
The Debate On Tariffs Ignores A Very Big Issue: The Tax Wedge
The debate on tariffs ignores a very big issue: the tax wedge.
A tariff is a tax, and a tax is a wedge, an obstacle between buyer and seller. How harmful the tax wedge is, of course, depends on its size and breadth.
Let's make this simple. Suppose there is no income tax and a person making $40 an hour wishes to buy an item that costs $200. That individual would have to work five hours to make that purchase (five hours times $40 equals $200).
Now, suppose the income tax is 50%. The would-be buyer keeps only $20 an hour after that 50% tax. This means the individual would have to work ten hours, instead of five hours, to make that purchase, thanks to the tax wedge.
Currently, the tariff discussions have focused on inflation, i.e., what the impact of tariffs will be on prices.
Overlooked is whatever impact tariffs might have on consumer prices; they will impose a wedge, a barrier to doing business. Taxes add friction to conducting business. The magnitude depends on the actual rates and how extensive they are on particular products and services, and the effect on supply chains and existing trading patterns.
That's why the focus on inflation misses the bigger issue. Tariffs don't necessarily raise overall prices. The cost of that $200 item may not change, but the effort required to buy it will. That means less prosperity.
Federal Reserve boss Jerome Powell misses this point with his fussing about the possible impact of tariffs on prices. Instead, he should concentrate on the friction they will impose on commerce.
Historically, the most devastating result from tariffs came from the sweeping Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act that began to wend its way through Congress in 1929, triggering the infamous stock market crash. It was signed into law in June 1930, imposing tariffs on thousands of items. The legislation triggered massive retaliations from other countries and effectively blew up the global trading system. Trade shriveled. It began what became the Great Depression, as it was followed by other big economic mistakes, particularly tax increases in the U.S., Britain, Germany and other nations. Countries resorted to competitive devaluations, what historians labelled beggar-thy-neighbor policies.
This disastrous state of affairs is why nations, following World War II and led by the U.S., began a series of agreements reducing tariffs and other trade barriers. The resulting explosion in trade was critical to the huge economic growth the world experienced after 1945.
The most immediate point to realize today is that the Smoot-Hawley tariffs didn't raise prices. The slump in commerce led to price cuts—prices don't go up in going-out-business sales.
Thankfully, the tariffs being enacted or proposed today aren't yet on the scale of Smoot-Hawley. Moreover—and unlike in 1929–30—they are still fluid, still subject to change.
Nonetheless, the helter-skelter way the tariff issue is being treated leads to real concerns.
Hopefully, these are hard-fisted negotiating tactics that will yield sensible agreements and end up reducing trade barriers.
But in the meantime, remember the impact the tax wedge can have on economic growth.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fox News
23 minutes ago
- Fox News
FNC Correspondent Matt Finn reports on Latest Trump Approved ICE raids
Matt Finn, Fox News National Correspondent, joined Guy Benson to discuss the latest on what happened during Trump administration-approved ICE raids of marijuana farms in California. Matt also shares his experience in Westwood, CA and how disgusting it looks today despite high rental and housing prices.


Bloomberg
26 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
US Threatens to Abandon IEA Over Green-Leaning Energy Forecasts
The US may depart the International Energy Agency without changes to forecasting that Republicans have criticized as unrealistically green, President Donald Trump's energy chief said. 'We will do one of two things: we will reform the way the IEA operates or we will withdraw,' Energy Secretary Chris Wright said during an interview Tuesday. 'My strong preference is to reform it.'


Forbes
27 minutes ago
- Forbes
McDonald's AI Breach Reveals The Dark Side Of Automated Recruitment
Millions of McDonald's job applicants had their personal data exposed after basic security failures ... More left the company's AI hiring system wide open. If you've ever wondered what could go wrong with an AI-powered hiring system, McDonald's just served up a cautionary tale. This week, security researchers revealed that the company's McHire website—a recruitment platform used by over 90% of McDonald's franchisees—left the personal information of millions of job applicants exposed to anyone with a browser and a little curiosity. The culprit: Olivia, an AI chatbot from designed to handle job applications, collect personal information, and even conduct personality tests. On paper, it's a vision of modern efficiency. In reality, the system was wide open due to security flaws so basic they'd be comical if the consequences weren't so serious. What Went Wrong? It didn't take a sophisticated hacker to find the holes. Researchers Ian Carroll and Sam Curry started investigating after Reddit users complained that Olivia gave nonsensical responses during the application process. After failing to find more complex vulnerabilities, the pair simply tried logging into the site's backend using '123456' for both the username and password. In less than half an hour, they had access to nearly every applicant's personal data—names, email addresses, phone numbers, and complete chat histories—with no multifactor authentication required. Worse still, the researchers discovered that anyone could access records just by tweaking the ID numbers in the URL, exposing over 64 million unique applicant profiles. One compromised account had not even been used since 2019, yet remained active and linked to live data. As Carroll told Wired, 'I just thought it was pretty uniquely dystopian compared to a normal hiring process, right? And that's what made me want to look into it more.' Why Security Fundamentals Still Matter Experts agree that the real shock isn't the technology itself—it's the lack of security basics that made the breach possible. As Aditi Gupta of Black Duck noted, the McDonald's incident was less a case of advanced hacking and more a 'series of critical failures,' ranging from unchanged default credentials and inactive accounts left open for years, to missing access controls and weak monitoring. The result: an old admin account that hadn't been touched since 2019 was all it took to unlock a massive trove of personal data. For many in the industry, this raises bigger questions. Randolph Barr, CISO at Cequence Security, points out that the use of weak, guessable credentials like '123456' in a live production system is not just a technical slip—it signals deeper problems with security culture and governance. When basic measures like credential management, access controls, and even multi-factor authentication are missing, the entire security posture comes into question. If a security professional can spot these flaws in minutes, Barr says, 'bad actors absolutely will—and they'll be encouraged to dig deeper for other easy wins.' And this isn't just about AI or McDonald's. Security missteps of this kind tend to follow each new 'game-changing' technology. As PointGuard AI's William Leichter observes, organizations often rush to deploy the latest tools, driven by hype and immediate gains, while seasoned security professionals get sidelined. It happened with cloud, and now, he says, 'it's AI's turn: tools are being rolled out hastily, with immature controls and sloppy practices.' Automation and the Illusion of Security McDonald's isn't alone in betting big on AI to speed up hiring and make life easier for franchisees and HR teams. Automated chatbots like Olivia are supposed to streamline applications, assess candidates, and remove human bottlenecks. But as this incident shows, convenience can't come at the expense of basic digital hygiene. Simple safeguards—unique credentials, robust authentication, and proper access controls—were missing entirely. The rush to digitize and automate HR brings with it a false sense of security. When sensitive data is managed by machines, it's easy to assume the system is secure. But technology is only as strong as the practices behind it. Lessons for the Future If there's a lesson here, it's that technology should never substitute for common sense. Automated hiring systems, especially those powered by AI, are only as secure as the most basic controls. The ease with which researchers accessed the McHire backend shows that old problems—default passwords, missing MFA—are still some of the biggest threats, even in the age of chatbots. Companies embracing automation need to build security into the foundations, not as an afterthought. And applicants should remember that behind every 'friendly' AI bot is a company making choices about how to protect—or neglect—their privacy. The Price of Convenience The McDonald's McHire data leak is a warning to every company automating hiring, and to every job seeker trusting a bot with their future. Technology can streamline the process, but it should never circumvent or subvert security. The real world isn't as neat as a chatbot's conversation tree. If we aren't careful, the push for convenience will keep putting real people at risk.