Conservationists sue Trump administration over rollback of green policies
Filed by the environmental non-profit Center for Biological Diversity, the litigation focuses on Trump's day-one 'unleashing American energy' executive order. In an effort to boost already booming US energy production, the emergency declaration directed federal agencies to identify all policies and regulations that 'unduly' burden fuel producers and create 'action plans' to weaken or remove them.
The lawsuit seeks information about the development of these action plans from four federal agencies: the Department of the Interior, the Department of Commerce, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Department of Agriculture's Forest Service.
Since the executive order was passed, the administration has announced plans to eliminate scores of other green policies. Last week, for instance, it emerged that the EPA plans to eliminate long-standing requirements for polluting companies to collect and report their greenhouse gas emissions, ProPublica reported.
The legal challenge follows a February request for information filed by the advocacy group under the Freedom of Information Act (Foia), for which officials have not yet provided any records.
'Given the substantial implications for air and water, wildlife and nature, climate, public lands, and the environment generally through the development of energy resources,' the lawsuit says, 'the Center is deeply interested in, and affected by, how the action plans implementing the Executive Order could harm, undermine, or negate the Center's longstanding efforts to protect the environment.'
Foia is meant to compel officials to provide access to information about the functioning of federal agencies within 20 business days of a request. Though backlogs have long been common, the advocacy group says it is concerned the Trump administration is deliberately slowing the process to block public access to information.
The lawsuit comes as federal agencies have slashed protections for public lands, approved air pollution permits for fossil fuel-processing facilities without environmental reviews, and gutted slews of green policies and spending plans while firing thousands of civil servants.
It also follows record donations to Trump's presidential campaign from oil, gas and coal companies, sparking concerns of corruption. In a June meeting at his Mar-a-Lago club, Trump infamously asked fossil fuel bosses for $1bn in campaign contributions, while vowing to unravel dozens of Biden-era environmental policies.
'It seems obvious that polluters and other special interests are completely in the driver's seat and probably ghost-writing all of Trump's pro-fossil fuel directives,' said Brett Hartl, government affairs director at the Center for Biological Diversity. 'Why else would Trump officials be so defiant about illegally keeping the public in the dark?'
The EPA declined to comment on the pending litigation. The White House did not respond to a request for comment.
Sign up to Headlines US
Get the most important US headlines and highlights emailed direct to you every morning
after newsletter promotion
The new lawsuit comes as part of a wave of litigation seeking transparency from the Trump administration. Green groups earlier this week sued federal officials over the removal of government webpages containing federal climate and environmental justice data; last month, another lawsuit targeted the US Department of Agriculture's erasure of climate data.
The Trump administration and the so-called 'department of government efficiency', helmed by billionaire Elon Musk, pledged to be 'maximally transparent'. Yet federal officials have undercut that promise, environmentalists say, including by gutting public records teams.
'The Trump administration and Doge continue to dismantle environmental safeguards across the nation without a modicum of transparency,' said Hartl.
Foia was an important tool for environmentalists during Trump's first term. A request filed by the Sierra Club led to the former EPA administrator Scott Pruitt's resignation, and records obtained by the Center for Biological Diversity led to an investigation by the inspector general of then interior secretary David Bernhardt.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
8 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Aussies revolt as American beef makes a quiet return to Australia
Aussies are pushing back against the return of American beef to Australian plates, after the federal government lifted a long-standing ban on US imports. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has dismissed calls from the Opposition for an investigation, insisting the decision was made independently. 'There has been an independent review, it took 10 years,' he told the ABC on Sunday. 'The decision has been made, and it was made independently, at arm's length from any political influence.' But the explanation hasn't satisfied everyone, especially not Tasmanian farmer Tree, who took to social media to share her fury. Tree, a fifth-generation cattle producer, said the decision comes as a slap in the face to Australian farmers and is putting unaware consumers at risk. 'It's a betrayal,' she said in a TikTok video this week. 'We raise some of the cleanest, best beef in the world, and they want to undercut us with feedlot rubbish from the States?' Tree fears that American beef will slip quietly into the kitchens of cafes, restaurants and fast food outlets, where country-of-origin labelling isn't required. 'It won't be at your butcher, it'll be in your burger. Your lasagne. Your pub steak. And you'll never know unless you ask,' she warns. She's urged Australians to be vigilant and vocal about the origins of beef. 'Ask where the beef is from. Make it awkward. If we don't, we'll be eating that stuff without realising,' she said. For Tree, the issue goes beyond economics. 'This is about respect. For the land, for our farmers, for the food we put in our bodies. We don't want to eat that beef. And we shouldn't have to,' she said. And the cattle farmer isn't alone. 'Australian meat is internationally recognised as the best. Why would we eat anything else?' one person commented. 'I will not be selling American beef in my cafe!!! I will put a sign up at the front if it helps,' another said. Others were concerned about the impact on local producers. 'This is devastating for our Aussie farmers. Please don't buy USA meat,' one said. 'Time for all of us to fully support our farmers! I'll never buy anything other than Aussie meat' another wrote. The issue has sparked political embarrassment in Canberra, after Trade Minister Don Farrell backtracked on claims that Donald Trump had personally raised the matter with Albanese. Farrell told Sky News the US President had mentioned beef imports on a phone call, before later admitting that no such call had taken place. Opposition Leader Sussan Ley wasted no time slamming Farrell, saying he 'seemed to be hallucinating' over his comments. The US beef ban was originally imposed in 2003 after a US outbreak of Mad Cow Disease, or Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy, which is linked to the deadly human brain disease Creutzfeldt-Jakob. While the import ban on US-slaughtered cattle raised in Canada and Mexico remained in place until recently, beef from US-raised cattle was cleared in 2019. The Albanese Government says the full reopening follows a rigorous safety review by the Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, and insists Australia's biosecurity will remain protected by strict controls. Meanwhile, the Trump Administration has celebrated the move as a trade win for the US, with one former official declaring it would help 'make agriculture great again.'
Reuters
35 minutes ago
- Reuters
Oil pauses rally as markets weigh Trump's ultimatum to Russia
NEW DELHI, July 30 (Reuters) - Oil prices took a breather in Asian trade on Wednesday after the previous session's spike of more than 3%, as investors awaited developments from U.S. President Donald Trump's tighter deadline for Russia to end the war in Ukraine. Most active Brent crude futures rose 8 cents, or 0.12%, to $71.81 a barrel by 0419 GMT, while U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude gained 8 cents, or 0.12%, to $69.29 a barrel. The Brent crude September contract expiring on Wednesday was up 18 cents at $72.69 per barrel. Both contracts had settled on Tuesday at their highest since June 20. On Tuesday, Trump said he would start imposing measures on Russia, such as secondary tariffs of 100% on trading partners, if it did not make progress on ending the war within 10 to 12 days, moving up from an earlier 50-day deadline. "The $4 to $5 per barrel of supply risk premium injected in recent days can be expected to be sustained, unless Putin makes a conciliatory move," said Vandana Hari, founder of oil market analysis provider Vanda Insights. The United States had warned China, the largest buyer of Russian oil, it could face huge tariffs if it kept buying, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told a news conference in Stockholm, where the U.S. was holding trade talks with the EU. JP Morgan analysts said in a note that while China was not likely to comply with U.S. sanctions, India has signalled it would do so, putting at risk 2.3 million barrels per day of Russian oil exports. The United States and the European Union averted a trade war with a deal for 15% U.S. tariffs on European imports, easing concerns about the impact of trade tension on economic growth and offering support to oil prices. In Venezuela, foreign partners of state oil company PDVSA are still waiting for U.S. authorisation to operate in the sanctioned country after talks last week, which could return some supply to the market, so easing pressure for prices to rise. "The oil market is keeping an eye on the U.S. trade deals and talks and on the Fed, but those are marginal influences on sentiment," Hari added. Despite President Donald Trump's objections, the U.S. Federal Reserve is expected to hold interest rates steady at its policy meeting later on Wednesday. On Tuesday, the International Monetary Fund raised global growth forecasts slightly for 2025 and 2026, but warned the world economy faced major risks, such as a rebound in tariff rates, geopolitical tension and larger fiscal deficits.
The National
an hour ago
- The National
John Swinney's approach to Donald Trump didn't look good for Scotland
In 2019, Murray backed a House of Commons motion accusing Trump of 'misogynism, racism and xenophobia'. Fast forward six years and Trump's second administration has turbocharged a global rollback of human rights. In the US, it has carried out enforced disappearances, halted protections for abortion patients facing violence, and signed executive orders steeped in white supremacist ideology. On the global stage, Trump's withdrawal from the Paris Climate Agreement marks a surrender in the fight against climate breakdown – one of the greatest human rights threats of our time – as we now cross the grim milestone of 1.5 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial temperatures. Meanwhile, his sanctions on International Criminal Court officials have sent a chilling message that Israel is above international law, as we watch it carry out a live streamed genocide in Gaza. By undermining the institutions that uphold and advance human rights, Trump has compounded the damage done by other leaders and accelerated our plunge into a brutal new era of authoritarian practices and corporate greed. READ MORE: John Swinney gives statement after Donald Trump meeting – read in full Yet on Friday, he stepped off Air Force One to a warm welcome from the UK Government. 'I hope you're looking forward to a bit of downtime with some golf this weekend,' Murray reportedly told him. Perhaps the Scottish Government would take a firmer stance? The initial signs weren't promising. On Saturday, hundreds gathered in protest at Trump's visit. As speakers described the horrors of genocide in [[Gaza]] fuelled by the 2000-pound bombs the United States sends to Israel, we learned that First Minister John Swinney had written a cheque for £180,000 of Scottish public money for Donald Trump's Aberdeenshire hotel to host a golf tournament. Swinney insisted the funding would 'help drive economic growth and contribute to environmental sustainability while promoting Scotland through global profile.' But the First Minister should know better. Almost two decades ago as Finance Secretary he intervened to save Trump's controversial golf course development at the Menie Estate in Aberdeenshire after local councillors rejected it. What followed should have been a cautionary tale the Government never forgot. It's all documented expertly in the film "You've Been Trumped". The thousands of jobs promised never materialised – some estimates put the true number as low as 81. Trump's hostility to press freedom was made plain in his treatment of the film's director Anthony Baxter: 'I want real journalists … it's only questions like you ask that cause trouble'. Trump's development, approved against the advice of the Scottish Environmental Protection Agency, irreversibly damaged protected sand dunes that were home to wildlife and helped guard against coastal erosion. Molly Forbes, a 90-year old local resident, lived without access to clean water for years because a billionaire wanted a golf course. Scotland's 'global reputation' was cynically used to justify this disgrace. One Aberdeen Business School professor asked a protester objecting to Trump's attempts to force the sale of the homes neighbouring his development: 'Have you seen some of the ramshackle dumps … do you think that does any good to the vision of Scotland throughout the world?' Sadly, Swinney's decision to open the public purse for Trump's [[Aberdeen]]shire course suggests the lesson still hasn't sunk in. It sent an alarming message that despite Scotland's previous experience with Trump and despite the authoritarian practices on full display in his current administration – the [[Scottish Government]] is still open for business. By Monday any hope that the First Minister would rise to the occasion had largely evaporated. On social media he set out the issues he intended to raise with Trump. Among tariffs, trade and whisky was [[Gaza]]. There should be a significant increase in aid, an urgent ceasefire, and recognition of the state of Palestine as part of a viable two-state solution he said, failing completely to set himself apart from the limited position occupied by Keir Starmer earlier in the day. He left his bilateral with Trump on Tuesday morning praising the president's "pleasant company". READ MORE: The National Trump front page sold out – so you can buy it as a poster The First Minister clearly needs to decide what his vision for Scotland's global reputation is. Trying to do business with Trump while being seen as a principled global actor is like trying to ride two horses galloping in opposite directions. We're undeniably at a critical juncture for human rights, but there is hope. The residents of the Menie Estate took Trump on in a David and Goliath battle and saved their homes against the odds. Similarly, those protesting over the weekend – and I believe many more people in Scotland won't stand by quietly while rights are violated and the world becomes a more unequal and dangerous place. To fall for the suggestion that the global rise in authoritarian practices and dismantling of human rights is inevitable would be the greatest gift we could give leaders like Trump. If our own political leaders remain silent at this critical juncture, that is a choice we must judge them upon, but we can also make our own choices. If everyone who cares about justice and equality makes their voice heard, even in small ways, we can turn the tide.
