
Timeline: See how 70 years of history led to the U.S. bombing in Iran
While President Donald Trump's decision to bomb the country's nuclear sites has Americans on edge, the United States has a long history of punishing Iran's government, most often through sanctions.
At the center of it all is the state of Israel, the United States' key ally in the region — one that consistently finds itself at war with Iran or with the Islamic extremist groups that are proxies for Iran's interests.
Some key moments in the relationship between the U.S. and Iran.
Can't see the above timeline? Click here to reload the page.
1953: Coup d'etat | The United States and United Kingdom back a coup d'etat in what is then called the Imperial State of Iran. The aim is to stop the Iranian parliament's attempt to nationalize the country's lucrative oil industry. The prime minister is replaced, and the autocratic monarch Mohammed Reza Pahlavi, known as the shah, increases his power.
1957: Atoms for Peace | U.S. President Dwight D. Eisenhower and Iran sign an agreement allowing the developing country to participate in the 'Atoms for Peace' program. The United States provided materials and training to Iran, and essentially kicked off its modern nuclear program.
1978-1979: Iranian Revolution | After Pahlavi attempts to remove Ruhollah Khomeini, a high-ranking religious leader known as an ayatollah, Iranians grow fed up with the shah's massive power. The people stage a revolution to end the same monarchy that the United States had strengthened. A constitution for the Islamic Republic of Iran is established, and Khomeini becomes Supreme Leader a religious-political position more powerful than the role of president. The new regime is markedly anti-Israel, a stance that contributes to 50 years of tense United States-Iran relations.
1979-1981: Iran hostage crisis | Pahlavi is in exile, but U.S. President Jimmy Carter allows him to come to New York for cancer treatment. As retaliation, Iranian militants take over the U.S. embassy in Tehran and take hostages. Carter issues a series of sanctions that freeze billions of dollars in Iranian government assets and block trade between the two countries. More than 50 people are held for more than 400 days and finally released just after Carter leaves office.
1980-88: Iran-Iraq War | Iraq invades Iran, and the United States, under President Ronald Reagan, eventually sides with Iraq and its leader Saddam Hussein. The war lasts for eight years, and hundreds of thousands of people die. More than a decade after the war ends, Secretary of State Madeleine Albright will call the United States' policies 'regrettably shortsighted.'
1984: State sponsor of terrorism | The U.S. Department of State declares Iran a state sponsor of terrorism and imposes new sanctions. The designation continues until this day.
1989: A new supreme leader | Ali Khamenei succeeds Khomeini as supreme leader of Iran. Now in his 80s, Khamenei has stayed in the position for nearly 36 years.
1992-1997: More sanctions | Congress passes laws and President Bill Clinton signs executive orders that sanction Iran. The policies begin with attempts to stop the country from getting chemical or nuclear weapons, crippling its oil industry, and harming its general economy. They culminate with a near-embargo on goods and services traded between the United States and Iran.
2002: Axis of Evil | U.S. President George W. Bush, in the aftermath of the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, identifies three countries — Iran, Iraq and North Korea — as an 'Axis of Evil' that threaten American security. 'Iran aggressively pursues these weapons and exports terror, while an unelected few repress the Iranian people's hope for freedom,' Bush says. Later that year, the world learns that Iran has been enriching uranium, a key step toward building a nuclear bomb.
2007-2010: Stuxnet | The Bush administration deploys a cyber weapon called Stuxnet that sabotages the computers Iran uses in its nuclear program while making users believe everything is running as usual. The public learns about the program, built in conjunction with Israel, in 2010, after U.S. President Barack Obama's administration also uses it.
2011-2013: Obama-era sanctions | U.S. President Barack Obama issues a series of sanctions designed to harm Iran's ability to move money around the international banking system and profit off its oil industry.
2013: Preliminary nuclear deal | Obama announces a temporary deal between U.S., its allies, and Iran. The deal requires Iran to limit its nuclear program for six months in exchange for reducing sanctions that have been harming the country's economy.
2015: Final nuclear deal | Obama — along with leaders of China, France, Germany, Russia, the United Kingdom, and the European Union — reaches a deal with Iran to put significant restrictions on its nuclear program. The terms include limits on enriched uranium, and inspections by the International Atomic Energy Agency. While defending the deal from critics, Obama says the only other alternative is war.
2016: Sanctions end | Obama signs an executive order revoking sanctions against Iran that were originally designed as consequences for its nuclear weapons program. The order says there has been a 'fundamental shift in circumstances with respect to Iran's nuclear program.'
2017: Axis of Evil 2.0 | Fifteen years after Bush, President Donald Trump identifies a new 'Axis of Evil' that includes Iran, North Korea, and Venezuela.2018: Trump reverses course | Trump withdraws the United States from the Iran nuclear deal and instead renews sanctions on Iran. The administration says the campaign, called 'maximum pressure,' devastates Iran's economy and oil revenue.
2020: Soleimani assassination | Trump orders a drone strike in Iraq that assassinates Qasem Soleimani, an influential Iranian military leader. Iran threatens revenge, and international experts and policymakers warn that the United States may have started an unwinnable war. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu praises Trump for 'acting swiftly, forcefully, decisively,' and says Israel stands with the United States in its 'just struggle for peace, security and self-defense.'
2022: Jerusalem Declaration | U.S. President Joe Biden and Israeli Prime Minister Yair Lapid meet in Jerusalem to sign a declaration reaffirming the 'unshakeable' alliance between the two countries. 'The United States stresses that integral to this pledge is the commitment never to allow Iran to acquire a nuclear weapon, and that it is prepared to use all elements of its national power to ensure that outcome,' the pledge says.
2023-2024: Tensions rise | Israel goes to war in Gaza, following a brutal terrorist attack by Hamas that galvanizes the nation. The Iran-backed militant Houthis in Yemen attack ships in the Red Sea. The conflict expands when Israel conducts a first-of-its-kind attack on Iran-backed Hezbollah, detonating explosives hidden inside their handheld communication devices. The following month, Iran fires nearly 200 missiles at Israel, which intercepts most of them, but promises revenge.
March 2025: U.S. takes on Houthi rebels | In March, the United States bombs the Iran-backed Houthis in Yemen, a now-notorious attack that officials discussed it on Signal.
June 2025: Israel-Iran war | Israel launches airstrikes on Iran, killing top military leaders and damaging nuclear technology. Iran counters with its own missile attacks on Israel. The United States bombs Iran's nuclear facilities days later. The Western intervention escalates the war and stokes fears of a wider global conflict.
Contributing: Shawn J. Sullivan
More visual stories explaining the Iran conflict:
Current conflict timeline: From Israeli attack to Iran's retaliation, US bombing and ceasefire
How Operation Midnight Hammer unfolded: Details of US bombing in Iran
How does a bunker-buster bomb work? A closer look at the GBU-57
Iran fires missiles at U.S. base in Qatar. Where else could it strike?
Live updates: Ceasefire in place, but Iran nuclear program may have survived
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
5 hours ago
- The Hill
Ohio State University president: Ivy League presidents ‘in survival mode, quite frankly'
The Ohio State University (OSU) President Ted Carter said on Sunday that he thinks Ivy League schools are in 'survival mode,' when asked about Columbia University's settlement with the Trump administration. In an interview on CBS News's 'Face the Nation,' moderator Margaret Brennan asked Carter whether he's troubled by the 'precedent' that the settlement sets and whether he would have agreed to a similar deal to resolve a hypothetical dispute with the administration. 'I can't speak to those institutions because I'm not leading them,' Carter responded. 'I know both President Shipman and some of the other Ivy League presidents are colleagues, and they're having to do, I think, what I would call, be in survival mode, quite frankly,' he said, referring to acting Columbia University President Claire Shipman. 'We're not going through any of that here at Ohio State, and nor do I think that we will,' Carter added. Columbia agreed to pay $221 million to restore the more than $400 million in federal funding that was blocked by the administration, according to the settlement announced July 21. In cutting off Columbia's funding, the Trump administration originally cited alleged inaction on antisemitism, though Education Secretary Linda McMahon pointed to more ideological motives in an interview after the settlement was announced. 'This is a monumental victory for conservatives who wanted to do things on these elite campuses for a long time because we had such far left-leaning professors,' McMahon said on Fox Business Network. The university, which saw some of the nation's most active pro-Palestinian campus demonstrations amid the war in Gaza, did not have to admit to wrongdoing as part of the deal.


Business Upturn
5 hours ago
- Business Upturn
Former CIA Insider Highlights America's Buried Advantage in Online Presentation
By GlobeNewswire Published on July 28, 2025, 02:00 IST Washington, D.C., July 27, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Rediscovering America's Strategic Core In a released presentation , renowned former national security advisor Jim Rickards warns that the next major shift in U.S. policy may come not from Wall Street or Washington—but from beneath the surface of federally controlled lands. 'This story is not about real estate… the government retained the most valuable part'. Rickards points to a dormant but active legal provision—originally designed to encourage domestic growth—which may now hold the key to America's technological future. The Invisible Wiring of Modern Power The materials Rickards identifies are not commodities in the traditional sense—they are foundational enablers of global advancement: Application Mineral Inputs AI Chips & Data Centers Silicon, gallium, germanium, copper EV Batteries Lithium, cobalt, nickel, manganese, graphite Missile Systems & Drones Neodymium, dysprosium, samarium, rare earth alloys Satellite Navigation Indium, tantalum, beryllium, aluminum 'These seemingly obscure minerals… they're the building blocks of everything from NVIDIA chips to advanced military weapons'. Sources: U.S. Department of Energy CSIS Visual Capitalist A 150-Year-Old Law, Still in Effect Rickards centers the opportunity on Title 30—a little-known federal statute from the 1800s that allowed Americans to claim rights to public lands, which were often rich in mineral deposits. 'Back then, anyone could make a claim… pay $2 to $5 per acre… and do a minimal amount of work'. The framework still exists—and Rickards believes it may quietly be resurfacing to address modern strategic needs without requiring congressional debate. Technology May Be the Catalyst Rickards believes a convergence of technology and geopolitics is making this moment different: The use of AI mapping tools to identify previously unreachable mineral deposits The Pentagon's direct involvement in securing U.S. rare-earth supply chains Escalating foreign control over strategic mineral exports 'We have truly massive mineral wealth here. It's not hard to extract. We know where it is. And how to get it' About Jim Rickards Jim Rickards is a former advisor to the CIA, Pentagon, White House, and Treasury. His work has guided U.S. leadership during global crises including the Iran Hostage Situation and the 2008 financial collapse. He is the editor of Strategic Intelligence , a monthly report on national security, macroeconomics, and resource policy. Disclaimer: The above press release comes to you under an arrangement with GlobeNewswire. Business Upturn takes no editorial responsibility for the same. Ahmedabad Plane Crash GlobeNewswire provides press release distribution services globally, with substantial operations in North America and Europe.


UPI
6 hours ago
- UPI
Fatal DR Congo church attack linked to Islamic State-backed rebels
A Lendu militiaman arrives to the U.N. disarmament post of Yambi in Bunia, Democratic Republic of Congo to give up his weapon in 2005. Bunia is 75 miles east of Komada, where Islamic State-backed rebels attacked a church in Momanda. File Pohot by Riccy Gares/EPA July 27 (UPI) -- Islamic-backed rebels killed at least 43 people in the northeastern Democratic Republic of Congo, including raiding a Catholic Church, early Sunday, a United Nations-backed radio station reported. The Allied Democratic Forces emerged in Uganda in the 1990s against the marginalization of Muslims but rebels have gone across the border into DR Congo. About 20 people were stabbed to death during the church's night vigil in the town of Komanda, Radio Okapi reported. Other bodies were found in burned-out houses and businesses near the church. One man's charred body was found in a truck set on fire. The DRC Army confirmed the incident but reported 10 deaths. An alarm sounded at 2 a.m. Sunday of smoke from burning houses. The attackers had already left the scene when military authorities arrived. All activities in the city were suspended. The attack was about 7.5 miles from the center of Komanda. Security forces, including the DR Congo Armed Forces, Ugandan military and local police, are searching for the attackers. The area had been relatively peaceful with residents returning to the city. Komanda is in DR Congo's Ituri province, which is mineral rich. The United States is seeking to get access to those critical minerals, which are used to manufacture high-tech devices and weapons. On June 27, DR Congo and Rwanda signed a peace agreement in Washington, D.C., after 30 years of conflict between the two nations. Then on July 19, DR Congo and M23 rebels backed by Rwanda signed a declaration of peace after nearly four years of fighting. The rebels were not involved in the agreement in Washington but the declaration must follow the Washington Accord brokered by the United States. Around 7 million people have been displaced in Congo, which has a population of 106 million. Rwanda also borders Uganda to the south.