Supreme Court spares jail term for convict in POCSO case, cites systemic failures
A bench comprising Justices Abhay S. Oka and Ujjal Bhuyan invoked its extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 142 of the Constitution, which empowers the top court to pass any order as is necessary for doing complete justice in any cause or matter pending before it.
"This year we have completed 75 years of the Constitution on 26th January. The Constitution contemplates the State to be a welfare state. The Constitution guaranteed social and economic justice to all the citizens. In this case, there is a failure to provide both social and economic justice to the victim," the verdict said.
Failure of welfare state concept
The facts of the case indicate the failure of the concept of welfare state, it added.
"To remedy the situation in this case, it is the obligation of the State Government to act as the true guardian of the victim and her child and ensure that they settle down in life and lead a happy, healthy and constructive life ahead," it said.
The verdict came in a case that had captured national attention not only for the legal issues involved but also for the broader social questions it raised about adolescent rights, institutional accountability and child protection.
The case
The case arose from a 2018 incident in West Bengal, where a 14-year-old girl left her home to live with a 25-year-old man, who later fathered her child. The man was convicted by a Special POCSO court for aggravated sexual assault under Section 6 of the Act and relevant provisions of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).
However, the Calcutta High Court controversially overturned the conviction, citing the consensual nature of their relationship and the current family circumstances.
The top court suo motu (on its own), and an appeal by the West Bengal government reversed the High Court's decision in August 2024. However, it deferred sentencing until further inquiry into the well-being of the victim and her child.
"Broadly, there are three issues which we are considering. The first issue is of sentencing the accused. The second issue is about the rehabilitation of the victim and her child. The third issue is a wider issue about adopting measures for adolescent well-being and child protection which goes to the root cause of the problem in our changing society," the verdict said.
Jail would deepen trauma
"Sending him to jail now would only deepen the trauma suffered by the victim," Justice Oka said and emphasised that the "true justice" in this case lies in family rehabilitation, not retribution.
"In law, we have no option but to sentence the accused and send him to jail for undergoing the minimum punishment prescribed by the Statute. However, in this case, the society, the family of the victim and the legal system have done enough injustice to the victim.
"She has been subjected to enough trauma and agony. We do not want to add to the injustice done to the victim by sending her husband to jail," the bench said.
The judgment said judges cannot shut their eyes to harsh realities.
"Now, at this stage, in order to do real justice to the victim, the only option left before us is to ensure that the accused is not separated from the victim. The State and the society must ensure that the family is rehabilitated till the family settles down in all respects," it said.
Case to not be treated as precedent
The verdict, however, made clear that "this case will not be treated as a precedent", describing it instead as "an illustration of the complete failure of our society and legal system".
"This case is an illustration of the complete failure of our society and our legal system. All that the system can do for the victim now, is to help her fulfil her desire of completing her education, settling down in life, providing a better education to her daughter and ensuring overall better living conditions for her family," it said.
The court-appointed panel's reports painted a grim picture of systemic lapses and flagged failure of village-level Child Protection Committees and poor implementation of welfare schemes like Kanyashree Prakalpa.
The panel said there was inaction from child welfare police officers and an absence of free legal aid and gender-sensitive counselling.
Hardship for victim
The verdict noted these shortcomings and said they have worsened the situation for the minor victim, who not only endured the original offence but also faced immense social, psychological and financial hardship.
Issuing a slew of directions, the bench directed the state government to provide full financial and educational support to the victim and her daughter. It also ordered that the victim be enrolled in a school and be supported up to the college level, if desired.
The bench directed the state government to ensure the child's nutrition and education under schemes like Mission Vatsalya, besides exploring the option of imparting vocational training and part-time employment to the victim post-school.
It asked the government to secure better housing and settle the family's debts with NGO or public support.
The bench has also directed the Union Ministry of Women and Child Development to form a committee of experts alongside senior state officers and amici curiae to suggest systemic improvements based on the recommendations of the court's own committee. The central ministry has to submit a report by July 25.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hindu
28 minutes ago
- The Hindu
NDPS cases surge in Kerala's Ernakulam: Over 2,800 registered by excise and police in first seven months of 2025
The Ernakulam excise division spread across 15 range offices, 7 circle offices and an enforcement squad has registered 866 cases under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act and arrested 862 accused during the period between January 1, 2025 and July 18, 2025. Besides, 39 vehicles used for smuggling drugs and ₹5.82 lakh have also been seized during the period. Though ganja continues to dominate the drug market with the seizure pegged at 357 kilograms, synthetic drugs continue to show a rising trend. MDMA topped the list among the synthetic drugs with nearly 408 grams seized. Nearly 348 grams of heroin have been seized during the period followed by hashish with 169 grams. Among the other seized items were brown sugar (34 grams), charas (47 grams), hashish oil (60 grams), methamphetamine (13 grams), LSD (0.84 grams), nitrazepam tablets (27 grams), lorazepam (120 grams), buprenorphine tablets (6.15 grams), tramadol (7 grams), clonazepam (9 grams), and hybrid ganja (2 grams). Two guns seized Two guns have also been seized. 'We have been able to tighten up the enforcement and register more cases during this year as many pending vacancies in our offices could be filled. Ganja continues to dominate the drug market while synthetic drugs are also being seized in small quantities almost on a daily basis. One thing we have noticed is the increasing number of women being used as carriers,' said T.M. Maju, Excise Deputy Commissioner, Ernakulam. He said drugs are being increasingly smuggled in through trains as excise has intensified checking inter-State buses. The Ernakulam Rural police have registered 2,068 NDPS cases in the first six months of this year, which has surpassed the total number of cases, 2,037, registered during the whole of 2024. Action has been initiated against 2,197 during the period. During the period, 20 kilograms of ganja were seized, which was more than 225 kilograms seized during the entire 2024. MDMA seized as on June 30, 2025, stood at 750 grams, which was exactly the total seizure during 2024. Besides, 88 grams of hashish oil and 228 grams of heroin have also been seized as against 1,200 grams and 400 grams seized during 2024. Besides, 500 sacks of banned tobacco products were seized from a go-down near Perumbavur from where supplies were being made to other States. In another incident, 25 kilograms of ganja were found hidden in cycle tubes. 'Ganja is being increasingly smuggled in from Assam, Odisha, Andhra Pradesh and West Bengal targeting mostly the migrant community. Bengaluru, Goa, and Delhi are among the destinations from which synthetic drugs are mostly smuggled in,' said Rural police sources. District Police Chief (Ernakulam Rural) M. Hemalatha has intensified the drive against drugs.


Mint
28 minutes ago
- Mint
7/11 Mumbai blasts: SC stays HC acquittal verdict, but 12 freed men won't return to jail—here's why
7/11 Mumbai blasts: The Supreme Court on Thursday stayed the July 21 Bombay High Court's judgment that acquitted the 12 men in the 2006 Mumbai train blasts case. July 21. The top court, however, did not stay the release of all the 12 acquitted persons in the case. The Supreme Court noted the Maharashtra government's concern that the July 21 Bombay High Court ruling could adversely impact several pending trials under the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA). The Supreme Court bench of justices MM Sundresh and N Kotiswar Singh also issued notices to all 12 men and sought their replies on the state's appeal. 'We are inclined to hold that the impugned judgment shall not be treated as a precedent. Therefore, there will be a stay of the impugned judgment,' the court said in its brief order. In its July 21 verdict, the Bombay High Court acquitted all 12 accused in the 7/11 Mumbai train blasts case of 2006. All the 12 accused have already walked free following their acquittal earlier this week. The HC quashed the judgment of a special MCOCA court, which handed over the death sentence to five and life term to seven people accused of conspiring and executing the Mumbai train bomb blasts on July 11, 2006. Convicts Kamal Ansari, Mohammad Faisal Ataur Rahman Shaikh, Ehtesham Qutubuddin Siddiqui, Naveed Hussain Khan and Asif Khan were handed over the death penalty for planting the bombs. Among other convicts, Tanveer Ahmed Mohammed Ibrahim Ansari, Mohammed Majid Mohammed Shafi, Shaikh Mohammed Ali Alam Shaikh, Mohammed Sajid Margub Ansari, Muzammil Ataur Rahman Shaikh, Suhail Mehmood Shaikh, and Zameer Ahmed Latiur Rehman Shaikh were granted life terms. Maharashtra government challenged the Bombay HC judgement in the Supreme Court with Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis calling the HC judgement 'very unfortunate.' In the Supreme Court, however, Solicitor General of India Tushar Mehta, appearing for Maharashtra, told the bench that he was not seeking an order to direct the accused persons, who have been released from prison following the judgment, to surrender. However, he requested a stay of the judgment, saying that some of the observations made by the High Court in the judgment can impact other pending trials under the MCOCA, legal news website LiveLaw reported. "Your lordships may consider saying, the judgment is stayed, however, they will not be required to come back to the prison," SG said. The SC accepted the contention and said the Bombay HC ruling shall not carry precedential value until further orders. In its order, the SC bench said it was not necessary to bring the 12 acquitted persons back to jail. "We have been informed that all the respondents have been released and there is no question of bringing them back to the prison," the SC bench court said. We are inclined to hold that the impugned judgment shall not be treated as a precedent. Seven bombs had ripped through the local lines in Mumbai on November 7, 2006. A total of 189 citizens lost their lives and nearly 820 innocents sustained severe injuries in these blasts, which are also known as the infamous "7/11 Mumbai Blasts." (With inputs from LiveLaw)


India Today
28 minutes ago
- India Today
Complete nonsense: Rahul Gandhi slams poll body for defending Bihar voter revision
Congress MP and Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha, Rahul Gandhi, on Thursday tore into the Election Commission over its defence of the ongoing Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Bihar, calling the poll body's justification "complete nonsense" and accusing it of failing to do its constitutional duty."Today they made some statement, this is complete nonsense. The Election Commission is not functioning like the Election Commission of India," Gandhi said, declaring that the Commission was "not doing its job".advertisementThe Congress leader's sharp attack came as the controversy over alleged large-scale voter deletions and additions in Bihar continued to fuel uproar in Parliament. Gandhi claimed that the revision exercise was part of a larger pattern of electoral manipulation, and warned the Commission and its officers: "If you think you are going to get away with this, you are mistaken. We are going to come for you."Gandhi also claimed that the Congress had gathered irrefutable evidence of electoral fraud being facilitated by the Commission. "We have concrete, 100 per cent proof of the Election Commission allowing cheating in a seat in Karnataka," he said."Not 90 per cent - when we decide to show it to you it's 100 per cent proof." He suggested the issue was far more widespread, saying his party had examined just one constituency and already uncovered major irregularities."I am absolutely convinced that constituency after constituency, this is the drama that is taking place," he to Gandhi, thousands of suspicious voter additions had taken place, including elderly individuals being newly registered. "Thousands and thousands of new voters, how old are they? 50, 45, 60, 65 new voters. Now we have caught them," he said, doubling down on his claim that the Commission was enabling voter list latest remarks follow similar allegations made after the Maharashtra Assembly elections, where he accused the BJP of manipulating the voter rolls to benefit Congress has since alleged that the BJP is using the SIR exercise in Bihar to disenfranchise marginalised communities and Opposition voters by removing their names from the rolls ahead of crucial state protests continued inside Parliament and the Bihar Assembly, the Election Commission issued a fresh statement defending the SIR process. It maintained that the voter list revision was essential for ensuring clean, credible elections and asked whether it should abandon constitutional obligations "out of fear of such matters and swayed by such people"."So, should the Election Commission - out of fear of such matters and swayed by such people - go against the Constitution and clear the path first in Bihar and then across the country for fraudulent voting in the name of dead voters, permanently migrated voters, voters registered in two places, fake voters, or even foreign voters?" the statement Commission asserted that the revision was being carried out transparently and described it as the "foundation for fair elections and a strong democracy". It urged all citizens to rise above political ideologies and reflect on the larger democratic principles EC had earlier revealed that 52 lakh names had been deleted from the electoral rolls in Bihar so far - including 18 lakh voters reported dead, 26 lakh who had moved to other constituencies, and 7 lakh who were registered in more than one scale and timing of the deletions, however, have drawn legal and political scrutiny. While the Supreme Court has allowed the revision to continue, it questioned the timing and asked the Commission to accept Aadhaar, voter ID, and ration cards as valid identity documents in the Parliament, the controversy has led to repeated adjournments and Opposition walkouts since the Monsoon Session began.- EndsMust Watch