Trump orders Alcatraz to reopen: Notorious criminals locked up before its closure
US President Donald Trump has ordered the reopening and expansion of Alcatraz prison. The prison, which lies near San Francisco's Golden Gate Bridge, was shut down in 1963 and is currently a tourist site.
"Today, I am directing the Bureau of Prisons, together with the Department of Justice, FBI, and Homeland Security, to reopen a substantially enlarged and rebuilt ALCATRAZ," Trump wrote on his Truth Social site BBC reported. The prison would "house America's most ruthless and violent Offenders," he said.
Why was Alcatraz closed?
Alcatraz Federal Penitentiary was closed in 1963 primarily due to its high operational costs and deteriorating infrastructure. Located on an isolated island in San Francisco Bay, the prison required constant maintenance, and all supplies—including water and food—had to be transported by boat, making it far more expensive than mainland prisons. Additionally, the buildings were aging and corroding from salt exposure, and modernizing the facility was deemed too costly. With increasing public scrutiny over its harsh conditions and expenses, the federal government decided to shut it down and transfer inmates to more cost-effective, secure institutions.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
How can a 3-month-old get cancer? Please help!
Give Hope India
Donate Now
Undo
During its operation, Alcatraz held several notorious criminals like:
Alphonse "Al" Capone
Also known as "Scarface," he was one of the most notorious gangsters of the 1920s and 1930s. Convicted of tax evasion in 1931, he was transferred to Alcatraz in 1934 to serve an 11-year sentence. At Alcatraz, Capone's influence waned; he was assigned menial tasks like working in the prison laundry. Suffering from neurosyphilis, his health deteriorated, leading to his transfer to Terminal Island in 1938. He was released in 1939 and died in 1947.
George "Machine Gun" Kelly
George Kelly Barnes, dubbed "Machine Gun Kelly," was infamous for his involvement in bootlegging and kidnapping during the Prohibition era. Convicted for the 1933 kidnapping of oil tycoon Charles F. Urschel, he was sentenced to life imprisonment and transferred to Alcatraz in 1934. At Alcatraz, Kelly was considered a model inmate, working in the laundry and maintaining a low profile until his transfer in 1951.
Robert Stroud
Robert Franklin Stroud, known as the "Birdman of Alcatraz," was convicted of manslaughter in 1909 and later murdered a prison guard, leading to a death sentence commuted to life imprisonment. While at Leavenworth Prison, he became an expert on birds, authoring books on canary diseases. Transferred to Alcatraz in 1942, he was not permitted to keep birds but continued his research. Stroud spent 17 years in solitary confinement and died in 1963.
Alvin "Creepy" Karpis
Alvin Francis Karpis, nicknamed "Creepy" for his sinister smile, was a leading figure in the Barker-Karpis gang, responsible for numerous crimes during the 1930s. Captured in 1936, he was the only "Public Enemy No. 1" apprehended alive. Karpis served the longest sentence at Alcatraz—26 years—working in the bakery and often clashing with fellow inmates. Transferred in 1962, he was paroled in 1969 and died in 1979.
Arthur "Doc" Barker
Arthur "Doc" Barker, son of the infamous Ma Barker, was part of the Barker-Karpis gang. Convicted of kidnapping, he was sent to Alcatraz in 1935. In 1939, Barker attempted an escape with fellow inmates but was shot and killed during the attempt.
Henri Young
Henri Young was convicted of bank robbery and murder. Transferred to Alcatraz in 1935, he attempted an escape in 1939 with Arthur Barker. After the failed attempt, Young murdered fellow inmate Rufus McCain. His trial highlighted the harsh conditions at Alcatraz, leading to public scrutiny.
Frank Morris and the Anglin Brothers
Frank Morris, along with brothers John and Clarence Anglin, orchestrated one of the most daring escapes in 1962. Using makeshift tools, they tunneled through their cells and escaped the island on a raft made of raincoats. Despite extensive searches, they were never found, leading to speculation about their fate.
Bumpy Johnson
Ellsworth Raymond "Bumpy" Johnson was a prominent figure in Harlem's underworld. Convicted of drug conspiracy, he was sent to Alcatraz in 1954. Known for his intelligence and demeanor, Johnson was released in 1963 and returned to Harlem, where he died in 1968.
Mickey Cohen
Meyer Harris "Mickey" Cohen was a Los Angeles mobster involved in illegal gambling and racketeering. Convicted of tax evasion, he was incarcerated at Alcatraz from 1961 until its closure in 1963. Transferred to Atlanta Penitentiary, he was attacked by a fellow inmate, leading to partial paralysis. Released in 1972, Cohen died in 1976.
A site of several blockbuster movies, Alcatraz was originally a naval defence fort that was rebuilt as a military prison. Movies like Birdman of Alcatraz, starring Burt Lancaster; The Rock, starring Sean Connery and Nicolas Cage were shot here.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
8 minutes ago
- First Post
US imports from Russia surge 23% in 2025, India calls out Trump for hypocrisy amid tariff threats
Even as Donald Trump threatens India with tariffs over its oil imports from Russia, fresh data shows the US itself has quietly ramped up trade with Moscow, importing key commodities like uranium, fertilisers, and palladium despite earlier sanctions. read more Even as US President Donald Trump attempts to dictate tariff terms and impose penalties on India for importing oil from Russia, Washington's own trade with Moscow is quietly on the rise, even as it chastises New Delhi over its energy and defence ties. According to a report from The Indian Express, between January and May 2025, American imports from Russia rose by 23 per cent year-on-year to $2.1 billion, driven largely by uranium, palladium, and fertilisers. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD This surge comes despite earlier heavy US sanctions on Moscow. Following the outbreak of the Ukraine war in 2022, US imports from Russia plummeted from $30 billion in 2021 to just $3 billion by 2024. Crude oil, once the top US import from Russia, valued at over $17 billion in 2021, has virtually disappeared. Yet essential commodities such as fertilisers, uranium, and palladium continue to enter the US in significant volumes. According to data from the US International Trade Commission cited in the report, America imported $806 million worth of Russian fertilisers in the first five months of 2025, a 21 per cent increase from last year and 60 per cent higher than the same period in 2021. Uranium imports surged 28 per cent year-on-year to $596 million, nearly 150 per cent higher than in 2021. Although the US formally banned enriched uranium imports from Russia in 2024, companies are allowed to apply for waivers until 2028, a key reason behind the continuing flow. Palladium, primarily used in catalytic converters to reduce vehicle emissions, also remains a significant import. In 2024, the US imported $878 million worth of the metal from Russia. This growing trade has drawn scrutiny after President Donald Trump threatened steep new tariffs on Indian goods, accusing New Delhi of taking advantage of discounted Russian crude. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD India hit back sharply. 'The US continues to import uranium, palladium, and fertilisers from Russia even as it criticises us,' the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) said on Monday. 'India's oil imports are based on economic necessity, not political preference.' The MEA had earlier criticised the US and European nations for what it called blatant hypocrisy. In 2024, the EU traded goods worth €67.5 billion and services worth €17.2 billion with Russia far surpassing India's total trade. European imports of Russian LNG also hit a record 16.5 million tonnes that year, higher than pre-war levels. 'Unlike India, whose trade is driven by national need, many Western countries continue their commerce with Russia by choice,' the MEA said.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
8 minutes ago
- First Post
Trump's war against the world comes at America's expense
Trump seems to visualise that what is good for the globe is not good for the US. AFP President Donald Trump has unleashed an economic war against the rest of the world from the very inception of his second administration. American people, American companies and the entire political class of the United States are not with President Trump's economic policies—domestic or foreign. However, the principal difficulty lies in the fact that not many within the United States who oppose Trump's tariff tantrums are able to counter, resist or confront an administration that is vindictive against the opponents and resorts to retribution or revenge. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD President Trump does not spare anyone who makes statements or brings out reports on issues that run counter to his policies. The latest example is the quick removal of the head of the Bureau of Labour Statistics, Erika McEntarfar, after the bureau released the job statistics showing that the US labour market is not as resilient as expected. The latest job report indicated that Trump's tariff war and other economic policies have begun to demonstrate the negative consequences of Trump policy. American consumers are yet to feel the adverse impact of high tariffs on imports, partly because some of the US' importers bought foreign goods in bulk and put them in stores before the new tariff would kick in, and partly because some of the import duties are yet to be systematically implemented, as many countries are still in the process of negotiating with the officials of the Trump Administration. The price pressure on consumers will certainly pose a serious political challenge to President Trump. But in order to deal with that possible outcome, the Trump supporters can come up with false data and build an untruthful narrative. Unfortunately, the Democratic Party also appears to be a bystander and unable to counter Trump effectively. The big American companies that contribute to election campaign financing are also mute spectators for fear of becoming the target of Trump's wrath. President Trump's dislike for foreigners is clearly vindicated in his harsh treatment of the immigrants. His aversion for foreign countries is reflected in his call to American companies to return and base their manufacturing activities at home. But this Trumpian drive would harm US companies that have invested around the world, taking advantage of cheap land and labour, by implication, making America richer than other countries. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Trump's anxiety about a rising China that would ferociously compete economically with the US is explicable. But when the Apple company sought to exit from China and enter the Indian market, Trump threatened high duties on the products of the company! It gives the impression that his main goal is not to allow India to grow, even if it is in American interest. Indian economic performance is viewed by President Trump as a 'dead economy', not because he lacks basic knowledge about India but because he would not like to see an India that would question his false statements or assert itself as a country that stands by its policy of strategic autonomy. Trump seems persuaded that his vision of 'America First' would be good for his country. Actually, his America First policy would benefit him and his supporters but harm the United States and the world. He wrongly assumes that in a globalised world with complex interdependence among countries, the US economy can thrive all by itself. He seems to visualise that what is good for the globe is not good for America. Otherwise, he would not have embarked upon a journey that would make the US allies suffer, make the strategic partners reassess the value of partnering with the US and induce the competitors to resolve to stand up to the US. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD By his decision to withdraw the US membership from global institutions and initiatives, such as the World Health Organisation, the Paris Climate Accord, Unesco and the disrespect for the World Trade Organisation, Trump seeks to make America a bolted island country in a deeply interconnected world. Can such an America protect itself against the next pandemic? Can the Americans breathe safe air when the world gets progressively polluted along with rising earth temperature? Can it sustain a durable trading relationship by browbeating countries to accept its policies and diktats through bilateral networks? So far Trump has been in the commanding position for a little above six months. He has a distance to go before he is supposed to step down in January 2029. His recent contemplation for an unconstitutional third term in the White House appears to have been abandoned for the time being. Yet, whether there will be a peaceful transfer of power after the 2028 presidential election in Washington, DC, cannot be predicted now. He pardoned many who were convicted and sentenced to jail due to their involvement in the insurrection of January 6, 2021. Will there be another insurrection? STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD A lot will depend on how the political scene unfolds within the United States. There is an opportunity for the American voters to send Trump a message in the November 2026 congressional election. There are still openings for Corporate America to press upon him to abandon his damaging tariff policies and other economic measures. The think tanks and the American universities, where academia plays a constructive role in the policymaking ecosystem, are struggling hard to make compromises with the Trump Administration to ensure restoration of federal funding. But still, the American academia can elucidate whether the proverbial emperor is without clothes. But how the international community responds will also determine if the current American imperial presidency is a passing phenomenon. The European allies have been left high and dry by Trump and are clamped with a 15 per cent tariff, which is much higher than the 2.5 per cent tariff that was imposed earlier. The Nato member countries have been bulldozed into spending 5 per cent of their GDP on defence when they are undergoing economic downturn and energy shortages. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Japan and South Korea are forced to pay more to keep the alliance structure alive. India was one of the first countries in 2025 to start negotiations with the Trump team on bilateral trade. After months of negotiations, the Trump Administration keeps pressuring India to open its agricultural sector, which would surely hurt the millions of Indian farmers. This pressure is compounded by its insistence on India to stop buying Russian energy resources, which would again grievously affect India's energy security. China stood firm and responded by restricting rare earth materials. It pinched the US, and Trump promptly relaxed its restrictions on technology and chip trade. But China's export controls hurt many other countries, including India. As the world is facing Trump's tariff war, it remains utterly divided. There were some whispers about the EU, China, Japan and many others coming together to confer on how to manage the uncertainties in international trade and overall political economy. But whispers have not given way to any concrete steps. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The international community rightly thinks that Trump is not America. Numerous countries around the world seem to be interested in waiting him out. But the big question is whether Trumpism will survive Donald Trump. All major countries look prepared to work for a truce with Trump. However, the truce should not be at the cost of the stability of the international trade ecosystem. Trump's economic war against the world will not end soon unless there are countermeasures against Trumpian unilateralism. The author is founding chairperson, Kalinga Institute of Indo-Pacific Studies, and editor, India Quarterly. The views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost's views.
India.com
8 minutes ago
- India.com
‘Satan 2' Missile: Russia's RS-28 Sarmat can hit target anywhere in the world, capable of causing massive destruction in seconds, US, China worried due to…
A recent war of words between US President Donald Trump and former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev has once again raised military tensions between the United States and Russia. In response, Russia has shown off one of its most powerful and feared weapons i.e. the RS-28 Sarmat, a long-range nuclear missile. NATO has nicknamed it 'Satan 2' because of its massive destructive power. As the US moves two nuclear submarines closer to Russian waters, Russia is hitting back by highlighting this missile, which it claims can get past any Western missile defence system. Russian President Vladimir Putin considers the RS-28 an important part of the country's nuclear defense strategy. According to Russian officials, this missile can go farther and hit harder than any missile the US or China currently has. They also say it can make existing Western defence systems useless, raising fears that a new global arms race might be starting.
