University of Brighton nursing students to care for Lourdes pilgrims
The pilgrimage, taking place from 25-31 July, will be part of a new clinical placement for the university's nursing students. According to the university, the programme offers rare professional experience in delivering round-the-clock, holistic care to people with complex needs in a deeply personal, faith-based setting.Students will support pilgrims with daily personal care, medical needs, and emotional support throughout the journey.Sally Hao, a third year nursing student, said: "As someone who isn't religious, I was curious to understand what this journey means to others."After the training day, I realised it's about belief, faith and hope – qualities that help people face life's biggest challenges. That resonated with me, reminding me of my own journey through nursing."
Natalie Timmerman is one of the seven nurses travelling to Lourdes, said it was a "privilege'. "As nurses we provide holistic, person-centred care for our patients, that includes spirituality and emotional wellbeing alongside their physical wellbeing," she added.
The initiative is part of a wider drive by the University of Brighton to diversify placement opportunities for health students. Alongside established NHS and community partnerships, the university is expanding its international placement offer – including programmes in Kenya and other countries.Emma Moon, chief nurse for the Arundel & Brighton Lourdes Pilgrimage, said: "Nursing on pilgrimage is a truly rewarding experience – offering care to those who might not otherwise be able to travel."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
NHS trust investigates after ‘unnecessary delay' for thousands of patients
An NHS trust has identified 8,849 patients whose referrals to ear, nose and throat (ENT) specialists were 'not correctly managed', leading to 'unnecessary' delays in care. The patients were waiting for ENT appointments provided by Medway NHS Foundation Trust (MNFT) operating out of Medway Maritime Hospital in Gillingham and Darent Valley Hospital in Dartford. The trust said it was 'very sorry' for the delays caused to patients and has commissioned an independent investigation. Some 4,279 adults and children were awaiting a first outpatient appointment after a referral, while 4,570 existing patients were awaiting a follow-up appointment, diagnostic test or procedure. Approximately 20% of those affected are children, and a few patients have waited as much as five years to be seen, the trust confirmed. Jonathan Wade, chief executive of Dartford and Gravesham NHS Trust and interim chief executive of Medway NHS Foundation Trust, said: 'We are very sorry for the unnecessary delay experienced by some of our ENT patients. 'We are in the process of contacting patients to apologise and make arrangements for them to be seen as quickly as possible.' The delays affected patients predominantly in the Dartford, Gravesham, Swanley, Bexley and Greenwich areas. When these referrals were first received, they were reviewed by a clinician and assessed as routine, meaning that no urgent concerns, such as cancer, were identified at the time, the trust has said. Mr Wade continued: 'We have taken immediate action to ensure referrals to this service are correctly managed, with stronger oversight and improved systems in place. 'A full, independent investigation has been commissioned to understand how the error occurred and if anyone has come to harm as a result of these unnecessary delays. 'We are committed to learning from this so that it does not happen again.' MNFT declined to comment on whether the commissioned investigation has begun, and how long it will take.
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Tribunal nurse 'would not treat trans patients differently'
A nurse who confronted a trans doctor in a hospital changing room would not have treated trans patients differently from any other patient, a tribunal has heard. Charlotte Myles, a clinical service manager at NHS Fife, was tasked with reviewing Sandie Peggie's suspension following an altercation with Dr Beth Upton - a trans woman - on Christmas Eve Myles said she did not have patient safety concerns regarding Ms Peggie, as the nurse's feelings towards Dr Upton and trans patients in general could not be Peggie claims her treatment was unlawful under the 2010 Equality Act and brought the case against NHS Fife. Ms Myles said she asked Ms Peggie how she would treat trans patients and that the nurse told her she would treat them as she would any patient. Ms Peggie said she "felt sorry" for trans people and Ms Myles deemed there was not any risk from her returning to work. She believed the nurse would "treat patients as patients".Ms Myles was later questioned by Ms Peggie's lawyer Naomi witness said she was "not impressed" with concerns regarding an alleged previous incident where Ms Peggie was accused of walking out on seeing a patient due to Dr Upton's Myles said this had not been escalated or reported in the correct manner at the time. Timeline of the Sandie Peggie tribunal Ms Myles also said she was told by other members of NHS Fife staff - including Dr Upton's line manager Dr Kate Searle - that Ms Peggie had previously been involved in racist incidents in the Ms Myles said these incidents had never been escalated or documented, with no times or dates provided for when they added she was not willing to use "third hand information" when deciding whether Ms Peggie should return to her work and that she considered the claims hearsay. Ms Myles said some of the other senior staff consulted were reluctant to have Ms Peggie return to work at the Victoria Hospital in Myles said senior staff alleged Ms Peggie apparently supported American President Donald Trump, a noted critic of trans rights. 'Damage limitation' Ms Peggie was suspended on 3 January 2024 following the Christmas Eve incident, where Dr Upton said Ms Peggie had referenced Isla Bryson, a rapist who is also transgender. The tribunal previously heard the encounter left Dr Upton in a distressed state. Ms Myles was asked to help oversee Ms Peggie's return to believed it was "in the best interests of both (Dr Upton and Ms Peggie) to keep them separated".The clinical service manager added that this was "damage limitation" given the previous proposed Ms Peggie could work at another hospital, such as the Queen Margaret hospital in Dunfermline, an idea rejected by the proposal was to have Dr Upton and Ms Peggie work different shift patterns, but Ms Peggie told Ms Myles did not feel she could work day shifts due to having a routine based around her family and looking after her dog.A compromise was agreed where Ms Peggie would work weekends and be supervised during a phased return to Myles said that as the case was "quite limited" regarding witnesses to the Christmas Eve incident, then what was said in the changing room was a case of "she said/she said."The tribunal moved straight to evidence, without any mention of a controversial statement published by the health board on Friday.
The Independent
3 hours ago
- The Independent
Concerns major new NHS reforms to GP appointments will make no difference
Nearly half of the public believes the government's ambitious 10-year plan to overhaul the nation's health will either make no difference or exacerbate the difficulty of securing a GP appointment, a new survey has found. The Ipsos poll, conducted for the PA news agency, also revealed that more than four in 10 respondents anticipate no improvement in A&E waiting times. Despite this widespread scepticism, the blueprint has garnered significant support for several key proposals, including the establishment of neighbourhood health centres, the expansion of the NHS app, and increased mental health provision in educational settings. Unveiled by Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer earlier this month, the strategy aims to shift healthcare provision closer to people's homes, thereby reducing the current reliance on hospitals and emergency departments. Central to the reforms are plans for an enhanced NHS app, designed to give patients greater control over their care, alongside new neighbourhood health centres slated to operate six days a week for at least 12 hours daily. The plan also includes proposals for new legislation concerning food and alcohol, intended to proactively prevent ill health. The survey, which polled 1,023 adults across Britain, specifically questioned public perceptions on how the plan would affect access to GP services, A&E waiting times, and routine hospital treatment. Some 35 per cent said the plan will have no impact on getting a GP appointment, while 14 per cent believe it will make things harder. This compares with the 29 per cent of people who said they think it will make getting an appointment easier. More than a third (37 per cent) said it will make no difference to waiting times in emergency departments, while almost one in 10 (9 per cent), said they believe it could worsen waiting times, compared with 30 per cent who said it will improve them. Meanwhile, 31 per cent said the plan will have no impact on waiting times for hospital treatment, 11 per cent believe the plan will worsen waiting times and 34 per cent said they think the measures will help. However, a number of proposals outlined in the plan were strongly backed by the public. Some 84 per cent said they supported the creation of a single patient record, while 78 per cent backed the creation of neighbourhood health centres, 73 per cent support the expansion of the NHS app and 72 per cent are in favour of more mental health support in schools and colleges. However, more than a quarter (27 per cent) of people do not support making hospitals fully AI enabled, compared with 44 per cent who would back the move. Almost one in five (18 per cent) said they would not support so-called 'patient power payments', which would allow patients to hold back some of the payment for their care if they are not satisfied, while 42 per cent would support the measure. Some proposals aimed at helping people to lead healthier lives were also strongly supported. A ban on the sale of high-caffeine energy drinks was backed by 78 per cent of people, while 69 per cent back plans to restrict junk food advertising. However, almost one in five (18 per cent) tended to disagree with measures that could see alcoholic drinks labelled with nutritional information, although 57 per cent backed the move. One in four people think the measures included in the plan will make no difference to patients, the poll found. Almost one in 10 (9 per cent) said they think the changes will make things worse, while 35 per cent believe it will improve the health service. A similar proportion, 23 per cent, said the 10-year health plan will make no difference to NHS staff, while 13 per cent said it could make things worse and 33 per cent believe it will have a positive effect. A Department of Health and Social Care spokesperson said: 'We're getting on with the job of delivering for patients, with NHS waiting lists falling by 260,000 since July 2024, delivering more than 4.6 million additional appointments since the general election and recruiting over 1,900 extra GPs to fix the front door of the NHS. 'Backed by an additional £29 billion, our 10-year health plan will seize the opportunities provided by new technology, medicines and innovation to deliver better care for all patients, no matter where they live or how much they earn, and better value for taxpayers. 'It is no surprise the plan is popular with patients, it was the result of the biggest conversation with staff, patients and the public since the formation of the NHS, with more than a quarter of a million contributions.'
