logo
Ex-Obama intel boss wanted anti-Trump dossier included in 'atypical' 2016 assessment despite pushback

Ex-Obama intel boss wanted anti-Trump dossier included in 'atypical' 2016 assessment despite pushback

Fox News5 days ago
Former CIA Director John Brennan, who served under former President Barack Obama, pushed for the so-called "Steele dossier," which featured salacious material and unfounded allegations about President Donald Trump's connections to Russia, to be included in an assessment evaluating Russian interference in the 2016 election, according to a review declassified Wednesday.
The CIA, FBI and National Security Agency's Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) evaluating Russia's interference in the 2016 presidential election diverted from intelligence standards and featured some "procedural anomalies," according to a new lessons-learned review of the assessment that CIA Director John Ratcliffe ordered for declassification Wednesday.
The lessons-learned review determined that the "decision by agency heads to include the Steele Dossier in the ICA ran counter to fundamental tradecraft principles and ultimately undermined the credibility of a key judgment."
Specifically, the new review found that the CIA's deputy director for analysis said in a December 2016 email to Brennan that including the dossier in any capacity jeopardized "the credibility of the entire paper."
"Despite these objections, Brennan showed a preference for narrative consistency over analytical soundness," the new review stated. "When confronted with specific flaws in the Dossier by the two mission center leaders—one with extensive operational experience and the other with a strong analytic background—he appeared more swayed by the Dossier's general conformity with existing theories than by legitimate tradecraft concerns. Brennan ultimately formalized his position in writing, stating that 'my bottomline is that I believe that the information warrants inclusion in the report.'"
Brennan served as director of the CIA from March 2013 to January 2017 under the Obama administration.
The dossier originated after law firm Perkins Coie hired opposition research firm Fusion GPS to conduct opposition research into then-presidential candidate Trump in April 2016 on behalf of Trump's opponent, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, and the Democratic National Committee.
Fusion GPS hired former British intelligence officer Christopher Steele, who composed the so-called "Steele dossier." The document included scandalous and mostly unverified allegations, including details that Trump engaged in sex acts with Russian prostitutes.
Trump has denied the allegations included in the dossier.
Brennan could not be reached for comment by Fox News Digital.
The lessons-learned review also found fault with other tradecraft employed while drafting the ICA, including a rushed timeline and atypical involvement of agency heads while compiling the assessment.
"While agency heads sometimes review controversial analytic assessments before publication, their direct engagement in the ICA's development was highly unusual in both scope and intensity," the review said. "This exceptional level of senior involvement likely influenced participants, altered normal review processes, and ultimately compromised analytic rigor."
Additionally, the review said that Brennan sent a note to intelligence community analysts one day before their only session coordinating on the ICA that he had met with then-Director of National Intelligence James Clapper and then-FBI Director James Comey. The review said that Brennan told the CIA workforce that "there is strong consensus among us on the scope, nature, and intent of Russian interference in our recent Presidential election."
"While officers involved in drafting the ICA consistently said they did not feel pressured to reach specific conclusions, Brennan's premature signaling that agency heads had already reached consensus before the ICA was even coordinated risked stifling analytic debate," the review said.
Ratcliffe ordered the "lessons-learned" review of the ICA earlier in 2025 specifically focused on the ICA's assessment that Russian President Vladimir Putin "aspired" to assist Trump win the 2016 election, and declassified the results Wednesday in an attempt to promote transparency, according to a CIA news release.
"Agency heads at the time created a politically charged environment that triggered an atypical analytic process around an issue essential to our democracy," Ratcliffe said in a Wednesday statement. "Under my watch, I am committed to ensuring that our analysts have the ability to deliver unvarnished assessments that are free from political influence."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Little Rock bartender reacts to ‘no tax on tips' in ‘Big Beautiful Bill'
Little Rock bartender reacts to ‘no tax on tips' in ‘Big Beautiful Bill'

Yahoo

time39 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Little Rock bartender reacts to ‘no tax on tips' in ‘Big Beautiful Bill'

LITTLE ROCK, Ark. — A new federal tax break touted as a win for service workers may not be quite the windfall it first appears. As part of the recently passed 'Big Beautiful Bill,' a sweeping budget proposal championed by former President Donald Trump, Section 70201 eliminates federal income tax on tips, but only up to a point. Beginning in 2025, workers in tip-based jobs can deduct up to $25,000 in qualified tips from their taxable income. The deduction is set to last through the end of 2028. It applies only to cash or charged tips that are formally reported on IRS forms, such as W-2s or Form 4137. Arkansas food relief groups brace for impact after SNAP cuts in 'One Big Beautiful Bill' For Jordon O'Donald, a bartender at Brewski's in downtown Little Rock, the news sounded like a welcome break. She has worked in the industry for eight years and relies on tips to support her and her son. 'Some weeks it's $900 to $1,000, sometimes more, sometimes less,' she said. 'You really don't ever make the same money every single time.' But her excitement quickly gave way to skepticism after hearing the fine print. 'Looking at it as a whole, it's honestly not the best,' she said. 'It sounds good, but I feel like we're just going to end up paying more money at the end of the year.' O'Donald isn't alone in that concern. While the bill's headline suggests service workers will stop paying taxes on their tips, the reality is more complicated. Only the first $25,000 of qualified tips are exempt. Anything earned beyond that is still fully taxed. And there are other restrictions: The deduction phases out for single filers making over $150,000 and joint filers earning over $300,000. Self-employed individuals must show a profit to qualify. The business cannot fall under 'specified service trades' like law, accounting, consulting, or athletics. Taxpayers must include a valid Social Security Number and, if married, file a joint return. O'Donald says the cap could even discourage some workers from pushing past that $25,000 mark. 'Yes and no… because I feel like I would be striving to make under the $25,000 instead of trying to make over it,' she said. Things to know about 'no tax on tips,' Trump's tax pledge that's in the GOP budget bill The Treasury Department has been given 90 days to publish an official list of occupations that 'customarily and regularly' receive tips—something that may further limit who qualifies. Still, supporters say the measure is a step toward giving frontline service workers more breathing room in a volatile industry. But O'Donald offers a warning to anyone who's celebrating too soon. 'Yes, I feel like they would be excited,' she said. 'But like I tell everyone—read the fine print.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Trump says U.S. will send more weapons to Ukraine, after halting some shipments
Trump says U.S. will send more weapons to Ukraine, after halting some shipments

Yahoo

time44 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump says U.S. will send more weapons to Ukraine, after halting some shipments

President Trump said Monday his administration will send more defensive weapons to Ukraine amid its war with Russia, days after pausing some weapons shipments. "We're going to send some more weapons. We have to. They have to be able to defend themselves," Mr. Trump told reporters during a White House event with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Monday night. The president said the shipments will consist of "defensive weapons, primarily," saying Ukraine is "getting hit very hard" and "so many people are dying in that mess." "At President Trump's direction, the Department of Defense is sending additional defensive weapons to Ukraine to ensure the Ukrainians can defend themselves while we work to secure a lasting peace and ensure the killing stops," Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell said in a statement later Monday night. "Our framework for POTUS to evaluate military shipments across the globe remains in effect and is integral to our America First defense priorities." The United States has provided Ukraine with tens of billions of dollars in weapons and other assistance since February 2022, when Russia launched a full-scale invasion of the country, according to the Council on Foreign Relations think tank. Last week, the White House confirmed it had decided to halt some shipments to Ukraine. A White House official said the pause was part of a broader review of weapons transfers to other countries. A U.S. official told CBS News the administration was concerned about military stockpiles falling too low. In comments to reporters last week, Mr. Trump said his administration is still sending weapons to Ukraine, but former President Joe Biden "emptied out our whole country giving them weapons, and we have to make sure that we have enough for ourselves." Mr. Trump spoke with both Russian President Vladimir Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy last week. Mr. Trump told reporters he was "very disappointed" with the Putin call, saying he "didn't make any progress" with the Russian leader. Mr. Trump also said Monday he's "not happy with President Putin at all." Meanwhile, Zelenskyy said his call with Mr. Trump was "very important and fruitful," adding the two leaders "agreed that we will work together to strengthen protection of our skies." Mr. Trump has pressed Russia and Ukraine to strike a deal to end their three-year war. But his relationship with both leaders has been rocky at times. Mr. Trump — who has expressed skepticism about Ukraine aid — accused Zelenskyy in April of prolonging the conflict, and the administration briefly paused military aid to Ukraine in March, after a televised Oval Office meeting-turned-argument between the American and Ukrainian leaders. Mr. Trump has also lashed out at Putin over Russian strikes on Ukraine. Death toll rises as desperate search for Texas flash flood survivors continues Sabrina Carpenter on the biggest misperceptions about her How Lady Liberty became a beacon for immigrants

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store