
UK government urged to seek MPs' approval before sending troops to Middle East
MPs should be given a choice over sending troops to the region before the UK follows another US president into war, the Liberal Democrats have said.
The party's foreign affairs spokesman, Calum Miller, said such a decision should be subject to 'the strongest democratic scrutiny', by giving MPs a vote in the House of Commons.
The Armed Forces (Deployment Outside the UK) Bill, tabled by Mr Miller, would mandate parliamentary approval before sending the UK's armed forces into overseas conflict zones.
It says retrospective parliamentary approval could be granted in cases of emergency military deployments or responses.
Parliamentarians have voted on whether to go to war before, and the decision essentially rests on whether the prime minister of the time feels a moral obligation to gain approval from the House of Commons.
Parliament has no legally established role and the government is under no legal obligation with respect to its conduct, including keeping parliament informed. In practice, however, successive governments have consulted and informed the Commons about the decision to use force and the progress of military campaigns.
MPs gave their approval to Tony Blair's government to take action in Iraq in 2003 when they voted in favour.
In August 2013, MPs vetoed British intervention in the war in Syria, defeating the motion put forward by David Cameron's government. He became the first prime minister in more than 200 years to lose a vote on military action, which he accepted.
The UK took no action in Syria at that point, although Theresa May ordered an operation in Syria five years later without a vote.
Mr Starmer opposed the invasion of Iraq and military action against ISIS in Syria.
Polling by Savanta, commissioned by the Lib Dems, revealed 57 per cent of people believe Parliament should vote on any UK military action in Iran.
Mr Miller said: 'With the Middle East in the throes of an all-out regional war, we are reckoning once again with the prospect of the UK becoming embroiled in foreign conflict.
'No one knows the fragility of peace in that region, or the price paid for our safety, better than our British troops. It's critical that, if they are asked to put their lives on the line for the UK in active conflict zones, this decision is subject to the strongest democratic scrutiny our country can offer.
'If the government chooses to put our troops directly in the line of fire, Parliament must be granted a vote on that choice before they are deployed – especially now, as the Prime Minister weighs up following another American president into war in the Middle East.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The National
2 hours ago
- The National
Iran says it 'remains committed' to nuclear non-proliferation treaty
Iran 'remains committed to the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and its safeguards agreement', its Foreign Minister said on Thursday, a day after President Masoud Pezeshkian put into effect a law suspending co-operation with the UN nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency. 'Our co-operation with the IAEA will be channelled through Iran's Supreme National Security Council for obvious safety and security reasons,' Abbas Araghchi said in a post on X. Mr Pezeshkian, who also chairs Iran's Supreme National Security Council, on Wednesday approved a law to suspend co-operation with the IAEA, which had been passed by parliament and approved by the Guardian Council, the country's constitutional watchdog. Iranian leaders have accused the UN agency of providing Israel with grounds for attacking its nuclear facilities after its board censured Iran last month for not complying with its obligations under the non-proliferation treaty, which is intended to stop the spread of nuclear weapons. The IAEA has monitored Iran's nuclear energy programme for years. Tehran claims the programme is for peaceful, civilian purposes, but western powers suspect Iran is seeking to build a bomb. Israel launched air strikes aimed at crippling Iran's nuclear infrastructure on June 13, hours after the IAEA board passed the censure resolution. The US entered the conflict on June 22 by sending B-2 bombers to drop 'bunker-buster' bombs on three Iranian nuclear sites. Israel's attacks and Iran's retaliatory missile strikes ended two days later after US President Donald Trump announced a ceasefire. An IAEA spokesman told The National on Wednesday that they were aware of reports on suspension co-operation with the agency and were 'awaiting further official information from Iran'. The US State Department condemned Iran's move to stop co-operating with the IAEA, while the UN said the decision was 'obviously concerning'. Secretary General Antonio Guterres 'has been very consistent in his call for Iran to co-operate with the IAEA', his spokesman Stephane Dujarric said. Israel's Foreign Minister Gideon Saar called on Germany, France and Britain 'to reinstate all sanctions against Iran' under an earlier nuclear deal. Germany said Iran's decision to suspend co-operation with the IAEA sends a 'devastating message'. The extent of damage to Iran's nuclear facilities from the Israeli and US attacks is not fully known. Mr Araghchi told US broadcaster CBS in an interview, part of which was released on Tuesday, that the Fordow nuclear plant had been 'seriously and heavily damaged' by the US bombing, adding that the full picture was still unclear. Fordow was the stronghold of Iran's nuclear energy programme and came to be seen as a symbol of defiance by the ruling regime against the international community, as well as a bargaining chip in diplomacy. The site's extreme fortification made it nearly impossible to attack without advanced bunker-busting weaponry, something only the US possesses.


The National
2 hours ago
- The National
Israel responsible for one of the ‘cruellest genocides in modern history', says UN expert
A United Nations expert on Thursday called on states to impose an arms embargo and sever trade and financial ties with Israel, accusing it of carrying out a 'genocidal campaign' in Gaza. Francesca Albanese, the UN special rapporteur on the occupied Palestinian territories, told the Human Rights Council in Geneva that Israel was responsible for 'one of the cruellest genocides in modern history' in its offensive against Palestinians. 'Fourteen months ago, I warned that this genocide marked an escalatory stage of a long-standing settler colonial project over Gaza, one that has targeted the Palestinian people for over seven decades, and now it is happening, and we must stop it,' she said. 'The situation in the occupied Palestinian territory is apocalyptic. In Gaza, people continue to endure suffering beyond imagination.' Israel has repeatedly denied allegations of genocide, saying its military operations in Gaza are aimed at dismantling Hamas, the militant group that governs the enclave, following its deadly October 7, 2023 attack on southern Israel. The US, Israel's top ally, has repeatedly criticised Ms Albanese. This week its UN mission issued a statement saying her allegations that Israel is committing genocide and engaging in apartheid are "false and offensive." Ms Albanese accused Israel of using its military campaign in Gaza as an opportunity to test new weapons and surveillance technologies, stating it was employing 'lethal drones, rudder systems, and other unmanned technology to exterminate a population without restraint'. She said more than 40 companies were complicit in supporting Israeli settlements and military operations in Gaza. 'The 40 entities named in my report, alongside their parents, subsidiaries, licensees, and franchisees, are just the tip of the iceberg, illustrative of a system that entangles many, many more,' she said. 'What I expose is not a list, it is a system and that is to be addressed.' Ms Albanese, one of dozens of independent UN-mandated rights experts, said arms companies had reaped 'near-record profits' by supplying Israel with advanced weaponry, enabling it to drop 85,000 tonnes of explosives 'six times the power of Hiroshima on Gaza'. 'We must reverse the tide,' she said, urging states to impose a full arms embargo, suspend trade agreements, and hold companies legally accountable for alleged violations of international law. The Gaza war was sparked by a Hamas-led attack on southern Israel communities in October 2023, in which 1,200 were killed and another 250 taken hostage. The attack drew a harsh military response from Israel that has killed more than 57,000 Palestinians and injured more than twice that number, according to health authorities in Gaza.


The National
3 hours ago
- The National
More than two million lives 'on the brink' as Gaza runs out of fuel
Hamas must accept ceasefire deal or it will get worse, US says Israeli attacks kill more than 300 in 48 hours UN official asks countries to cut trade ties with Israel Hezbollah chief says group will never 'surrender our weapons to the Israeli enemy' At least 57,012 Palestinians killed and 134,592 wounded since Gaza war began