BRICS countries express "grave concern" over military strikes against Iran
Brasilia [Brazil], June 25 (ANI): The BRICS countries have expressed 'grave concern' over military strikes against Iran in 'violation of international law and the United Nations Charter,' and called for an urgent need to break the cycle of violence and restore peace.
In a joint statement on Wednesday, the influential bloc comprising India, Russia, China, Brazil, South Africa, and six other countries, including Iran, called for immediate de-escalation of the situation and urged all parties to engage in dialogue and diplomacy to resolve their differences peacefully.
'We express grave concern over the military strikes against Iran since 13 June 2025, which constitute a violation of international law and the Charter of the United Nations, and the subsequent escalation of the security situation in the Middle East,' the statement read.
The Iran-Israel conflict escalated on Sunday morning following the US bombing of three Iranian nuclear sites. Later, US President Donald Trump announced a ceasefire between Iran and Israel.
'In the face of rising tensions with unpredictable consequences for international peace and security, as well as for the world economy, we underscore the urgent need to break the cycle of violence and restore peace. We call on all parties to engage through existing channels of dialogue and diplomacy, with a view to de-escalating the situation and resolving their differences through peaceful means,' it added.
The statement also highlights the importance of upholding nuclear safeguards, safety, and security, particularly in armed conflicts. 'Nuclear safeguards, safety, and security must always be upheld, including in armed conflicts, to protect people and the environment from harm. In this context, we reiterate our support for diplomatic initiatives aimed at addressing regional challenges,' the BRICS countries affirm.
Further, BRICS countries express 'serious concern' over any attack against 'peaceful nuclear installations that are carried out in violation of international law and relevant resolutions of the International Atomic Energy Agency.'
The BRICS emphasised the need to protect civilian lives. 'Civilian lives must be protected, and civilian infrastructure must be safeguarded, in full compliance with international humanitarian law,' they stress.
'We extend our sincere condolences to the families of the victims and express our solidarity with civilians affected,' it added.
The joint statement reiterates the BRICS countries' commitment to promote international peace and security through diplomacy and peaceful dialogue. 'Guided by the principles enshrined in the United Nations Charter, BRICS remains committed to promoting international peace and security and to fostering diplomacy and peaceful dialogue as the only sustainable path toward long-term stability in the region.'
The BRICS countries have also called for the 'establishment of a zone free of nuclear weapons and other weapons of mass destruction in the Middle East, in line with relevant international resolutions.'
'We call upon the international community to support and facilitate dialogue processes, uphold international law, and contribute constructively to peaceful settlements of disputes for the benefit of all humanity. BRICS countries will remain seized of the matter,' it added. (ANI)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Toronto Star
an hour ago
- Toronto Star
Trump calls for deal on Gaza war as signs of progress emerge
TEL AVIV, Israel (AP) — U.S. President Donald Trump on Sunday pleaded for progress in ceasefire talks in the war in Gaza, calling for a deal that would halt the fighting in the 20-monthlong conflict as the sides appeared to be inching closer to an agreement. An Israeli official said plans were being made for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to travel to Washington, D.C., in the coming weeks, a sign there may be movement on a new deal. The official declined to discuss the focus of the visit and spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss plans that had not yet been finalized.
Globe and Mail
2 hours ago
- Globe and Mail
Letters to the editor, June 29:‘Aging egomaniacs around the world … dropping bombs on their perceived enemies. What do we do?'
Re:'What was the point of the conflict in Iran? To keep three men in power'(June 26): When kids fight and one hits another with a bat, a thoughtful parent would take the bat away, put them in separate corners to cool down and eventually shake hands to make peace. Now we have aging egomaniacs around the world, whose powers are waning, dropping bombs on their perceived enemies. What do we do? Do we take away the toys from oppressors acting like children? There is the opposite happening, and countries on the sidelines of the conflict are also encouraged to weapon up themselves. Shouldn't countries get together and encourage mutual disarmament? After all, who profits? The arms industry is making a killing. What countries and corporations are investing in planes and bombs? Is it in their financial interest to plead for peace? Of course Donald Trump wants other countries to contribute to the arms industry. War is big business. Melody Wales Squamish, B.C. Re 'Shifting winds' (Letters, June 26): A letter-writer argues that Doug Ford's controversial comments about Indigenous peoples, for which he apologized, are simply a reflection of a shift in public opinion away from sympathy for reconciliation. He describes himself as 'a tax-paying citizen and descendant of immigrants' who expected and received nothing from the government. I think, however, that immigrants to this country expected and received rather a lot from Indigenous peoples: Canada with all of its resources. The government may have had something to do with that. If only land acknowledgments, apologies and thank yous were enough. Anne Morris Mississauga Re 'Cambodia allowing 'slavery and torture' in scam compounds, report says' (June 26): The Khmer Movement for Democracy urges the Canadian government to take urgent action in response to a damning report on human rights abuses and cybercrime operations in Cambodia. Canada should move swiftly to protect not only Canadian victims of cyberscams, but also the countless individuals trapped and exploited in these brutal scam compounds. A crucial first step would be to impose sanctions on the Huione Group, which is reported to have facilitated up to US$4-billion (about $5.5-billion) in illicit transactions since 2021. While the United States has proposed banning the group from accessing its financial system, Canada has yet to respond – despite reports that Huione is now seeking a new licence. Canada has not participated in new sanctions against such cyberscams since 2023. The time has come for an independent investigation to identify those enabling these abuses, as well as co-ordinated international action to prevent further exploitation and uphold human rights. Mu Sochua Former Cambodian politician; president, Khmer Movement for Democracy; Providence, R.I. Re 'As Trump plans to overhaul manufacturing, U.S. factories struggle to fill nearly 400,000 jobs' (Report on Business, June 24): Why aren't younger people going into manufacturing jobs? For the last 40 years, many thousands of manufacturing jobs were eliminated by automation and outsourcing to countries with cheaper labour such as China. So with that in mind, can we blame younger people for not going into a field that looked like it had no future? Did no one look to the future to see the possible consequences of eliminating these jobs? Doug Payne London, Ont. Re 'How to crack open Canada's coddled egg market' (Editorial, June 20): While the number of farms in this country is generally on the decline, Canada's egg sector has seen the opposite outcome. Programs such as Egg Farmers of Alberta's new entrant program are actively adding egg farms to our food system. Why? Because the stability of supply management ensures egg farming is a viable career and this co-operative model supports their success. The administration of the system through provincial quota is critical in safeguarding the distribution of farms across the country, driving rural economic activity, enabling rapid response to disease outbreaks and delivering the fresh, local eggs Canadians want. This approach supports smaller farms and maintains a steady supply of high-quality, affordable eggs. That's not coddling, that's informed agricultural policy. Roger Pelissero Chair, Egg Farmers of Canada; West Lincoln, Ont. Re 'B.C. First Nations offer haven for Texada grizzly, but officials say relocation not an option' (June 21): Don't watch and wait, help Tex now. Inaction gets my goat. This grizzly's fate is at the mercy of the Minister of Water, Land and Resource Stewardship, Minister of Environment and Parks and the B.C. Conservation Officer Service. He needs new management. Tex is not a body of water, resource or park. He is someone who finds himself in the wrong place. Government stewards have no business leaving him on Texada Island to make a mistake, collide with humans and be killed. The chances of him leaving the island on his own are slim, so what are they waiting for? Decision-makers should accept help from other professionals who are knowledgeable, capable and willing to relocate Tex. Why is that so hard? Jennifer Azizi West Vancouver Re 'Amateur conductor pays Toronto Symphony Orchestra to lead Mahler performance, shocking some musicians' (June 20): I've heard far worse from bigger names for more money. It had some great moments and they nailed the end. I saw Mandle Cheung rely heavily on section heads and not immersed in the tempo. But it was, as the Toronto Symphony Orchestra's principal timpanist predicted, a solid performance. Unless we find ways to fund more classical performances, Mahler's Symphony No. 2 in C minor and other pieces requiring vast numbers of performers will likely go unheard. It was a casual, accessible night. Galas performances are year-long projects for donors. They take up large overhead and immense staff hours, with very little in the way of hard cash at the end. They often don't attract new audiences and their dollars. I don't like that extremely wealthy people exist and hold this kind of power in our time, but this is our reality – and hardly a fiasco here, as portended. Rosalind Robertson Toronto Re 'Billionaire founder of FedEx revolutionized freight transport' (Obituary, June 25): In the mid-1970s, I was with World Airways in Oakland, Calif. We had a guy come from Memphis who had flown in himself. This was Fred Smith, a plain-talking southerner who, even when seated, exuded energy. He wanted three DC-8 stretch aircraft on a wet lease with our crew, our fuel and landing and uplift costs. He wanted these in cargo configuration and explained that he planned to use them for a hub-and-spoke package delivery system in the United States, initially, then in Canada and elsewhere. He had the initial deposit, so the deal was signed. When he left, we mused as to whether or not the deal would survive. Of course it did work. Mr. Smith then bought his own planes which now fly the skies around the world. In the words of writer Hilaire Belloc: 'From quiet homes and first beginning, out to the undiscovered ends.' Jim Mulrooney Toronto Letters to the Editor should be exclusive to The Globe and Mail. Include your name, address and daytime phone number. Keep letters to 150 words or fewer. Letters may be edited for length and clarity. To submit a letter by e-mail, click here: letters@
CBC
2 hours ago
- CBC
Did Trump make Canada Day great again? Some observers say, in a way, yes
Just a few years ago, Canada Day was going through a serious identity crisis. Calls to #CancelCanadaDay were trending in 2021 after preliminary findings from a ground-penetrating radar survey at a former residential school in British Columbia had found some 200 potential unmarked graves at the now-national historic site. In 2017, protesters with Idle No More descended on Parliament Hill, calling for a national day of action called UNsettling Canada 150 on the country's 150th birthday. Enter, Donald Trump and his threats to annex Canada if the country doesn't voluntarily become the 51st state — something that's dominated headlines this year. "There is a switch this year suddenly," said historian Matthew Hayday. The threat to Canadian sovereignty has galvanized Canadians, the University of Guelph department chair said. This year, he expects celebrations with "the whole rhetoric of 'elbows up' and championing Canada." Trump's taunts and very real tariffs may be driving a resurgence of patriotism, but while some Torontonians are heading to Ottawa to celebrate, some Indigenous people say their concerns remain and shouldn't be forgotten. "July first can, in some ways, be a microcosm of a given year of what the national mood looks like," Hayday said. A day shaped by tensions Earlier this year, Canadians across the country were boycotting American products and cancelling vacations plans to the U.S. Those sentiments may not be as potent now, but for many the sentiment lingers. Yao Ameyaw told CBC Toronto he's still avoiding spending money south of the border, and he'll be travelling to Ottawa for Canada Day. "There is a bit of bad blood whether spoken or not, between us and America," he said. Patrick Shea and his wife will also be heading from Toronto to the nation's capital. He agrees Canada-U.S. relations have "reinvigorated [Canadians] sense of nation and our sense of belonging together," but hopes the tensions die down soon. "It may pass like a kidney stone, but it's going to pass." For Tira Cardinal, who is Indigenous, the holiday is an opportunity to spend time with friends, but she won't be celebrating. "I'm going to be wearing an orange shirt on Canada Day," she said, adding that she isn't surprised Indigenous issues aren't front of mind for many Canadians this year. "People hop on the bandwagon for a lot of things. Unfortunately, I think that's how people in society are going to be." Brianna Olson-Pitawanakwat, a member of the member of Wiikwemkoong Unceded First Nation, said she'll be spending the day rallying around her community and highlighting their resilience and resistance. She's the co-founder of the Native Arts Society in Toronto, an art gallery and studio space dedicated to celebrating and showcasing Indigenous artists, many of whom are survivors of residential schools or the Sixties Scoop. "[They] are struggling with displacement, and deserve to be honoured on this day," Olson-Pitawanakwat said. "There's been a big push with what's happening south of the border for Canada to kind of relish in this hyper-nationalism. I think it's really important to recognize that like the boundaries of what we call Canada today would not exist without Indigenous peoples." Recent bills could move the pendulum of public opinion Already, the surge in patriotism — and protectionism — has led to threats against Indigenous sovereignty, Olson-Pitawanakwat said. She compares Bill 5 in Ontario to Stephen Harper's Bill C-45, a controversial omnibus bill that made changes to the Indian Act, the Environmental Protections Act and Navigation Protection Act to make it easier for pipelines to be approved on Indigenous land without the consent of affected First Nations. That 2012 bill was part of what sparked the Idle No More movement that drove protests across the country and calls for Canada Day to be cancelled. Olson-Pitawanakwat says, like C-45, the Ford government's Bill 5 will also allow the government to expedite and approve energy project in Indigenous territories without local approval, namely when it comes to mining in the Ring of Fire. "We cannot approve these things without free, prior-informed consent," Olson-Pitawanakwat said. Similar tensions are playing out at national level, too. Prime Minister Mark Carney has signalled Bill C-5 could be used to greenlight and fast-track new energy projects, including pipelines, mines and other resource-related initiatives. There's already fear and pushback in some Indigenous communities about what it'll mean for the consultation process — though both Carney and Ford have vowed their governments will consult. "Right now, there is a lot more leeway for various actors to do things in the name of Canada," Hayday said. And as a result, "Indigenous concerns more broadly are kind of getting shunted," he said. With the pendulum in one direction, this could be the moment that it starts to move the other way, Olson-Pitawanakwat said.
