
DU UG admissions: Simulated ranks to be announced on Jul 15, first allocation list on Jul 19
The simulated ranks will provide applicants with a preview of their standing based on submitted preferences and CUET-UG scores, helping them refine their choices, the university said.
New Delhi, Jul 14 (PTI) The University of Delhi will release the simulated ranks for undergraduate admissions under the Common Seat Allocation System (CSAS-UG) 2025 at 5 pm on Tuesday.
The first CSAS allocation list will be declared at 5 pm on July 19. Candidates allotted a seat must accept it by 4.59 pm on July 21, followed by verification and approval by respective colleges by July 22. The last date for fee payment in the first round is July 23, it said.
The university had kept both Phase-I registration and Phase-II preference filling open until July 14, allowing fresh applicants to join. A one-time correction window for Phase-I closed on July 11.
Vacant seats will be displayed on July 24, followed by the second allocation list on July 28. The new academic session begins August 1, with 71,624 undergraduate (UG) seats offered across 69 colleges.
Officials said changes in subject combinations and a new auto-accept feature aim to improve flexibility and ease for students.
The CUET-UG 2025 saw 13.5 lakh applicants, with English, General Test, and Chemistry being the most chosen subjects. PTI MHS RHL
This report is auto-generated from PTI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
30 minutes ago
- Time of India
NEET-UG 2025: SC to hear re-test plea as students cite power cuts during exam in Madhya Pradesh
Supreme Court to hear NEET-UG 2025 re-test plea over power cuts in Madhya Pradesh NEET-UG 2025: The Supreme Court of India has agreed to hear a petition seeking a re-examination of the NEET-UG 2025 for students who claim their performance was affected by power outages at several examination centres in Madhya Pradesh. The petition challenges an earlier decision by the Madhya Pradesh High Court which had rejected a similar plea. The plea, filed on behalf of candidates from Indore and Ujjain, states that multiple exam centres experienced prolonged electricity disruptions during the test. The Supreme Court has issued a notice to the National Testing Agency (NTA), which conducts NEET-UG, seeking a response. The matter will be listed for hearing next week. Power cuts reported across multiple centres According to the petitioners, power outages occurred at more than 12 exam centres in Indore, lasting between one to two hours due to thunderstorms. The disruption allegedly prevented many candidates from attempting several questions. Emergency lighting arrangements, including battery lights and candles, were reportedly made available only around 4:30 PM, approximately 30 minutes before the exam concluded. The students have argued that they were made to write the paper under inadequate lighting conditions without compensatory time, which put them at a disadvantage. In support of these claims, the petitioners submitted media reports, video evidence, and statements from the District Collector of Indore acknowledging weather-related power failures. Initial relief from High Court overturned A single-judge bench of the Madhya Pradesh High Court had initially ruled in favour of the students, directing the NTA to conduct a re-examination at the affected centres. The Court held that the candidates were disadvantaged through no fault of their own, and ordered that the counselling process for admissions would remain subject to the outcome of the re-test. However, this decision was later set aside by a Division Bench of the same High Court following an appeal by the NTA. The Division Bench relied on the findings of an expert committee which concluded that despite the power outages, sufficient natural light was available and that there was no significant deviation in the average scores between affected and unaffected centres. The court also noted that only 70 out of 27,264 students had filed the original writ petitions. Supreme Court to hear matter before counselling begins The petitioners' counsel mentioned the matter before a bench of Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi. Although the bench agreed to list the case for hearing next week, it declined an earlier date requested by the petitioners, who cited the upcoming counselling session scheduled to begin on July 21. The NEET-UG 2025 examination was conducted on May 4, and the results were declared on June 14. A total of 22.09 lakh candidates appeared for the test, of whom 12.36 lakh qualified. TOI Education is on WhatsApp now. Follow us here . Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!


Time of India
30 minutes ago
- Time of India
RUHS CUET counselling 2025: Round 1 seat allotment result released, check direct link to download list here
RUHS counselling 2025 round 1 seat allotment result released. The Rajasthan University of Health Sciences (RUHS), Jaipur, has released the Round 1 seat allotment list for CUET 2025 counselling today, July 16, 2025. This pivotal announcement paves the way for thousands of aspirants seeking admission in allied health courses. such as BSc Nursing, BSc MLT, BRT, and pharmacy, across more than 200 colleges in Rajasthan. Based on merit and choice preferences, candidates can now check their allotment status via the official portal, Those who have secured seats must act promptly, downloading the allotment letter and completing reporting formalities between July 16 and July 22, 2025, failing which their seat may lapse. Candidates not satisfied or unallotted can still participate in subsequent rounds scheduled in August. How to check RUHS round 1 seat allotment Candidates participating in the RUHS counselling process can check their seat allotment results by following the steps below: Visit or Click the 'Round‑1 Seat Allotment' link. Log in using your CUET roll number and password. View and download/print your allotment letter. Direct link to download RUHS round 1 seat allotment result . Reporting and verification Candidates who are allotted seats in round 1 have to report to the allotted college between July 16 and 22 with their allotment letter, fees (INR 50,000 counselling fee for BSc Nursing), and the following documents: CUET admit card & scorecard Class 10 & 12 certificates Category/domicile certificate (if applicable) PwD/EWS certificate (if applicable) Photo ID (Aadhaar, Voter ID, etc.), passport-size photographs, and fee receipts Failure to report or pay fees will result in cancellation and ineligibility for Round 2. Options for next rounds Candidates who have accepted their allotted seat and successfully reported to the college in Round 1 will remain eligible for upgradation in Round 2. This means they can be considered for a higher-preference seat based on availability and merit. Those who were not allotted a seat or are dissatisfied with their current allotment can still participate in Rounds 2 and 3 by registering again and re-submitting their choices as per the revised schedule. However, candidates who were allotted a seat in Round 1 but failed to report within the stipulated time will lose their current allotment and will not be eligible for Round 2. Such candidates may still be considered for admission during the Round 3 mop-up phase, subject to seat availability. TOI Education is on WhatsApp now. Follow us here . Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!


Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
My son just cleared Class XII. But do Board exams even matter today?
It is that time of the year when children who finish school pack their bags for the next phase of their lives. Last week, my son's school had a felicitation ceremony for the Class XII students who had done well in the CBSE Board exams. The plans of the top three students revealed how little those results mattered. The first was an engineering aspirant who was going to go where his JEE rank would take him. The second was taking a gap year to 'find herself' and the third was going to a posh private university in the city which accepts all who can pay their fees. The 98 per cent and 97 per cent on their marksheets were irrelevant to their choices and unlikely to ever matter in their lives. Class X and XII Board exams have been a milestone event in the lives of generations of Indians. Families would go to great lengths to ensure that the child is not distracted, switching off the TV for the entire year, not taking vacations or entertaining guests. But changes in higher education in recent times have left students, parents and teachers puzzled about the importance of the Board exams. The Class XII Boards were critical because the results would determine which college you got admission into. However, with the introduction of the Common University Entrance Test (CUET) in 2021, the XII Boards performance has become irrelevant to those interested in taking up a BA/BCom or BSc degree. For engineering, there is JEE, most medical colleges are covered under NEET. Architecture, law, design or science research institutes all have their own entrance exams and only require minimum qualifying marks in the XII Boards of 45-50 per cent. Scoring these marks doesn't require burning the midnight oil, so students prefer to prepare for entrance exams and barely even attend classes. So the question is: Why should students care about their performance in the XII Board exams anymore? The Board exams hold great importance only for the tiny slice of well-heeled Indians who are planning to go abroad for their undergraduate studies because the universities in the West use it as an indicator of academic calibre. For the vast majority aiming to study in India, the XII marksheet, once a revered document, is now just another ID proof. Meanwhile, teachers are still trying to adjust to the new reality. They are increasingly dealing with students who have a lackadaisical approach to assignments and tests, many of them not even bothering to submit their work or attend school regularly. China, with whom we like to compare ourselves, has an exacting exam at the end of school called Gaokao. There is no ambiguity about its importance. The Gaokao score is the singular determinant of whether students can enter their preferred university or college. In the three days of June when the exam is held, the government clears roads, arranges transport for the high school students to reach their exam halls and enforces noise control measures around exam centres. On the other hand, we have a dozen different exams, most of which are mired in controversy because either they have been leaked or there were errors in the paper. The NEET 2024 paper leak was only the most high profile among a long line of such fiascos. New reports have tracked down as many as 70 paper leaks in the past decade from competitive exams to state high school exams across Uttar Pradesh, Gujarat, Telangana, Rajasthan, Tamil Nadu and Bihar. Months later, if at all, the exams are conducted again, crushing aspirants' morale. There are other ways in which competitive exams are flawed. Errors, typos and misprints, are unfortunately all too commonplace, confusing students who waste precious time trying to decode mistakes. The Common Law Admission Test (CLAT), taken by an estimated one lakh students in December 2024, is a case in point. Following an array of confusingly worded questions and wrong answers, several students filed cases against the Consortium of Law Schools, the body that conducts CLAT. After the Supreme Court's intervention, results were declared after a five-month delay. This year's intensely competitive JEE Mains had a record number of incorrectly framed questions. For a 16-17 year old, a public exam is their first brush with the 'system'. They trust the process and assume that the establishment will function as it should. When it doesn't, it is a shock, and cynicism about the country, and their own future in it, is planted early. In its present state, the mere pursuit of higher education in India is daunting and designed to frustrate rather than nurture youthful talent. The grind that children put in for their Board exams must be respected by making each exam have a clear purpose, setting the paper responsibly, and conducting it fairly. That's a small ask for the precious demographic dividend, which is expected to give India its competitive edge for the next couple of decades. The writer is visiting fellow, CSEP