logo
Taiwan is worried about spying threats. That may mean deporting thousands of Chinese

Taiwan is worried about spying threats. That may mean deporting thousands of Chinese

Yahoo22-05-2025
Liu Jia-yen had been living in Taiwan for more than two decades when she received notice that she was suddenly at risk of being deported.
In April, the National Immigration Agency told Liu, a 51-year-old Chinese immigrant, she had three months to provide evidence that she gave up her household registration — an official record of residence that grants benefits such as healthcare and education — in Guangxi, China. If she couldn't find the right documents, she'd have to leave.
Liu thought she'd submitted the files long ago and called her 26-year-old daughter, Ariel Ko, in tears.
Ko, who was born and raised in Taiwan, called the immigration agency dozens of times over the next few days, unable to reach an operator. Meanwhile in China, Liu's 80-year-old grandfather began visiting his local police station in search of old records, and her brother scoured his government contacts for anyone who could help.
There are tens of thousands of Chinese-born people in Taiwan, which has been increasing scrutiny of them over the past year, citing concerns about infiltration and espionage. The immigration agency says the vast majority of Chinese living in Taiwan have filed the appropriate paperwork showing that they have canceled household registration in China, but about 12,000 people are facing a scramble — similar to Liu's — for documents.
"I understand that the government has its policies, and we can respect that,' Ko said. 'But what makes us upset is that we're just ordinary citizens. If you're going to ask us to do something this difficult, have you considered things from our perspective?"
China considers Taiwan to be part of its territory and has threatened to take it by force, stepping up simulated attacks in recent years. Beijing has taken a particularly harsh stance against President Lai Ching-te, whom Chinese officials have called a 'dangerous separatist' because he has promoted Taiwanese independence.
Read more: Trump's tariffs reshaped manufacturing in Asia. This time, the ramifications are even broader
Concerns about spying in Taiwan and China date back to the Chinese civil war, after which the defeated Chinese Nationalist Party, or the Kuomintang, fled to Taiwan in 1949. Eventually, tensions began to ease as the two governments slowly resumed dialogue and cooperation over the next several decades. But in recent years, both China and Taiwan have been taking unprecedented actions in the name of national security.
Last year, China said it would ratchet up the punishment for advocates of Taiwanese independence, including imposing the death penalty. Lai, who took office a year ago and has called China a 'foreign hostile force,' has proposed reinstating military trials for some espionage cases, criminalizing expressions of loyalty to China within the armed forces and tightening oversight of people traveling between China and Taiwan.
In March, three members of the Taiwanese presidential security team were convicted of spying for China. Taiwan also deported three Chinese immigrants for voicing their support online for unification through military action. Taiwan's National Immigration Agency said this is the first time that spouses of Taiwanese citizens have had their residency revoked for such reasons. More than 140,000 Chinese immigrants hold residency in Taiwan because they are married to Taiwanese citizens.
Taiwan's Mainland Affairs Council said the records requirement has existed since 2004, and the recent notices were sent to ensure that those who want to stay in Taiwan can do so. But critics say that the sudden enforcement is unfair.
'It's like our government has been asleep, like Sleeping Beauty, for 21 years. And now, all of a sudden, it wakes up and demands that Chinese spouses who've been living in Taiwan for so many years provide an important document from two decades ago,' said Chang Chi-kai, an opposition party legislator who is urging the administration to give Chinese spouses and their children more time.
After the public backlash, Taiwan announced additional exemptions for individuals with extenuating circumstances such as financial hardship, medical needs or safety concerns about traveling to China to search for records.
Read more: Is Taiwan the happiest place in Asia?
In Taiwan, people born in China are subject to different immigration laws than other nationalities. Milo Hsieh, founder of the consulting firm Safe Spaces in Taipei, says that distinction makes them more susceptible to discriminatory legal treatment, particularly in times of extreme political polarization.
'It resembles what I'm observing in the U.S. right now in Trump's immigration crackdown, particularly on international students,' said Hsieh, referring to the hundreds of student protesters who have had their visas revoked. 'They are deliberately targeting this class of individuals that are associated with a national security threat.'
Some frustrated residents say the bureaucratic bind is emblematic of long-standing discrimination.
Ko, who was born and raised in Taiwan, still remembers how her classmates used to tease her for having a mother from China, and would tell her to go back to the mainland. On social media, some were sympathetic to her mother's struggle, while others told her to "save your fake tears," or "if you want to be Taiwanese then follow our rules."
Taiwan's government has said that, according to its own polls conducted in March, more than 70% of respondents in Taiwan want officials to more thoroughly investigate whether Chinese immigrants here still hold residency or household registration in China, especially those who work in the military or public sector.
'If China decides to start a war, then Taiwan needs to determine what to do in that situation,' said Fan Hsin-yu, an associate professor at National Taiwan University who specializes in immigration law. 'First, it has to clarify who belongs to which side, who is the enemy, and who is one of us. That's why this process is something they feel must be finalized soon.'
Fan said legal experts are divided on whether the government is justified in its recent documentation demands. She added that the measures may even be counterproductive, since China could simply issue certification to its spies or collaborators, while those who support Taiwanese sovereignty could put themselves at risk by going to China, or otherwise be forced to leave.
'The issue is not about legality, it's about whether this is a smart move,' she said.
Chang Chih-yuan moved to Taichung, a city in central Taiwan, at age 4 and served in Taiwan's military. He needs to secure documents to remain here but said he feels uneasy about providing all of his personal information — including his household registration history, physical ID card and travel permit — to the police station in Guangdong, China, where his family once lived.
Ultimately, he decided that he didn't have much choice. His Chinese mother had received the immigration notice in April, and after many sleepless nights, she decided to take a month off from her cleaning job to obtain the certificate. When Chang, 34, inquired about his own paperwork, the immigration agency told him he would probably get a similar notice later this year.
'It just made me feel like I'm still not considered a real Taiwanese person,' he said.
Another resident who immigrated from China as a child said he has been considering emigrating to Singapore since he received his notice. His father traveled to China's Fujian province to seek household documentation on his behalf, but he still worries that his mainland roots could put his status at risk again in the future.
'The situation now feels like they assume if you were born in China, you're an ally of the Chinese Communist Party and you have to prove your innocence," the 33-year-old said, requesting anonymity for fear that speaking publicly could affect his case. 'I feel like I've been completely betrayed by my country.'
Times staff writer Yang and special correspondent Wu reported from Taipei, Taiwan.
Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week.
This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

SOS — Save Our Shipping: Trump must break China's chokehold on global trade
SOS — Save Our Shipping: Trump must break China's chokehold on global trade

New York Post

time2 hours ago

  • New York Post

SOS — Save Our Shipping: Trump must break China's chokehold on global trade

A high-stakes deal that would give an American company a major role in running dozens of strategically crucial global ports is now in limbo — as China aggressively demands a stake. The United States cannot let that happen. US asset manager BlackRock and its partners are vying for 43 of the world's most important shipping ports, including the two that straddle the Panama Canal. The seller is C.K. Hutchison, a major Hong Kong operator that is one of China's 'big three' port giants — and the only one not owned outright by the Chinese government. Prying these ports from China's oversight is a critical move for both US national security and the global economy. Now the Chinese Communist Party is trying to block the deal, unless its state-owned COSCO joins the buyers' group and gains veto rights over port operations. Alarmingly, all three main parties are reportedly open to letting that happen, apparently thinking that a compromised deal is better than no deal at all. But with all that's at stake, President Donald Trump should use every tool available — starting with the ongoing US-China trade talks — to push the original deal through and keep COSCO out. The 43 ports that Hutchison seeks to sell would launch a global liberation from oppressive Chinese surveillance and control. If the plan falls through — or if it's altered to add COSCO to the ownership group — China could tighten its grip on the global shipping system, by replacing a Beijing-influenced company with a Beijing-controlled one. While the media has dubbed this the 'Panama Canal deal,' it's actually much bigger. The canal, a vital artery that runs through the center of the western hemisphere, is certainly critical — but many of the other ports involved in the deal are equally so. For example, this deal would include a port inside the Malacca Strait, the only direct maritime pathway between the Indian and Pacific Oceans. It sees 90,000 ships and $3.5 trillion worth of global trade every year. Hutchison is also looking to sell five ports that it owns on both sides of the Suez Canal, the preferred maritime commercial route between the Asian and European markets. About 12% of global trade, $1 trillion a year, passes through Suez. As China's purchases of sanctioned Iranian oil draw greater US scrutiny, Hutchison's four ports on the southern side of the Strait of Hormuz are also critical. Nearly all Iranian oil must pass through the strait, along with oil and gas from Saudi Arabia, UAE, Iraq, Kuwait and Qatar. In Europe, Hutchison controls 13 ports that act as a key entry point for Chinese goods into the European Union. The original deal would reduce China's port foothold on the continent — and the geopolitical influence that comes with it. Keep up with today's most important news Stay up on the very latest with Evening Update. Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters Like all major commercial deals, this one is complicated. Apart from the two Panama Canal ports, BlackRock would retain 20% ownership of the remaining facilities; its partner, Europe-based Mediterranean Shipping Corp., would control 70%, with Singapore's Sovereign Wealth Fund owning the rest. Meanwhile, China's power in global shipping is massive. China produces 95% of world shipping containers and all of the refrigerated ones. Ports around the world are plugged into China's logistical software platform, LOGINK, which tracks sensitive trade, market, maritime and passenger data. Huawei's 'Smart Port' 5G telecommunication towers provide Wi-Fi — and ready surveillance capacity — at ports worldwide. A Chinese state-owned company makes more than 70% of the world's ship-to-shore cranes (and 80% of the cranes used in America) — a major risk, according to the House Homeland Security Committee, which has alleged those cranes may be engaging in covert surveillance on behalf of the CCP. Adding state-owned COSCO to ports deal would give the CCP the power to veto any attempts to replace Huawei towers, LOGINK systems, Chinese cranes or other tools that may already be spying on behalf of the state. With BlackRock's minority interest in the vast bulk of these ports, replacing a private Chinese company with a state-owned one is even worse for the United States than the status quo. Breaking China's maritime monopoly is urgent. At the same time, America's economic leverage has never been higher. As Beijing trumps up patently absurd anti-monopoly investigations to stall or scuttle the BlackRock-MSC deal, the United States should Trump right back. He must make the choice clear: Access to American markets cannot continue unless Beijing releases its maritime monopoly. Elaine Dezenski heads the Center on Economic and Financial Power at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, where Susan Soh is a research associate.

Alaska senator blocks Navy chief confirmation
Alaska senator blocks Navy chief confirmation

Politico

time5 hours ago

  • Politico

Alaska senator blocks Navy chief confirmation

The hold is a way for the Alaska lawmaker to put pressure on the Navy so the Pentagon agrees to reopen the long-shuttered Adak Naval Air Station, located in the Aleutian Islands off the coast of Alaska. The Pentagon closed the base after the Cold War. Sullivan declined to comment. The Pentagon referred queries to the White House, which did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Capt. Adam Clampitt, Navy Secretary John Phelan's spokesperson, did not comment on the hold, but said Phelan 'is focused on maintaining our nation's maritime dominance and nothing will distract him from this critically important mission.' Sullivan has said that expanding the U.S. military presence around Alaska is critical to deter Russian and Chinese incursions in the region, and he has obtained endorsements for reopening the station from some top military commanders. While Sullivan pushed to include Adak funding in the GOP's recently passed megabill, the law's language says only that $115 million is for 'exploration and development of existing Arctic infrastructure.' The base was first used as a launching pad for U.S. missions against Japan in World War II. The island later played an important role in the Cold War, boasting a deep-water port, a pair of 7,000 foot runways and B-57 nuclear depth bombs. About 6,000 troops called the island home before the base was closed in 1997. Caudle appeared well on the way to confirmation — and the vast majority of military promotions are approved without opposition. But all 100 senators must agree to speed up consideration of nominees, which the Senate is trying to do to start its August recess. Sullivan's objection means that Pentagon and Senate leaders will need to strike a deal with him to continue the process. Sen. Majority Leader John Thune could hold extra procedural votes to get Caudle confirmed. But that move is highly unlikely as he would undercut a fellow Republican with a gripe against the Pentagon.

Ford will unveil a next-gen electric vehicle on August 11 — planning a 'Model T Moment'
Ford will unveil a next-gen electric vehicle on August 11 — planning a 'Model T Moment'

Tom's Guide

time6 hours ago

  • Tom's Guide

Ford will unveil a next-gen electric vehicle on August 11 — planning a 'Model T Moment'

Ford is promising to unveil a major electric vehicle in August that CEO Jim Farley described as a "Model T Moment" during a financial earnings call this week. As reported by InsideEVs, Farley said that car manufacturer will reveals its plans to build a "breakthrough" EV, alongside a new platform, during an August 11 event in Kentucky. "We will be in Kentucky to share more about our plans to design and build a breakthrough electric vehicle and a platform in the U.S," Farley said on the call. Despite taking nearly a $1 billion dollar hit thanks to tariffs, Farley said that the company's "skunkworks" team, under the direction of form Tesla engineer Alan Clarke, has been developing a more affordable EV for more than a decade. "This is a Model T moment for us at Ford, a chance to bring a new family of vehicles to the world that offer incredible technology, efficiency, space, and features,' Farley said. The original Model T is one of the early vehicles that pioneered mass-produced, affordable cars in the United States, putting the country on the path toward car culture. Previous reports from last year, indicated that Ford's skunkworks team was developing an electric platform that would undergird multiple vehicles including a compact SUV, small pickup truck and a delivery vehicle of some kind. The announcement comes at fraught time for electric vehicles in the United States. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. Tesla, the most well known electric vehicle manufacturer in the US, revealed its largest revenue drop in years, though that may largely be due to its CEO's largely unpopular political moves as the head of the Trump administration's Department of Government Efficiency program. Tesla did announce a number of deals to reverse slumping sales, and plans for a cheaper Model Y. As mentioned, tariffs on everything from steel to cheap online retailers has hurt manufacturers like Ford, and President Donald Trump has been especially antagonistic toward electric vehicles. The recently passed "Big Beautiful Bill" nixes the $7,500 tax credit for EVs. The administration is also considering zeroing out fines for vehicles that exceed fuel efficiency standards. Despite massive 27.5% tariffs against Chinese EV makes like Geely and BYD, Farley said that Ford is working to compete with those companies. Chinese EVs have made inroads in its own country and elsewhere thanks to more affordable options from a variety of companies. "We believe the only way to really compete effectively with the Chinese over the globe on EVs is to go and really push ourselves to radically reengineer and transform our engineering supply chain and manufacturing process,' Farley said in the call. Follow Tom's Guide on Google News to get our up-to-date news, how-tos, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store