Justice is not a privilege but right of every child: Odisha HC judge
Addressing a panel discussion on 'Advancing Child-Centred Justice' hosted by the National Law University Odisha (NLUO) and Child Rights and You (CRY) as part of the 5th World Congress on Justice with Children here recently, the Orissa High Court judge underscored the need for trauma-informed processes and regular monitoring under the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection) Act, 2015, especially for marginalised children. 'Justice is not a privilege to be earned; it is a promise to be kept for every child,' she affirmed.
Speaking on the occasion, chairperson of the United Nations' Internal Justice Council and former judge of the Supreme Court of India Justice Madan Lokur emphasised the need for meaningful access to justice for children - as victims, as accused, and as those in need of care and protection, in all their avatars.
He highlighted the underreporting of violence against children, alarming backlog in inquiries, and revictimization faced by survivors during the trial due to systemic delays and inadequate support systems.
While principal secretary of the Women and Child Development department Shubha Sarma shared the state's commitment through schemes like Subhadra and Ashirbaad, NLUO vice-chancellor Ved Kumari advocated for a broad, child-centred definition of justice.
The World Congress on Justice with Children is a global platform that convenes every five years to further the policy, practice and discourse on child-centred justice.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
MP High Court remands property dispute involving heirs of ex-Bhopal Nawab, including Saif Ali Khan, back to trial court after 25 years
The Madhya Pradesh High Court on June 30 set aside a trial court order from over 25 years ago that had deemed Saif Ali Khan, his sisters and mother as the successors to the properties in appeals by heirs of the elder brother of the erstwhile Nawab of Bhopal. The heirs of erstwhile Nawab Hamidullah Khan of Bhopal, who passed away in 1960, as well as those of his elder brother, were seeking partition and succession of the private properties as per Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Act, 1937, as was in force at the time of the then Nawab's death, and moved trial court in this regard in 1999. Begum Suraiya Rashid, heir of Obaidullah Khan, the elder brother of the erstwhile Nawab of Bhopal Hamidullah Khan, and Qamar Taj Rabia Sultan, the Nawab's heir, represented by Advocate Aadil Boparia, filed appeals challenging a trial court order in 2000. The court decreed two personal properties in favour of the heirs of Sajida Sultan, the second daughter of Nawab Hamidullah, and Saif's paternal grandmother. Sajida was declared Nawab following Hamidullah's death, and she died in 1995. The decision of the trial court had come in partition suits moved by the heirs of the Nawab's family in 1999. After 25 years of the appeals being heard before the Jabalpur bench of the Madhya Pradesh HC, Justice Sanjay Dwivedi, in an order on June 30, allowed them. The bench, however, remanded all the parties back to the trial court, and granted the liberty to move an appropriate application before the trial court. The appellant heirs contended that the trial court erroneously assumed that the private properties of the Nawab are part of the throne and will thus automatically pass on to the successor to the throne. They argued that the properties have nothing to do with succession, and the partition of the properties will be governed by the personal law of succession. Concurring with the appellants' submissions, the Madhya Pradesh High Court said, '…The matters need to be remanded back to the trial Court for deciding it afresh because these are the suits for partition. And if ultimately, the trial Court comes to the conclusion that suits have to be allowed, then the share of the parties can be determined only by the trial Court while passing the preliminary decree, and that can be further finalised by the trial Court itself after carrying out the necessary formalities of partition.' 'Thus, in my opinion, the impugned judgment and decree deserve to be and are hereby set aside….It is made clear that since the suits were initially filed in the year 1999, therefore, the trial Court shall make all possible efforts to conclude and decide it expeditiously, preferably within a period of one year,' added the court.
Indian Express
2 hours ago
- Indian Express
Crackdown in Haryana 50% revenue officials to face chargesheets
Over 100 tehsildars and naib tehsildars in Haryana are set to face chargesheets for executing land deals allegedly in violation of rules, with Chief Minister Nayab Singh Saini approving the action. Around 50 per cent of the total working strength of tehsildars and naib tehsildars in the state are accused of registering residential plots without mandatory clearances for the past few years. Currently, 58 tehsildars and 156 naib tehsildars are posted across Haryana's tehsils to oversee various types of land transactions. The sanctioned strength is higher — 96 for tehsildars and 219 for naib tehsildars. According to sources, the Haryana Revenue Department had initially proposed action against 45 tehsildars, 61 naib tehsildars, 14 district revenue officers (DROs), and nine Haryana Civil Services (HCS) officers — bringing the total to 129. However, chargesheets have now been approved against 118 of them, while no action has been deemed necessary against 11 officers. Officials who executed more than 50 land registrations will face charges under Rule-7 of the Haryana Civil Services (Punishment & Appeal) Rules, 2016. This rule allows for major penalties, including dismissal, removal, or compulsory retirement from service. Those who executed fewer than 50 registrations will be charged under Rule-8, which provides for minor penalties such as censure, withholding of promotion, or increment. As per existing regulations, revenue officers are required to register agricultural land—especially land falling within municipal committee jurisdictions—only after obtaining clearance from the Town and Country Planning Department and the respective municipalities. In such cases, a No Objection Certificate (NOC) under Section 7-A of the Haryana Development and Regulation of Urban Areas (Amendment) Act, 2017 is mandatory. 'But these officers executed the registration of land without due clearance. Final action following issuance of chargesheet will be taken after examining their replies,' a senior state government officer told The Indian Express. Sources revealed that agricultural land was sold for residential colonies or industrial use without obtaining CLUs (Change of Land Use), allegedly to evade heavy stamp duty and other charges. 'The same process was adopted for registration of residential plots,' said an official. However, a revenue official highlighted the practical challenges faced by tehsildars. 'Many of these cases of plots were those which already have all basic amenities including roads and streetlights. In several of the cases reached for registration and sale of the plots were those already having registration of the land concerned. What was the fault of a tehsildar if the land concerned had already a land registration document,' the official said. The latest decision to chargesheet revenue officers comes less than a month after the state government approved similar action against 80 officials from the Irrigation Department, following the failure of multiple construction material samples from ongoing irrigation projects in quality tests
Hindustan Times
3 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Sans govt SOP, pvt schools deny admissions under RTE
In the absence of clear procedural guidelines from the state government, many private schools across Punjab are refusing admission to children from economically weaker sections (EWS) under the provisions of the Right to Children to Free and Compulsory Education (RTE) Act, 2009. The Punjab and Haryana high court, in its order dated February 19, directed all private unaided schools in the state to reserve 25% of their Class 1 seats for children from these backgrounds. (Shutterstock) The denial of admissions in violation of provisions of the RTE Act, which mandates reservation of 25% of seats in Class 1 for children from weaker and disadvantaged backgrounds, has been repeatedly brought to the attention of the state government by social activists and non-government organisations over the past few weeks. The Punjab and Haryana high court, in its order dated February 19, directed all private unaided schools in the state to reserve 25% of their Class 1 seats for children from these backgrounds. The state government was also directed to ensure strict enforcement of the ruling in the 2025-26 session. The school education department, which instructed the director public instructions, elementary education, and all district education officers three months ago to inform unaided private schools about the HC's directives, had planned to issue a standard operating procedure (SOP) in April, detailing the procedure and guidelines related to the notification of reserved seats, eligibility criteria, admission process and monitoring mechanisms to ensure smooth implement of the legal provisions. Social activists Onkar Nath and Jagmohan Singh Raju, former bureaucrats, who had moved the high court for the implementation of the RTE Act in Punjab and removal of the restrictive state rules, said that there are no procedural guidelines or SOP for reservation of 25% seats from EWS children and admissions in private schools. 'I filed applications under the Right to Information Act (RTI) for information on RTE admissions and all the district education officers have replied saying 'nil', ' he said, blaming the state authorities' apathy for the situation. Raju said the government has neither issued guidelines nor declared the amount to be reimbursed to private unaided schools per child, which was to be notified by June 30 as per the RTE Act. 'They should be proactive and take steps required under the law to ensure RTE admissions. We will file a contempt petition in the matter soon,' said the former IAS officer, putting the number of schools that need to be reserved in Class 1 of private unaided schools for children from underprivileged sections at approximately 50,000. Onkar Nath, a former additional deputy comptroller and auditor general, wrote to chief secretary KAP Sinha on June 14, drawing his attention to the serious and growing non-compliance by private unaided schools, despite clear judicial orders and instructions of the school education department. 'Private schools are denying admissions or deferring responsibility to DEOs, elementary. They have used near-identical justifications, implying a coordinated refusal to ensure compliance. This pattern suggests a deliberate strategy by private school associations to undermine implementation of the RTE Act and high court directions,' he wrote, naming 12 private schools in eight districts of the state. He also submitted a list of students denied admission by private schools in Mohali. 'We have been writing to different authorities at district and state levels, but no action has been taken to ensure admissions,' he added. However, a school education department officer stated that the department had already issued instructions to district officials, who conveyed the court's directives to private schools across the state. 'The department is seized of the matter and exploring various options, including setting up a centralised portal for admission and seat allocation under the Act. This process was being used by Delhi and other states for EWS admissions,' said the officer, who did not wish to be named. Dr Jagjit Singh Dhuri, president of the federation of private schools and associations, claimed that private schools were not against implementing the RTE provisions. 'We have conveyed our willingness to the government several times in writing, but there has to be a procedure and guidelines for its implementation. The law provides for notification of reserved seats with a radius within which children can seek admission, the system of merit, the selection process in case admission seekers are in excess of the number of reserved seats, and notification for per-child fee reimbursement by the state government,' he said.
