British Library North: Temple Works restoration grant confirmed
Temple Works has been empty for 20 years and was once the subject of plans by Burberry to open a factory at the site. It has Egyptian-style architecture.
The £10m grant had been originally earmarked from the Department of Levelling Up's £100m culture regeneration budget, with British Library North one of 16 selected projects.Mr Hamilton said regenerating the "hugely important" building would "reach out" to communities nearby."If you look at the area of Holbeck, which has been the subject of lots of regeneration in recent years, It does suffer from a disconnect with areas like Beeston."You have the railway lines that sever more prosperous part of the city from the less prosperous parts."Institutions like this can really connect and provide employment opportunities."
It has been estimated that the scheme would cost £70m in total, and the West Yorkshire Combined Authority has contributed £5m.Temple Works also received a £1m boost for repairs in 2022 from Historic England.Councillor James Lewis, leader of Leeds City Council, also welcomed the funding from the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government."We have worked hard in recent months with partners, including the West Yorkshire Combined Authority, Homes England and the British Library itself, to make the case for this funding."We will now continue to work alongside partners on detailed plans for the full funding, design and development of a project that remains a complex and challenging undertaking, but one that offers a major regeneration opportunity for both Temple Works and the surrounding area."Listen to highlights from West Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North or tell us a story you think we should be covering here.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
5 hours ago
- Telegraph
Rachel Reeves ‘used unrealistic figures' to persuade savers to invest
Rachel Reeves has been accused of using 'unrealistic' figures to persuade savers to invest their hard-earned cash. Last week, the Chancellor unveiled plans aimed at encouraging savers to put more money in the stock market, including 'targeted support'. This would allow banks to nudge savers holding cash in low-interest accounts towards higher-performing stocks and shares. In a report accompanying the Leeds Reforms, the Treasury said that moving £2,000 from low-return savings accounts into investments could 'make millions of people over £9,000 better off in 20 years' time'. The Government said that £2,000 in the stock market would be worth £12,000 after 20 years, whereas £2,000 in a savings account paying 1.5pc would grow to only £2,700 over the same period. This was based on research which found that the average stocks and shares Isa returns 9.64pc per year. However, Steven Cameron, of pension provider Aegon, said the figure risked creating 'unrealistic expectations' for savers. He said: 'To get from £2,000 to £12,000, which is what was in the Government's release, you'd need a compound annual return of 9.37pc after charges. 'If charges were 1pc, you'd need a return before charges of 10.37pc. That looks pretty optimistic as an estimate of likely returns over the next 20 years.' He continued: 'As a financial services industry, it would be very difficult for us to use figures like this, without many caveats and context. And in some cases, it just wouldn't be allowed by our regulators.' The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) sets strict rules to ensure financial promotions are 'clear, fair and not misleading'. For example, companies must include a disclaimer saying that past investment performance does not guarantee future performance when marketing a financial product. In addition, the FCA states that pension providers must project three rates of return – low (2pc), intermediate (5pc) and high (8pc). According to Aegon's calculations, if the Treasury had used the same three rates to calculate future performance, then the maximum projection would be £7,739 compared to the £12,000 figure used in its example. Mr Cameron said: 'We very much welcome targeted support and the ability to go further to suggest courses of action to groups of customers, such as those with excess cash. But we also need to be realistic in the claimed benefits of investing some of this.' Sarah Coles, of stockbroker Hargreaves Lansdown, also said the Government could have provided a more 'holistic' view of the options available to savers. 'The choice to compare investment returns to a miserable rate on offer from a high street giant is valid, given how much of people's savings is still languishing in these accounts. 'But the fact is they could do much better by moving to a competitive rate with an online bank or savings platform, and making this clear would have given a more holistic view of their options. 'Having said that, the Government is making a vital point that over the long term, investments will outperform cash in the vast majority of cases.' Ms Reeves is looking at reforming Isas and savings to boost investment in the UK. The hope is that targeted support, which comes into effect next April, could help some savers take advantage of superior returns. The Chancellor has put on hold controversial plans to cut the amount a saver can put tax-free into a cash Isa from £20,000 to as little as £4,000. However, she announced in her annual Mansion House speech that she was still considering 'changes' which could restrict how much can be saved tax-free every year. She said in last week's speech: 'For too long, we have presented investment in too negative a light, quick to warn people of the risks, without giving proper weight to the benefits, and our tangled system of financial advice and guidance has meant people cannot get the right support to make decisions for themselves. 'That is why we are working with the FCA to introduce a new type of targeted support for consumers ahead of the new financial year.'
Times
5 hours ago
- Times
Should you help your children buy a home?
Homeownership is a distant dream for many young people, despite recent efforts by the Treasury and regulators to loosen lending rules. The Bank of Mum and Dad now helps more than half of first-time buyers on to the property ladder, according to the estate agency Savills. But is this a necessary act of generosity or is it helping to fuel the housing crisis? We hear both sides of the argument. The Bank of Mum and Dad is not a benevolent institution. It is an inequality engine. Helping your kids get on the property ladder may feel like good parenting, but it fuels a system that rewards birthright over merit and privilege over effort. And this is not just about fair play — although that matters. It is about distortion. Housing should be about what you earn, not who you are born to, and yet we're hurtling towards a feudal set-up where access to shelter hinges on parental wealth. In 2023 more than half of first-time buyers had financial help from family — so much for social mobility. • Read more money advice and tips on investing from our experts Meanwhile, the parents are often the ones doing the sacrificing. Draining pensions, dipping into savings, compromising their retirement or their future care needs to prop up a politically induced broken housing system. Others face tricky family politics. What if one child gets help and another doesn't? Suddenly the family WhatsApp group turns into a minefield. And don't forget the long-term cost, because if that gifted deposit pushes mum or dad below the threshold for local authority-funded care, the state picks up the tab. So we all end up paying for this bad idea. It also warps the market. When we inflate demand from cash-boosted buyers, it keeps prices high and shuts out the truly independent. It's no coincidence that areas with the most intergenerational support are often the least affordable — and the most resistant to change. Many of those lobbying against new homes do so under the guise of 'heritage' or 'environmental protection'. All the while ignoring the paradox: if you really want to help your children, stop blocking homes for them to live in. This is the real betrayal of Britain's working class. We have normalised parental bailouts instead of fixing the system. Homeownership should be a reward for work and not a birthright. Parental gifts may be well intentioned. But they entrench inequality, destabilise retirement and price out millions. Let's call it what it is: a personal favour that perpetuates a national failure. • Rachel Reeves is right, but she is walking a tightrope — with our money Helping your children get on the property ladder is a deeply personal decision — but if you're in a position to offer support, I'd argue it is a good idea. Intergenerational fairness is one of the strongest reasons why helping your child buy a home is the right thing to do. Many parents benefited from a housing market that has since become vastly less accessible. In the 1980s the average age of a first-time buyer was about 27. Today it's closer to 34 — and that's often with help. Property prices have risen much faster than wages, making it almost impossible for many twentysomethings to buy without a financial leg-up. If you plan to pass on wealth to the next generation, why not do it when it could make the biggest difference? An inheritance often arrives when adult children are already financially stable or even nearing retirement themselves. But helping them in their earlier years will allow them to stop wasting money on rent and start investing in a secure, long-term home. A study by the HomeOwners Alliance found that 54 per cent of homeowners with adult children had either already helped them buy a home or expected to in the future. Among homeowners whose children do not yet own property, 59 per cent worried about their chances of ever buying a home. But help doesn't have to mean writing a big cheque. There are several ways in which parents can support their children without handing over large sums. You might consider acting as a guarantor on a mortgage or getting a joint mortgage with your child. There are also distinct financial advantages to the so-called Bank of Mum and Dad. A gift used for a house deposit is inheritance tax-free, provided you live for seven years after giving it. This can also reduce the size of your estate and potentially lower inheritance tax on other assets. Helping with a deposit means your child may qualify for better mortgage rates, so that they have lower monthly repayments. A larger deposit can also help them to buy a better home — whether that means a larger space or a more suitable location — and reduce the need (and cost) of them moving again soon. Of course, this all depends on your own financial situation. And one final piece of advice: be fair. Helping one child and not others can lead to family tensions. If you're lending, be clear and be consistent.
The Sun
13 hours ago
- The Sun
Labour has wrecked the economy… here's how YOU might be made to pay – from fuel duty to income tax
IF Rachel Reeves was heading into Parliament's summer break with a huge headache, things just got a whole lot worse. The Chancellor woke up yesterday to a storm around Government borrowing hitting £20.7billion last month. 5 The figure — higher than the £17.1billion forecast for the period — was fuelled by a rise in the interest charges on government debt. And now, instead of blue skies and sunshine over the summer, Ms Reeves will have to deal with dark clouds gathering over the Treasury. She has said that 'the world has changed' since her previous Budget, with Donald Trump's global tariffs creating uncertainty. But the harsh reality is that a series of decisions this Government made has wrecked what was always going to be a fragile recovery. The decision to increase NI contributions for employers had a devastating impact on expansion and hiring plans — and wrecked confidence. Anger was also levelled at her and Sir Keir Starmer for talking the country down when Labour first came to power, as they painted a gloomy economic outlook for Britain. This is all before businesses face the roll-out of the workers' rights package over the next two years, which will hit firms for £5billion, according to the Government's own impact assessment. And better prospects for working people appear doomed as wealth creators flee the country due to the high-tax environment, with around 16,500 expected to leave this year. Self-inflicted misery And this self-inflicted misery could be compounded further in the Budget this autumn as Ms Reeves tries to solve her spending shortfall. The financial black hole has only been made worse by this month's £5billion welfare reform U-turn and the £1.5billion she will now have to find after the partial retreat on Winter Fuel payments. Rachel Reeves FINALLY addresses Commons tears after she and Keir Starmer put on awkward show of unity Economists have already said that the Chancellor may have to fund a £30billion shortfall to meet her fiscal rules, and higher taxes are a near-certainty because Whitehall departments have already faced brutal cuts. Ms Reeves insisted yesterday that UK productivity was the problem. She said low investment levels compared to other G7 countries had led to UK output not keeping pace with our competitors. Reeves said it would be easy to cut capital spending, but these would be 'short-sighted, wrong decisions'. Here, we weigh up the Chancellor's options as she battles to balance the books, along with our likelihood rating of the moves being adopted later this year. 1. Wealth tax REEVES will fend off pressure from Labour MPs to bring in a wealth tax after being warned the well-off will flee the country. The Chancellor is set to reject calls for levies on property, investments and savings after Lord Kinnock called for a two per cent surcharge on assets worth more than £10million. But a host of other countries have already tried wealth taxes and they haven't raised the money needed to cover the public finances. Recent research shows that the UK has seen 18 billionaires quit these shores in the past two years alone. 1/5 2. Income tax threshold freeze IN one of the positives from last autumn's Budget, the Chancellor said there would be 'no extension' of the freeze in income tax and National Insurance thresholds. She said such a move would hurt working people and take more money from their payslips. But a freeze on income tax thresholds for the next two years would help Ministers raise around £8billion to fill the Budget black hole. The move would mean that even more people would be brought into the higher rate of tax, with the freeze due to come to an end in 2028. 4/5 3. Fuel duty on petrol & diesel 5 COST-of-living demands on households will pile the pressure on to freeze fuel duty at its current level for another year, rather than opting for a much-needed cut. Keeping the duty frozen and maintaining the 5p cut brought in back in 2022 will cost around £5billion a year. The Sun's successful Keep It Down campaign has saved motorists around £100billion since our battle with the Treasury started in 2011. The headline tax rate on petrol and diesel is currently 52.95p per litre. Back in October, Reeves said raising fuel duty would be the 'wrong choice for working people'. 2/5 4. Capital Gains Tax PROFITS made from sales on shares, investments and property could fall into play for raising funds for Treasury coffers. Reeves raised the top rate of CGT by four per cent at the last Budget, but experts say if it goes up again the move could backfire. Higher rate taxpayers pay 24 per cent CGT on the profits from sales, which contrasts with 40 per cent if it was earned income. Nimesh Shah, from accountancy firm Blick Rothenberg, said: 'People may choose to hold on to things like houses so as not to crystallise the tax bill — or they may simply leave the UK and crystallise the gains abroad.' 2/5 5. Tourist tax on hotel rooms 5 DEPUTY Prime Minister Angela Rayner is pushing for councils to be given new powers to bring in a tax on tourists. The Labour number two is facing opposition from Reeves to bring in a surcharge similar to those other countries impose on hotel rooms. But the Treasury is understood to be concerned that it would just hit struggling hospitality businesses that have already been badly bruised by the National Insurance raid. 4/5 6. Income tax, VAT and NI pledge LABOUR promised at the last election to protect 'working people' from tax hikes, but uncertainty has arisen about who could be protected. A key pledge was not to hike the main revenue raisers of income tax, VAT or National Insurance when the party came to power. Treasury minister Darren Jones has insisted anyone who gets a payslip is a 'working person'. It comes after Cabinet colleague Heidi Alexander said those on 'modest incomes' would be protected. 1/5 7. Small business taxes 5 A MILLION bosses who own small businesses and set up as limited company directors fear being clobbered on their pay. The business community worry the first £500 of dividend income being tax free could be hit in the autumn Budget. Craig Beaumont, of the Federation Of Small Businesses, said: 'The Labour Government must show if it stands behind the country's everyday entrepreneurs'. 2/5 8. Pensions tax relief raid 5 FUTURE pensioners could see the tax relief on pension contributions lowered to help raise funds. Higher-rate taxpayers get 40 per cent tax relief and basic-rate taxpayers get a lower 20 per cent rate. If the rate was brought down to 20 per cent it could mean around £15billion would be raised. The idea appeared to be rejected last year. But it could be back on the table as autumn approaches to bring in necessary funding. 4/5
