Maharashtra Special Public Security Bill 2024 Tabled To Tackle "Urban Naxalism"
A Joint Committee comprising members from both Houses of the Legislature was formed to review the bill.
Committee Chairman Chandrashekhar Bawankule stated that the committee held five meetings to address misconceptions and incorporate public suggestions. The Legislature Secretariat received over 12,500 suggestions, based on which amendments were proposed.
Among the most significant amendments is a clarified statement of objectives. The bill's original intent has been revised to focus on preventing illegal activities linked to left-wing ideologies or similar acts, which will ensure that the bill will not be misused against political or social organisations.
To prevent arbitrary decisions, the amended bill mandates the formation of an Advisory Board before any organisation can be declared unlawful. The board will include a sitting or retired High Court judge, with members comprising a District Judge and officials of GP rank.
Another key revision relates to the rank of the officer responsible for conducting inquiries. Previously, the responsibility for inquiries was with a Police Sub-Inspector. Based on the committee's recommendation, this duty has now been assigned to an officer of Deputy Superintendent of Police rank.
Notably, the Joint Committee included prominent MLAs such as Jayant Patil, Nana Patole, Bhaskar Jadhav, Jitendra Awhad, and Ambadas Danve. These members provided valuable suggestions to eliminate potential misconceptions and prevent misuse of the bill.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
5 hours ago
- The Hindu
Danger of thought: on the Maharashtra Special Public Security Bill
The Maharashtra Special Public Security (MSPS) Bill, 2024 follows the disturbing pattern of executive overreach in the name of security. Existing laws are often misused against political opponents and critics of the ruling party, including commentators. Charges are often vague and sweeping, and the process itself becomes the punishment in many of these cases. Given this pattern, the move by Maharashtra's Mahayuti government led by the BJP to create an entire law to criminalise a certain kind of thought portends danger to freedom and democracy. Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis has said that the new law would only target those who try to undermine the constitutional order, but the possibility — indeed the probability — of its misuse is apparent. The State says that it is seeking to prevent Maoists from brainwashing youth, professionals, and civil servants through front organisations. As in the proposed law, which is now awaiting the assent of the Governor before coming into force, the State government can declare any suspect 'organisation' as an 'unlawful organisation'. Offences under the proposed law include membership of such organisations, fundraising on their behalf, managing or assisting them, and committing unlawful activities. The Bill's focus is on people and organisations that act as a front for Maoists, and what is unlawful is so broadly defined that anyone can be its target. Among other things, according to the Bill, 'unlawful' is 'any action taken by an individual or organization whether by committing an act or by words either spoken or written or by sign or by visible representation or otherwise, which constitute a danger or menace to public order, peace and tranquility'. Offences are cognisable and the accused can be arrested without a warrant. Punishment includes jail terms of two years to seven years, along with fines ranging from ₹2 lakh to ₹5 lakh. The State argues that Chhattisgarh, Telangana, Andhra Pradesh and Odisha have enacted Public Security Acts and banned 48 Naxal frontal organisations. The Opposition parties offered feeble resistance to the Bill and raised some broad concerns regarding its misuse but it was passed in the Assembly through a voice vote. As an afterthought, the Congress and the Shiv Sena (UBT) protested on the floor when it was taken up in the Legislative Council. The Bill had gone through a long deliberative process, but as it turns out, all parties appeared to be in agreement, barring the lone CPI (M) MLA who protested against it on the floor of the Assembly. The idea that thought and speech, howsoever unpalatable they might be to the ruling establishment, should be policed poses a grave danger for India as an open society.
The Hindu
5 hours ago
- The Hindu
Bihar police lathi charge on protesting Jan Suraaj workers in Patna, many get injured
Police lathi charged on the protesting Jan Suraaj party workers who were on their way to gherao the ongoing Monsoon Session of Bihar Vidhan Sabha on Wednesday (July 23, 2025). In the scuffle between the police and party workers, many got seriously injured. Jan Suraaj party was protesting against the government in support of their demands including alleged corruption in land survey, Dalit families not getting three decimal of land and 94 lakh poor families not getting ₹2 lakh for employment despite government announcement. As planned, the party workers were not allowed to enter the road which was leading towards the Assembly building. They tried their best from 11 a.m. when the Assembly proceedings began but everywhere there was heavy deputation of the police force. Holding placards, banners and posters, the party workers gathered at Patel Chowk near Chitkohra Bridge. Even Jan Suraaj founder Prashant Kishor also reached near the protest site. When the police tried to stop them, party workers including Mr. Kishore sat on a dharna on the road itself after a scuffle. The police tried hard to remove the workers and when they tried to break the police barricading and move towards the Assembly, the police responded through lathi charge to disperse the protestors. Many of the party workers received injuries. One party worker was hit on his head. One party worker was hit on both legs due to which he was unable to walk. Both were rushed to nearby hospitals. Pointing towards the police, Mr. Kishor said, 'Why did you lathi charge on my party workers? Did any of my party workers pelt stones on any police officer or magistrates, then why do you people lathi charge on them? Do you have the guts to use your lathi on me then I will show what I can do. I will make it difficult for the government to function even for a day.' When a police officer asked him to leave the place, Mr. Kishor further said, 'Don't show me this police tantrum, I have seen enough of this. For the last two months, we have trying to meet the Chief Minister over our demands but there is no response. We also tried to meet the Governor but ge also did not have time. So, we had no other options except going to Vidhan Sabha.' Later, a six member delegation led by Jan Suraaj State president Manoj Bharti met Bihar Chief Secretary Amrit Lal Meena to hand over the memorandum of the demands. Mr. Kishor threatened if the government does not take action on their demands then he will gheraoe the official residence of Chief Minister Nitish Kumar by bringing one lakh people.
The Hindu
10 hours ago
- The Hindu
FGG for V&E probe into ‘misuse' of special development funds
The Forum for Good Governance (FGG) has urged Chief Minister A. Revanth Reddy to order a Vigilance & Enforcement (V&E) inquiry into the alleged misuse of Special Development Funds (SDF) released for taking up developmental works in Assembly constituencies. FGG president M. Padmanabha Reddy said that the government sanctioned ₹1,190 crore at ₹10 crore for each Assembly constituency in 2023-24. The amount was released to District Collectors for taking up developmental works with the approval of the District In-Charge Minister. The SDF funds were meant to be spent on education infrastructure (₹2 crore), drinking water (₹1 crore), maintenance of collectorates or government offices (₹50 lakh) and balance ₹6.5 crore for other developmental works. However, the fund was not being implemented as per the guidelines leading to misuse and wastage of taxpayers' money. Citing examples in a letter addressed to the Chief Minister, he said that Devarakonda MLA proposed an amount of ₹1.14 crore for his office-cum-residence when there was no provision for renovation of MLA's residence. 'It is not clear how the district in-charge Minister approved such works. There are many similar cases in other districts also,' Mr. Padmanabha Reddy said. He said that tenders ought to be called for works more than ₹5 lakh in line with the rules, but executing agencies were splitting the works into bits of ₹5 lakh each and allotting them on nomination basis. The Congress Assembly constituency in-charges were proposing works bypassing the MLAs and the district in-charge Minister was sanctioning them. For instance, the sitting MLA was ignored in the Karimnagar Assembly constituency and proposals were received from the Congress in-charge, which were subsequently approved. There were many villages in Karimnagar Assembly constituency where infrastructure for schools and drainage facility were required, but sanction was made for 50 high mast lights in villages at a cost of ₹60 lakh and open gym in 25 villages at a cost of ₹1.25 crore. 'No tenders were invited and works were allotted on a nomination basis,' he lamented. In view of these, he wanted the government to order an inquiry and authorise the Collector to approve the works.
