Tiffany Trump Shares First Photo of Baby Son's Face & People Are Saying the Same Thing
shared the first photo of her and husband Michael Boulos' baby son, and people think he's a spitting image of .
On May 15, Tiffany, 31, welcomed her first child—a son she named Alexander Trump Boulos. The new mom announced the big news via Instagram with a black-and-white snapshot of the newborn's foot.
🎬 SIGN UP for Parade's Daily newsletter to get the latest pop culture news & celebrity interviews delivered right to your inbox 🎬
"Welcome to the world our sweet baby boy," the daughter of the POTUS and his ex-wife, Marla Maples, captioned the update. "We love you beyond words! Thank you for coming into our lives!"
On July 3, Tiffany returned to Instagram to reveal the first peek at baby Alexander's sweet face, writing, "The love of our lives, ATB 🧸."
In the featured image, the new mom held her son with his head resting on her shoulder. Alexander faced the camera with his blue eyes and mouth open. Several other pictures showed Tiffany and Boulous with their baby boy and the newborn fast asleep in solo shots.
Many folks in the comments couldn't get over how much Alexander looked like his politician grandpa.
One Instagram user declared, "The spitting image of his grandfather, Mr. President❤️❤️❤️."
Another wrote, "Actually looks like Trump too! He has strong genes because all his kids look like him!"
Someone else agreed, sharing, "Omg! What a precious and blessed little angel 👼 looks like grandpa!! And like the little Caroline!"
A different follower commented, "His beautiful blue eyes remind me so much of your dad's eyes...their shape. Precious baby 💙💙💙."
Meanwhile, yet another Instagram user exclaimed, "He look like Grampa Trump! ❤️."
Baby Alexander is Donald's 11th grandchild.
Next:
Tiffany Trump Shares First Photo of Baby Son's Face & People Are Saying the Same Thing first appeared on Parade on Jul 3, 2025
This story was originally reported by Parade on Jul 3, 2025, where it first appeared.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Musk Announces New America Party Is Formed Amid Trump Split
Elon Musk speaks during an America PAC town hall in Green Bay, Wisconsin, on Sunday, March 30, 2025. Credit - Jamie Kelter Davis—Getty Images Elon Musk says he has 'formed' his new political party titled the "America Party." The former lead of the Department of Governmental Efficiency (DOGE) had promised to do just that if President Donald Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' passed. Musk has been—and continues to be—a vocal critic of the policy bill, arguing that it will 'cause immense strategic harm' to America on account of the trillions of dollars the bill is projected to add to the debt of the country. 'By a factor of two to one, you want a new political party and you shall have it! When it comes to bankrupting our country with waste and graft, we live in a one-party system, not a democracy,' Musk said via his social media platform, X, on Saturday, a day after Trump signed the bill. 'Today, the America Party is formed to give you back your freedom.' The Tesla CEO had opened a poll on July 4, Independence Day, asking his more than 220 million followers if he should create the new political party. Over 65% of the more than 1.2 million respondents voted 'yes.' Read More: Musk Renews Promise to Start New Rival Political Party as Trump Debates Deporting Him Musk went on to share his potential strategy for 'gaining independence from the two-party system,' arguing that he might try to 'laser-focus on just two or three Senate seats and eight to 10 House districts' for his party. 'Given the razor-thin legislative margins, that would be enough to serve as the deciding vote on contentious laws, ensuring that they serve the true will of the people,' Musk elaborated. But as for what exactly Musk plans to do with his rival third party is largely open for discussion. Musk has yet to share any specific proposed policies or explicitly state what the core tenets of his party would what we do—and don't—know about Musk's vision for the America Party and how it came to be. When Musk floated the idea of creating a new political party in early June amid the very public fracturing of his relationship with Trump, his one-time ally, Musk after conducting a poll said: 'The people have spoken. A new political party is needed in America to represent the 80% in the middle!' He appeared to be referring to those who may not feel seen or represented by either the Republican Party or Democratic Party. Musk, the country's biggest Republican donor, is seemingly committed to campaigning against any Republicans who showed support and voted for the Big, Beautiful Bill that he so vehemently opposes. 'Every member of Congress who campaigned on reducing government spending and then immediately voted for the biggest debt increase in history should hang their head in shame!' Musk said on June 30. 'And they will lose their primary next year if it is the last thing I do on this Earth.' If he so desired, Musk could target pivotal congressional seats in an effort to turn them and thus potentially have the upper hand during votes on key matters. He seemingly referenced this plan with his July 4 post about establishing a 'laser-focus on just two or three Senate seats and eight to 10 House districts.' Musk did not elaborate or specify which seats would be at the center of his focus. While Musk has yet to share an actual policy platform for his party, he has reposted and responded affirmatively to some of his X followers' posts about what the platform could be. What appears to be on the docket is a platform that prioritizes cuts on debt and excess spending within the government, similar to what Musk pushed for during his time in the White House. One of Musk's followers asked: 'Is this the America Party platform?' They went on to list the following stances: Reduce debt, responsible spending only Modernize military with AI/robotics Pro tech, accelerate to win in AI Less regulation across board, but especially in energy Free speech Pro natalist Centrist policies everywhere else In response, Musk said 'yeah!' and went on to repost the list to his millions of followers, but stopped short of providing his own official policy plan. Read More: Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' Faces Opposition From Musk and Some Republicans as Senate Narrowly Votes to Advance It Though Musk had voted Democrat previously, he played a vital role for the Republican Party when he became the largest donor of the 2024 presidential race, predominantly funding Trump's campaign but also financially backing other Republicans via his super political action committee (PAC) titled America PAC. Musk became a close ally of Trump's and appeared at major campaign rallies with him, addressing large crowds and urging them to vote for Trump. As a sign of their close working relationship, Trump appointed Musk as the lead of DOGE, a role he held until May. During his tenure, Musk became known for actualizing Trump's vision of cutting 'waste' in the government, which amounted to laying off thousands of federal employees. But Musk and Trump's relationship soured, especially after the former took a public stance against the spending bill. 'I think a bill can be big or it could be beautiful,' Musk told CBS News in May, shortly before he announced his DOGE departure. 'But I don't know if it could be both.' Going a step further in early June, Musk said the 'massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination' and told his millions of followers to 'call your Senator, call your Congressman… kill the bill!' Musk and Trump engaged in an all-out war of words, exchanging jabs and lobbying threats—with Trump threatening to take away the government contracts for Musk's companies, including the SpaceX firm that has become a critical player for NASA. Trump has repeatedly claimed that the falling out stemmed from Musk being unhappy over changes to the Electric Vehicle [EV] mandate. Tensions reignited once more when Musk renewed his calls for the policy bill not to be passed. When asked by reporters on July 1 if he was planning to deport Musk, who has U.S. and South African citizenship, Trump replied: 'I don't know, we'll have to take a look.' 'We might have to put DOGE on Elon. The monster that might have to go back and eat Elon. Wouldn't that be terrible?' Trump said, appearing to refer to the contracts and subsidies that Musk's prominent businesses have from the federal government. Read More: Musk Floats Idea of Starting New Rival Political Party—and Even Names It—Amid Trump Feud Though Musk is looking to build a viable, competitive third party, it requires more than an X poll to actualize it in the U.S.. In fact, many have tried before. Two major parties—Democratic and Republican—have dominated U.S. politics and no third party in recent memory has been able to penetrate the two-party system in a meaningful way. Former 2020 Democratic presidential primary candidate Andrew Yang has pushed for representation beyond the two-party system, but has arguably encountered limited success with his Forward Party. In June, Yang expressed a keenness to join forces with Musk, seemingly hoping that the two of them may have a stronger chance of succeeding. 'Elon has built world-class companies from nothing more than an idea multiple times, and in this instance, you have the vast majority of Americans who are hungry for a new approach,' Yang said in an interview with Politico. 'I'm happy to spell it out for Elon, or anyone else who wants to head down this road. A third party can succeed very quickly.' Part of the reason third parties struggle is due to the U.S.' 'winner takes all' system in the Electoral College. 48 out of the 50 States award Electoral votes on a winner-takes-all basis (so does the District of Columbia). This makes voting for third party candidates difficult. For example, support for the Tea Party held strong at 24% according to polls in the 2010s, though they rarely held significant political power, since the Republicans were often fearful of splitting votes in races with narrow margins, which would have risked giving the election to Democratic candidates. Contact us at letters@
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
'Jurassic World Rebirth' chomps on big $147-million Fourth of July box office weekend
Dinosaurs ruled the box office once again this weekend as "Jurassic World Rebirth" hauled in a strong $147.3 domestically over the five-day Fourth of July period to kick off what industry insiders hope will be an impressive month at movie theaters. The holiday total for "Jurassic World" in the U.S. and Canada exceeded industry expectations. Universal Pictures' "Jurassic World" reboot was expected to gross $120 million to $130 million during its long opening weekend, according to analyst and studio projections. The movie unseated Apple's Brad Pitt racing film "F1 The Movie," which landed in second place with $26.1 million domestically, bringing its total to $109.5 million in North America, according to distributor Warner Bros. "Rebirth's" 2022 predecessor, "Jurassic World: Dominion," debuted with $145 million from its first three days of release and went on to collect $1 billion globally. The new movie carries an estimated production budget of $180 million, not counting marketing costs. Big-budget creature features have global appeal, as the numbers showed. Opening in 82 countries outside the U.S. and Canada, "Rebirth" grossed $171 million internationally. That included $41.5 million from China, proving that Hollywood movies can still do well in the Middle Kingdom despite the dominance of local production in the populous country. The global total for "Rebirth's" opening was $318.3 million. Directed by Gareth Edwards ("The Creator," "Rogue One") and starring Scarlett Johansson and Mahershala Ali, "Rebirth" earned unenthusiastic reviews from critics, notching a 52% approval rating on aggregator Rotten Tomatoes. The "Jurassic" franchise has seen multiple iterations since Steven Spielberg's landmark 1993 blockbuster "Jurassic Park," based on the popular Michael Crichton science fiction novel, wowed audiences with its combination of practical and computer-generated effects that gave the T. Rex and other killer dinos their stunning realism. That film spawned not only sequels but toys, theme park attractions, animated series and video games. Although the sequels, starting with Spielberg's own "The Lost World," never achieved the acclaim of the original, they continued to mint money for Universal and Spielberg's production company, Amblin. Prior to "Rebirth," the "Jurassic" movies had grossed a total of roughly $6 billion worldwide, not adjusting for inflation, according to box office website The Numbers. The first "Jurassic Park" grossed $978 million worldwide, according to Box Office Mojo, which is equal to $1.86 billion in today's dollars. Read more: Pixar had its worst opening weekend ever with 'Elio.' What happened? The latest "Jurassic" movie did not get a slot at Imax theaters, since those were taken up by "F1." Next week, the valuable Imax real estate will be taken up by Warner Bros. and DC Studios' "Superman." Films shown on Imax often reap bigger box office numbers, aided in part by the higher ticket prices at those theaters, and because they're viewed as more of a must-see "event." "Jurassic World" is the first of three big tentpole films arriving this month in theaters. In addition to "Superman," Walt Disney Co. and Marvel Studios' "The Fantastic Four: First Steps" opens in a few weeks. July has historically been one of the strongest summer months at the box office, putting more pressure on these three films to deliver. Despite big box office gains in April and May, June saw a string of underperforming films such as Lionsgate's "John Wick" spinoff "Ballerina," Sony Pictures' "Karate Kid: Legends" and Disney and Pixar's original animated effort "Elio." Theatrical business in June was 25% lower compared to the pre-pandemic average of June 2017, 2018 and 2019, according to David A. Gross's FranchiseRe movie industry newsletter. It was also down 5.3% compared to last June, which saw big hits like Disney and Pixar's "Inside Out 2" and Sony's "Bad Boys: Ride or Die." "We see this ebb and flow," said Shawn Robbins, founder of the website Box Office Theory. "These next four to five weeks will certainly give us a sense of how to grade the summer overall.' Sign up for our Wide Shot newsletter to get the latest entertainment business news, analysis and insights. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Jurassic World: Rebirth Review: I Was Really Hoping They'd Have Thrills On This Dinosaur Tour
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. I don't think I'd be surprising anyone who knows me by saying that I'm a Jurassic franchise superfan. I'm even someone who enthusiastically enjoyed both of the previous sequels to Jurassic World. But I can agree with everyone that 1993's Jurassic Park is the high bar of the series, and even when hearing various claims that Jurassic World: Rebirth was a love letter to that very modern classic, I put aside my usual trepidations. Jurassic World Rebirth (2025) Release Date: July 2, 2025Directed By: Gareth EdwardsWritten By: David KoeppStarring: Scarlett Johansson, Mahershala Ali, Jonathan Bailey, Rupert Friend, Manuel Garcia-Rulfo, Luna Blaise, David Iacono, Audrina Miranda, Philippine Velge, Bechir Sylvain, and Ed SkreinRating: PG-13 for intense sequences of violence/action, bloody images, some suggestive references, language and a drug 134 minutes I was wrong to do that, because if this is supposed to be a declaration of love for that original movie, it veers far from the mark. Stop me if you've heard this one: the hubris of humanity led to the recreation of dinosaurs, which our species now wants to exploit in the name of profit. What passes for novelty this time around is Rebirth's new island location, a remote facility where mutated attractions were being created for the main park. This lost world is now hosting a mercenary team led by Scarlett Johansson's Zora Bennett, with the goal being to recover genetic samples of the largest dinosaurs. The aim is to create a super drug that benefits cardiac health, and if that was the sole focus of this story, I might have been able to get on board. That's not what happens, however, as a family unit (Manuel Garcia-Rulfo, Luna Blaise, David Iacono and Audrina Miranda) randomly shipwrecked by some dinosaurs is rescued by the aforementioned mercenary team – an effort to make the tale into something more "blockbuster" worthy. And that is where the greatest irony presented in Jurassic World Rebirth lies, as watching this movie didn't invigorate my dino loving heart; rather, it broke it into 65 million pieces. As well-cast as Jurassic World Rebirth's mercenary mission plotline is, it should be the one and only plot this picture follows. Along with Johansson (a Jurassic superfan herself) are Jonathan Bailey, Rupert Friend, and Mahershala Ali. That sort of roster almost makes you think you're in for a Wes Anderson adventure, especially with Johansson and Friend being Asteroid City veterans. I think I honestly would take a modest stop-motion Anderson film over what we have here, with all of the money and effects a mega franchise can buy. And that is what brings me to the heart of my disappointment: writer David Koepp's script. Returning to the franchise for the first time since 1997's The Lost World: Jurassic Park, the scribe has given us a story that induces head-scratching. There is literally a moment where this film finds its characters minutes away from Ile Saint-Hubert, the island at the heart of Rebirth, only to turn around and save the family that'll give us our merchandising-friendly subplot. It's a move that's questioned by all but Zora and Duncan Kincaid (Mahershala Ali) – her traumatized friend who offers her conscience a window to sneak in Jurassic World Rebirth's unsubtle social messaging. With past films offering spins on Michael Crichton's thesis of scientific power being mishandled by humanity's hubris, director Gareth Edwards' entry focuses on the class inequality inherent with such big pharma fortune seeking. But it never lands its ideas as well as the previous films, which leads to a promising story beat turning into a blunt instrument that beats us over the head. As for the Jurassic part of this equation, Koepp's pre-release promise to not change the series canon holds up. However, Rebirth doesn't feel like a movie that's interested in even touching the more recent stories at hand, as seen in the decision to wipe out most of the world's dinosaurs at the start of the film. If anything, this feels like a partial attempt to execute a Halloween 2018 style sequel in Jurassic World's universe – selectively side stepping previous developments while eager to include legacy character name drops and callbacks. So I'd check those dino droppings for member berries, as I have a feeling they've poisoned what could have been a fun romp. For as much complaining as I've done about Jurassic World Rebirth's human characters, I can see the promise that they represent. Scarlett Johansson and Jonathan Bailey in particular have fantastic chemistry as the characters that puzzle out the moral dilemma we're supposed to be invested in. Mahershala Ali is left on the outside looking in, infusing as much personality as he can as an undeveloped figure of conscience. So with lackluster humans, you'd think the dinosaurs would pick the slack, right? Instead, I am shocked at how dino-avoidant Rebirth actually is, especially with mutant creatures on the table. So much of the hype surrounding the fifth Jurassic sequel has been teasing the Distortus Rex, a dinosaur that's literally designed with Alien's Xenomorph and Return of the Jedi's Rancor in mind. But we barely get to see the beast clearly, despite recent marketing not being very shy with the beast's face. As for the rest of our dinosaurs, we get what amounts to a legacy cameo from a T-Rex, bringing to life a long deleted scene from Jurassic Park's original script. It's not very long or terribly exciting, and the only benefit I can honestly claim is that we get to see a sleepy Rex roll over like an adorable house cat. That's not exactly an adventure 32 years in the making. Yet somehow, with Jurassic World Rebirth's beasts mostly hiding in the background – save for Dolores, an adorable Aquilops – I still found myself once again rooting for the dinosaurs. The big difference this time out is instead of wanting inGen's unwanted menagerie to teach us a lesson in why we shouldn't play God, I wanted them to take me away from the uninteresting human characters. This is where the Delgado family comes in, as their presence robs Zora Bennett and her team of any substantial development while also giving us an underbaked family unit meant to recall the emotional ride of Lex and Tim in Jurassic Park. It bothers me that the segment of Rebirth's narrative giving people of color its focus feels like a last minute addition. I do not fault stars Manuel Garcia-Rulfo, Luna Blaise, Audrina Miranda or David Iacono for their portion of the movie being annoying, especially because I wanted them to work better in the overall structure of the story. Diversity in representation doesn't only belong to the dinosaurs. Audrina Miranda notably also has the skills to sell the CGI/puppetry mashup of Dolores as a mini-dino companion worthy of an actual plotline... but alas, Jurassic World Rebirth doesn't even recognize what it has going for it long enough to really double down, as it flies towards an ending that can't even decide what it wants to be. Some of the worst criticisms of nostalgic legacyquels apply to Jurassic World: Rebirth . Acting as a greatest hits compilation of locations, iconography, and visual beats that made for the most memorable Jurassic moments, there's no heart behind the choices. It's a movie that asks for 'oohs' and 'ahhs' without inspiring them to come from an organic or meaningful place. If you'd asked me before seeing Rebirth if there's such a thing as too many references to John Williams' Jurassic Park theme, I may have said 'No.' But the underwhelming score from composer Alexandre Desplat has proven me wrong, as the numerous deployments of the iconic tune are all I really remember from this would-be adventure picture's score. The greatest failing I think Jurassic World: Rebirth suffers from is an obviously rushed production schedule. I still remember the project being announced out of nowhere last year, barreling down with what seemed like a freight train's worth of momentum to the finish line this summer. It's a lesson we should have learned in the past, as 2001's Jurassic Park III suffered a rushed production that yielded similarly disastrous results. I now feel I need to return to the only other entry I dislike in this canon, if only so I can decide whether I need to apologize for treating it so roughly. Despite my criticisms, I still believe in the promise of the Jurassic franchise at large. For my own personal scorecard to only have two misfires in a canon of seven films (and two wildly entertaining animated series), that's not a bad average to have. If there was a little more time and care given to Rebirth, I could see it being the lean and mean jungle adventure it's attempting to resemble. If there's a new entry announced tomorrow, I'll be there without question. I just hope that if the Jurassic universe continues, it takes its time to let an idea worthy of trotting out these massive marvels dawn on its consciousness. But unfortunately for now, I cannot endorse this walk in the park.
