Massive rise in betting ads: A call for vigilance
With the growing number of advertisements for illegal offshore betting platforms flooding the digital space, the Advertising Standards Council of India (ASCI) has had to take serious steps to protect consumers. Recognizing the scale and sophistication of these ads, ASCI instituted advanced digital monitoring systems and deployed specialized vigilance teams to detect and report misleading promotions.
What these teams uncovered was alarming.
Many of these platforms used artificial intelligence to create deepfake videos featuring fabricated testimonials—people claiming they had made so much money from betting that they no longer needed to work. These ads were not only deceptive but dangerously persuasive. In several cases, up to 60 different URLs directed users to the same illegal betting site—an elaborate strategy to bypass detection and takedown measures.
Also read: Here's how to navigate complex TDS rules for ads, software subscriptions & more
Even more concerning was how such promotions were embedded in seemingly innocent content. Cooking tutorials, lifestyle tips, and other harmless-looking videos were found to contain hidden links—via tickers, hashtags, or even bio links—leading viewers to betting platforms. Major social media platforms, despite their advanced ad systems, struggled to catch and block these ads.
This raises a crucial question: Who is responsible for ensuring such illegal and misleading ads don't reach consumers? While ASCI continues to do its part through proactive monitoring, there is a clear need for stronger platform accountability to detect such violations of the law, and prevent such ads from appearing in consumer feeds. ASCI works closely with government regulators to report such breaches of the law, who then take them down; however addressing this at scale remains a challenge.
Digital infrastructure growth and smartphone usage, while being critical economic drivers, have facilitated such potentially harmful targeting of consumers. As has the promotion of betting apps by celebrities and social media influencers. A Digital India Foundation report in March said that just four such platforms accounted for 1.6 billion visits in a mere three months. Organic search traffic to these sites was recorded at 184 million visits.
Also read: Brands pile in, ads get shorter: IPL 18 rewrites the rules of cricket-time marketing: Report
Another recent report, by the think tank Consumer Unity & Trust Society (CUTS) International, warned about the explosive growth of illegal online gambling platforms, of threats to minors, young adults and national financial integrity. Such platforms, the report said, had estimated annual deposits of about $100 billion and the top 15 illegal platforms logged 5.4 billion visits in FY25. The CUTS report further highlighted that these platforms often bypass basic safeguards such as Know Your Customer and age verification, giving minors and young adults unregulated access to gambling content. Some offshore operators even use tactics like cash-on-delivery, making it easier for minors who may lack digital payment access, to gamble.
Such is their reach that in March 2025, one such platform outranked even universally popular sites like amazon.in, wikipedia.org and google.co, as per reports.
ASCI's recently released annual complaints report showed a sharp spike in the rise of illegal offshore betting and gambling ads. From 1,311 in 2023-24 to 3,081 in 2024-25, the number of cases reported more than doubled. ASCI enhanced monitoring resources and set up a special monitoring cell, under an MoU it signed with the federations representing Real Money Games, which are legally permitted and regulated in most states in India.
Left unchecked, the gambling platforms can lead to addictive behaviour and financial risks. Additionally, they can expose consumers to risks like cyber attacks and unsafe online environments. Such unregulated activity can even threaten national security by acting as channels for money laundering and terror financing.
Also read: From skincare to smartphones: Ads by Apple, Mamaearth, L'Oreal under scrutiny
Hence, there is a serious risk for consumers and society.
As digital infrastructure and access to it grows, such platforms have the potential to target more consumers who are unaware of their illegality and harmful impacts. Regular monitoring and collaborations between industry, self-regulators and the government will be the key to consumer protection in the days to come. In the long term, a comprehensive regulatory framework that addresses some of the challenges of online gambling will need to be established to provide systemic solutions to this large-scale consumer threat.
Manisha Kapoor is chief executive officer and secretary general of the Advertising Standards Council of India.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
What are TDS, TCS and what is the difference between them?
If you are confused by personal finance terms, jargon and calculations, here's a series to simplify and deconstruct these for you. In the 57th part of this series, we explain the difference between two forms of indirect taxation. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads What is TDS? Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads What is TCS? The government collects taxes in two ways: directly and indirectly. Tax deducted at source (TDS) and tax collected at source TCS ) are two forms of indirect tax collection. Here, tax is levied at the source of income or transaction if it exceeds a certain limit. Failure to deduct or collect this tax can lead to penalties and interest Here's how the two types of indirect taxes tax is deducted at the source of one's income. It is done by the person, organisation or employer making the payment, or providing salary or income. The person cutting the tax deposits it with the person who receives the income after deduction is called 'deductee', while the person cutting the tax is 'deductor'. The rate at which the tax is deducted varies for different income options, such as salary, rent, interest income, commission or brokerage, purchase of property, professional fees, instance, if you are paying a rent of Rs.60,000 a month, which exceeds the threshold of Rs.50,000, you will have to deduct tax at 10% before paying it to the landlord. So, you will deduct Rs.6,000 and pay Rs.54,000 to the landlord as tax is collected by the person selling certain goods or services, from the buyer, under Section 206C of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The seller then deposits this tax with the government. Some of these goods include liquor, forest produce, minerals, purchase of vehicles, foreign remittances, among others, and the rate varies depending on the goods or instance, if you are travelling abroad and the tour package is Rs.12 lakh, above the threshold of Rs.10 lakh, then the tour operator will collect 20% tax on the excess amount. Hence, you will pay a tax of Rs.40,000.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
2 days ago
- Business Standard
'Trust restored': Officials to ask 'relevant' questions during tax scrutiny
The CBDT has asked its officers to ask 'relevant' and 'specific' questions while scrutinising tax assessments: a decision that experts say will reduce arbitrariness and harassment. Ravi Agrawal, chairman of Central Board of Direct Taxes, recently asked Principal Chief Commissioners of Income Tax (PCCITs) to supervise faceless assessing officers and ensure they avoid sending unjustified or vague queries to taxpayers, PTI reported. The directive applies to all scrutiny cases selected for review in FY26. Suresh Surana, a chartered accountant, said tax notices often seek information on personal expenditure, all bank statements, or explanation for travel or business operations even when these weren't relevant to a case. 'Such queries increased the compliance burden unnecessarily and caused stress to taxpayers,' he said. 'Even salaried taxpayers were asked to justify income already reported in Form 16 and reconciled with TDS data. Business owners were served blanket queries like 'justify business expenses' without context,' said Niyati Shah, chartered accountant and vertical head of personal tax at 1 Finance. Ashish Mehta, partner at Khaitan & Co, noted that even audited companies have often been asked to submit 'exhaustive details and past-year bank statements.' How does the CBDT directive help taxpayers? 'This is a step toward restoring trust,' said Shah. 'It forces assessing officers to apply their minds before raising a query and prevents blanket, template-based questioning.' Surana emphasized that it's especially helpful for senior citizens who rely on pensions or interest income. 'Focused scrutiny will spare them from excessive documentation or irrelevant questions,' he said. SR Patnaik, partner (Head – Taxation) at Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas, said the move will 'provide clarity by narrowing the scope of enquiry to specific transactions, making it easier for taxpayers to respond effectively.' Experts say taxpayer must do these things about queries they find irrelevant: -Respond politely, referencing relevant ITR sections or AIS data -Escalate the issue under the faceless assessment structure or through a grievance under e-Nivaran -Cite the CBDT directive to highlight non-compliance As a last resort, approach the Principal Commissioner or even consider a legal writ, said Patnaik 'It helps to get a tax professional involved if the queries remain repetitive or unjustified,' said Shah How will the faceless assessment system improve? The CBDT has placed the onus of quality control on assessment unit (AU) heads. 'This makes AU heads directly responsible for the relevance and clarity of queries,' said Shah. 'Over time, this should reduce 'fishing expeditions' by junior officers.' Mehta agreed, adding that the new responsibility 'should lead to fewer standardised notices and more case-specific scrutiny.' Patnaik, however, cautioned that implementation remains key: 'The faceless system is still evolving. Without a way to directly engage with officers, grievances can remain unaddressed unless structural reforms accompany these directives.' 'The faceless assessment system was meant to ensure transparency, but due to poor implementation, it has often led to genuine claims being rejected and even incorrect notices being issued,' said Rashi Khanna, associate partner at DMD Advocates. 'The department must ensure accountability of assessment units, incentivise reasoned orders, and create a feedback mechanism to improve trust and efficiency.' With enhanced oversight and accountability, the new framework aims to bring more fairness and professionalism to tax scrutiny, a welcome change for compliant taxpayers.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
4 days ago
- Business Standard
Unlimited but repeated ITR revisions may cause scrutiny, say experts
Revising income tax returns (ITR) multiple times by taxpayers in case of an error or discrepancy may invite scrutiny. Experts warn that careless or excessive revisions might not go unnoticed by the tax department's AI-driven systems. No cap on revisions, but a clear deadline There is no limit to the number of times an ITR can be revised under the Income Tax Act. As long as you're within the time frame, December 31 of the relevant assessment year, or before the assessment is completed, whichever is earlier, one can file multiple revisions. 'Section 139(5) does not limit how many times a return can be revised,' explains Shefali Mundra, chartered accountant and tax expert at ClearTax. 'But each revision must happen within the deadline, else it becomes invalid.' Niyati Shah, chartered accountant and vertical head of personal tax at 1 Finance, adds, 'Each revised return supersedes the last. So accuracy becomes extremely important, because your final filed version is what matters.' Frequent changes could raise red flags While the law allows multiple revisions, experts caution against overuse, especially when the revisions lead to significant changes in reported income, deductions, or tax paid. 'The Income Tax Department uses AI-based anomaly detection,' says Kumarmanglam Vijay, partner and head of practice, direct tax at JSA Advocates & Solicitors. 'Multiple revisions without valid reasons could delay refunds or trigger scrutiny under CASS.' Sujit Bangar, founder of adds a caveat: 'If revisions are due to minor issues and don't impact your tax calculations, the number of revisions isn't a concern. But material changes must be justifiable and documented.' Can you revise after receiving a notice? It depends on the type of notice. · Section 143(1) (intimation): A revised return can still be filed, as long as the time limit hasn't lapsed. · Section 143(2) (scrutiny notice): Opinions vary. -Mundra says, 'Yes, but only before the assessment is completed.' -Shah adds: 'After 143(2), the door for revision closes and explanations must be provided during the scrutiny.' -Vijay, referencing judicial precedent, notes that a revised return is possible if the assessment isn't completed and the statutory deadline hasn't expired. When should you actually revise? Revising your return makes sense if: · You forgot to report income (interest, rent, capital gains) · You used the wrong ITR form · You missed claiming deductions (like 80C or HRA) · There's a mismatch in TDS or Form 26AS data However, it's not advisable to revise for minor spelling errors or cosmetic details. 'For such cases, it's better to file a rectification under Section 154,' says Mundra. Updated return option (Section 139-8A) Taxpayers also have the option to file an updated return within 48 months from the end of the assessment year under Section 139(8A), introduced in the Finance Act, 2022. 'This is useful if you missed filing a return entirely or need to declare additional income later,' says Vijay. 'But remember, it comes with a cost, an additional 25–50 per cent tax over and above your dues.' Bottom Line: Revise only if there's a genuine error that affects your tax liability. Keep documentation ready, and don't treat the revision window as a casual edit tool. The tax department may be watching
