South Korean restaurant may face charges for adding ants in 12,000 dishes for ‘unique flavour'
SEOUL (The Korea Herald/ANN): A restaurant that used ants to add 'unique flavor' is facing possible charges of violating the Food Sanitation Act, as ants are not a type of insect deemed edible by South Korean law.
The South Korean Ministry of Food and Drug Safety said on July 10 that it has transferred the case of a local restaurant and its owner to prosecutors for the eatery's use of imported dried ants in the dishes.
The restaurant owner was found to have brought in two types of ants, from the US and Thailand, via an express mail service from April 2021 to November 2024.
The restaurant purportedly added three to five ants per plate for specific dishes sold there up to January 2025. An estimated 12,000 dishes were sold.
Recipes using ants, while not common, are not unheard of. But the Food Sanitation Act does not permit restaurants to use materials that are not recognised by law as food ingredients.
As of 2025, Korean law only permits 10 types of insects to be used as food ingredients, including grasshoppers, mealworms and silkworm pupae, that is commonly sold as the street snack beondaegi.
Regardless of the effects or safety of ingested ants, it must be authorised by the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety in accordance with the Food Sanitation Act and related decree to be used in restaurants. -- THE KOREA HERALD/ASIA NEWS NETWORK
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
11 hours ago
- The Star
South Korea's top court clears Samsung Chairman Lee in 2015 merger fraud case
FILE PHOTO: Samsung Electronics Chairman Jay Y. Lee leaves a court in Seoul, South Korea, February 3, 2025. REUTERS/Kim Hong-Ji/File Photo SEOUL (Reuters) -South Korea's top court upheld on Thursday a not-guilty verdict for the chairman of Samsung Electronics Jay Y. Lee, backing two lower court rulings clearing him of accounting fraud and stock manipulation related to an $8 billion merger in 2015. The Supreme Court's verdict permanently removes a long-running legal distraction for Lee as Samsung plays catch-up in a global race to develop cutting-edge AI chips. The verdict upheld an appeals court's ruling dismissing all the charges in the case involving the merger a decade ago between two Samsung affiliates, Samsung C&T and Cheil Industries, which prosecutors said was designed to cement Lee's control of the tech giant. A lower court last year had also cleared Lee of the charges. "The Supreme Court ruling clears a layer of legal uncertainty, which could be a long-term positive for Samsung," said Ryu Young-ho, a senior analyst at NH Investment & Securities. "It remains to be seen how directly and proactively he will engage going forward, but if the owner takes a more active role, it could allow management to focus more on long-term initiatives rather than short-term results," Ryu added. Samsung Electronics shares were little changed after the ruling, up 1.7%. The Supreme Court verdict was widely expected, but comes at a critical moment for Lee, who has faced mounting questions about his ability to lead Samsung Electronics - the world's top memory chip and smartphone maker. Samsung's lawyers said they were "sincerely grateful" to the court for its decision and added in a statement that the ruling confirmed that the merger was legal. Business lobby groups welcomed the court's decision, framing it as a stabilising development for the South Korean economy. The Korea Enterprises Federation said the ruling removes a major legal burden for Samsung and comes at a time of intensifying global competition in high-tech industries like AI and semiconductors as well as economic pressure from U.S. trade tariffs. "Samsung's role as a leading South Korean company is more critical than ever," the group said in a statement. The group said it hoped Samsung, under Lee's leadership, would step up investment and innovation, helping to create jobs and bolster South Korea's economic rebound. For nearly a decade, Lee has faced legal challenges, including those from the merger that paved the way for his succession after his father, Lee Kun-hee, had a heart attack in 2014 that left him in a coma. Park Ju-gun, head of corporate analysis firm Leaders Index, said Lee now faces dual challenges of tightening his grip on the conglomerate while steering Samsung back to leadership in key sectors. "He must both defend Samsung's core businesses and find new growth engines, all while consolidating his control," Park said. (Reporting by Joyce Lee and Heekyong Yang; Additional reporting by Hyunjoo JinEditing by Ed Davies and Saad Sayeed)
Malaysian Reserve
13 hours ago
- Malaysian Reserve
Samsung billionaire Lee's acquittal upheld by Korea's top court
SAMSUNG Electronics Co. Executive Chairman Jay Y. Lee was cleared of all charges related to accounting fraud and stock manipulation by South Korea's Supreme Court, marking a major legal victory for the billionaire head of the world's largest electronics empire. The top court on Thursday upheld a Seoul High Court ruling that acquitted Lee and other Samsung officials of all 19 charges stemming from the 2015 merger of Samsung C&T Corp. and Cheil Industries Inc. Prosecutors alleged the deal helped Lee cement his control over the conglomerate. The decision ends a years-long legal saga that had cast a shadow over the leadership of South Korea's biggest conglomerate. South Korean prosecutors in 2023 sought a five-year prison sentence along with a 500 million won ($362,000) fine for Lee. However, a Seoul district court in February 2024 ruled in Lee's favor. A year later, the Seoul High Court dismissed the prosecution's appeal and upheld the lower court's decision, clearing Lee of all charges. The case has been ongoing since 2020. –BLOOMBERG
Malaysian Reserve
a day ago
- Malaysian Reserve
Billionaire Hybe founder said to face probe over IPO disclosures
BANG SI-HYUK, the billionaire founder of BTS-agency Hybe Co. Ltd. faces investigation by South Korean prosecutors for allegedly misleading investors ahead of its 2020 IPO. The Financial Services Commission referred the largest shareholder of an unidentified company and its former executives on allegations of deceiving investors and violating trading practices. While the FSC did not name the probe's targets in its statement, a person familiar with the investigation told Bloomberg News the company in question was Hybe. The parties 'deceived existing shareholders by making it seem as if the listing would be delayed' even though the company was preparing for the IPO, the FSC said in the statement. That prompted the existing investors to sell their holdings to a special purpose vehicle that was established by a private equity fund in which the company executives were involved, the statement added. Hybe said it respects the FSC's decision and will do its best to proactively take efforts to restore the trust of the market as well as stakeholders. It also expressed regret that the FSC rejected Bang's explanation that he did not pursue the IPO for personal gain. The Hybe IPO raised about $820 million, pricing shares at the top of the marketed range. The FSC allege that Bang, whose net worth is estimated at $2.3 billion, according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index, had signed a profit-sharing agreement with the private equity fund, but concealed that information during the IPO process. That agreement allowed Bang to collect about 30% of the profits from the share sales after the IPO, the statement added. Bang, 52, is said to have made approximately 190 billion won ($137 million) through the side transaction, according to Yonhap News. FSC did not reveal the amount Bang made from the side deal. Calls to FSC officials were not answered. The investigation is the latest controversy to hit Hybe. Last year, the firm was shaken by a rare public feud involving chart-topping girl group NewJeans, which unilaterally terminated a lucrative exclusive contract with Hybe affiliate ADOR. –BLOOMBERG
