SC to hear next week pleas challenging lack of transparency in NEET-PG exam
A bench presided over by Chief Justice of India (CJI) BR Gavai will likely hear the matter on Monday (May 26). In their plea filed before the apex court, NEET-PG aspirants claimed that the introduction of two shifts, normalisation method, and change in the tie-breaker criterion affected medical students adversely.
The petitioners contended that the NEET-PG information bulletin could be amended at the whim and fancy of the authorities, and no rules or regulations existed governing the conduct of examinations. It challenged the National Board of Examinations (NBE) decision not to disclose question papers, answer keys, or response sheets of candidates.
The plea said that there was a clear lack of transparency in the conduct of the examination since none of the documents allowed students to check their performance, adding that neither the question paper, nor the response sheet filled in by candidates, or an answer key was supplied to the students, and merely a scorecard had been provided.
The petition, filed through advocate Parul Shukla, highlighted that, unlike previous years where the candidate used to receive their total score along with the number of correctly attempted questions and the number of incorrectly attempted questions, the NEET-PG 2024 results did not provide their total score.
"The method/manner in which examination under the NEET PG 2024 is conducted by the respondents (authorities) is manifestly arbitrary and against the principles of transparency and fairness in state action as enshrined under Article 14 of the Constitution of India," it added. The plea said that NEET-PG had never been held in two shifts before and had always remained a single-shift and single-day examination to ensure a uniform examination standard and fairness of the national test.
It highlighted a "serious patent defect in the conduct of the examination", requiring redressal in order to achieve a clean, transparent and effective system of examination which gives the best candidates.
Recently, the top court issued notices to the Centre, NBE and NMC (National Medical Commission) on a plea filed by the United Doctors Front (UDF) challenging the conduct of the NEET-PG 2025 examination in two shifts. The plea sought the top court's intervention to conduct NEET-PG 2025 in a single and uniform session, apart from seeking an interim stay on the examination scheduled for June 15.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
13 minutes ago
- Indian Express
SC stays Calcutta HC order on West Bengal OBC list
The Supreme Court on Monday stayed the Calcutta High Court's decision that had stalled the implementation of a revised list of Other Backward Classes (OBCs) notified by the West Bengal government. 'Prima facie, the high court order seems to be erroneous,' said a bench comprising Chief Justice B R Gavai and Justices K Vinod Chandran and NV Anjaria while hearing the appeal of the state government. On June 17, the Calcutta High Court ordered an interim stay on notifications issued by the state government with regard to reservations to 140 subsections under OBC-A and OBC-B categories made by it. At the outset, the bench took note of the submissions of senior advocate Kapil Sibal, appearing for the state government, and said, 'This is surprising. How can the High Court pass such an order? Reservation is part of the executive function.' The state had prepared the new list after the high court, in May 2024, quashed the inclusion of as many as 77 communities in the OBC list.
The Hindu
13 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Supreme Court stays Calcutta HC order on West Bengal OBC list
The Supreme Court on Monday (July 28, 2025) stayed the Calcutta High Court's decision that had stalled the implementation of a revised list of Other Backward Classes (OBCs) notified by the West Bengal government. 'Prima facie, the High Court order seems to be erroneous,' said a Bench comprising Chief Justice B.R. Gavai and Justices K. Vinod Chandran and N.V. Anjaria while hearing the appeal of the State government. On June 17, the Calcutta High Court ordered an interim stay on notifications issued by the State government with regard to reservations to 140 subsections under OBC-A and OBC-B categories made by it. At the outset, the Bench took note of the submissions of senior advocate Kapil Sibal, appearing for the State government, and said, 'This is surprising. How can the High Court pass such an order? Reservation is part of the executive function." The State had prepared the new list after the High Court, in May 2024, quashed the inclusion of as many as 77 communities in the OBC list.
Hindustan Times
19 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Lakshya Sen's big relief; SC quashes FIR in birth certificate forgery case, says criminal proceedings unwarranted
The Supreme Court on Monday quashed an FIR against badminton player Lakshya Sen, his family members, and coach in the birth certificate forgery case. India's Lakshya Sen hits a return against Japan's Kodai Naraoka during their men's singles match of the Japan Open badminton tournament at Tokyo Gymnasium in Tokyo on July 17, 2025. (Photo by Yuichi YAMAZAKI / AFP)(AFP) A bench of Justices Sudhanshu Dhulia and Aravind Kumar said the continuation of criminal proceedings against Sen is unwarranted and amounts to abuse of the process of court. The top court had earlier issued notices to the Karnataka government and complainant M G Nagaraj, who alleged that birth certificates of Lakshya Sen and his brother Chirag Sen were forged. The top court was hearing a plea challenging the February 19 order of the Karnataka High Court which rejected the petitions filed by Sen, his family members, and his coach U Vimal Kumar. The high court ruled there was prima facie evidence warranting an investigation into the case. The case stems from a private complaint filed by Nagaraj, who alleged Sen's parents Dhirendra and Nirmala Sen, along with his brother, coach, and an employee of the Karnataka Badminton Association, were involved in "falsifying" the birth records.
