logo
EV maker Scout Motors wants to sell directly to buyers but can't do it in its home state

EV maker Scout Motors wants to sell directly to buyers but can't do it in its home state

Independent07-02-2025
Volkswagen-backed Scout Motors is making a massive bet in the electric SUV market with a carefully cultivated experience that will allow some customers to buy the company's vehicle in minutes on an app and then use it to handle everything after from repairs to updates and upgrades.
But without some help from lawmakers, that will be impossible in South Carolina, where the company is pouring billions into its new auto plant and a Scout Motors experience like BMW's test track in Greer.
In a world where almost everything can be bought online, automobiles remain an exception. Supporters of the dealership model say the experience allows buyers to compare prices across several businesses.
Unlike a pair of pants, where color, style and size are about the only concerns, buying a car involves financing, state registration, taxes, regulations — and often a test drive.
South Carolina is one of about two dozen states that ban manufacturers from selling vehicles directly to consumers and instead require all new autos be purchased through a dealer. Scout would like to see that practice changed nationwide for all EV makers and figured it could start in its new backyard.
South Carolina also bans manufacturers from owning their own service centers, which means anyone who wants to own a Scout SUV must travel to another state to have it repaired or serviced.
People who back the dealership structure said online sales could lead to carmakers raising their own prices with less competition.
The dealership structure requires local business owners to back what they sell and assure buyers get quality service on their vehicles. Auto dealers often have close ties to their communities and cities could lose one of their biggest businesses and heftiest taxpayers.
'If for some reason the car is a lemon or the job isn't getting done, they are the folks who live there, who pay their taxes and send their kids to school,' said Republican Sen. Larry Grooms, who runs the Senate Transportation Committee where any bill changing the rules would likely end up.
Scout is determined to get the law changed to help them as well as other EV makers like Tesla and Rivian. They have gone on a media blitz that includes stories in local outlets. They are also trying to secure support in a Republican-dominated state with an argument that consumers should be free to buy whatever they wish directly, without a middleman.
Scout also is armed with a 2000 Attorney General 's Office opinion on the bill which would weeks later would become law and serve as the most recent major overhaul to South Carolina's laws on new car buying.
'If a manufacturer cannot sell his own product, but must constitutionally pass that product through a 'middle man,' then our understanding of the free market system is way off base. The Internet is a worldwide web for trade, not a local instrument for protectionism,' wrote then-Republican state Attorney General Charlie Condon in the opinion, which is not binding and an educated guess on what a judge might do if someone sued over the law.
Scout officials say using a dealership-only business model would make the vehicles aimed at the under-$60,000 market too expensive and complicate what the company wants to be a seamless experience, from start to finish.
Gov. Henry McMaster touts the Scout plant in Blythewood as one of his biggest economic development scores The Republican has been to both the February 2024 groundbreaking of the massive facility and this month's ceremony to mark work starting on a new $150 million interstate interchange the state is paying for to help get workers, parts and new SUVs in and out.
McMaster recently said he wants to protect dealers, but wants to let Scout sell directly, too.
'Over the last few years with the Internet and Amazon and all the others customers are looking for their freedom and that ability to order things direct without a middleman,' McMaster said.
Scout is trying to find a niche in a growing but uncertain U.S. electric vehicle market. President Donald Trump's election could threaten the industry, both through ending tax credits and tariffs that could raise prices.
The original Scout Motors made gasoline-powered vehicles for about 20 years when it was owned by International Harvester. Production ended in 1980, but their shape and features continue to influence modern SUVs. Scouts have had a niche fanbase of collectors ever since.
The new Scout Motors is trying to tap into a mix of nostalgia and technology. Key to Scout's success will be its app, Scout Vice President of Growth Cody Thacker said.
He envisions a Scout buyer scrolling through types and colors, performance and comfort options and hundreds of other choices. Financing, titling and paperwork would all be handled in minutes instead of the hours it takes at dealerships. That custom SUV could then be delivered to the buyer's door.
'You see the point of contention and the huge opportunity,' Thacker said.
Scout's plant in Blythewood, about 20 miles (32 kilometers) north of Columbia, is expected to open in 2027 and employ up to 4,000 people if the company can hit its goal of making and selling 200,000 vehicles per year.
Scout also wants to build by its plant a center where people could test drive vehicles on a company-owned track and take tours. For it to work, the company wants to be able to sell someone a vehicle after they zoom around the site, Thacker said.
South Carolina agreed in 2023 to give Scout more than $1 billion in incentives to land the plant. At the time, the dealership law wasn't on their radar. It came up as executives started looking at their business model, Thacker said.
The company doesn't regret choosing South Carolina and still believes it gave them the best workforce, economic climate and infrastructure. And it will move forward if the law isn't changed selling its vehicles through other states where it can get national licenses sending the money and tax benefits out of the state, Thacker said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

John Fetterman looks unrecognizable as he credits AI for brand new makeover
John Fetterman looks unrecognizable as he credits AI for brand new makeover

Daily Mail​

time26 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

John Fetterman looks unrecognizable as he credits AI for brand new makeover

Pennsylvania Senator John Fetterman was spotted wearing a suit on Capitol Hill Thursday, a far cry from his usually attire of a hoodie and athletic shorts. The senior senator from Pennsylvania was seen wandering the halls under the U.S. capitol in his sharp threads, and also posed for a photo with his Republican colleague from the Commonwealth Dave McCormick, celebrating the latter's maiden floor speech. Fetterman himself commented on his look Thursday, joking that 'It's all A.I.' Many on X noticed the radically different look for Fetterman, but reactions were mixed. Some users complimented the Senator, while others wondered why he didn't dress like this more often. Pam Besteder, posting under the handle @pambesteder asked 'Why does Fetterman wear a suit to this but not to Trump's Inauguration? Has he realized this ridiculousness of not being dressed professionally as a Senator I wonder? 'Finally Fetterman can afford a suit! He sure has changed the last year or so,' wrote Johnny Midnight. X user @Kimberly Reich noted 'I didn't recognize Senator Fetterman (at first)...' Another user with the X handle @joannesnyder64 wrote '@JohnFetterman you look great in a suit!! Please wear it more often.' Fetterman is, as many users pointed out, typically spotted in much more relaxed attire. In 2023, shortly after Fetterman was elected to the chamber, then Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer told the Senate Sergeant at arms to not enforce the dress code. That lasted about a week until the Senate passed a formal dress code. US Senator John Fetterman (L) and his wife Gisele Barreto Fetterman arrive for the White House Correspondents' Association (WHCA) dinner at the Washington Hilton, in Washington, DC, on April 27, 2024 The SHORTS Act ('SHow Our Respect To the Senate') required business attire, specifying "a coat, tie, and slacks or other long pants" for men. It didn't say anything about women's attire. "Though we've never had an official dress code, the events over the past week have made us all feel as though formalizing one is the right path forward," Schumer said at the time. Back in 2023, Fetterman, known for his sense of humor responded to an announcement of the rule's passage with a meme, while also promising to comply with the regulations. — U.S. Senator John Fetterman (@SenFettermanPA) September 27, 2023 Fetterman has been spotted dressed professionally at work on other occasions such as the day that he presided over the Senate for the first time. He also wore one the day that he was sworn in to the chamber, which prompted some to wonder if he had turned over a new leaf in taking on a new job. Fetterman is now wearing a suit as he's walks into preside in the Senate chamber — Joseph Zeballos-Roig (@josephzeballos) September 28, 2023 Fetterman wore a suit. He's now Senator Fetterman. — Frida Ghitis (@FridaGhitis) January 3, 2023 The Senior Pennsylvania Senator did not wear a suit to Trump's inauguration this past January. He did wear one when he attended his own swearing-in to be the Lieutenant Governor of Pennsylvania.

Trump wildly trolls Fed Chair Jerome Powell with face-to-face demand on interest rates during tour of 'fraudulent' $3B renovation
Trump wildly trolls Fed Chair Jerome Powell with face-to-face demand on interest rates during tour of 'fraudulent' $3B renovation

Daily Mail​

time26 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Trump wildly trolls Fed Chair Jerome Powell with face-to-face demand on interest rates during tour of 'fraudulent' $3B renovation

President Donald Trump on Thursday visited the Federal Reserve building in Washington, DC, marking a rare public event with Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell. Trump has complained about the massive $2.5 billion project to renovate the building, as he and his staff continue hammering Powell for the cost of the renovation project. Trump arrived with Republican Senators Tim Scott, Thom Tillis, and OMB Director Russ Vought, Chairman of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac Bill Pulte as well as his Appointees to the National Capital Planning Commission, Deputy chief of staff James Blair and White House Staff Secretary Will Scharf. 'We're going to take a look, we're going to see what's happening and it's got a long way,' Trump said as the president and Powell wore hard hats and spoke to the press about the overall cost of the project. The visit was awkward as the Federal Reserve values it's independence, even as presidents frequently gripe about its failure to react in a timely way to boost the economy. Trump slapped Powell on the arm and joked about his refusal to cut interest rates as he discussed the costs of the project. 'We would be helped if interest rates would come down but we're going to see how the board rules on that soon,' he said. The president has repeatedly criticized Powell for refusing to cut interest rates, even as inflation has slowed. 'He's a moron,' Trump said on July 1, 'You talk to the guy, it's like talking to a nothing. It's like talking to a chair,' he added on July 15. 'No personality, no high intelligence, no nothing.' Trump has since encouraged Powell to step down. 'I'd love it if he wants to resign,' Trump said on July 16, repeating earlier criticisms of him acting 'too late' on inflation. Powell has said the Federal Reserve continues to monitor the results of Trump's tariffs on inflation, before an interest rate cut could be approved. The increased pressure on Powell over the renovation project appears a familiar tactic by Trump to give him a pretense to fire the chairman. The stock market fell when Trump floated the idea of firing Powell to Republican senators, but he later told reporters he would not do so. The Federal Reserve briefed reporters ahead of Trump's visit, as they blamed tariffs and inflation for the increased cost of rennovating the building, as well as the increased cost of materials and security features. The renovation of the Marriner S. Eccles building and its adjacent Federal Reserve East Building was intially estimated at $1.9 billion in 2021, but costs have balloned since construction began. The project is now expected to be finished by the fall of 2027.

Oregon adoption policy on LGBTQ acceptance violates free speech rights, court says
Oregon adoption policy on LGBTQ acceptance violates free speech rights, court says

Reuters

time26 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Oregon adoption policy on LGBTQ acceptance violates free speech rights, court says

CHICAGO, July 24 (Reuters) - An Oregon woman seeking to adopt two children out of foster care will be allowed to move forward after a U.S. appeals court on Thursday said a state policy requiring adoptive parents to 'respect, accept and support' the children's gender expression and sexual orientation was unconstitutional. A divided three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a lower court ruling blocking Jessica Bates from adopting because of the Oregon Department of Human Services' policy. The majority agreed with Bates, a devout Christian who said her beliefs prevent her from following the policy, finding that it violates Bates' rights to free speech and free exercise of religion under the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. Circuit Judge Daniel Bress, who was appointed by Republican President Donald Trump in his first term, joined with Circuit Judge Michael Hawkins, an appointee of Democratic President Bill Clinton, in finding that the policy is unconstitutional. Oregon hasn't explained why other ways to protect LGBTQ children in foster care — instead of a policy that broadly bans Bates from adopting — aren't feasible, Bress wrote in the opinion. 'A state's general conception of the child's best interest does not create a force field against the valid operation of other constitutional rights,' he wrote. Bates was represented by lawyers from Alliance Defending Freedom, a conservative Christian group that is routinely involved in high-profile court cases involving religious liberties. 'The 9th Circuit was right to remind Oregon that the foster and adoption system is supposed to serve the best interests of children, not the state's ideological crusade,' ADF Senior Counsel and Vice President of Litigation Strategy Jonathan Scruggs said in a statement after the ruling. A spokesperson for Democratic Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield, whose office defended the policy, said in a statement they are reviewing the ruling to determine their next steps. Bates filed the lawsuit in 2023 after her application to adopt a pair of siblings was denied when she told an administrator that she couldn't support the behavior of a hypothetical child whose preferred pronouns and identity don't match their biological sex. The district court rejected Bates' bid for an injunction against the policy, finding that Oregon has a strong interest in protecting the rights of LGBTQ children and the policy's regulation of free speech was precise enough. Circuit Judge Richard Clifton, an appointee of former President George W. Bush, dissented, saying that the policy regulates parental actions and does not impact speech beyond what is necessary. The case is Bates v. Pakseresht, case number 23-4169 in the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. For Bates: Jonathan Scruggs, James Campbell, Johannes Widmalm-Delphonse, John Bursch of the Alliance Defending Freedom and Rebekah Schultheiss of the Freedom Foundation For Oregon: Philip Thoennes, Denise Fjordbeck, Benjamin Gutman, Ellen Rosenblum of the Oregon Department of Justice

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store