logo
Supreme Court spares jail term for convict in POCSO case, cites systemic failures

Supreme Court spares jail term for convict in POCSO case, cites systemic failures

The Hindu24-05-2025
The Supreme Court on Friday (May 23, 2025) spared a convict, who married the victim, from undergoing a jail term under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, citing systemic failures and the need to ensure justice for the adolescent girl and her child.
A bench comprising Justices Abhay S. Oka and Ujjal Bhuyan invoked its extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 142 of the Constitution, which empowers the top court to pass any order as is necessary for doing complete justice in any cause or matter pending before it.
"This year we have completed 75 years of the Constitution on 26th January. The Constitution contemplates the State to be a welfare state. The Constitution guaranteed social and economic justice to all the citizens. In this case, there is a failure to provide both social and economic justice to the victim," the verdict said.
Failure of welfare state concept
The facts of the case indicate the failure of the concept of welfare state, it added.
"To remedy the situation in this case, it is the obligation of the State Government to act as the true guardian of the victim and her child and ensure that they settle down in life and lead a happy, healthy and constructive life ahead," it said.
The verdict came in a case that had captured national attention not only for the legal issues involved but also for the broader social questions it raised about adolescent rights, institutional accountability and child protection.
The case
The case arose from a 2018 incident in West Bengal, where a 14-year-old girl left her home to live with a 25-year-old man, who later fathered her child. The man was convicted by a Special POCSO court for aggravated sexual assault under Section 6 of the Act and relevant provisions of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).
However, the Calcutta High Court controversially overturned the conviction, citing the consensual nature of their relationship and the current family circumstances.
The top court suo motu (on its own), and an appeal by the West Bengal government reversed the High Court's decision in August 2024. However, it deferred sentencing until further inquiry into the well-being of the victim and her child.
"Broadly, there are three issues which we are considering. The first issue is of sentencing the accused. The second issue is about the rehabilitation of the victim and her child. The third issue is a wider issue about adopting measures for adolescent well-being and child protection which goes to the root cause of the problem in our changing society," the verdict said.
Jail would deepen trauma
"Sending him to jail now would only deepen the trauma suffered by the victim," Justice Oka said and emphasised that the "true justice" in this case lies in family rehabilitation, not retribution.
"In law, we have no option but to sentence the accused and send him to jail for undergoing the minimum punishment prescribed by the Statute. However, in this case, the society, the family of the victim and the legal system have done enough injustice to the victim.
"She has been subjected to enough trauma and agony. We do not want to add to the injustice done to the victim by sending her husband to jail," the bench said.
The judgment said judges cannot shut their eyes to harsh realities.
"Now, at this stage, in order to do real justice to the victim, the only option left before us is to ensure that the accused is not separated from the victim. The State and the society must ensure that the family is rehabilitated till the family settles down in all respects," it said.
Case to not be treated as precedent
The verdict, however, made clear that "this case will not be treated as a precedent", describing it instead as "an illustration of the complete failure of our society and legal system".
"This case is an illustration of the complete failure of our society and our legal system. All that the system can do for the victim now, is to help her fulfil her desire of completing her education, settling down in life, providing a better education to her daughter and ensuring overall better living conditions for her family," it said.
The court-appointed panel's reports painted a grim picture of systemic lapses and flagged failure of village-level Child Protection Committees and poor implementation of welfare schemes like Kanyashree Prakalpa.
The panel said there was inaction from child welfare police officers and an absence of free legal aid and gender-sensitive counselling.
Hardship for victim
The verdict noted these shortcomings and said they have worsened the situation for the minor victim, who not only endured the original offence but also faced immense social, psychological and financial hardship.
Issuing a slew of directions, the bench directed the state government to provide full financial and educational support to the victim and her daughter. It also ordered that the victim be enrolled in a school and be supported up to the college level, if desired.
The bench directed the state government to ensure the child's nutrition and education under schemes like Mission Vatsalya, besides exploring the option of imparting vocational training and part-time employment to the victim post-school.
It asked the government to secure better housing and settle the family's debts with NGO or public support.
The bench has also directed the Union Ministry of Women and Child Development to form a committee of experts alongside senior state officers and amici curiae to suggest systemic improvements based on the recommendations of the court's own committee. The central ministry has to submit a report by July 25.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Imran Khan says he's facing ‘harshest prison term' in Pakistan's history
Imran Khan says he's facing ‘harshest prison term' in Pakistan's history

First Post

time9 minutes ago

  • First Post

Imran Khan says he's facing ‘harshest prison term' in Pakistan's history

Pakistan's incarcerated former prime minister Imran Khan on Thursday said he is undergoing the 'harshest prison term' in the country's history. read more Pakistan's currently incarcerated former Prime Minister Imran Khan has described his imprisonment as the most severe ever faced by any political leader in the country. The 72-year-old has been held at Adiala Jail in Rawalpindi since August 2023 in connection with several cases. 'I am enduring the harshest prison term in the country's history solely for the supremacy of the Constitution and in service of my nation,' he was quoted as saying in a post uploaded on his verified X handle. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'The level of oppression and authoritarianism is such that even the water I have for ablution is filthy and contaminated with dirt, unfit for any human being,' Khan alleged. The Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf: founder alleged the books sent to him by his family have been withheld for months and access to television and newspapers has also been suspended. 'I have spent countless hours re-reading the same old books, but now even those are no longer available,' he said. Khan asserted that no political leader in Pakistan's history has faced the kind of treatment he is currently experiencing. He contrasted this with former prime minister Nawaz Sharif, who, despite being involved in several corruption cases, 'was granted every possible comfort' during his imprisonment. Khan emphasised that his wife, Bushra Bibi, who is 'innocent' and not involved in politics, is being subjected to 'inhumane conditions' in prison. The 72-year-old cricketer-turned-politician further alleged that all his basic human rights have been violated. Even the minimum facilities accorded to ordinary prisoners under the law and the jail manual are denied to him. 'Despite repeated requests, I have not been allowed to speak to my children. Political meetings have also been restricted; I am only permitted to meet certain 'choice individuals', while all other interactions are barred,' he said. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Khan appealed to his party members to set aside all internal differences and focus solely on the movement planned for August 5. The PTI is all set to launch the 'Free Imran Khan Movement' from August 5 across the country. Khan's sons –Suleman and Kasim — are currently in the US, meeting with the Trump administration and Congressmen as part of efforts to release Khan who has been in jail for the last two years in multiple cases. 'I am waging a battle against a 78-year-old system, and my greatest success is that despite unprecedented oppression, the public stands firmly with me,' Khan said. He said on February 8, 2024, the people expressed their trust in PTI by voting for it even in the absence of an electoral symbol. 'After such a clear mandate, it is the moral and political responsibility of every party member to become the voice of the people. It will be nothing short of disgraceful and condemnable if PTI leaders waste time on internal conflicts at this critical juncture. Anyone found engaging in factionalism within the party will be expelled,' he said. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Khan said the Shehbaz Sharif-led government has crippled the judiciary and 'the way biased judges are now delivering blatantly unjust verdicts' is visible to the entire nation. 'We must launch a robust campaign to liberate the judiciary, for no nation can survive, let alone progress, without judicial independence,' he said. With inputs from agencies

Residential property used for harbouring terrorists in Kashmir's Baramulla attached
Residential property used for harbouring terrorists in Kashmir's Baramulla attached

Time of India

time27 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Residential property used for harbouring terrorists in Kashmir's Baramulla attached

Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel Srinagar: A residential property used for harbouring terrorists was attached in Jammu and Kashmir 's Baramulla district, police said on a major action under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act ( UAPA ), the police in Sopore attached the residential property for its use in providing shelter and logistical support to terrorists involved in unlawful and anti-national activities , a police spokesman said the property comprises a single-storey residential house along with land measuring three kanals and three marlas situated at Reban Ramham. The property falls under the ownership of Javaid Ahmad Dar, resident of Reban area of Sopore in the north Kashmir attachment has been made in connection with an FIR registered under various sections of the UAPA and the Arms Act, the spokesman the course of investigation, it was found that the said property was wilfully used for harbouring terrorists and facilitating their stay, thereby aiding the execution of terror activities in the Sopore area, he on the gathered evidence, and after obtaining necessary approval from the competent authority, the said property has been attached according to legal provisions under the UAPA, he added.

Row over SIR: 'Should dead voters, foreigners stay?' CEC pushes back on political pressure
Row over SIR: 'Should dead voters, foreigners stay?' CEC pushes back on political pressure

Time of India

time27 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Row over SIR: 'Should dead voters, foreigners stay?' CEC pushes back on political pressure

Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel New Delhi: Amid political opposition - including in Parliament - to the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of Bihar's electoral roll, Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar on Thursday shot back at critics, asking whether the poll panel should get intimidated and allow dead electors, 'fake' voters/foreigners and those registered at multiple places or having migrated out permanently, to stay on the electoral rolls and vote in elections."Isn't a pure voter list being prepared by the ECI through a transparent process the foundation for fair elections and a strong democracy?" he asked, according to the CEC underlined that allowing ineligible people to vote, whether in Bihar or later in the entire country, is against the Constitution."At some point, we all must go beyond ideologies and ponder over these profound questions. Maybe the appropriate time has arrived for India to address this concern," the CEC is said to have CEC's remarks have come as the time limit for submission of enumeration forms closes in Bihar on July 25, setting the stage for publication of the state's draft electoral roll on August also come ahead of the July 28 SC hearing on the ECI's latest assessments show that over one lakh electors in Bihar are 'untraceable' while 21.6 lakh electors have passed away. As many as 31.5 lakh electors are said to have permanently migrated out of their constituencies, while more than seven lakh are yet to submit their forms despite several visits by the Booth Level Officers (BLOs).This means all the above will not figure in the August 1 electoral roll, sparking political concern over 'disenfranchisement' of those unable to submit their however, has underlined that any aggrieved eligible elector, or a recognised party on his behalf, will have time until September 1 to 'claim' inclusion in the final electoral roll if he was somehow left out by the BLO or if his name was wrongly excluded from the draft roll.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store