Why Did Prince William Wear a Blue Suit to Pope Francis' Funeral?
Like President Donald Trump, the Prince of Wales faced some criticism for wearing a dark blue suit instead of black clothing
However, the Vatican doesn't list official funeral protocol, and a source told PEOPLE that attendees were only expected to wear 'appropriate attire' for the service
Prince William was among the many dignitaries and heads of state who traveled to Rome to attend Pope Francis' funeral over the weekend.
While the ceremony, held in St. Peter's Square on Saturday, April 26, was intended to honor the late pontiff, there was also attention on the attendees, including on what they chose to wear.
The Prince of Wales — who attended the event on behalf of his father, King Charles — donned a navy suit with a white shirt, black tie and black dress shoes.
Prince William, 42, wasn't the only attendee who wore blue instead of the more traditional option of black for the funeral. U.S. President Donald Trump, Jordan's King Abdullah and Indian President Draupadi Murmu all opted for blue ensembles for the event, drawing criticism on social media.
Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, who dressed in black but not in a traditional suit, also had his sartorial choice analyzed online.
Related: Donald Trump Wears Blue to Pope Francis' Funeral. Did He Break Vatican Protocol?
However, Prince William, Trump and other attendees who wore a color other than black were not necessarily breaking protocol. The Vatican does not list an official funeral dress code on its website, and an insider told PEOPLE that attire for the ceremony was left up to the individual.
"Attendees wore what they considered to be appropriate attire for such a solemn occasion," a Vatican source said.
Prince William's blue suit and black tie combination is something he's worn for funerals in the past, including the November 2023 services for Manchester United legend Sir Bobby Charlton.
Related: Could an American Be the Next Pope? Here's Who Experts Say Might be the Top Contenders
For the funeral of his grandmother Queen Elizabeth on September 19, 2022, Prince William wore his dress military uniform.
However, his eldest son, Prince George, sported a navy suit, white shirt and black tie — a similar ensemble to what his father wore to mourn the late pope.
Can't get enough of PEOPLE's Royals coverage? to get the latest updates on Kate Middleton, Meghan Markle and more!
While King Charles was not in attendance at the pope's funeral, he and Queen Camilla visited with the Catholic leader just 12 days before he died, on April 9.
Upon news of Pope Francis' death, the King reflected on their final meeting in an official statement commemorating His Holiness, saying he and his wife were 'greatly moved to have been able to visit him earlier in the month.'
'Our heavy hearts have been somewhat eased, however, to know that His Holiness was able to share an Easter Greeting with the Church and the world he served with such devotion throughout his life and ministry,' he continued in the statement, via Buckingham Palace.
'His Holiness will be remembered for his compassion, his concern for the unity of the Church and for his tireless commitment to the common causes of all people of faith, and to those of goodwill who work for the benefit of others,' King Charles noted in his tribute. 'His belief that care for Creation is an existential expression of faith in God resounded with so many across the world. Through his work and care for both people and planet, he profoundly touched the lives of so many.'
Read the original article on People
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
23 minutes ago
- Politico
‘Essential isn't a strong enough word': Loss of foreign workers begins to bite US economy
'President Trump is a tireless advocate for American farmers – they keep our families fed and our country prosperous. He trusts farmers and is committed to ensuring they have the workforce needed to remain successful,' White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson said in a statement. 'But there will be no safe harbor for the countless, unvetted, criminal illegal aliens that Joe Biden let waltz into the country.' The administration exacerbated the situation Monday, revoking legal status for approximately 76,000 people from Honduras and Nicaragua – and eliminating their work authorizations. It had previously done so for Haitians, Afghans, Venezuelans and Cameroonians. Some large corporations that rely on foreign-born workers, including those with protected status people admitted under other programs, have already felt the impacts. In May, Disney reportedly began cutting workers with temporary legal status, and Walmart took a similar step last month. Foreign-born workers at Amazon have reported receiving similar notices. Walmart and Amazon declined to comment. Disney did not respond to requests for comment. Mass arrests of people without legal status have sent a chill through several industries as Immigration and Customs Enforcement conducts raids around the country. Agriculture businesses have expressed concern about the knock-on effects of ICE raids – that they deter even legal workers from showing up to work, worsening existing labor shortages and jeopardizing crops. Trump's immigration actions are squeezing the labor market even as some broader economic trends remain positive. Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell has repeatedly indicated as much, including at a congressional hearing in June, where he said economic growth is 'slowing' due to a shrinking labor force. Tightening the labor market through strict immigration enforcement could permanently increase inflation, an Oxford Economics study from June finds, pointing to subsequent increases in production costs and lower output due to limited workers. Uncertainty in the labor market could contribute to an 'economic malaise,' said Stuart Anderson, executive director at the nonpartisan think tank National Foundation for American Policy. 'If you want to have a growing economy, you need to have a growing labor force,' Anderson said. 'The idea that you are just going to create more opportunity by having fewer workers available just doesn't work in practice, because that's not the way business runs.' Trump has signaled some willingness to ease access to foreign-born labor specifically for farmers and hospitality workers – industries he has long prioritized as a key political constituency. Agriculture lobbyists have pushed the administration for an expansion of the seasonal visa program to apply to year-round workers and an easing of wage requirements. Neither the administration nor Congress have yet to announce concrete steps on a solution for those groups despite Trump's rhetoric, and any moves would need to be extensive to offset the exodus of workers. 'American produce growers are facing a severe labor shortage that's driving up food prices and threatening domestic production,' Sarah Gonzalez, spokesperson for the International Fresh Produce Association, said. 'We appreciate President Trump's recognition of this crisis and any efforts to stabilize the agricultural workforce. But lasting solutions require bipartisan legislation that ensures U.S. farmers have access to a legal, reliable workforce.'
USA Today
24 minutes ago
- USA Today
Rubio impersonator used AI voice to contact US, foreign officials
An imposter using an artificially generated voice impersonated Secretary of State Marco Rubio and contacted multiple foreign ministers and American politicians. A July 3 diplomatic cable sent from the department warned that the imposter contacted at least three foreign ministers, a U.S. governor and a U.S. member of Congress, the Washington Post first reported. "The actor likely aimed to manipulate targeted individuals using AI-generated text and voice messages, with the goal of gaining access to information or accounts," the cable said, per Reuters. The cable pointed to a separate incident in April that was attributed to a Russia-linked hacker who conducted a spear phishing campaign targeting think tanks, Eastern European activists and dissidents and former State Department officials. In a statement to USA TODAY on Tuesday, July 8, the State Department said it is investigating the incident. "The Department takes seriously its responsibility to safeguard its information and continuously takes steps to improve the department's cybersecurity posture to prevent future incidents," the statement, attributed to a senior State Department official, said. State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce echoed this sentiment at a July 8 press briefing. The State Department did not reveal further details about the identities of the foreign ministers and U.S. politicians contacted. Neither the cable nor the department indicated a suspected perpetrator. Trump trade war: Copper imports hit with tariffs, pharmaceuticals are next How did the impersonator reach officials? The impersonator created a Signal account using the display name ' which is not Rubio's State Department email, according to the Washington Post. In mid-June, the person contacted the ministers, a U.S. governor and a member of Congress via the Signal messaging app. Voicemails were left in two instances, and a text message in a third instance invited the targeted person to communicate on Signal. The Washington Post reported that other State Department personnel were impersonated by email. The administration was previously embroiled in scandal for the use of Signal to share detailed secret plans for a U.S. strike on Iran-backed militants in Yemen via a group chat consisting of top Trump administration officials that accidentally included The Atlantic magazine editor-in-chief Jeffrey Goldberg. That group included users whose names matched Trump's top officials, including Rubio, Vice President JD Vance, Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, CIA Director John Ratcliffe, White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles and Brian McCormack, a member of the National Security Council. The Wall Street Journal reported in May that federal authorities were investigating an attempt to impersonate Wiles. 'The White House takes the cybersecurity of all staff very seriously, and this matter continues to be investigated,' a White House spokeswoman told the outlet at the time. Reuters contributed to this story.
Politico
34 minutes ago
- Politico
The problem with Elon Musk's techie dream of rebooting politics
His America Party announcement touched on traditional populist-conservative themes. 'When it comes to bankrupting our country with waste & graft, we live in a one-party system, not a democracy,' he wrote in a Saturday X post. 'Today, the America Party is formed to give you back your freedom.' Musk has suggested that he will focus on tight congressional races. He has reportedly spoken to Andrew Yang, the tech commentator and entrepreneur who launched the centrist Forward Party in 2022. It's not clear what lessons he'll learn from Yang, whose party has yet to make an impact on any big races so far. During his run for president, Yang pitched universal basic income to address AI displacing workers. His Forward Party also has techie leanings — proposing data-driven policymaking and incubating innovative businesses — along with broader support for enforcing the democratic process and rule of law. Some alternative parties have been even more tech-driven. In 2006, programmers in Sweden founded the Pirate Party out of frustration around restrictions on online file sharing. That same year, American tech activists established their own branch, specifically to push back against the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) and promote data privacy. Though it has never become a political force, the Pirates enjoyed some successes in Iceland and Germany. (In 2022, the U.S. party ran one of its members for the House representing Kentucky, but Ethan Osborne won only 3.9 percent of the vote.) The Transhumanist Party has also struggled to get tech-focused candidates into office. Zoltan Istvan, a futurist who founded the party in 2014, mounted two unsuccessful bids for president, and another for California governor. Istvan is running again for governor, but this time as a Democrat. 'If you don't run for one of the two parties, you just simply don't break in, and so you have to be realistic,' he told POLITICO. Quite a bit less fringey was the political group Win the Future (WTF), launched by established players in Silicon Valley to challenge the two-party system after Trump's victory over Hillary Clinton. In 2017, LinkedIn founder Reid Hoffman and Mark Pincus, founder of the mobile gaming company Zynga, launched the group and tried to convince singer Stephan Jenkins of Third Eye Blind to be WTF's challenger against then-California Sen. Dianne Feinstein. The plans never came to fruition. (Hoffman declined to comment; the website for Win the Future is defunct.) Arguably the lineage of know-it-all tech entrepreneurs trying to disrupt politics starts with Ross Perot, the swaggering Texas IT entrepreneur who founded the Reform Party in 1996. He twice ran for president in the 1990s on a populist, tech-savvy platform that included measures to facilitate democratic participation via the then-nascent internet. At some level, all these projects crashed against the same obstacles that have sunk most third parties trying to crack the U.S.'s political duopoly. Political novices have to build coalitions from scratch and quickly figure out the patchwork of state election laws to make any kind of national impression.
