Corbyn throws his weight behind striking Birmingham bin workers
A day after Birmingham City Council said it had launched contempt of court proceedings against the Unite trade union over the all-out strike which began in March, Mr Corbyn said central government was underfunding local authorities.
Addressing more than 100 workers and other protesters at a 'mega-picket' event outside a council refuse depot in the Tyseley area, the MP for Islington North, told the crowd: 'It wasn't the Birmingham bin workers that spent ludicrous amounts of money on the Commonwealth Games.
'And it wasn't the bin workers who created any of the problems that Birmingham faces. They are the people that keep this city clean.
'I am here today to support you but also to make this point.
'Birmingham is not isolated and Birmingham is not alone – the financial issues that affect Birmingham are actually there in almost every local authority in the country, particularly in the big urban cities.
'And those problems are that they have not enough money. The Government is not spending enough money on local government.'
Mr Corbyn warned: 'Local government services are under pressure and in many cases, even without the Birmingham model, still facing cuts.
'If we win in Birmingham and they are not allowed to cut wages, not allowed to destroy conditions, not allowed to damage the working rights of bin workers, that's a huge victory.
'But if we lose, think which city is going to be next.
'That is the point. And so I say to the wider community – get behind the Birmingham bin workers.'
The second, so-called mega-picket, with speakers from other trade unions, following a similar event in May, involved members of 26 organisations protesting at fives sites in Birmingham and Coventry on Friday.
The city council said on Thursday night that it had had 'persistent evidence' of a breach of a court order previously agreed with Unite.
A city council spokesperson said: 'We are taking this step to ensure the safety of our city and the safety of our workforce, including those who are on strike.
'Our injunction prevents the blocking of our refuse collection vehicles, both at our depots and on the streets. Despite writing repeatedly to Unite for several weeks to highlight what we believe to be clear breaches of the injunction, the situation has worsened.
'Since the injunction was granted, vehicles have been blockaded on roads to and from our depots, with Unite representatives and members stepping in front of, and even leaning against, moving heavy vehicles and blocking road junctions.'
A Unite spokesperson said: 'The court application is the latest distraction from the real task of resolving the ongoing dispute.
'The court papers will be subject to a careful review and the interests of Unite and our members will be fully represented at any future hearing.'
Speaking after his speech, Mr Corbyn urged the leader of Labour-run Birmingham City Council, John Cotton, not to dig himself into a hole and to settle the dispute.
Mr Corbyn said: 'There has to be a settlement and they should not be facing a wage cut.
'We just don't need to stretch this thing out.'
Asked what his message to Mr Cotton would be, he added: 'John, get a deal. Get a settlement, get the bin workers back to work.
'And remember, a lot of the public support the bin workers even though obviously it (the strike) does create difficulties.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
a few seconds ago
- Telegraph
Starmer has no plan for Middle East peace
The Prime Minister's statement to Cabinet included several valuable steps to relieve the humanitarian crisis in Gaza. He is to be commended for sending food supplies, for delivering them by air drops if necessary, and for offering treatment to Palestinian children with serious medical conditions in the UK. The British public is always generous in such dire circumstances and on this front Sir Keir will have the nation's support. But his promise to recognise a State of Palestine in September unless Israel fulfils a series of improbable conditions is neither realistic nor justifiable. In Jerusalem, Sir Keir's demands will be met with cynicism: they look like an ultimatum addressed only to one side, dictated by the arbitrary deadline of the UN General Assembly. Indeed, the Prime Minister appears to be falling in line with Emmanuel Macron, rather than paying attention to Donald Trump, who has already indicated that he will veto any such recognition of Palestine. There is, moreover, a contradiction at the heart of Sir Keir's strategy. He insists that 'there would be no role for Hamas in future governance', but demands that Israel desist from removing Hamas by force. Yet the West has no leverage over this terrorist organisation and his plan offers no practical way to exclude Hamas from control of Gaza – a key part of the proposed Palestinian state. While Hamas – which began the war with its hideous massacre on October 7 2023 – is let off lightly, Israel is made to bear all the responsibility for bringing it to an end. Yet it takes both sides to end hostilities – and Hamas refuses even to release its hostages, let alone surrender. Israel must acquiesce forthwith in the creation of a potentially hostile neighbouring state, the territories and military status of which are not even vaguely specified by Sir Keir's peace plan. He calls on Hamas to 'disarm', but imposes no such condition on a future Palestinian state. Yet after the shock of October 7, not only the present Israeli government, but any future one would only countenance a two-state solution with a demilitarised Palestine. The Starmer peace plan looks at best a naive bid for a seat at the negotiating table, at worst a calculated attempt to appease Labour's pro-Gaza faction and to stave off the threat of Jeremy Corbyn's new far-Left party. Sir Keir is likely to fail on both fronts. He would have done better to focus on sending aid and steer a cautious, moderate course towards Israel.
Telegraph
a few seconds ago
- Telegraph
They tried to break Lucy Connolly, but the decent people of Britain will never desert her
Yesterday, I spoke to Orla Minihane, mother of three teenagers and a Reform UK council candidate, who gave a magnificent, impromptu speech in Epping saying that the protesters were not 'far-Right', as the media and the authorities like to allege. It was a peaceful demonstration by normal British people who had had enough and were going to protect their kids come what may. Addressing the issue at a press conference in London, Nigel Farage took the bold step of saying that immigration was to blame for the sharp rise in rapes and sexual assaults in the UK. Orla, who has been trolled online as a 'Nazi Barbie' and a 'moronic fascist', was disgusted with Essex Police for escorting counter-protesters from Stand Up to Racism (far-Left agitators with placards apparently paid for by the Socialist Workers Party, as the media and authorities don't like to allege) to clash with concerned locals like her. 'If you were in Dover in these numbers, stopping hundreds breaking into our country every day, we wouldn't have this problem,' Orla told officers. One Epping single mother reported an incident involving a migrant to the police and an officer replied: 'Be careful what you say, you know what happened to Lucy Connolly.' 'Outrageous,' says my senior source in Essex Police, 'but a true reflection of the woke culture the chief constable (Ben-Julian Harrington) has spent so much time and money on. Officers aren't taught about free speech in relation to cases like Lucy Connolly's – all they know is hurt feelings.' The tide is turning fast on that deluded, self-loathing culture, in no small part due to the scandal of Lucy Connolly. Just consider how things have changed: 'If that makes me racist so be it' Lucy's defiant assertion of her right to criticise the UK's immigration policy is now echoed up and down the land, from pubs to dinner parties. Starmer's Stasi could silence people with the stigma of being racist or 'far-Right' a year ago, but the people have wised up to their tricks. The British will no longer be demonised for defending their women, their children and their culture against illegal migrants. Call us what you like, we are right and they are wrong. Two-tier Keir The UK has become a free-speech pariah with Lucy jailed for two-and-a-half years for a thought crime no one has ever linked to actual violence while a (now former) Labour MP Mike Amesbury, who admitted punching a constituent repeatedly, had his laughable 10-week prison sentence suspended within a few short days. Meanwhile, suspended Labour councillor Ricky Jones, captured on video apparently calling for far-Right protesters to have their throats 'cut', only a few days after Lucy's tweet, has been out on bail; his case will not even be heard until later this month. What the hell? Little wonder the Connolly case has made astounded headlines around the world. Last week, Le Monde quoted me on the scandal, saying it had 'brought shame on the UK'. See also the Prime Minister's embarrassment as President Trump schooled him on the way to deal with illegal migrants. An ashen Starmer looks as itchily uncomfortable as a seven-year-old boy with worms. 'You better get your act together or you're not going to have Europe anymore,' Trump warned on his arrival. 'But you're allowing it to happen to your countries and you got to stop this horrible invasion that's happening to Europe. Immigration is killing Europe.' And so say all of Epping! Misinformation While ordinary protesters are accused of acting on and spreading 'misinformation', the state is already using (and abusing) the new Online Safety Act to censor public discontent with immigration while denying that posts have wrongly been taken down from X. In fact, since the new rules came into force last week, the platform has blocked users from viewing a clip of MP Katie Lam speaking about grooming gangs in the House of Commons until X has verified their age. So the state is not prepared to protect children against rape, but instead 'protects' adults from hearing about it. At the weekend, The Telegraph revealed that an elite police unit will monitor social media for signs of 'anti-migrant sentiment'. That's the same state which used a superinjunction to hide from the British people the fact that it had smuggled in thousands of Afghans at a total cost believed to be around £7bn to the taxpayer. And some of those Afghans were Taliban who had fought against British troops, and are now occupying Army quarters next to squaddies' wives and kids. Surely, the most outrageous piece of 'misinformation' in our history. But apparently the real problem is with mothers and fathers who don't want their daughters hissed at and molested on the way to school. 'Take the treacherous government and politicians with them' Lucy's contempt for politics is nigh on universal now. Successive governments are increasingly viewed as traitors to this country, having ushered in more immigration since 1997 than in all preceding centuries in our history combined. 'Diversity is our strength' rings hollow when foreign-born men are responsible for some 40 per cent of sexual crime against women in London. Opposition to immigration now stands at 75 per cent, which is why Reform UK, the party that is the most trusted opponent of immigration, is at 34 per cent in the polls. I could go on, and on. It was truly appalling for Lucy Connolly to call for people to set fire to migrant hotels; even if it was a throwaway remark in the heat of the moment, no one could condone it. The burden of her tweet, however, has only gained salience over the past year. As Nigel Farage said, when he insisted that Lucy did not belong in jail: 'Millions of mothers at that moment in time were feeling exactly the same.' They were, and fathers too, and they will no longer keep quiet. The safety of their children may depend on it. 'Lucy will be a national hero when she gets out,' Orla Minihane told me, and that is why our Government fears her. One ordinary woman, a bereaved mother herself, enraged by the massacre of little girls, has acquired a talismanic force because she articulated the furious anguish of millions, and had to be punished for it. What if Lucy Connolly were to run against Yvette Cooper at the next general election and the patriotic people of West Yorkshire chose to vote to protect British children and showed what they think of a Labour government that is allowing our country to be invaded so there is no Britain anymore? Don't rule it out. We know it now, don't we? This is our last stand.
The Independent
30 minutes ago
- The Independent
Is Jeremy Corbyn's new party the fastest-growing political force in Britain?
To the consternation of their many critics, the new party launched by Jeremy Corbyn and Zarah Sultana claims it has already signed up some 500,000 supporters. This makes them bigger and faster-growing than any other UK political grouping – and recalls the heady days of a decade ago when a surge of new members made Corbyn the most improbable leader of the Labour Party in its history. Even so, success is still far from assured. What's the latest? Well, the recruitment is cracking along and polling for the embryonic party is also encouraging; one in six British voters, according to YouGov, say they are likely to consider voting for a new left-wing party led by Corbyn. After all, he did manage to score 40 per cent at the 2017 general election, more than any Labour leader since Tony Blair (albeit deflating to 32 per cent in 2019). Sultana, the self-declared co-leader (some say that Corbyn seems uncomfortable with the title), has given an interview to Novara explaining her reasons for leaving Labour, which include, she says, its 'austerity' policies and support for Israel over the war in Gaza. She declared it a 'dead' party, morally and electorally. The hostility between her and the Labour leadership is palpable, if not surprising: 'Keir Starmer said: 'Well, if you don't like it, leave.' So I did, and Jeremy and I – along with millions of others – are going to build something new and different. And they are rattled.' Has the new party got a name yet? No. 'Your Party' was a working title, and not a great one for web search, and Sultana says she has an alternative: 'I think it should be called 'The Left' or 'The Left Party', because it says what it is on the tin. That is something I will be pitching.' That might also not work so well on Google. Corbyn's first grouping after he left Labour was called the 'Peace & Justice Project'. A public vote to decide the name is an option, although that could mean these serious socialists urge people to back a Votey McVoteface government. Independent Alliance is one label for the loose parliamentary association. What's going well? A certain amount of momentum, reflecting some of the excitement the original Momentum movement once had. It may not be a surprise that James Schneider, the founder of Momentum and a former Corbyn adviser, is now reportedly involved in the new party. They've now got six MPs in their Independent Alliance grouping, including a number from areas with a relatively large Muslim and/or younger population where Labour's stance on the war in Gaza has proved a negative for the party. Votes for 16 and 17-year-olds might also prove a small help. Apart from some useful geographical concentrations of support, they also attract people who've tended to defect from Labour to the Greens since Starmer took over. Corbyn, love him or hate him, has got name recognition, a strong populist instinct, and seemingly inexhaustible reserves of self-confidence. As, indeed, does Sultana. Elections in Scotland and Wales under a partly proportional system next May, and successive rounds of local elections in the big cities, where pockets of support can get councillors in, will also see new Sultana-Corbynites elected. In some places, local politics might get unhealthily polarised, if not communalised, between Reform and the Corbynites. Who are they hurting? Greens have most to lose, followed by Labour, followed by Reform (because protest voters don't have to be consistent, just angry). Angela Rayner, Shabana Mahmood and Wes Streeting are just three of the more prominent MPs vulnerable to a Corbynite revival. Multi-party politics will probably be quite chaotic electorally next time round. What could go wrong? A majority muslim base is not necessarily consistent with a general wish to be socially progressive on, for example, LGBT+ rights. A similar debate has been going on in the Green Party, with such issues raised by Mothin Ali, a prominent Green activist and councillor in Leeds. Adnan Hussain, independent MP for Blackburn, remarked: 'I'm following this dilemma being faced by Mothin with great interest. It's no secret that Muslims tend to be socially conservative. Is there space on the left to create a broad enough church to allow Muslims an authentic space, just as it does all other minority groups?' What are their prospects? Israel's conduct of the war has shocked so many people, and it has become such a powerfully charged issue that Gaza, and opposition to 'austerity', will hold them together – but there will be arguments. The left is traditionally prone to splintering (as Labour itself did in Corbyn's heyday), and there's no reason to suppose it'll be different this time, given the busy intersection of cultural and traditional class issues. Sadly, the kind of bitter controversies about antisemitism and Islamophobia that disfigured Corbyn's period as Labour leader could quite easily cause even more disruption and appalling publicity for the new party. Corbyn's answer to all this is maximum autonomy at the local level, but that also means a lack of clarity on policy, and yet more room for internal division – just like when he ran Labour, in fact.
