Letters go up on world's largest wildlife crossing over 101 Freeway
On Tuesday, Caltrans announced that the letters for the world's largest wildlife crossing, which is under construction over the 101 Freeway in Agoura Hills, have officially been placed on the side of the bridge.
The massive wildlife crossing will connect two natural landscapes that have been bisected by one of the nation's busiest highways, stretching over 200 feet long and 165 feet wide across the roadway.
It's one of the biggest infrastructure construction projects currently underway in Southern California, and crews have been working around the clock to keep the project on track for its planned opening next year.
Funded through a public-private sponsorship, the Annenberg Wildlife Crossing is named for Wallis Annenberg, philanthropist and heiress who chairs the multibillion-dollar Annenberg Foundation, a primary sponsor of the project.
Wildlife crossings in SoCal aim to prevent animal deaths
Other wildlife activist groups have pooled funds to assist in the realization of the project, including those inspired by the story of P-22, the world-famous mountain lion that once inhabited the hills of Griffith Park, and whose story brought attention to the plight of animals who find themselves trapped on all sides by urban sprawl.
The massive undertaking is part of California's plan to identify locations where animals face barriers that keep them from moving freely, and prioritize building or converting existing infrastructure to allow them to cross more safely. The legislation was signed by California Gov. Gavin Newsom in September 2022.
'This wildlife crossing is just one example of how California is building infrastructure that connects rather than divides,' Newsom said last May. 'With projects like this, we're reconnecting and restoring habitats so future generations can continue to enjoy California's unmatched natural beauty.'
A groundbreaking was held in spring 2022, but officials say more than 30 years of conservation work have gone into the preparations to connect the critical protected lands in the Santa Monica Mountains and the Sierra Madre Range.
The crossing, originally estimated to cost around $90 million, is located near Liberty Canyon and is expected to open for foot and paw traffic by early 2026.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Bettendorf Community School District looks to fill vacancy on Board of Education
The Bettendorf Community School District Board of Education is looking to fill a vacancy created by the resignation of Kevin Freking. According to a post by the Bettendorf Community School District: An individual appointed would serve until the next school board election on November 4, 2025. The member elected at the November 4 election will serve the remaining balance of the term of office, November 2, 2027. The electors of the School District have the right to file a valid petition requiring that the vacancy be filled by a special election. Due to the timing of the vacancy and the upcoming regular election, if a petition is filed, the required special election will occur on November 4, 2025, the date of the general election. Bettendorf Community School District Applications must be received by 4:00 pm on Thursday, August 7. For further information and to apply, click here. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword
Boston Globe
3 hours ago
- Boston Globe
How redistricting in Texas and other states could change US House elections
Advertisement Other states are waiting to see what Texas does and whether to follow suit. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up The rules of redistricting can be vague and variable; each state has its own set of rules and procedures. Politicians are gauging what voters will tolerate when it comes to politically motivated mapmaking. Here's what to know about the rules of congressional redistricting: When does redistricting normally happen? Every decade, the Census Bureau collects population data used to divide the 435 House seats among the 50 states based on the updated head count. It's a process known as reapportionment. States that grew relative to others might gain a seat at the expense of those whose populations stagnated or declined. States use their own procedures to draw lines for the assigned number of districts. The smallest states receive just one representative, which means the entire state is a single congressional district. Advertisement Some state constitutions require independent commissions to devise the political boundaries or to advise the legislature. When legislatures take the lead, lawmakers can risk drawing lines that end up challenged in court, usually for violating the Voting Rights Act. Mapmakers can get another chance to resubmit new maps. Sometimes, judges draw the maps on their own. California Governor Gavin Newsom in Sacramento after meeting with Texas lawmakers to push back on that state's redistricting maneuver that aims to tilt the outcome of the 2026 midterm elections. Justin Sullivan/Getty Is midcycle redistricting allowed? By the first midterm elections after the latest population count, each state is ready with its maps, but those districts do not always stick. Courts can find that the political lines are unconstitutional. There is no national impediment to a state trying to redraw districts in the middle of the decade and to do it for political reasons, such as increasing representation by the party in power. 'The laws about redistricting just say you have to redistrict after every census,' Spencer said. 'And then some state legislatures got a little clever and said, well it doesn't say we can't do it more.' Some states do have laws that would prevent midcycle redistricting or make it difficult to do so in a way that benefits one party. Gov. Gavin Newsom, D-Calif., has threatened to retaliate against the GOP push in Texas by drawing more favorable Democratic seats in his state. That goal, however, is complicated by a constitutional amendment that requires an independent commission to lead the process. Is Texas' effort unprecedented? Texas has done it before. When the Legislature failed to agree on a redistricting plan after the 2000 census, a federal court stepped in with its own map. Republican Tom DeLay of Texas, who was then the U.S. House majority leader, thought his state should have five more districts friendly to his party. 'I'm the majority leader and we want more seats,′′ he said at the time. Advertisement Statehouse Democrats protested by fleeing to Oklahoma, depriving the Legislature of enough votes to officially conduct any business. But DeLay eventually got his way, and Republicans replaced Democrats in five seats in 2004. What do the courts say about gerrymandering? In 2019, the Supreme Court ruled that federal courts should not get involved in debates over political gerrymandering, the practice of drawing districts for partisan gain. In that decision, Chief Justice John Roberts said redistricting is " highly partisan by any measure. " But courts may demand new maps if they believe the congressional boundaries dilute the votes of a racial minority group, in violation of the Voting Rights Act. Could other states follow suit? Washington Rep. Suzan DelBene, who leads House Democrats' campaign arm, indicated at a Christian Science Monitor event that if Texas follows through on passing new maps, Democratic-led states would look at their own political lines. 'If they go down this path, absolutely folks are going to respond across the country,' DelBene said. 'We're not going to be sitting back with one hand tied behind our back while Republicans try to undermine voices of the American people.' In New York, Democratic Gov. Kathy Hochul recently joined Newsom in expressing openness to taking up mid-decade redistricting. But state laws mandating independent commissions or blunting the ability to gerrymander would come into play. Among Republican-led states, Ohio could try to further expand the 10-5 edge that the GOP holds in the House delegation; a quirk in state law requires Ohio to redraw its maps before the 2026 midterms. Advertisement Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis said he was considering early redistricting and 'working through what that would look like.'
3 hours ago
Texas Democrats escalate fight against Republican-led redistricting efforts with Pritzker, Newsom meetings
Texas Democrats on Friday traveled to California and Illinois for meetings with Democratic governors who have criticized Republicans' plans to redraw the Texas congressional map to protect the GOP House majority. The day of meetings with Gov. Gavin Newsom of California and Gov. JB Pritzker of Illinois comes as Texas Democrats are weighing a walkout from the ongoing special legislative session where redistricting could be considered in Austin - in a bid to obstruct and delay the efforts. "They're changing the rules in the middle of the game… this is cheating," Pritzker said on Friday of the GOP-led effort in Texas. "Everything is on the table." Texas state Rep. Barbara Gervin-Hawkins, chair of the Texas Legislative Black Caucus, told ABC News she was hoping to receive guidance on how to navigate the redistricting situation from Newsom, who has frequently sparred with the Trump administration. Texas Gov. Greg Abbott, proclaiming a special legislative session that focused largely on flood relief, included redistricting on the agenda "in light of constitutional concerns raised by the U.S. Department of Justice." In a letter earlier this month, the Trump Justice Department told Texas that four majority minority districts represented by Democrats needed to be redrawn, citing a recent federal court decision and arguing they were now "unconstitutional racial gerrymanders." President Donald Trump has rubber-stamped the Texas effort, saying he wants his party to pick up five seats if Texas redraws its congressional maps. (States redo their maps every decade with new Census data, and rarely attempt to do so absent a court order mid-decade.) Taken with Republican-led redistricting efforts in Ohio and other GOP-controlled states, the changes to Texas' map could help Republicans insulate their fragile House majority from the historic midterm backlash presidents traditionally face from voters. Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis on Thursday suggested his state could revisit its map, which Republicans remade after the 2020 Census, because, in part, of "the way the population has shifted around Florida just since the census was done in 2020 -- I think the state is malapportioned." In response, Democratic leaders in states like California, Illinois and New Jersey have raised the possibility of revisiting their maps if Texas moves forward, though some states face more legal and constitutional restrictions than Texas to do so. While there has been speculation that Texas Democrats could interrupt the special session by walking out or breaking quorum, the travels on Friday do not break quorum and members are not framing it as a walkout. In the state House, Democrats would need 51 members to agree to break quorum, and they'd all risk fines for doing so. The effort, which Democrats have attempted in the past, would be unlikely to do more than delay Republicans' efforts to redraw the maps. "I am more than willing to participate in a quorum break," State Rep. Gina Hinojosa told ABC News on Friday while cautioning that discussion of one is premature. Some Democrats, who for years have advocated for nonpartisan redistricting, say the party should respond in kind to GOP efforts. "I think one of the things we can say while maintaining a reform principle is that we believe in an independent commission and independent redistricting, but that should only kick in when Texas agrees to it, or when Florida agrees to it," said Rep. Ro Khanna, D-Calif. The chair of the Texas redistricting committee, Republican state Rep. Cody Vasut, said during a Thursday hearing that "it is prudent and proper" for the committee to deal with items the governor put on the agenda, and that "we have no plans to change any particular district." Others are waiting to see if Texas actually moves forward with changes to its map. "We have to think about what should our response be, and how do we make sure that we have a response that's actually meeting voters with what they're hoping for, instead of actually making a system worse for voters," Gov. Wes Moore, D-Md., told ABC News. Experts have told ABC News that either party could risk backlash from voters or in court, depending on how they redraw their state maps. And efforts to make Democrat-held districts in Texas more friendly to GOP pickup could weaken Republicans' hold on neighboring red districts.
