MAS proposes to improve complex product labelling and disclosures for investors
The central bank released a consultation paper on Tuesday (Jul 1) seeking feedback over the next two months on plans to strengthen product highlights sheet (PHS) requirements and streamline the framework for complex products.
A PHS refers to a document provided to investors for certain investment products to outline key features and risks. It complements the main offer document, and helps users better understand key product information.
Meanwhile, the complex products framework classifies capital market products as 'complex' or 'non-complex' and requires distributors to assess an investor's knowledge and experience. Investors deemed lacking must complete a learning module or receive mandatory advice.
In a statement, MAS said the proposals aim to 'strengthen the effectiveness of a disclosure-based regime for investors to make informed choices on their own, while requiring an appropriate level of intervention for consumers who need more assistance'.
They come at a time when investors are increasingly empowered to make self-directed investments, supported by the digitalisation of financial services. However, some investors who are less technologically or financially savvy would still benefit from seeking professional advice to better understand the features and risks of the products they invest in.
A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU
Friday, 3 pm Thrive
Money, career and life hacks to help young adults stay ahead of the curve.
Sign Up
Sign Up
MAS invites views and suggestions from interested parties on the proposals, with comments to be submitted via the FormSG link by Sep 1.
After the consultation, it will refine the proposals as needed and issue a separate consultation on the draft amendments. A six-month transition period is planned once the changes take effect.
PHS enhancements
To improve investor understanding, MAS is proposing revised PHS templates that present key product information more clearly. For instance, essential product features will be highlighted on the first page to draw investors' attention upfront.
A new 'question and answer' format will also be introduced to better engage users on important considerations.
Complex products will be clearly marked with a 'red' label to prompt investors to seek advice where necessary.
Additionally, investment-linked policies (ILPs), which were previously exempt, will now require a PHS under the proposed enhancements.
MAS is also seeking to standardise PHS requirements across different investment products. It plans to host mandatory PHS templates on its website instead of setting them out in the Securities and Futures Act's regulations, allowing more flexibility for future updates.
It also proposes removing different page limits for PHSes based on the use of diagrams.
Under the new format, which incorporates diagrams where appropriate, PHSes for asset-backed securities, structured notes, collective investment schemes (excluding REITs), and ILP sub-funds will be capped at eight pages.
Revisions to complex products framework
MAS sees 'room to streamline the complex products distribution safeguards' by shifting towards a more disclosure- and information-based approach.
The proposals include removing the requirement for mandatory financial advice in most cases, introducing a product knowledge assessment (PKA) and applying targeted safeguards for investors who may need additional protection.
These changes follow MAS' periodic review of the complex products framework to ensure it remains fit for purpose amid evolving market conditions and the increasingly diverse investment needs of Singapore's retail investors. .
The central bank is looking to remove the requirement for mandatory financial advice even where the investor does not have the qualifications, experience, or knowledge to invest in the product, except in the case of those who require added protection.
'With clearer complex product labelling and investor-friendly PHS disclosures, investors will be in a good position to make considered, informed investment decisions,' said MAS.
Investors requiring additional protection, known as selected clients, will still need to go through a mandatory financial advisory process before transacting in complex products. This includes safeguards such as having a trusted individual present during the advisory process and a follow-up call to confirm the investment decision before proceeding.
To further support investor understanding, MAS is introducing the PKA as an alternative to assess product-specific knowledge. Unlike the existing customer account review (CAR) and customer knowledge assessment (CKA) which focus on general experience or qualification, the PKA tests an investor's understanding of a product's specific features and risks.
Under this approach, a non-selected client, such as a 40-year-old software engineer with no trading experience, would receive a risk warning before proceeding with an investment in a complex product. If the client acknowledges the risks, they may proceed without financial advice.
In contrast, a selected client, such as an 80-year-old retiree with limited English proficiency, would be required to undergo a full advisory process with added safeguards before completing the transaction.
'Timely changes'
Industry observers have welcomed the proposals, with the Securities Investors Association (Singapore), or SIAS, calling the changes 'timely and necessary given the evolving investment habits of investors'.
In particular, SIAS supported the move to introduce a clearer, more reader-friendly PHS, especially for complex investment products.
David Gerald, the president of SIAS, noted that the use of a 'red' label to clearly flag a product as 'complex' and the reorganisation of content to present key risks upfront on the first page of the PHS will help investors quickly identify the nature of the product and make more informed decisions.
Noting that investors today are increasingly savvy, he pointed out that many conduct their own research, make independent investment decisions, and even trade complex products online, both in Singapore and overseas.
'The new streamlined framework for complex products strikes the right balance — introducing sufficient safeguards to help investors understand the risks, while preserving their autonomy to choose products that suit their investment goals,' he said.
However, he cautioned that investors active in overseas markets may not realise they face the same product risks but without the protection of Singapore's regulations or recourse through SIAS if disputes arise.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
7 hours ago
- Business Times
No compulsory financial advice needed for most retail investors under proposed MAS changes
[SINGAPORE] Retail investors may soon be able to invest in products that are deemed complex without seeking the now-mandatory financial advice, even where they may not have the relevant qualifications, experience or knowledge in investing. But safeguards would still be in place for those who need the protection. Under the proposals, information on the products will be put more clearly, and guidance will be offered when transacting in complex products. Most investors would need to take a product knowledge assessment (PKA) to test their understanding of such products. The targeted safeguards proposed for more vulnerable investors – the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) calls them 'selected clients' – include, for example, a mandatory financial advisory process before they can purchase complex products. They could also have a trusted individual present during the financial advisory process, and a call-back to confirm the investment decision before proceeding. These are some of the changes that MAS has proposed in a consultation paper released on Jul 1, which attempts to strike a balance between giving retail investors autonomy and putting in place safeguards for those who need them. MAS also gathered feedback from the Equities Market Review Group and its regulatory workstream ahead of this consultation, a spokesperson told The Business Times. A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU Friday, 3 pm Thrive Money, career and life hacks to help young adults stay ahead of the curve. Sign Up Sign Up 'While this review is part of MAS' ongoing review efforts, it is also in line with the Equities Market Review Group's broad objective to improve the vibrancy of our equities market through streamlining regulations and empowering investors in their investment journey,' added the spokesperson. Feedback sought on proposals The central bank will be seeking feedback over the next two months on ways to improve the way information is presented in the product highlight sheet (PHS) and to streamline the framework for complex products. A PHS is a document outlining the key features and risks for investors for certain investment products. It complements the main offer document, and helps users understand key product information. Meanwhile, the existing complex-product framework classifies capital market products as 'complex' or 'non-complex', and requires distributors to assess an investor's knowledge and experience. Investors deemed lacking must now complete a learning module or receive mandatory advice. In a statement, MAS said the proposals aim to 'strengthen the effectiveness of a disclosure-based regime for investors to make informed choices on their own, while requiring an appropriate level of intervention for consumers who need more assistance'. The proposals come at a time when investors are becoming more self-directed when making investments with the digitalisation of financial services. However, some investors who are less technologically or financially savvy would still benefit from seeking professional advice. MAS invites views and suggestions from interested parties on the proposals. They may submit their comments through the FormSG link by Sep 1. After the consultation, MAS will refine the proposals as needed and issue a separate consultation on the draft amendments. A six-month transition period is planned once the changes take effect. PHS enhancements MAS is proposing revised PHS templates that present key product information more clearly. For instance, essential product features are to be highlighted on the first page to draw investors' attention upfront. A new 'question and answer' format is being proposed to better engage users on important considerations. Complex products will be clearly marked with a 'red' label to prompt investors to seek advice where necessary. Investment-linked policies (ILPs), previously exempt, will now require a PHS under the proposed enhancements. MAS is also seeking to standardise PHS requirements for various investment products. It plans to host mandatory PHS templates on its website, thus making future updates possible. It also proposes removing page limits for PHSes based on the use of diagrams. Under the proposed format incorporating diagrams where appropriate, PHSes for asset-backed securities, structured notes, collective investment schemes (excluding Reits), and ILP sub-funds are proposed to be capped at eight pages. Fit for purpose These proposed changes follow MAS' periodic review of the complex-product framework to ensure it remains fit for purpose amid evolving market conditions and the increasingly diverse investment needs of Singapore's retail investors. MAS said: 'With clearer complex product labelling and investor-friendly PHS disclosures, investors will be in a good position to make considered, informed investment decisions.' In its consultation paper, it cited an example of a 'non-selected' client, a 40-year-old software engineer with no trading experience, who would receive a risk warning before proceeding with an investment in a complex product. Such a client who acknowledges the risks may proceed without financial advice. A 'selected' client could be an 80-year-old retiree with limited proficiency in English, who would have to undergo a full advisory process with added safeguards before completing the transaction. 'Timely changes' Industry observers welcomed the proposals, with the Securities Investors Association (Singapore), or Sias, calling the changes 'timely and necessary, given the evolving investment habits of investors'. Sias also supports the proposal to introduce a clearer, more reader-friendly PHS, especially for complex investment products. President David Gerald lauded the use of a 'red' label to clearly flag a product as 'complex', and the reorganisation of content to present key risks upfront. Noting that investors today are increasingly savvy, he said that many do their own research, make independent investment decisions, and even trade complex products online, both in Singapore and overseas. 'The new streamlined framework for complex products strikes the right balance – introducing sufficient safeguards to help investors understand the risks, while preserving their autonomy to choose products that suit their investment goals.' However, he cautioned that investors active in overseas markets may not realise that they face the same product risks but are without the protection of Singapore's regulations or recourse through Sias if disputes arise.
Business Times
11 hours ago
- Business Times
Opening the private-market door
[SINGAPORE] The hawker's dream: Each morning at 5 am, Madam Liew opens her kway teow stall in Serangoon. She diligently saves, but inflation quietly erodes her earnings. A financial adviser suggests she invest S$5,000 in a private fund backing South-east Asian logistics. It offers dividends only from the third year, and locks her money in for nine years. She hesitates, thinking: 'What if I need the cash urgently? Will I even know what it's worth?' The engineer's pause: Julian, a 29-year-old software engineer, sees a robo-adviser banner advertising 'private credit – target 9 per cent IRR' (internal rate of return). He clicks in, but freezes at the words: 'No liquidity for seven years.' Burned by a crypto platform freeze, he recalls how long illiquidity can feel when markets tank. These hypothetical stories reflect the challenge facing Singapore's regulator. In March, the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) released a consultation paper proposing long-term investment funds (LIFs) – vehicles that could offer retail investors access to private equity, credit and infrastructure. MAS' stated objective is to 'provide retail investors, in a risk-calibrated manner, access to private market investments as part of a diversified investment portfolio' while advancing the equities market review goal of expanding retail choice and potential fund listings. Three needles to thread To bring LIFs to retail investors, MAS must strike a delicate balance on three fronts: Investor protection v market growth: LIFs could boost Singapore's alternatives ecosystem – but even one misstep could shake public trust. Access must align with product complexity and financial literacy. Manager incentives v investor interests: Performance fees drive returns – but can also spur aggressive valuations. Alignment tools such as general partner co-investment, clawbacks and hurdle rates must be mandatory. Market integrity v investor access: Infrequent valuations and liquidity mismatches demand safeguards, such as independent pricing, redemption gates and third-party custody. Consultation paper at a glance – six pillars MAS' consultation paper funnels 25 questions which can be categorised into six big topics. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up What LIFs can invest in: Proposes both direct investment and fund-of-fund (FoF) structures. Who can manage LIFs: Standards for manager experience, governance and licensing. Portfolio limits: Caps on single investments and diversification requirements. Liquidity rules: Options for annual redemption, limits on withdrawal. Leverage and valuation: Borrowing controls and external valuation requirements. Product classification and warning: Disclosures, risk labels and investor knowledge assessments. In response to the consultation paper, CFA Society Singapore and CFA Institute jointly submitted our views, including recommendations in a number of key areas, such as regulatory actions, financial education and learning from other markets abroad. Five regulatory recommendations First, start at the sturdier end of the spectrum. We endorse MAS' view that it should give the green light only to LIFs that allocate the bulk of capital to seasoned, cash-flow-generating assets – think brownfield infrastructure or senior secured private credit – while deferring higher risk strategies to a later phase. In addition, we recommend multi-asset strategies, as mixing public and private asset management could be a good place to start. Second, mandate 'plain English' disclosures with cinematic clarity. Product highlight sheets must explain, in simple language, how valuation lags, lock-ups and clawbacks work. Fees – both management and performance – should appear in absolute dollars for a hypothetical S$10,000 investment. Quarterly fact sheets and audited annual reports should be posted publicly. Third, license managers with proven private-markets DNA. We endorse MAS' view that a retail LIF manager ought to hold a full-retail fund-management company licence. In particular, we recommend that the LIF manager possess at least two completed fund vintages and manage multicycle track records across downturns – not just boom-era IRRs. Portfolio heads must demonstrate due-diligence chops in originating, structuring, and exiting deals. Fourth, embed conflict-of-interest brakes directly into fund deeds. Related-party transactions must trigger independent fairness opinions; any sale of an asset from one fund to another managed by the same general partner should require advisory-committee consent and full disclosure. Leverage provided by affiliates must clear arm's-length pricing checks, and any side letters that grant preferential liquidity or fees must be disclosed to all unitholders. Fifth, encourage FoFs as training wheels for the mass affluent. Yes, FoFs introduce an extra fee layer, but they also diversify vintage, manager, and sector risk – qualities invaluable to first-time retail investors. FoFs should therefore enjoy expedited approval if they cap underlying manager concentration, bring a mix of public/private assets and commit to quarterly liquidity windows. Education: Singapore's invisible circuit breaker Rules alone cannot inoculate markets against naivety, and neither can they insulate Madam Liew and Julian from behavioural pitfalls. Financial literacy is Singapore's national defence against mis-selling – and it must evolve. Suitability beyond net worth: A million-dollar condo does not mean its owner understands an IRR waterfall. A customer knowledge assessment-style quiz focused on private-market basics should precede every subscription, with results logged for audits. Upskilling the intermediaries: Relationship managers at banks, financial advisers, digital platforms and independent financial advisers should earn a 'private-assets passport' through MAS- or Institute of Banking and Finance-endorsed modules covering valuation, cash-flow modelling and secondary-market dynamics. Sales scripts and marketing decks must be vetted for balance. Ongoing investor refreshers: Regulations could require a short e-learning module whenever capital is called, reminding investors why liquidity is restricted and how valuations are derived. The lesson: lock-ups last longer than memory. Learning from abroad, leading at home Hong Kong allows listed closed-ended alternatives with 30 per cent leverage caps and weekly net asset values; the United Kingdom's model mandates independent valuation committees. Singapore can go further by publishing a 'LIF risk dashboard' on defaults, discounts and redemptions, and by linking leverage limits to cash-flow coverage – not a hard 30 per cent cap. Singaporean households now hold S$2.9 trillion in net worth, much of it sitting idle in cash. Redirecting even 5 per cent into LIFs could unlock billions for local entrepreneurs, infrastructure and green-energy projects – supporting national goals such as Budget 2025's economic repositioning. Yet, trust is fragile. A single poorly priced LIF could undo years of progress and regulatory goodwill. Closing the loop: back to our investors Months later, Julian passes MAS' suitability module and realises his emergency fund is thin – he defers private credit for now, feeling empowered rather than excluded. Madam Liew attends an alternatives seminar and decides a five-year lock-up is acceptable – but only with money she won't need for stall renovations. One day, Singaporeans could own a slice of the high-speed rail to Kuala Lumpur through a regulated fund. They won't need Ivy League-endowment capital – only patience, literacy and a system built on stewardship, not sales. Done well, Singapore will show the world how to democratise access to investments and open the private-market door – gently. The writer, a CFA charterholder, is a member of the CFA Society Singapore advocacy committee
Business Times
12 hours ago
- Business Times
MAS proposes to improve complex product labelling and disclosures for investors
[SINGAPORE] Investors in Singapore may soon gain clearer disclosures and improved guidance for complex products, following the implementation of proposed amendments by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS). The central bank released a consultation paper on Tuesday (Jul 1) seeking feedback over the next two months on plans to strengthen product highlights sheet (PHS) requirements and streamline the framework for complex products. A PHS refers to a document provided to investors for certain investment products to outline key features and risks. It complements the main offer document, and helps users better understand key product information. Meanwhile, the complex products framework classifies capital market products as 'complex' or 'non-complex' and requires distributors to assess an investor's knowledge and experience. Investors deemed lacking must complete a learning module or receive mandatory advice. In a statement, MAS said the proposals aim to 'strengthen the effectiveness of a disclosure-based regime for investors to make informed choices on their own, while requiring an appropriate level of intervention for consumers who need more assistance'. They come at a time when investors are increasingly empowered to make self-directed investments, supported by the digitalisation of financial services. However, some investors who are less technologically or financially savvy would still benefit from seeking professional advice to better understand the features and risks of the products they invest in. A NEWSLETTER FOR YOU Friday, 3 pm Thrive Money, career and life hacks to help young adults stay ahead of the curve. Sign Up Sign Up MAS invites views and suggestions from interested parties on the proposals, with comments to be submitted via the FormSG link by Sep 1. After the consultation, it will refine the proposals as needed and issue a separate consultation on the draft amendments. A six-month transition period is planned once the changes take effect. PHS enhancements To improve investor understanding, MAS is proposing revised PHS templates that present key product information more clearly. For instance, essential product features will be highlighted on the first page to draw investors' attention upfront. A new 'question and answer' format will also be introduced to better engage users on important considerations. Complex products will be clearly marked with a 'red' label to prompt investors to seek advice where necessary. Additionally, investment-linked policies (ILPs), which were previously exempt, will now require a PHS under the proposed enhancements. MAS is also seeking to standardise PHS requirements across different investment products. It plans to host mandatory PHS templates on its website instead of setting them out in the Securities and Futures Act's regulations, allowing more flexibility for future updates. It also proposes removing different page limits for PHSes based on the use of diagrams. Under the new format, which incorporates diagrams where appropriate, PHSes for asset-backed securities, structured notes, collective investment schemes (excluding REITs), and ILP sub-funds will be capped at eight pages. Revisions to complex products framework MAS sees 'room to streamline the complex products distribution safeguards' by shifting towards a more disclosure- and information-based approach. The proposals include removing the requirement for mandatory financial advice in most cases, introducing a product knowledge assessment (PKA) and applying targeted safeguards for investors who may need additional protection. These changes follow MAS' periodic review of the complex products framework to ensure it remains fit for purpose amid evolving market conditions and the increasingly diverse investment needs of Singapore's retail investors. . The central bank is looking to remove the requirement for mandatory financial advice even where the investor does not have the qualifications, experience, or knowledge to invest in the product, except in the case of those who require added protection. 'With clearer complex product labelling and investor-friendly PHS disclosures, investors will be in a good position to make considered, informed investment decisions,' said MAS. Investors requiring additional protection, known as selected clients, will still need to go through a mandatory financial advisory process before transacting in complex products. This includes safeguards such as having a trusted individual present during the advisory process and a follow-up call to confirm the investment decision before proceeding. To further support investor understanding, MAS is introducing the PKA as an alternative to assess product-specific knowledge. Unlike the existing customer account review (CAR) and customer knowledge assessment (CKA) which focus on general experience or qualification, the PKA tests an investor's understanding of a product's specific features and risks. Under this approach, a non-selected client, such as a 40-year-old software engineer with no trading experience, would receive a risk warning before proceeding with an investment in a complex product. If the client acknowledges the risks, they may proceed without financial advice. In contrast, a selected client, such as an 80-year-old retiree with limited English proficiency, would be required to undergo a full advisory process with added safeguards before completing the transaction. 'Timely changes' Industry observers have welcomed the proposals, with the Securities Investors Association (Singapore), or SIAS, calling the changes 'timely and necessary given the evolving investment habits of investors'. In particular, SIAS supported the move to introduce a clearer, more reader-friendly PHS, especially for complex investment products. David Gerald, the president of SIAS, noted that the use of a 'red' label to clearly flag a product as 'complex' and the reorganisation of content to present key risks upfront on the first page of the PHS will help investors quickly identify the nature of the product and make more informed decisions. Noting that investors today are increasingly savvy, he pointed out that many conduct their own research, make independent investment decisions, and even trade complex products online, both in Singapore and overseas. 'The new streamlined framework for complex products strikes the right balance — introducing sufficient safeguards to help investors understand the risks, while preserving their autonomy to choose products that suit their investment goals,' he said. However, he cautioned that investors active in overseas markets may not realise they face the same product risks but without the protection of Singapore's regulations or recourse through SIAS if disputes arise.
