Islamic New Year: Here's why it will be a long weekend in 2025
The announcement, made on Monday June 16, meant that we knew the official day off without waiting on the moon sighting committee to spot the crescent of Muharram.
Islamic New Year is one of several public holidays in the UAE that, traditionally, rely on the Hijri calendar to be determined.
Months in the Islamic Hijri calendar are either 29 or 30 days long, depending on the moon's visibility.
In 2024, the date of Islamic New Year fell on a weekend, which meant that for the majority of people living in the UAE, there was no additional day off to mark the occasion.
However, at the beginning of 2025, the UAE introduced a new public holiday law that allowed for more flexibility in when holidays tied to the Islamic Hijri calendar are celebrated.
Introduced on January 1 2025, the new law allows the UAE government to move holidays to the beginning or the end of the week and improve our chances of more long weekends throughout the year.
So, while the official start of the new Islamic year 1447 AH won't be confirmed until the evening of Wednesday June 25, we know that Friday June 27 will be an official holiday for the private and public sectors.
Current astronomical predictions indicate that Dhu Al Hijjah will be a 29-day month, which would mean that Thursday June 26 is the likely first day of the Islamic year. But if Dhu Al Hijjah is a 30-day month, then Friday June 27 will be the first day of the break.
The Islamic New Year public holiday has been announced (Credit: Canva)
This would have no bearing on the start of the public holiday, however, as only one day is set aside for the occasion in the UAE public holiday law.
The article in the UAE public holiday law related to the transfer of official holidays applies to all occasions except Eid Al Fitr and Eid Al Adha. If the Eid holidays fall on a weekend, then they won't shift to another time of the week.
However, the Islamic New Year and Prophet Muhammad's Birthday (PBUH) are holidays that can now move around the week to give us a long weekend.
More news in Dubai
There will be two Ramadans in 2030 – here's why
This won't happen again until 2063
When you can expect three Eid holidays in one year (yes, three)
Eid, sleep, repeat
UAE public holidays 2026: All the predicted days off next year revealed
Including when we can expect a six-day weekend
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
2 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Terrorist 7/7 London bombings and 9/11 plotter 'could walk UK streets in days'
Haroon Aswat, 50, originally from West Yorkshire, could soon be freed despite admitting his role in the attack on the World Trade Center and the 7/7 London bombings A terrorist who helped mastermind 9/11 and the 7/7 London bombings could soon be freed in the UK despite being a 'risk to national security'. Haroon Aswat, 50, was jailed for 20 years in 2015 in New York over terror offences and deported back to the UK in 2022. He has since been detained in a secure hospital, with his release expected soon to his family in West Yorkshire. He had been involved in setting up a 'terrorist training camp' in the US with radical cleric Abu Hamza in the 1990s and has admitted his role in 9/11 as well as the London bombings in 2005. It comes as Putin warns of nuclear war after unleashing another night of hell on Ukraine. He admitted to a psychiatrist 'I am a terrorist' before he was deported back to the UK and US court documents reveal that he also confessed to being a 'mastermind behind the (9/11) attacks and a 2005 attack in the UK', reports The Sun. Aswat has also threatened to kill Jews, Christians and other Muslim groups, and it is feared that he could be released onto streets in the UK without a full risk assessment within days due to a legal loophole blocking him from stringent checks. Shadow Justice Secretary Robert Jenrick reportedly said: 'This despicable man was behind one of the most deadly attacks in modern history. He should never experience freedom again." At a hearing in April, the Metropolitan Police applied for a 'notification order', meaning Aswat would be subject to certain requirements about informing police of his whereabouts and personal life upon his release. In a ruling, Mr Justice Jay approved the order for 30 years, which Aswat did not oppose. But he said that despite a psychiatrist's finding in 2022 that there 'remains the risk of Islamic violent extremism' by Aswat, no risk assessment had been carried out. In his judgment, Mr Justice Jay added: 'Although (the psychiatrist) did not conduct a full risk assessment for terrorist risk, he identified 15 of the 22 relevant factors … as being likely to be present.' He added: 'No formal terrorist risk assessment has been carried out in the United Kingdom since the defendant's return here. The circumstances of his detention have precluded that. However, on the basis of the material which is available, the defendant has been assessed by various police officers … that he remains a risk to national security.' He said that the psychiatrist had concluded 'there remains the risk of Islamic violent extremism-motivated targeted terrorist offending behaviour given his threats to kill Jews, Christians and certain groups of Muslims … (t)here is also a risk of him influencing other vulnerable individuals, as when he is in an abnormal mental state his religious extremist rhetoric is amplified by mental illness'. And a US District Court document shows how he admitted his role in terrorist activities. It stated: 'In March 2017 the defendant stated, 'if you think I am a terrorist, I don't shy away from my responsibility' and also stated he was a mastermind behind the 9/11 attacks and a 2005 terrorist attack in the UK.' The papers also reveal that Aswat was in contact with Osama bin Laden and trained in al-Queda camps in Afghanistan before the attack on the World Trade Center in 2001. Police also traced 20 calls made by 7/7 bombers to a phone connected to Aswat. In his witness statement Det Chief Supt Gareth Rees, head of operations for the Met's SO15 Counter Terrorism Command, said of Aswat: 'He has spoken positively of his time with al-Qaeda in Afghanistan and expressed aspirations to reconnect with them. 'Based on my experience, this is conduct which gives me grave concerns about the risk which the defendant poses to the UK's national security and to the public. The assessment of medical practitioners is that he currently has capacity to make complex decisions and understand complex restrictions when mentally he may temporarily lose capacity if he were to relapse into a psychotic state.' Aswat, who is now 50, helped to set up a terrorist training camp in Oregon and Seattle in the US from 1999, which the American government described as a camp 'to train young impressionable men in America to fight and kill so that they could travel to Afghanistan to join forces with al Qaida'. He then travelled to Afghanistan to receive training from al Qaida in 2001, and in 2005 was arrested in Zambia and extradited to the UK. In August that year, he was then arrested in the UK because of an arrest warrant being issued for him in the US, and was eventually extradited. In March 2015, he pleaded guilty in the US to one count of conspiracy to provide support to a foreign terrorist organisation before January 1 2000, and to another charge related to providing material to a terrorist organisation. He was jailed for 20 years, but did not serve the full sentence due to 'periods of detention in this country awaiting extradition' being taken into account, Mr Justice Jay said. A Government spokesman reportedly said: "Protecting our national security is the very first priority of this government and if any individual poses a threat to that security, the police and intelligence services have a range of powers they can apply to deal with that threat. "We will always do whatever is necessary inside the law to protect the public from any risk posed by former terrorist offenders or people of terrorist concern." The Mirror has contacted the Ministry of Justice for comment.
Spectator
5 hours ago
- Spectator
The Charity Commission's laughable approach to radical Islam
It's taken me a while, but I've finally realised the purpose of the Charity Commission. I'd always thought its role was to regulate charities – to check that they comply with their charitable aims (and with the law) and then to take action if they don't. But it's finally dawned on me that the real purpose of the Charity Commission is satire. Once you realise that the Charity Commission exists in fact to satirise how pathetically weak we are in the face of radical Islam then everything falls into place – especially its otherwise inexplicably pathetic response to the hate preaching that is commonplace in mosques up and down the country. On Wednesday, the Charity Commission issued a press release over its action in response to two mosques which it found had promoted 'inflammatory and divisive' language. Let's look at one of them, the Mosque and Islamic Centre of Brent. As the Commission put it yesterday, it 'opened a case after concerns were raised in the media about speeches held at the charity's premises. The sermons were promoted on the speaker's social media channel.' In November and December 2023 Sheikh Babikir Ahmed Babikir gave a series of sermons in which he said that 'any Muslim who speaks against the Palestinians, any Muslim who stands against even Hamas, you are a hypocrite.' In another sermon he compared the proscribed terrorist organisation with Nelson Mandela, saying he was 'shocked' when asked about Hamas at a meeting: 'I said to the person that was asking me, 'what did you used to think of Mandela?' … Yesterday he was a terrorist but tomorrow he's the best leader in the world.' Discussing the 'Gaza mujahideen' in a sermon on 29 December 2023, he said: 'These are people whom Allah has chosen, Allah has empowered. They make their own weapons, with the least they have, with all the difficulties in front of them, and they are managing to destroy the most hardest, advanced weapon man be proud of… Your job and my job is to support them and to help them.' As for Zionists: they plot to 'control the world' by manipulating banks, media organisations and regimes. They are in league with the Dajjal – which in Islamic theology is an evil false prophet like the Antichrist: 'Zionism is like a political party, preparing for the Dajjal to come to rule the world, and their main function is to make sure that all the organs of states across the world and the national and international bodies will be in their hold. They hold the media, they hold all the financial institutions, they control a lot of the political regimes around the world and once they have that they will try to control the world.' In another sermon he said that Zionists bribe UK politicians to 'use their false narrative and fabricated stories to push their agenda.' They are, he said, 'soldiers of the devil'. Videos of his sermons were then posted on YouTube. On Wednesday, over 18 months after its investigation began, the Charity Commission found that 'of five speeches given at the charity's premises in November and December 2023, four included inflammatory and divisive content, two contained content that could reasonably be interpreted as encouraging support of Hamas, a proscribed organisation, and one could be reasonably interpreted as discouraging worshippers from engaging with democratic processes.' You don't say. Let me hazard a guess that it took you all of a second to reach that same conclusion about the sermons. But for the Charity Commission, that was 18 months' work. And that's not even the most ludicrous aspect of all this. Wielding its big stick in response, to ensure that charities don't spread hate (or, if we are being technical, don't 'have effective policies in place to manage risks related to speakers at the charity', as the Commission put it), the Commission sanctioned the Mosque and Islamic Centre of Brent and another mosque, Central Oxford Mosque Society, which it said posted 'graphic cartoons…just three days after the attack on Israel on 7 October 2023. The Commission considered that the sharing of these cartoons could create community tensions in the context of the conflict in the Middle East.' The sanction for both? An official warning. Not just any warning, oh no, but an official one. That's them told. Pathetic doesn't even come close. Which is how I've realised what's really going on. I refuse to believe that sentient, intelligent humans can seriously think that the way to deal with radical Islamic preachers and the mosques that host them is to tell them they've been naughty and ask them not to do it again. So it simply has to be satire – and a rather brilliant one at that, since it unambiguously exposes how, as a nation, we refuse to act against the preachers who turn our freedoms against us and who use the platforms we give them to spread their poison. Well done, Charity Commission. Superb work.
The National
17 hours ago
- The National
Expert debunks peers' bid to stop UK recognising Palestine as a state
On Thursday, around 40 members of the unelected second chamber wrote to Attorney General Richard Hermer, suggesting that the criteria for recognising Palestine had not been met under the Montevideo Convention – a Pan-American treaty signed in 1933. The Convention, signed by 17 signatories in the Americas, set out four key criteria for statehood. The UK was not a signatory. Richard McNeil-Willson, who lectures in the Islamic and Middle Eastern studies department at Edinburgh University, said that the interpretation was 'not only ludicrous' by a 'cynical' interpretation of the treaty. READ MORE: Ipso defends chair for publicly opposing recognition of Palestine And, Scottish Greens co-leader Patrick Harvie said it was 'deplorable' that peers were trying to use legal technicalities while a genocide is underway. The criteria under the Montevideo Convention sets out that a state must have a permanent population, a defined territory, a government and capacity to enter into relations with other states. But, McNeil-Willson explained there are several issues with that argument, adding that it was a 'spoiler attempt' to stop Palestinians from having 'basic rights'. 'It's very bizarre that this has been focused on by the 43 peers and signatories who essentially put forward these arguments that Palestine doesn't meet any of the four criteria," he said. 'You can look at this from a technical point of view, the letter of the law, and you can say, well clearly Palestine has a permanent population. 'It also has borders, and it has borders that are internationally recognised, and they are recognised under the International Court of Justice.' (Image: Supplied) McNeil-Willson noted the claims that this applies as there isn't a functioning government in Palestine, there have been no elections for decades, and Hamas is a terrorist organisation, falls short. 'The [Montevideo Convention] doesn't care what kind of government is in place, if it's a democratic organisation, they wouldn't care if it's non-democratic authoritarian – that doesn't stop it from being recognised as a state,' he added. 'Equally, the idea that it's a terrorist organisation – if you look at contemporary international relations, the recognition of the Taliban as a government in Afghanistan, despite it being previously seen by the US and lots of Europe as a terrorist organisation. 'Then there's the HTS [Hay'at Tahrir al-Sham] in Syria which is now being recognised as the legitimate government of Syria, that doesn't change Syria's righteousness as a state. None of these ideas make any sense.' McNeil-Willson added that under the interpretation put forward by the peers in the letter, the 147 states that have already recognised Palestine, including Mexico, Brazil, and Chile, who also signed the Montevideo Convention, are already in violation of international law. READ MORE: 'Keir' name goes extinct after Starmer comes to power 'The arguments they're putting forward – that the population isn't permanent, the borders aren't recognised – are a direct result of Israel's genocide, of its bombing and its invasion,' he added. 'It's not only ludicrous, it's a very cynical view of the conflict that in no way takes Israel's role into account.' He added: 'To Israel, the existence of Palestine is a threat. To Palestinians, it's simply a way of proclaiming basic human rights that should be granted to them.' Scottish Greens co-leader Harvie said that recognition of Palestine as a state is 'long overdue'. 'It must be just the first step of many toward achieving peace, security and justice for the Palestinian people,' he added. 'To seek legal technicalities to block progress is deplorable. We should completely reject the idea that Palestine should be denied statehood because of factors which are entirely the result of Israel's occupation and illegal settlements over many years. 'The current genocide must end, the occupation must end, and the international community must finally take action against the state of Israel for its dehumanisation of Palestinians and hold war criminals accountable.' We previously told how Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced the UK Government would follow France's lead and officially recognise Palestinian statehood in September if Israel and Hamas do not agree to a ceasefire.
