What Starmers plan for UK to recognise Palestinian state means
PTI
London, Jul 30 (AP) Britain has announced that it will recognise a Palestinian state in September unless Israel agrees to a ceasefire in Gaza, stops building settlements in the West Bank and commits to a two-state solution.
The UK followed France, which declared last week that it will recognise Palestinian statehood at the United Nations General Assembly in September.
More than 140 countries have already taken that step, but France and Britain are significant as members of the Group of Seven and the UN Security Council. The two countries hope their bold – if largely symbolic – diplomatic moves will help add pressure on Israel to ease a catastrophic humanitarian crisis in Gaza and breathe life into a moribund peace process.
What Starmer said Prime Minister Keir Starmer said Tuesday that Britain will recognise a Palestinian state in September, 'unless the Israeli government takes substantive steps to end the appalling situation in Gaza, agree to a ceasefire and commit to a long-term, sustainable peace, reviving the prospect of a two-state solution." He said that included 'allowing the UN to restart the supply of aid, and making clear there will be no annexations in the West Bank." Starmer also said Hamas must release all the hostages it holds, agree to a ceasefire, disarm and 'accept that they will play no part in the government of Gaza" — though he did not make that a condition for recognition. Britain says that's because Hamas has no role in a two-state solution.
UK officials increasingly worry that such a solution is becoming all but impossible – not only because of the razing of Gaza and displacement of most of its population during 22 months of war, but because Israel's government is aggressively expanding settlements in the West Bank, land Palestinians want for their future state. Much of the world regards Israel's occupation of the West Bank as illegal.
'The moment to act is now," Cabinet minister Heidi Alexander told Times Radio. 'There's the effective annexation of the West Bank happening." Starmer is also under mounting domestic pressure to do something as horror spreads at the scenes of hunger in Gaza.
More than 250 of the 650 lawmakers in the House of Commons signed a letter in recent days urging the British government to recognise a Palestinian state. Opinion polls suggest far more Britons support recognition than oppose it, though a large number are undecided.
Reaction is polarised Israel quickly condemned the British move. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who rejects the two-state solution on both nationalistic and security grounds, said Starmer's announcement 'rewards Hamas's monstrous terrorism and punishes its victims." The families of Israelis taken hostage by Hamas were also critical.
'Recognising a Palestinian state while 50 hostages remain trapped in Hamas tunnels amounts to rewarding terrorism," said the Hostages Family Forum, which represents many hostages' relatives. Emily Damari, a British-Israeli national who was held captive for more than a year, called Starmer's stance 'a moral failure." The British statement was welcomed by the Palestinian Authority, which Britain views as a legitimate representative of Palestinians. It has limited autonomy in pockets of the occupied West Bank.
Husam Zomlot, the Palestinian Authority's envoy in London, said Britain's statement 'is a corrective to over a century of dispossession, during which the Palestinian people have been deprived of our land, liberty and lives." Limited influence, historical weight In practice, Britain's influence on Israel is limited. The UK government has suspended free trade talks and halted some arms shipments to Israel over its conduct of the war, but is not a major economic or military partner.
History has, however, given Britain a particular interest and role in the Middle East.
Foreign Secretary David Lammy said Britain bears a 'special burden of responsibility" as the former governing power of what was then Palestine and author of the 1917 Balfour Declaration, which backed the establishment of a Jewish homeland, but also pledged to protect the rights of the Palestinian population.
'This has not been upheld, and it is a historical injustice which continues to unfold," Lammy said at the UN on Tuesday.
Most of Britain's main political parties support a two-state solution. But the right-of-centre opposition Conservatives said Starmer's announcement was premature.
'Recognition of a Palestinian state is only meaningful if it is part of a formal peace process and cannot happen while hostages are still being held in terrorist captivity and while Hamas' reign of terror continues," said Priti Patel, the party's foreign affairs spokeswoman.
Ed Davey, leader of the centrist Liberal Democrats, welcomed Starmer's statement as a step forward but said the prime minister should not use Palestinian statehood as 'a bargaining chip." The move may spark diplomatic momentum Britain and France hope other countries will follow their move. On Tuesday, European Union member Malta said it, too, would recognise a Palestinian state in September.
Germany, a major European power and strong ally of Israel, remains a holdout. Chancellor Friedrich Merz reiterated his country's position that recognition of a Palestinian state 'can be one of the last steps on the road to realising a two-state solution," but that Berlin has no plans for recognition 'in the short term." Real clout rests with the US, and Starmer's cautious approach may be designed to persuade President Donald Trump to take a tougher line with his ally Netanyahu.
The prospects are uncertain, to say the least. Asked about Britain's stance on Tuesday, Trump said: 'We have no view on that." Yossi Mekelberg, a Middle East expert at international affairs think tank Chatham House, said there is 'no doubt" that a global majority supports Palestinian statehood, but that's not enough to make it a reality.
'British recognition or French recognition doesn't make it internationally recognised," he said. 'You need the (UN) Security Council — and that is not going to happen because of a certain person in the White House." (AP) GSP
(This story has not been edited by News18 staff and is published from a syndicated news agency feed - PTI) view comments
First Published:
July 30, 2025, 19:45 IST
News agency-feeds What Starmers plan for UK to recognise Palestinian state means
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
4 minutes ago
- First Post
India begins groundwork for US tariff deal, ministries told to draft sector-wise concessions: Report
Facing pressure from Trump's 25 per cent tariff, the Indian government has launched an inter-ministerial effort to draw up trade concessions ahead of key negotiations. With a US delegation set to arrive on August 25, key economic ministries have been directed to prepare sector-specific proposals read more President Donald Trump with Prime Minister Narendra Modi at the White House. The 25 per cent tariff and Russian penalty on India comes even as officials continue to hammer out a trade deal, which has been ongoing since February. File image/AP In response to US President Donald Trump's sweeping 25 per cent tariff imposition on Indian goods, New Delhi has launched a cross-ministerial exercise to identify trade concessions it can offer in upcoming negotiations. With a high-level US delegation set to arrive on August 25, key economic ministries have been directed to prepare sector-specific proposals, The Indian Express reported. The Trump administration is seeking deeper market access than India has previously committed to, pressing for broad tariff reductions and the removal of non-tariff trade barriers. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The 25 per cent tariff, effective from August 7, is compounded by a separate, unspecified 'penalty' tied to India's defense and energy imports from Russia. According to the report, government departments have already begun submitting possible concession packages. In some cases, such as oil refining, adjustments are underway, with refiners beginning to cut back on Russian crude purchases. However, sources warned against retaliatory posturing in response to Trump's provocations, no matter how inflammatory they may be. 'This is a time for pragmatism, not posturing,' one official noted. Although Trump had originally listed India among his top trade priorities, progress has been sluggish, leading to mounting frustration in Washington. Like other countries navigating Trump's tariff tactics, India has followed a cautious approach, offering selective concessions while safeguarding its economic interests and shielding vulnerable domestic sectors. Observers note that several nations that rushed to sign trade deals with the US—such as the UK and Australia, emerged with lopsided agreements that disproportionately benefited Washington, particularly in cases where trade deficits existed. New Delhi had long operated on the assumption that the US would maintain a 10–20% tariff differential between India and China, and continue to respect India's longstanding trade red lines. These include opposition to genetically modified (GM) crops and the need to protect its vast, labor-intensive manufacturing base that underpins much of its export economy. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Officials remain cautious on sensitive agricultural imports, particularly soybeans, corn, and dairy, despite already proposing tariff cuts on 55 per cent of US imports. This figure could rise in the upcoming talks, especially as India's trade pacts with Japan, South Korea, and ASEAN saw over 80 per cent of tariff lines reduced to zero. While negotiators are eyeing October as the tentative deadline for finalising a deal, progress in fresh rounds of talks could accelerate that timeline. Complicating India's position, however, is the possibility of China finalising a trade deal of its own, potentially locking in favorable tariff rates and securing waivers, including on penalties linked to Russian oil imports.
Economic Times
an hour ago
- Economic Times
‘Haven't eaten for days, forced to dig his own grave': Family of Hamas hostage releases ‘propaganda' video with message for Netanyahu
Synopsis The family of Evyatar David, a 24-year-old hostage, released distressing video footage showing his severe starvation in Hamas captivity. The videos, dated July 27 and released August 2, depict David emaciated and documenting his meager meals, often consisting of just lentils or nothing at all. David emotionally appealed to Prime Minister Netanyahu, expressing feeling abandoned. Reuters Demonstrators take part in a protest to demand the immediate release of hostages held in Gaza since the October 7, 2023, attack on Israel by Hamas and to end the war, in Tel Aviv, Israel, August 2, 2025. REUTERS/Ammar Awad A video footage of a 24-year-old hostage, Evyatar David, was released by his family in which he was seen starving for food and facing severe hardships. It was the second 'propaganda video,' which was made public a day after Hamas published what it claimed was a 'sign of life' from the captive. The initial footage, which was posted Friday (August 1, 2025), was released with the consent of the family and was confirmed by the Hostages and Missing Families Forum a day the video, David appears severely emaciated, his bones protruding beneath his skin, according to Ynet News. He appears to be sitting in a tunnel, documenting his daily meals on a handwritten chart. On some days, it says 'no food,' and on others, just 'lentils.' The family on Saturday (August 2, 2025) also released a second video dated July 27, in which David, visibly weakened and gaunt, says he has been without proper food or water for an extended period and claims he was forced by his captors to dig his own grave. The family of the hostage released a second video on Saturday, August 2, 2025, dated July 27. In the footage, David, looking frail and thin, says he's gone a long time without proper food or water and claims his captors forced him to dig his own grave.'I don't know what I'm going to eat. I haven't eaten in days,' he said, as quoted by Ynet News. 'I've been living in a really difficult situation and have been for many months,' he further stated. Even though his captors likely dictated his words, David's appearance clearly shows his health is declining. 'I'm getting thinner and weaker by the day,' he said in the video. 'No meat, no chicken, no fish. Almost no bread. On Friday, July 4, I didn't eat anything. I'm writing everything down,' he added, referring to the food chart. David was seen reading aloud from the chart in the footage: 'Lentils, lentils, beans. On July 16 and 17, I ate nothing—two days in a row. Then more lentils, again lentils. On July 20, nothing again. Then lentils, and again nothing. Then again nothing, and again nothing. This can is for two days, just to keep me alive.' While addressing Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu directly, David made an emotional appeal, saying that he feels that he has been abandoned. 'I feel that I have been abandoned... I've been told that in Israel, the government cares for prisoners and cares for anyone imprisoned by the enemy. I feel that I have been abandoned by you and this government,' he said. 'Everything I was taught was simply not true,' he added, as quoted by Ynet News.'What I'm doing now is digging my own grave,' he adds. 'Each day, my body grows weaker and weaker. I'm walking directly to my grave. This is the grave where I think I'm going to be buried. Time is running out. You are the only ones who can end this, [so I can] be released and be able to sleep in my bed with my family.'In a strong statement against Hamas, David's family accused it of intentionally starving him for propaganda purposes. 'We are forced to witness our beloved Evyatar, our son and brother, being deliberately and cynically starved in Hamas tunnels in Gaza. He is a living skeleton, buried alive,' the statement said. 'Our son has only days left to live in his current state. Hamas is using Evyatar as a live experiment in a grotesque hunger campaign.'The family called the alleged starvation campaign 'one of the most horrifying acts the world has seen,' as quoted by and appealed to Israel and the international community to intervene. 'Israel and the international community must stand against Hamas' cruelty and ensure Evyatar receives immediate nutrition,' they said. 'This intentional starvation and abuse for propaganda purposes violates even the lowest standards of humanitarian law and basic human decency.'
Deccan Herald
an hour ago
- Deccan Herald
Realising the Palestinian state remains a complex challenge
Spurred by the declaration of French President Emmanuel Macron in early July, a host of Western powers are lining up and promising to recognise the State of Palestine next month, coinciding with the 80th session of the UN General Assembly. Following similar announcements by Britain and Canada, an Australian minister remarked that his country's recognition was a matter of 'when, not if'.Currently, European nations such as Ireland, Norway, Spain and Sweden have already recognised the State of Palestine. The Gaza crisis and the escalating humanitarian catastrophe — widely feared to lead to mass starvation — are prompting many to push for the only viable option on the table: the two-state cooperation with the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, France convened a meeting in New York with the participation of key Western (Canada, Britain, Japan, and Spain), Arab (Egypt, Jordan and Qatar), Islamic (Indonesia and Türkiye) and Global South (Brazil and Senegal) powers. Much of the globe has already endorsed the New York Declaration, which outlines the contours, rationale and roadmap for a two-state solution. However, two notable dissenters remain: Israel and the United States. Israel has criticised Macron's recognition plan as a 'reward' for Hamas. Despite his frustration with Benjamin Netanyahu over delaying the Gaza ceasefire deal, the Trump Administration is reportedly fuming over Western powers taking the lead and has even threatened to punish Canada for its recognition under Russian missile attack, says Ukraine military .Recognition of the State of Palestine is largely a political act with legal implications. It assumes that the entity in question satisfies international criteria regarding territory, population, government, and, crucially, sovereignty. Countries only grant recognition after being satisfied that these conditions are met. As a sovereign decision, recognition is often used by countries to gain diplomatic leverage and strategic advantages. For instance, the US took more than two decades to accept the People's Republic of China and support its admission to the United Nations in 1971. For similar reasons, a vast number of countries—including some even today—have not recognised the State of Israel, despite it meeting all the criteria of an independent sovereign entity decades many others, India adopts a cautious approach when recognising and accepting a newly emerged entity into the international community. This caution was evident in its stance towards the then East Germany, which it recognised only in 1972, shortly before the latter joined the United Nations in September 1973. At the same time, India's immediate recognition of Bangladesh on 7 December 1971—amidst the war with Pakistan—paved the way for the latter's international same caution and legal considerations informed India's approach towards Palestine. Despite its longstanding support for the Palestinian cause dating back to the early 1920s, Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru refrained from recognising the hastily formed and short-lived All-Palestine Government announced in the Gaza Strip in 1948. As global opinion began to coalesce around an independent Palestinian leadership under the Palestine Liberation Organisation (PLO), New Delhi initiated engagement with Yasser the wake of the 1973 oil crisis and the sudden rise in political clout of key oil-exporting nations— particularly Iraq and Saudi Arabia — the regional stance towards the Palestinian leadership began to shift. At the Rabat Arab Summit in October 1974, the Arab League recognised the PLO as the 'sole and legitimate' representative of the Palestinians. This led India to sign a formal agreement with the PLO in January of the following year, soon after which an independent PLO office began functioning in New her landslide victory in the 1980 Lok Sabha elections, Prime Minister Indira Gandhi extended full diplomatic recognition to the Palestinian mission in March, granting it all diplomatic privileges and immunities on par with United Nations missions. The first Intifada prompted the PLO to accept the UN's partition plan for Palestine — albeit four decades late — indicating its readiness to coexist with the State of Israel. Consequently, India became one of the first countries to recognise the State of Palestine on 18 November 1988. The Palestinian mission in New Delhi was upgraded to a full-fledged embassy. At that time, the Israeli consulate in Mumbai remained limited in function and jurisdiction, primarily serving the state of then, India has hosted both Yasser Arafat and Mahmoud Abbas as heads of state. The last such visit occurred in May 2017, when Prime Minister Modi hosted Abbas. Following the Oslo Accords, India also opened a diplomatic mission in Gaza City, which was later relocated to the West Bank due to worsening security conditions, which also forced Arafat to move his headquarters to support for the two-state solution has remained consistent, vocal and unwavering. Even after the Hamas-led attacks on Israel on 7 October 2023, India reiterated its backing for the two-state framework. During a detailed media briefing on 12 October, the MEA spokesperson reaffirmed India's consistent support for 'a sovereign, independent, and viable state of Palestine, living within secure and recognised borders side by side at peace with Israel.'Despite growing normalisation and deepening strategic ties with Israel, India's commitment to the two-state solution remains resolute. The rising support among key Western powers only reinforces the strength and vision of India's long-held position. Yet, without active American support and endorsement, France and its European and Arab allies may struggle to realise Palestinian statehood — and this remains a major hurdle.(The writer teaches contemporary Middle East at Jawaharlal Nehru University, Delhi)
