logo
US tariffs on European goods threaten to shake up the world's largest trade relationship

US tariffs on European goods threaten to shake up the world's largest trade relationship

Arab Timesa day ago
FRANKFURT, Germany, July 6, (AP): The European Union expects to find out on Monday whether President Donald Trump will impose punishing tariffs on America's largest trade partner in a move economists have warned would have repercussions for companies and consumers on both sides of the Atlantic.
Trump imposed a 20% import tax on all EU-made products in early April as part of a set of tariffs targeting countries with which the United States has a trade imbalance. Hours after the nation-specific duties took effect, he put them on hold until July 9 at a standard rate of 10% to quiet financial markets and allow time for negotiations.
Expressing displeasure the EU's stance in trade talks, however, Trump said he would increase the tariff rate for European exports to 50%, which could make everything - from French cheese and Italian leather goods to German electronics and Spanish pharmaceuticals - much more expensive in the U.S.
The EU's executive commission, which handles trade issues for the bloc's 27-member nations, said its leaders hope to strike a deal with the Trump administration. Without one, the EU said it was prepared to retaliate with tariffs on hundreds of American products, ranging from beef and auto parts to beer and Boeing airplanes.
Here are important things to know about trade between the United States and the European Union.
The EU's executive commission describes the trade between the U.S. and the EU as "the most important commercial relationship in the world.'
The value of EU-U.S. trade in goods and services amounted to 1.7 trillion euros ($2 trillion) in 2024, or an average of 4.6 billion euros a day, according to EU statistics agency Eurostat.
The biggest U.S. export to Europe is crude oil, followed by pharmaceuticals, aircraft, automobiles, and medical and diagnostic equipment.
Europe's biggest exports to the U.S. are pharmaceuticals, cars, aircraft, chemicals, medical instruments, and wine and spirits.
Trump has complained about the EU's 198 billion-euro trade surplus in goods, which shows Americans buy more stuff from European businesses than the other way around.
However, American companies fill some of the gap by outselling the EU when it comes to services such as cloud computing, travel bookings, and legal and financial services.
The U.S. services surplus took the nation's trade deficit with the EU down to 50 billion euros ($59 billion), which represents less than 3% of overall U.S.-EU trade.
Before Trump returned to office, the U.S. and the EU maintained a generally cooperative trade relationship and low tariff levels on both sides. The U.S. rate averaged 1.47% for European goods, while the EU's averaged 1.35% for American products.
But the White House has taken a much less friendly posture toward the longstanding U.S. ally since February. Along with the fluctuating tariff rate on European goods Trump has floated, the EU has been subject to his administration's 50% tariff on steel and aluminum and a 25% tax on imported automobiles and parts.
Trump administration officials have raised a slew of issues they want to see addressed, including agricultural barriers such as EU health regulations that include bans on chlorine-washed chicken and hormone-treated beef.
Trump has also criticized Europe's value-added taxes, which EU countries levy at the point of sale this year at rates of 17% to 27%. But many economists see VAT as trade-neutral since they apply to domestic goods and services as well as imported ones. Because national governments set the taxes through legislation, the EU has said they aren't on the table during trade negotiations.
"On the thorny issues of regulations, consumer standards and taxes, the EU and its member states cannot give much ground,' Holger Schmieding, chief economist at Germany's Berenberg bank, said. "They cannot change the way they run the EU's vast internal market according to U.S. demands, which are often rooted in a faulty understanding of how the EU works.'
Economists and companies say higher tariffs will mean higher prices for U.S. consumers on imported goods. Importers must decide how much of the extra tax costs to absorb through lower profits and how much to pass on to customers.
Mercedes-Benz dealers in the U.S. have said they are holding the line on 2025 model year prices "until further notice.' The German automaker has a partial tariff shield because it makes 35% of the Mercedes-Benz vehicles sold in the U.S. in Tuscaloosa, Alabama, but the company said it expects prices to undergo "significant increases' in coming years.
Simon Hunt, CEO of Italian wine and spirits producer Campari Group, told investment analysts that prices could increase for some products or stay the same depending what rival companies do. If competitors raise prices, the company might decide to hold its prices on Skyy vodka or Aperol aperitif to gain market share, Hunt said.
Trump has argued that making it more difficult for foreign companies to sell in the U.S. is a way to stimulate a revival of American manufacturing. Many companies have dismissed the idea or said it would take years to yield positive economic benefits. However, some corporations have proved willing to shift some production stateside.
France-based luxury group LVMH, whose brands include Tiffany & Co., Luis Vuitton, Christian Dior and Moet & Chandon, could move some production to the United States, billionaire CEO Bernaud Arnault said at the company's annual meeting in April.
Arnault, who attended Trump's inauguration, has urged Europe to reach a deal based on reciprocal concessions.
"If we end up with high tariffs, ... we will be forced to increase our U.S.-based production to avoid tariffs,' Arnault said. "And if Europe fails to negotiate intelligently, that will be the consequence for many companies. ... It will be the fault of Brussels, if it comes to that.'
Some forecasts indicate the U.S. economy would be more at risk if the negotiations fail.
Without a deal, the EU would lose 0.3% of its gross domestic product and U.S. GDP would fall 0.7%, if Trump slaps imported goods from Europe with tariffs of 10% to 25%, according to a research review by Bruegel, a think tank in Brussels.
Given the complexity of some of the issues, the two sides may arrive only at a framework deal before Wednesday's deadline. That would likely leave a 10% base tariff, as well as the auto, steel and aluminum tariffs in place until details of a formal trade agreement are ironed out.
The most likely outcome of the trade talks is that "the U.S. will agree to deals in which it takes back its worst threats of 'retaliatory' tariffs well beyond 10%,' Schmieding said. "However, the road to get there could be rocky.'
The U.S. offering exemptions for some goods might smooth the path to a deal. The EU could offer to ease some regulations that the White House views as trade barriers.
"While Trump might be able to sell such an outcome as a 'win' for him, the ultimate victims of his protectionism would, of course, be mostly the U.S. consumers,' Schmieding said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Gold prices surge amid economic, political tensions
Gold prices surge amid economic, political tensions

Kuwait Times

time7 hours ago

  • Kuwait Times

Gold prices surge amid economic, political tensions

KUWAIT: Women visit a stand during the 23rd international gold and jewelry exhibition at the Kuwait International Fairgrounds in this file photo. - Photo by Yasser Al-Zayyat KUWAIT: Global gold prices witnessed a sharp increase at the close of the first week of July, reaching $3,337 per ounce, as investors turned to the precious metal as a safe haven amid mounting economic and geopolitical uncertainties. In a report issued Sunday, Kuwait's Dar Al-Sabayek Company attributed the surge to a range of interrelated factors, foremost among them growing concerns over the widening fiscal deficit in the United States. The company noted that fears escalated after the US House of Representatives approved a tax cut and spending expansion package proposed by former President Donald Trump's administration. According to the report, projections by the Congressional Budget Office and the Joint Committee on Taxation estimate that the package will increase US public debt by more than $3.4 trillion over the next decade. The resulting pressure on the US dollar prompted many investors to boost their gold holdings to hedge against market instability and the weakening purchasing power of the currency. The report also highlighted the intensification of trade tensions following the US President's announcement of new tariffs on several countries, potentially reaching up to 70 percent. These tariffs, expected to take effect in early August, have sparked fears of retaliatory measures by nearly 100 countries should trade agreements fail to materialize by July 9, as warned by the US Treasury Secretary. These developments have contributed to a retreat in the US dollar index, which fell to 97 points against major currencies, further strengthening gold's appeal. The report pointed out that the holiday-induced liquidity decline in US markets, particularly around the Independence Day holiday, helped reduce selling pressure in the final trading sessions of the week. Despite the upward momentum, gold's gains were partially curbed by positive US labor market data. Official figures showed that 147,000 jobs were added in June and the unemployment rate dipped to 4.1 percent. This data has dampened expectations of an imminent interest rate cut by the Federal Reserve. Moreover, the rise in yields on 10-year US Treasury bonds to 4.338 percent exerted additional pressure on gold prices. Dar Al-Sabayek stated that gold continues to respond to shifts in both economic indicators and political developments, even with US markets closed. Investor sentiment remains cautious as markets await key monetary policy signals from global central banks, including the release of the US Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meeting minutes and weekly unemployment claims data. Locally, the report noted that gold prices mirrored global trends in the Kuwaiti market. The price of 24-karat gold reached KD 32.89 per gram (approximately $107), while 22-karat gold was priced at KD 30.15 per gram (about $98). The price of silver remained stable at KD 407 per kilogram (roughly $1,329). Gold is traditionally measured in troy ounces, with one troy ounce equivalent to approximately 31.103 grams, the standard unit for weighing precious metals. — KUNA

EU GDPR should merely be a guiding framework for Kuwaiti legal system
EU GDPR should merely be a guiding framework for Kuwaiti legal system

Kuwait Times

time7 hours ago

  • Kuwait Times

EU GDPR should merely be a guiding framework for Kuwaiti legal system

By Noura Almutairi Since May 25, 2018, the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) has been applied across all EU member states, establishing a global benchmark. Several countries, including South Korea, Brazil, Japan, Kenya, Egypt, Indonesia and the US State of California, have enacted data privacy laws aligned with the GDPR. Unlike the EU Data Protection Directive (DPD), the GDPR aims to enhance control over personal information to safeguard fundamental rights, especially the individual's right to data protection. The right to protect personal information is distinct from the right to privacy under the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ECHR). The values underlying the regulation and protection of the former right are transparency, autonomy, fairness, dignity and non-discrimination. These are different from the values of reputation and honor, which underpin the individual's right to privacy in Kuwaiti society. Nonetheless, this article urges Kuwaiti lawmakers to be guided by the GDPR, as the individual's right to privacy is one of the values underpinning the protection of their personal information under the GDPR. Some of an individual's personal information, as defined under Article 4 of the GDPR, is linked to their right to privacy, for example, their photo. In addition, most of the individual's sensitive or private information, as outlined in Article 9 of the GDPR, is linked to the individual's right to privacy or a private life under the Kuwaiti legal system. Examples of such information include genetic data and health data. Even the process of collecting an individual's non-sensitive or private information can be used to reveal hidden private data about them. To illustrate how this point is relevant to the GDPR, it applies to private companies (as data controllers) that monitor individuals' online behavior and activities through their online identifiers or observed data, such as IP addresses, cookies and location data. A massive amount of 'dynamic personal information' is collected through such observed data and can then be analyzed predictively or using AI, which may infer private information about the Internet. As such, the GDPR protects the individual's right to privacy. However, this article suggests that Kuwaiti decision-makers should be guided by the GDPR, rather than merely copying it, when drafting a comprehensive Data Privacy Law. The GDPR has legal loopholes and vague provisions, and it does not entirely suit Kuwait for the following reasons, as explained. Firstly, the meaning of 'personal information', which determines the material scope of the Data Privacy Law, should be interpreted broadly to cover an exponentially growing range of situations. This article finds that identifiability is the core element required to consider data or information as personal information under the definition of personal information under Article 4 of the GDPR. Therefore, the GDPR does not cover anonymous information within its scope; however, the re-identification of an individual's data may still occur. Re-identification of an individual's data can be easily achieved, for example, through the Internet of Things (IoT), such as wearable devices like a Fitbit or an Apple Watch; the combined data, including location information, can distinguish one person from millions of others. Therefore, this article recommends that when Kuwaiti decision-makers draft an information Data Privacy Law, they should broaden the definition of personal data to include not only identifiability but also the ability to single out an individual from a crowd, regardless of whether their identity can be confirmed. Although Recital 26 of the GDPR explicitly mentions 'single out,' there is no clear indication of whether singling out an individual without identifying them is covered under the GDPR's scope. The GDPR also does not clarify whether inferred data falls within the scope of personal information, and the European Court of Justice's approach is inconsistent. To emphasize this point, the judgment in the case YS, M and S v Minister voor Immigratie, Integratie en Asiel clearly excludes inference data from the safeguards of Data Protection Law, while a later judgement of the case Peter Nowak v Data Protection Commissioner in 2017 attributes the status of 'personal data' to inferences. However, in the former case, the Court was clear that GDPR does not grant all rights for inference data. As such, this article recommends including inferred data within the protection or material scope, since these types of data contain hidden private information. Secondly, Article 8 (1) of the GDPR states that the processing of minors' data (those under the age of 16, or if the law of the Union Member State sets a lower age, but not younger than 13) must be authorized by the holder of parental responsibility. This article argues that the decision maker in Kuwait, instead of ignoring this requirement, should consider the following questions before implementing the parental consent requirement under Article 8 (1): Whether the age setting under Article 8(1) accurately reflects the concept of childhood, culture, social heritage, and the Kuwaiti legal system; Should the requirement for parental consent apply to all online service providers, or should online services that are offered directly to children be excluded? If so, what are the indicators that an online service is offered directly to children? How can it be ensured that parents give verification in cases where a parent is no longer responsible for their child, or when parents are deceased? Thirdly, the digital privacy rights are the legal mechanisms that put an individual in a position of control over their personal information, thereby safeguarding the individual's right to privacy. However, not all the rights that regulate users under the GDPR are necessary to put Internet users in control of their data, to safeguard their right to privacy from the challenges posed in the digital age. To illustrate this point, the right to data portability, as outlined in Article 20 of the GDPR, empowers individuals to take control of their data by allowing them to retrieve it from one service and transfer it to another. Although it offers individual control, it is not rooted in the right to privacy; rather, it stems from competition laws. The right to data portability aims to foster competition among private companies, serving a primarily economic purpose to enhance the market, which is one of the main objectives of the GDPR. Therefore, this article does not recommend that Kuwaiti lawmakers recognize data portability as a new right within a Data Privacy Law, as it is not directly related to the right to privacy. Also, some rights under the GDPR are redundant, as they can be exercised through other rights. For instance, the right to restriction of processing under Article 18 of the GDPR is an alternative or optional right that an individual can exercise in place of other rights in some legal cases. As an alternative right, whether this right is regulated or guaranteed is less critical, since another right takes its place. To emphasize this point, if an individual's consent is not valid, instead of requesting erasure, they may request a restriction on processing. As such, this article emphasizes that there is no need to set the right to restriction of processing, except in cases where the individual requires that right for the establishment, exercise or defense of legal claims against a company for breach of their right to privacy by misuse of their private data, in which case the plaintiff can request restriction of processing through an immediate injunction under the KCC. NOTE: Noura Almutairi is an Assistant Professor at Kuwait University School of Law, Private Law Department, with research interests in the right to privacy, AI, the tort liability of tech companies and IP law.

US signals trade announcements in 48 hours
US signals trade announcements in 48 hours

Kuwait Times

time7 hours ago

  • Kuwait Times

US signals trade announcements in 48 hours

WASHINGTON/BRUSSELS: The United States will make several trade announcements in the next 48 hours, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said on Monday, adding that his inbox was full of last-ditch offers from countries to clinch a tariff deal before a July 9 deadline. The clock is ticking down for countries around the world to conclude deals with the US after President Donald Trump unleashed a global trade war that has roiled financial markets and sent policymakers scrambling to protect their economies. Bessent did not say which countries could get deals and what they might contain. Trump has kept much of the world guessing on the outcome of months of talks with countries hoping to avoid the hefty tariff hikes he has threatened. 'We've had a lot of people change their tune in terms of negotiations. So my mailbox was full last night with a lot of new offers, a lot of new proposals,' Bessent said in an interview with CNBC. 'So it's going to be a busy couple of days.' Trump said the US would start delivering tariff letters from 12 pm ET (1600 GMT) on Monday, but Bessent said they would not necessarily contain ultimatums. 'It's just 'thank you for wanting to trade with the United States of America,'' he said. ''We welcome you as a trading partner, and here's the rate, unless you want to come back and try to negotiate'.' For its part, the European Union still aims to reach a trade deal by July 9 after Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and Trump had a 'good exchange', a Commission spokesperson said. It was not immediately clear, however, whether there had been a meaningful breakthrough in talks to stave off tariff hikes on the United States' largest trading partner. Adding to the pressure, Trump threatened to impose a 17 percent tariff on EU food and agriculture exports, it emerged last week. Trump had on Sunday said the US was close to finalizing several trade pacts and would notify other countries by July 9 of higher tariff rates. He said they would not take effect until August 1, a three-week reprieve. More broadly, stocks drifted and the US dollar held near multi-year lows after the US flagged the tariff reprieve but failed to provide specifics. The EU has been torn over whether to push for a quick and light trade deal or back its own economic clout in trying to negotiate a better outcome. It had already dropped hopes for a comprehensive trade agreement before the July deadline. 'We want to reach a deal with the US We want to avoid tariffs,' the spokesperson told reporters at a daily briefing. 'We want to achieve win-win outcomes, not lose-lose outcomes.' Without a preliminary agreement, broad US tariffs on most imports would rise from their current 10 percent to the rates set out by Trump on April 2. In the EU's case, that would be 20 percent. Von der Leyen also held talks with the leaders of Germany, France and Italy at the weekend, Germany said. Chancellor Friedrich Merz has repeatedly stressed the need for a quick deal to protect industries vulnerable to tariffs ranging from cars to pharmaceuticals. The German spokesperson said the parties should allow themselves 'another 24 or 48 hours to come to a decision'. Germany's Mercedes-Benz on Monday its second-quarter unit sales of cars and vans had fallen 9 percent, blaming tariffs. Russia said BRICS was 'a group of countries that share common approaches and a common world view on how to cooperate, based on their own interests'. – Reuters

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store