felt limited by the options listed in the application's racial identity boxes — and since he was born in Uganda, decided to write in the country on his application. Mamdani's application was made available to The Times after a cyberattack on Columbia University in late June led to some of the school's sensitive information being exposed to the hackers. Healy stated that although the outlet received the information after it was stolen in a cyberattack, "The Times does not solely rely on nor make a decision to publish information from such a source," and verified the application with Mamdani himself before publishing the story. Regarding the feedback, he added, "We believe Mr. Mamdani's thinking and decision-making, laid out in his words, was newsworthy and in line with our mission to help readers better know and understand top candidates for major offices." Liberal critics, such as Keith Olbermann, lashed out at the Times on X. He stated, "Your absolute abrogation of the NYT standards would in a better era there have led the full range of you in management to resign. Utter failure. Then again, if you don't realize NYT is perceived as actively campaigning against Mamdani, you're all lost anyway." Another aspect of the article that some readers took issue with was The Times' source, who sent them Mamdani's 2009 college application. An opinion columnist for the outlet took to the social media platform Bluesky to slam his own publication for the story. Jamelle Bouie, a columnist for The Times, slung personal insults at the reporters on social media as well. Responding to a Bluesky post slamming one of the Times reporters, Benjamin Ryan, the columnist had this to say: "Everything I have seen about him screams a guy with little to no actual brain activity." Shortly after pubically slamming The Times' story and the reporters who worked on it, Bouie deleted the posts and issued a short statement on his Bluesky account. "I deleted several posts about a Times story because they violated Times social media standards," he said. The New York Times did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital's request for comment on this matter. Fox News Digital also reached out to Bouie for comment.
UPI
24 minutes ago
- UPI
U.S. tariff letters delayed, being sent Monday to first 12 countries
1 of 3 | President Donald Trump said letters will now go out on Monday to 12 countries with a final 'take it or leave it' offer on tariff negotiations, pushing the date forward by two days. Photo by Bonnie Cash/UPI | License Photo July 5 (UPI) -- President Donald Trump said letters will now go out on Monday to 12 countries with a final "take it or leave it" offer on tariff negotiations, pushing the date forward by two days. Trump did not name the 12 countries, adding that news would be made public on Monday. The president told reporters earlier in the week the letters would start going out on Friday but has since postponed the date. "I signed some letters and they'll go out on Monday, probably twelve," Trump told reporters aboard Air Force 1. "Different amounts of money, different amounts of tariffs." A 90-day pause instituted in April on Trump's so-called reciprocal tariffs of different sizes expires on July 9. A separate 10% "baseline" U.S. tariff on all countries is unrelated. The letters are expected to be sent by July 9, Trump told reporters this week. The pause was meant to give countries time to negotiate a deal with the Trump administration, but only a few have been finalized to date. Several other nations and the European Union have said they are not close. Britain and the United States came to an agreement at the end of June. American officials earlier this week announced a deal with Vietnam. Japan has said a deal with the United States on tariffs remains "unlikely," while European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said the three-month window was not long enough to properly negotiate a comprehensive agreement. This week, South Korean President Lee Jae Myung said negotiations on a tariff deal with the United States were "not very easy." "They'll range in value from maybe 60% or 70% tariffs to 10% and 20% tariffs, but they're going to be starting to go out sometime tomorrow," Trump told reporters earlier in the week, confirming the 90-day pause would end as scheduled. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said last month the deadlines are flexible in his understanding and that he expects negotiations to continue with the possibility of further deals getting done before Labor Day.
CNN
28 minutes ago
- CNN
Smerconish: America faces a crisis of nostalgia
CNN Michael Smerconish describes the best decade in America from his childhood and explains why nostalgia plays a critical role in American politics.
